Impact of New Chemotherapy Regimens on the Treatment Landscape and Survival of Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: New chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer have changed the therapy paradigm. We aimed to assess their impact on the treatment landscape and clinical outcome at our academic institution. METHODS: In this single institutional posthoc registry analysis, we assessed characteristics and survival rates from all patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer who started a systemic treatment between 01/2011 and 12/2017. Survival analyses were performed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 301 patients started a systemic treatment in the observation period. In the first line treatment, we observed a shift from the four different main regimens (gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, modified FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine/oxaliplatin +/- erlotinib or gemcitabine alone) to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and modified FOLFIRINOX that add up to more than 80% of administered first line treatments in each of the time cohorts (2011-2013 vs. 2014-2017). The rate for first line modified FOLFIRINOX treatment was balanced between the two groups (19% and 15%). Median overall survival differed significantly between the two time cohorts (8.89 versus 11.9 months, p = 0.035). Survival rates for different first to second line treatment sequences (modified FOLFIRINOX to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel to fluoropyrimidines plus nanoliposomal irinotecan, or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel to fluoropyrimidines plus oxaliplatin) were not significantly different and median overall survival ranged from 14.27 to 15.64 months. CONCLUSION: Our study provides real-world evidence for the effectiveness of the new chemotherapy regimens and underscores the importance of the choice of the front-line regimen when considering different sequencing strategies.

Targeting of VEGF-dependent transendothelial migration of cancer cells by bevacizumab.

Cancer progression is often associated with the formation of malignant effusions. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a major regulator of vascular permeability and has been implicated as mediator of tumor progression. We examined the production and secretion of VEGF(165) in various primary cancer cells derived from malignant effusions, and the role of exogenous VEGF(165) as a mediator of effusion formation. VEGF(165) was constantly secreted by all cultured tumor cells in an mTOR-dependent manner, as it was inhibited by the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin. Secreted VEGF(165) showed functional activity by inducing endothelial leakiness and tumor cell-transendothelial migration in vitro, effects which could be reverted by the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab. Thus, mTOR inhibitors as well as bevacizumab should be considered as potential agents in cancer patients suffering from malignant effusions.

Limited value of CA 19-9 in predicting early treatment failure in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The role of CA 19-9 in monitoring treatment response in advanced pancreatic cancer remains uncertain. We assessed its value in predicting early failure of first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: Data of 84 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had received first-line chemotherapy were analyzed with regard to changes in CA 19-9 during the first 2 months of treatment. RESULTS: Median time to progression and overall survival in patients with a transient increase in CA 19-9 during month 1 (n = 15; 5.5 and 13 months) and in those with no increase during the 2 months (n = 52; 6.5 and 12 months) were comparable and slightly above the median values of the entire study population. The hazard ratios for disease progression for a 20% increase in CA 19-9 during the first and second month of therapy were 1.065 and 1.339 in the univariate- and 1.092 and 1.298 in the multiple Cox regression model, respectively. CA 19-9 did not influence survival. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that early CA 19-9 measurements are weakly associated with disease progression rather than survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy. In view of a possible tumor marker flare, values after the first month of therapy must be interpreted with caution.

Clinical benefit and quality of life in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine plus capecitabine versus gemcitabine alone: a randomized multicenter phase III clinical trial--SAKK 44/00-CECOG/PAN.1.3.001.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical benefit response (CBR) and quality of life (QOL) in patients receiving gemcitabine (Gem) plus capecitabine (Cap) versus single-agent Gem for advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive GemCap (oral Cap 650 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 through 14 plus Gem 1,000 mg/m(2) in a 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or Gem (1,000 mg/m(2) in a 30-minute infusion weekly for 7 weeks, followed by a 1-week break, and then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks) for 24 weeks or until progression. CBR criteria and QOL indicators were assessed over this period. CBR was defined as improvement from baseline for >or= 4 consecutive weeks in pain (pain intensity or analgesic consumption) and Karnofsky performance status, stability in one but improvement in the other, or stability in pain and performance status but improvement in weight. RESULTS: Of 319 patients, 19% treated with GemCap and 20% treated with Gem experienced a CBR, with a median duration of 9.5 and 6.5 weeks, respectively (P < .02); 54% of patients treated with GemCap and 60% treated with Gem had no CBR (remaining patients were not assessable). There was no treatment difference in QOL (n = 311). QOL indicators were improving under chemotherapy (P < .05). These changes differed by the time to failure, with a worsening 1 to 2 months before treatment failure (all P < .05). CONCLUSION: There is no indication of a difference in CBR or QOL between GemCap and Gem. Regardless of their initial condition, some patients experience an improvement in QOL on chemotherapy, followed by a worsening before treatment failure.

