Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 49(2): 538-44; discussion 544-5, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25855593

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our experience with patients reoperated after primary repair of atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) and identify predictors of poor outcome. METHODS: Between 1976 and 2014, 69 patients were reoperated after primary repair of partial (n = 28), intermediate (n = 15) or complete (n = 26) AVSD. RESULTS: Median age at first reoperation was 62.4 (range, 1.6-845) months, median interval to first reoperation was 22.3 (range, 0.2-598) months. Main indications for first reoperation included left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) pathology (66%), residual septal defect (19%) and left ventricle outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO; 4%). Procedures to address LAVV pathology included various valvuloplasties in 47 (77%) patients and valve replacement in 14 (23%) patients. A second, third, fourth and fifth reoperation was required in 27, 12, 4 and 1 patient, respectively. Most common procedures were LAVV replacement (LAVVR), LVOTO relief, pacemaker implantation and right atrioventricular valve procedure. Freedom from reoperation after LAVV valvuloplasty (LAVVP) was 84 and 62% at 1 and 10 years, respectively. There were 10 early and 4 late deaths. Estimated overall survival at 1, 5 and 10 years was 87, 83 and 83%, respectively. Double orifice LAVV (DOLAVV) was a risk factor for in-hospital and overall mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 14.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-178.7; P = 0.037 and hazard ratio (HR) = 6.8; 95% CI = 1.5-31.7; P = 0.015, respectively]. Patients with LAVVP and LAVVR differed significantly in overall survival (P = 0.014). At the last follow-up (median, 9.8; range, 0-34 years), 84% survivors were in New York Heart Association Class I or II. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients reoperated after primary AVSD repair needed surgical reintervention. LAVV pathology was the most common indication for reoperation. DOLAVV was a risk factor for mortality. Particular AVSD type did not appear to be a risk factor for mortality or LAVVP failure. There is some evidence for the close relationship between LAVV pathology and LVOTO in subjects undergoing reoperation after primary AVSD repair as some patients with initial LAVV problems needed LVOTO repair later on and vice versa.


Assuntos
Defeitos dos Septos Cardíacos/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Marca-Passo Artificial , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Defeitos dos Septos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Defeitos dos Septos Cardíacos/fisiopatologia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 48(5): 724-30; discussion 730-1, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25646400

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Aberrant origin of the coronary arteries is rare but can be life threatening. It is an important cause of sudden death in athletes and other young adults, and may be treated surgically. Consensus exists that interarterial left coronary artery (LCA) should be surgically repaired. For interarterial right coronary artery (RCA), the discussion remains open. The purpose of this study was to analyse our surgical experience. METHODS: From 2001 until 2014, 31 patients were operated for interarterial RCA, interarterial LCA or intraseptal course of the LCA. Twenty-six patients had interarterial RCA, 4 patients interarterial LCA and 1 patient an intraseptal course of the LCA. Median age at operation was 38 years (range 9-66 years). Twenty-eight patients had previous or current symptoms. The most important were a life-threatening event with resuscitation in 3 and myocardial infarction in 3 others. Surgical repair of interarterial RCA consisted of unroofing of the ostium with or without reimplantation in 25 patients and CABG on the RCA with a venous graft in 1 patient. Reconstruction of interarterial LCA consisted of ostium reconstruction of the LCA with a venous patch in 4 patients. The patient with an intraseptal course had a complete release of the LCA out of the septum and reimplantation in the correct coronary sinus. Follow-up was done by analysis of outpatient records, direct patient contact, echocardiography, electrocardiography, CT-angiography and an exercise test. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 6 years (range 0-11 years). One patient was lost to follow-up. No early or late mortality occurred. Three patients had ischaemia with ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia shortly after surgery. Two were immediately reoperated, 1 had a stent implantation 1.5 months after release of intraseptal LCA. Two of these patients show a slight dysfunction of the left ventricle at follow-up. All other patients are asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for aberrant origin of coronary arteries is safe. There is a risk of cardiac ischaemia shortly after operation, especially in LCA reconstruction. We strongly believe that a slit-like coronary ostium and an intramural aortic course is an absolute indication for surgical repair, also in asymptomatic aberrant RCA.


Assuntos
Aorta/cirurgia , Anormalidades Cardiovasculares/cirurgia , Anomalias dos Vasos Coronários/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Aorta/anormalidades , Criança , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...