Neurologic outcomes for adult spinal cord ependymomas stratified by tumor location: a retrospective cohort study and 2-year outlook.

Determine whether craniocaudal spinal cord tumor location affects long-term neurologic outcomes in adults diagnosed with spinal ependymomas (SE). A retrospective cohort analysis of patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent surgical resection for SE over a ten-year period was conducted. Tumor location was classified as cervical, thoracic, or lumbar/conus. Primary endpoints were post-operative McCormick Neurologic Scale (MNS) scores at < 3 days, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years. One-way ANOVA was performed to detect significant differences in MNS scores between tumor locations. Twenty-eight patients were identified. The average age was 44.2 ± 15.4 years. Sixteen were male, and 13 were female. There were 10 cervical-predominant SEs, 13 thoracic-predominant SEs, and 5 lumbar/conus-predominant SEs. No significant differences were observed in pre-operative MNS scores between tumor locations (p = 0.73). One-way ANOVA testing demonstrated statistically significant differences in post-operative MNS scores between tumor locations at < 3 days (p = 0.03), 6 weeks (p = 0.009), and 1 year (p = 0.003); however, no significant difference was observed between post-operative MNS scores at 2 years (p = 0.13). The mean MNS score for patients with thoracic SEs were higher at all follow-up time points. Tumors arising in the thoracic SE are associated with worse post-operative neurologic outcomes in comparison to SEs arising in other spinal regions. This is likely multifactorial in etiology, owing to both anatomical differences including spinal cord volume as well as variations in tumor characteristics. No significant differences in 2-year MNS scores were observed, suggesting that patients ultimately recover from neurological insult sustained at the time of surgery.

Surgical outcomes in large vestibular schwannomas: should cerebellopontine edema be considered in the grading systems?

PURPOSE: Large (> 3 cm) vestibular schwannomas pose complexity in surgical management because of narrow working corridors and proximity to the cranial nerves, brainstem, and inner ear structures. With current vestibular schwannoma classifications limited in information regarding cerebellopontine edema, our retrospective series examined this radiographic feature relative to clinical outcomes and its possible role in preoperative scoring. METHODS: Of 230 patients who underwent surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma (2014-2020), we identified 107 patients with Koos grades 3 or 4 tumors for radiographic assessment of edema in the middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP), brainstem, or both. Radiographic images were graded and patients grouped into Koos grades 3 or 4 or our proposed grade 5 with edema. Tumor volumes, radiographic features, clinical presentations, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The 107 patients included 22 patients with grade 3 tumors, 39 with grade 4, and 46 with grade 5. No statistical differences were noted among groups for demographic data or complication rates. Unlike grades 3 and 4 patients, grade 5 patients presented with worse hearing (p < 0.001), larger tumors (p < 0.001), lower rates of gross total resection (GTR), longer hospital stays, and higher rates of balance dysfunction. CONCLUSION: With edema detected in 43% of this cohort, special considerations are warranted for grade 5 vestibular schwannomas given the preoperative findings of worse hearing, lower GTR rates, longer hospital stays, and 96% who pursued postoperative balance therapy. We propose that grade 5 with edema offers a more nuanced interpretation of a radiographic feature that holds relevance to treatment selection and patient outcomes.

An Update on Medical School Accreditation in the United States: Implications for the Single Graduate Medical Education (GME) Era.

In the United States, medical schools are accredited by either the Liaison on Committee Medical Education (LCME) or the Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation (COCA), which assesses the quality and standards of Doctor of Medicine (MD)-granting and Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO)-granting institutions, respectively. Thereafter, new MD and DO physicians complete graduate medical education (GME) training. Historically, the two physician licensure pathways have been predominantly separate, but in 2020, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Osteopathic Association finalized a single accreditation GME system. Now, other elements of MD and DO physician training that have traditionally remained separate, such as undergraduate medical education (UME), are increasingly being scrutinized. Since 2010, when the accreditation of UME was last qualitatively criticized, the standards and competencies set forth by LCME and COCA have converged. COCA, in particular, has updated its requirements to emphasize scholarly activity, improve inpatient clinical rotation requirements, engage medical students, and enhance clinical faculty qualifications. Such convergence brings to question the continuing need for two independent accreditation pathways and barriers that may prevent a single accreditation. We argue that although MD and DO physicians are unique, the natural confluence of UME accreditation represents an opportunity to simplify and improve physician training in the United States. Our analysis suggests the major barriers to implementing a single accreditation system surround the requirement of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM)-focused faculty by COCA and the two separate licensing exams (USMLE (United States Medical Licensing Examination) and COMLEX (Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination)). However, with a continuing decline in osteopathic physicians practicing OMM and growing debate over a new single licensing exam, a single accreditation UME system may be practically achieved.

Shared Objective Mentorship via Virtual Research and Education Initiatives for Medical Students and Residents in Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review and Methodological Discussion of the Neurosurgery Education and Research Virtual Group Experience.