UFT/leucovorin and mitomycin C as salvage treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer - a retrospective analysis.

Active anticancer drugs and/or combination regimens for the treatment of patients failing oxaliplatin, irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil are desperately needed. In this analysis we describe the safety and efficacy of the combination of mitomycin C, UFT and leucovorin in such an extensively pretreated patient population. Between January 2002 and June 2004, a total of 41 patients were treated with mitomycin C (8 mg/m on day 1) and UFT (350 mg/m)+ leucovorin (90 mg) both divided into three daily doses from day 1 to day 14 every 4 weeks. All patients had failed prior first-line and second-line treatment with oxaliplatin, irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety data of this potential salvage therapy regimen. Thirty-nine patients were evaluable for the response. The overall response rate (intent-to-treat) was 7.3% (95% confidence interval, 2.5-19.4%) and disease stabilization was achieved in 29.3%. Median time to progression was 2.5 months (range, 1.5-13.5) and median overall survival was 6 months (range, 1.5-26). Myelosuppression was the most frequent side effect. Grade 3 hematotoxicity, however, was observed in only three patients. The most common nonhematological toxicities consisted of mild and reversible nausea, emesis and diarrhea; again, severe symptoms were only occasionally seen. These data show that the combination of mitomycin C/UFT/leucovorin is safe and active in about one-third of patients in terms of abrogation of progression in extensively pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Gemcitabine plus capecitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: This phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (Gem) plus capecitabine (GemCap) versus single-agent Gem in advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive GemCap (oral capecitabine 650 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 14 plus Gem 1,000 mg/m2 by 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or Gem (1,000 mg/m2 by 30-minute infusion weekly for 7 weeks, followed by a 1-week break, and then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks). Patients were stratified according to center, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), presence of pain, and disease extent. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients were enrolled between June 2001 and June 2004. Median overall survival (OS) time, the primary end point, was 8.4 and 7.2 months in the GemCap and Gem arms, respectively (P = .234). Post hoc analysis in patients with good KPS (score of 90 to 100) showed a significant prolongation of median OS time in the GemCap arm compared with the Gem arm (10.1 v 7.4 months, respectively; P = .014). The overall frequency of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was similar in each arm. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse event in both arms. CONCLUSION: GemCap failed to improve OS at a statistically significant level compared with standard Gem treatment. The safety of GemCap and Gem was similar. In the subgroup of patients with good performance status, median OS was improved significantly. GemCap is a practical regimen that may be considered as an alternative to single-agent Gem for the treatment of advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with a good performance status.

Phase II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) plus Gemcitabine in chemotherapeutically pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer.

A phase II trial was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of combined gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin +/- recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with chemotherapeutically pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Thirty-four patients were entered in this trial. Chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin +/- G-CSF. Twenty seven patients received this regimen as 2nd line therapy, five patients as 3rd line and two patients as 4th line therapy after having failed taxane- and/or anthracycline-based chemotherapy or other drug combinations. After a median of six courses, an overall response rate of 26% (9 PR in 34 enrolled patients) was observed; 14 patients had disease stabilization (41%), and eight (24%) progressed. Three patients were not evaluable for response due to anaphylaxis after the first course and protracted thrombocytopenia. The median TTP was 7.5 months, and median overall survival was 15 months. Myelosuppression was the most frequently observed toxicity. Non-haematological side effects were generally mild to moderate. Our data suggest that gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin +/- G-CSF is an effective and fairly well tolerated regimen for chemotherapeutically pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer.

Severe enteropathy associated with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin chemotherapy: report of two patients experiencing this rare, potentially lethal gastrointestinal adverse event.

Among the several different combination chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed has shown encouraging therapeutic results and a fairly good toxicity profile. Here, we report on two patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving this combination therapy, which leads to severe enterocolitis and neutropenia resulting in death in one patient. One patient was a 67-year-old woman suffering from an adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon with multiple liver metastases. The other patient was a 74-year-old woman with colon cancer, and metachronous multiple pulmonal and hepatic metastases. In both patients, palliative chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 in combination with raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days. Both patients developed neutropenia in combination with severe enterocolitis after the fourth and the second chemotherapy cycle, respectively. Despite antibiotic treatment, diarrhea persisted in both patients for weeks. One patient died 17 days after hospital admission because of enteric sepsis with bleeding of the colonic mucosa and multiorgan failure. The other patient recovered completely and was discharged from hospital after 8 weeks. Severe enterocolitis, a hitherto infrequently recognized adverse event, which has been described in association with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin chemotherapy, may also occur with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin. Physicians should be aware of this rare, although potentially lethal, gastrointestinal toxicity.

Update on ocular complications of systemic cancer chemotherapy.

The constantly growing list of cytotoxic chemotherapeutics requires a new survey of ophthalmic complications, which are often underestimated. Based on the review by Imperia et al (1989), an update on ophthalmic complications of currently used cytotoxic chemotherapeutics in oncology was written. Vision is a quality of life issue, which must be nurtured, especially if loss of vision can be prevented. The broad spectrum of ophthalmic complications induced by cytotoxic chemotherapy includes reversible and irreversible acute and chronic disorders. Mild to moderate ophthalmic complications are very common and reversible after cessation of anti-cancer therapy. Some major ocular toxicities may require a dose reduction or the discontinuation of cytotoxic chemotherapy in order to prevent visual loss. Ocular toxicities can be treated or even prevented, if detected early enough. That is why an ophthalmic baseline examination for patients receiving cytosine arabinoside, 5-fluorourocil, methotrexate, or docetaxel should be taken into consideration, and a consultation with an ophthalmologist has to be done as soon as symptoms are recognized. Oncologists and ophthalmologists must be aware of potential ophthalmic complications during cytotoxic chemotherapy, and should work together.

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of linezolid during continuous venovenous haemofiltration.

OBJECTIVES: Linezolid is a new antibacterial agent with a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive pathogens including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp., and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. The aim of this prospective, single-centre, open-label, two-arm study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of linezolid during continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) in critically ill patients and to derive a dosage recommendation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty anuric ICU patients undergoing CVVH (mean age and body weight 60.7 +/- 10.9 years and 86.0 +/- 18.0 kg) were included. All patients received linezolid 600 mg intravenously every 12 h. CVVH was performed using highly permeable polysulphone membranes (PSHF 1200, Baxter, Germany and AV 400, Fresenius, Germany). Mean blood flow rate and ultrafiltration rate were 186 +/- 15 and 40 +/- 8 mL/min, respectively. Post-dilution was performed. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of linezolid in critically ill patients with acute renal failure undergoing CVVH were comparable to healthy subjects and patients without renal impairment. The elimination half-life, total clearance and haemofiltration clearance were 4.3 +/- 1.7 h, 9.3 +/- 3.5 L/h and 1.9 +/- 0.8 L/h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that linezolid was highly removable by CVVH. These data suggest that a schedule of 600 mg linezolid at least twice daily may also be an appropriate dosing for patients with severe Gram-positive infections undergoing CVVH with both types of membranes.

Single-agent trastuzumab versus trastuzumab plus cytotoxic chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: a single-institution experience.

Trastuzumab has shown significant single-agent activity in patients with Her-2/neu overexpressing metastatic breast cancer, and increased response rates, progression-free and overall survival when added to standard chemotherapy. Despite higher response rates, the combination with chemotherapy has higher toxicity and it remains unknown whether single-agent trastuzumab is equally effective as the combined treatment in terms of progression-free and overall survival. We therefore carried out a retrospective multivariate analysis of 117 patients with Her-2/neu overexpressing metastatic breast cancer who were treated with trastuzumab with or without chemotherapy at a single institution between November 1999 and December 2003. Response rates tended to be higher in patients receiving trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy (34 versus 8%, p=0.060). However, this did not translate into a benefit in progression-free survival: median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival was 6.2 (4.45-7.95) months in patients receiving trastuzumab plus chemotherapy versus 4.2 (1.77-6.63) months in those receiving single-agent trastuzumab (p=0.560). Likewise, no significant difference in overall survival was observed: 27.0 (19.9-34.0) versus 23.1 (16.2-30.0) months (p=0.809). We conclude that in the absence of extensive visceral involvement necessitating a higher response rate, single-agent trastuzumab may be a safe and less-toxic alternative to its combined use with other chemotherapy agents. This needs to be confirmed in prospective randomized trials.

Effective combination chemotherapy with bimonthly docetaxel and cisplatin with or without hematopoietic growth factor support in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial was performed to determine the antitumor efficacy and tolerance of combined docetaxel and cisplatin with or without hematopoietic growth factor support in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with histologically confirmed metastatic gastroesophageal cancer were entered in this trial. Treatment consisted of 4-weekly courses of docetaxel 50 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) both given on day 1 and 15. Depending on absolute neutrophil counts on the days of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration (1,000-2,000/microl), a 5-day course of human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 microg/kg/day was given subcutaneously; in addition, if hemoglobin was <12.0 mg/dl, erythropoietin 10,000 IU was administered subcutaneously 3 times per week. RESULTS: The confirmed overall response rate (intent-to-treat) was 46%, including 4 complete responses (11%) and 13 partial responses (35%). Eleven patients (30%) had stable disease and 9 (24%) progressed while on treatment. The median time to response was 3 months, the median time to progression was 7 months and the median overall survival time was 11.5 months with 16 (43%) patients currently alive. Hematologic toxicity was common, though WHO grade 4 neutropenia occurred only in 3 patients. Nonhematologic adverse reaction were usually mild to moderate; grade 3 toxicities included alopecia in 5 patients (14%), infection in 1 (3%), neutrotoxicity in 2 (5%) and anaphylaxis in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin with or without G-CSF and/or erythropoietin has a promising therapeutic index in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer.

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of two different schedules of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin, two new agents with potential synergistic activity, have demonstrated promising antitumor efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). Preclinical and clinical evidence indicating that dose intensification of the oral fluorouracil prodrug might result in improved therapeutic results led us to the present randomized multicenter phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with bidimensionally measurable ACC previously untreated for metastatic disease were randomly allocated to receive oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) day 1 plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m(2)/d days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks (arm A) or to receive oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) days 1 and 14 combined with capecitabine 3,500 mg/m(2) days 1 to 7 and 14 to 21 every 4 weeks (arm B). In both treatment arms, chemotherapy was continued for a total of 6 months unless there was prior evidence of progression of disease. RESULTS: Patients allocated to the high-dose capecitabine combination arm B had a higher radiologically confirmed response rate (54.5% v 42.2%) and a significantly longer median progression-free survival time than those allocated to control arm A (10.5 v 6.0 months; P =.0013). Median overall survival times cannot be calculated for either treatment arm at this point. Despite a 34% higher dose intensity of capecitabine in arm B, there was no difference in hematologic toxicity between treatment arms (neutropenia/thrombocytopenia: 60%/43% in arm B v 56%/33% in arm A). Similarly, the incidence rate and degree of nonhematologic adverse events were comparable: The most commonly encountered symptoms (all grades, arm A and arm B) included nausea/emesis (A: 58%; B: 62%), diarrhea (A: 44%; B: 31%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (A: 80%; B: 83%), and fatigue (A: 40%; B: 50%). CONCLUSION: Results of this study indicate that both combination regimens are feasible, tolerable, and clinically active. The dose-intensified bimonthly capecitabine arm, however, seems to be more effective in increasing both response rate and progression-free survival time.

Capecitabine treatment results in increased mean corpuscular volume of red blood cells in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

Capecitabine is a novel fluoropyrimidine carbamate which is selectively activated after oral administration to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by a sequential triple enzyme pathway in liver and tumor cells. The cytotoxic activity of the metabolized 5-FU depends on thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibition, leading to defective DNA synthesis. Capecitabine has shown promising activity in all tumor types sensitive to 5-FU and is therefore investigated in many clinical trials. Since we observed an increase of mean corpuscular volume (MCV) of red blood cells under therapy with capecitabine, the current investigation aimed to quantitate this effect and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. A total of 154 patients suffering from advanced cancer received capecitabine (2500 mg/m2/day for 14 days every 21 days) either as monotherapy, or in combination with other antineoplastic agents or biological response modifiers. During 3 consecutive cycles of therapy a complete blood cell count including the red cell indices MCV, mean corpuscular hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration was performed before each application of capecitabine. In addition, vitamin B12, folic acid and homocysteine were determined to define their role in increasing MCV. Restaging was performed after 9 weeks. Within 9 weeks, a statistically significant increase of MCV (without other hematologic abnormalities or clinical symptoms) could be observed (p<0.0001). Vitamin B12, folic acid and homocysteine levels did not change significantly during the observation period. When comparing the different increases of MCV during 9 weeks (deltaMCV) with respect to tumor response, deltaMCV tended to higher values in patients with tumor remission or stable disease than in patients with tumor progression. We conclude that serum levels within the normal range rule out severe deficiencies of vitamin B12, folic acid or homocysteine as an account of macrocytemia. We therefore hypothesize that an increased MCV (without concomitant anemia) in patients receiving capecitabine might be due to the 5-FU-induced TS inhibition also in erythroid precursor cells. Whether this increase in MCV might serve as a surrogate marker for tumor response has to be evaluated in further investigations.

Mitoxantrone and cisplatin in recurrent and/or metastatic salivary gland malignancies.

A phase II study was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of mitoxantrone and cisplatin in locally recurrent and/or metastatic carcinomas of the salivary glands. Between May 1997 and March 2001, a total of 14 patients were entered on this trial. All of them had previously undergone radical resection and 10 were subsequently treated with adjuvant radiation therapy with (n=3) or without (n=7) concomitant chemotherapy. Therapy according to the study protocol consisted of mitoxantrone given as i.v. bolus on day 1 at a dose of 12 mg/m2 and cisplatin given as 90-min infusion at a dose of 30 mg/m2 on days 1-3. We observed two partial responses (14.3%) and stabilization of disease in nine patients (64.3%); progression during therapy was noted in only three cases (21.4%). The median time to progression was 15 months (range 2-36) and the median survival time was 27 months (range 4-54). Myelosuppression was commonly observed. Leukocytopenia occurred in all patients, and was grade 3 or 4 in three (21%) and four (29%) patients. WHO grade 3 thrombocytopenia and anemia was seen in three (21%) and four (29%) patients, respectively. Non-hematologic toxicity was in general mild to moderate except for two cases (14%) of grade 3 nausea and vomiting; overall incidence rates were nausea and vomiting (n=14), stomatitis (n=6), diarrhea (n=3), alopecia (n=11), infection (n=7), increase of serum creatinine (n=3), and peripheral neuropathy (n=3). The combination of mitoxantrone and cisplatin seems to be an active and fairly well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced salivary gland cancers. According to the observed high rate of abrogating progressive disease for a long duration, and the resulting promising progression-free and overall survival time, further investigation seems warranted.

Treatment of advanced breast cancer with docetaxel and gemcitabine with and without human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

PURPOSE: A multicenter Phase II trial was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of combined docetaxel and gemcitabine +/- recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients participated in this trial, 51 of whom are evaluable for response. Thirty-eight patients received this combination as first-line chemotherapy, and 14 patients received this combination as second-line chemotherapy, including 10 patients who had failed anthracyclines. Therapy consisted of 1500 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 50 mg/m2 docetaxel, both administered on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks. Depending on the absolute neutrophil counts on the day of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration, a 5-day course of 5 microg/kg G-CSF was given. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 60.5% (95% confidence interval, 43.4-75.9%) in patients receiving docetaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy, including 4 complete responses (10.5%) and 19 partial remissions (50%); 9 patients (24%) had disease stabilization, and only 5 (13%) progressed. Second-line treatment with this regimen resulted in 6 of 14 (43%) objective responses, 5 had stable disease, and 3 progressive disease. The median time to progression was 8.5 months in the first-line setting and 6.6 months in the second-line setting, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 15 months, 36 patients (69%) are still alive with metastatic disease. Myelosuppression was commonly observed; WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, however, occurred in only 15 (29%) patients and was complicated by septicemia in 2 cases; grade 3 anemia was seen in 1 patient (2%). Severe (grade 3) nonhematological toxicity except for alopecia was rarely observed and included nausea/vomiting in 3 (6%), stomatitis in 2 (4%), anaphylaxis in 2, and peripheral neuropathy, skin toxicity, and increase of liver enzymes each in one patient. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that docetaxel and gemcitabine with and without G-CSF is an effective and fairly well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. It might be particularly useful in patients exposed previously to adjuvant or palliative anthracyclines and/or alkylating agents.

Randomized phase II study of irinotecan plus mitomycin C vs. oxaliplatin plus mitomycin C in patients with advanced fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-pretreated colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Irinotecan and oxaliplatin are two new agents with promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer. Based on preclinical and clinical evidence that both drugs might act synergistically with mitomycin C, a randomized study using a 'pick the winner' design was undertaken to determine the effectiveness and tolerance of these two combination schedules in patients with fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-pretreated advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, who progressed while receiving or within 6 months after discontinuing palliative chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines/leucovorin were enrolled onto this study. They were randomly assigned to treatment with irinotecan 120 mg/m2 on days 1 + 15 plus mitomycin C 8 mg/m2 on day 1 (arm A) or oxaliplatin 85 mg/M2 on days 1 + 15 plus mitomycin C 8 mg/m2 on day 1 (arm B). In both treatment arms, courses were repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: The objective response rate in arm A is 7/33 (21.2%; 95% confidence interval, 9.0-38.9%) as compared to 5/31 in arm B (16.1%; 95% CI, 5.5-34.7%). Stable disease was noted in 48.5 vs. 45.2%, whereas the tumor progressed in 30.3 vs. 38.7%, respectively. Similar to the recorded response activities, the difference of the two combination regimens in terms of median time to progression (7.0 vs. 5.2 months) and overall survival (12.0 vs. 11.2 months) was only minor and clincally insignificant. The tolerance of treatment was acceptable in both arms, though severe adverse reactions requiring dose reductions (30 vs. 16%) and treatment delays (22 vs. 13% of courses) were more commonly noted with irinotecan/mitomycin C. The most common toxicities in arm A were neutropenia (85%; WHO grade 3/4 in 33%), thrombocytopenia (52%), diarrhea (45%), emesis (52%) and alopecia (92%). In arm B, common toxicities included neutropenia (68%; grade 3/4 in 13%), thrombocytopenia (81%), emesis (52%), and peripheral neutropathy (48%). CONCLUSIONS: Both mitomycin C combination regimens seem to provide an acceptable therapeutic index in patients with fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. In view of the increasing need for a broader chemotherapeutic armentarium for second-line therapy of this common malignant disease, both regimens may be worthwhile to undergo further clinical investigation.

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan versus raltitrexed as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan and oxaliplatin are two new agents with promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer. Based on preclinical and clinical evidence that both drugs act synergistically, a randomized phase II study was initiated to investigate the therapeutic potential and tolerance of this combination in the front-line setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-two patients with previously untreated, measurable disease were randomized to receive biweekly oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) plus irinotecan 175 mg/m(2) or raltitrexed 3 mg/m(2) given on day 1 every 3 weeks. Upon development of progressive disease, second-line treatment with the opposite arm was effected. RESULTS: Patients allocated to oxaliplatin/irinotecan had a significantly better radiologically confirmed response rate (43.5% v 19.6%; P =.0025) and longer progression-free survival (median, 7.1 v 5.0 months; P =.0033). Improvement in overall survival, however, did not reach the level of significance (median, 16.0 v 16.5 months; P =.3943). The response rate after cross-over was 33.3% (eight of 24) for assessable patients treated with oxaliplatin/irinotecan compared with 14.2% (three of 21) for those treated with second-line raltitrexed. Oxaliplatin/irinotecan caused more hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities, necessitating dose reductions in 10 of the first 20 patients. After adjustment of the irinotecan starting dose from 175 to 150 mg/m(2), tolerance of treatment was acceptable; the most commonly encountered events (all grades) were neutropenia (81%), alopecia (65%), nausea/emesis (62%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (62%), and diarrhea (46%). CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin/irinotecan seems beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, with an acceptable toxicity profile at the reduced irinotecan dose level. Its promising therapeutic potential is supported by the high response activity noted in the raltitrexed control arm after cross-over, which may also explain the lack of a difference in overall survival.