OBJECTIVE: Virtual mentorship and research programs are becoming increasingly popular to facilitate education and career development for students and residents. We review virtual research initiatives for early trainees in neurosurgery and describe our effort to expand access to resources and shared objective mentorship (SOM) via the novel Neurosurgery Education and Research Virtual Group (NERVE). METHODS: A systematic review of neurosurgical programming delivered via a virtual platform was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Identified articles were screened. Those meeting prespecified inclusion criteria were reviewed in full and examined for relevant data. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel, and means and standard deviations were calculated. Descriptive analysis of NERVE characteristics was also performed. RESULTS: Of the 2438 identified articles, 10 were included. The most common (70%) implementation style was a webinar-based lecture series. The least common (10%) was a longitudinal curricular interest group. Of the total NERVE cohort, 90% were first generation medical students and 82% attended institutions without home programs. Survey results indicated 73.8% had contributed to at least 2 research projects throughout the year. CONCLUSIONS: There is a scarcity of virtual neurosurgical resources which facilitate SOM opportunities for trainees. In our systematic review, NERVE is the only multi-institutional virtual initiative aimed at increasing access to neurosurgical education and research opportunities for the purpose of SOM among early trainees from disadvantaged backgrounds. This highlights the group's niche and potential impact on increasing diversity in neurosurgery, improving trainees' career development, and facilitating future resident research productivity.

Surgical management of petrous apex cholesteatomas in the pediatric population: A systematic review.

Background: Cholesteatomas are growths of squamous epithelium that can form inside the middle ear and mastoid cavity and damage nearby structures causing hearing loss when located at the petrous apex. The primary goal of petrous apex cholesteatoma resection is gross total removal with tympanoplasty and canal-wall up or canal-wall down tympanomastoidectomy. At present, there is no definitive surgical approach supported by greater than level 4 evidence in the literature to date. Methods: A systematic review was conducted utilizing PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Articles were screened and selected to be reviewed in full text. The articles that met inclusion criteria were reviewed for relevant data. Data analysis, means, and standard deviations were calculated using Microsoft Excel. Results: After screening, five articles were included in the systematic review. There were a total of eight pediatric patients with nine total cholesteatomas removed. Conductive hearing loss was the most common (77%) presenting symptom. Perforations were noted in seven ears (86%). Recurrence was noted in 50% of patients with an average recurrence rate of 3.5 years (SD = 1.73). Average length of follow-up was 32.6 months (SD = 21.7). Canal-wall up was the most utilized technique (60%) and there were zero noted surgical complications. Five of the seven (71%) patients that experienced hearing loss from perforation noted improved hearing. Conclusion: Due to its rarity, diagnostic evaluation and treatment can vary. Further, multi-institutional investigation is necessary to develop population-level management protocols for pediatric patients affected by petrous apex cholesteatomas.

Impact of Surgical Timing on Neurological Outcomes for Spinal Arachnoid Cyst: A Single Institution Series.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal arachnoid cysts (SACs) are rare lesions that often present with back pain and myelopathy. There is a paucity of literature evaluating the impact of surgical timing on neurological outcomes for primary SAC management. To compare long-term neurological outcomes in patients who were managed differently and to understand natural progression of SAC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients treated for SAC at our institution from 2010 to 2021, stratified into 3 groups (conservative management only, surgical management, or conservative followed by surgical management). Study outcome measures were neurological outcomes as measured by modified McCormick Neurologic Scale (MNS), postoperative complications, and cyst recurrence. Nonparametric analysis was performed to evaluate differences between groups for selected endpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with SAC were identified. Eighteen patients were managed surgically. The remaining 18 patients were managed conservatively with outpatient serial imaging, 7 of whom (38.9%) ultimately underwent surgical treatment due to neurological decline. Most common presenting symptoms included back pain (50.0%), extremity weakness (36.1%), and numbness/paresthesia (36.1%). Initial/preoperative (p = 0.017) and 1-year postoperative (p = 0.006) MNS were significantly different between the 3 groups, but not at 6 weeks or 6 months postoperatively (p > 0.05). Additionally, at 1 year, there was no difference in MNS between patients managed surgically and those managed conservatively but ultimately underwent surgery (p > 0.99). CONCLUSION: Delayed surgical intervention in minimally symptomatic patients does not seem to result in worse long-term neurofunctional outcomes. At 1 year, postoperative MNS were significantly higher in both surgical groups, when compared to the conservative group highlighting worsening clinical picture regardless of preoperative observational status.

Qualitative Methodology for Planning and Executing In-Person and Virtual Neurosurgery Educational Opportunities for Medical Students: Lessons Learned from Five Years of Medical Student Neurosurgery Training Center Initiatives.

INTRODUCTION: There is a growing need for collaborative and broad-scale medical student neurosurgery educational initiatives. Here, we propose a comprehensive methodology and structure for hosting both in-person and virtual learning opportunities for early trainees interested in clinical neurosciences. METHODS: We conducted an internal review of educational courses hosted by Medical Student Neurosurgery Training Center from 2017 to 2022. Inspired by the lessons learned from these activities, we examine the elements vital to the planning, production, funding, and execution of future programs. RESULTS: Six domains were deemed important for carrying out medical student neurosurgery educational opportunities: directorship, curriculum, logistics, faculty and instructor outreach, funding, and marketing. Each of these elements is discussed in detail for both in-person and web-based programs, as well as an examination of the advantages and disadvantages of various implementation strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the Medical Student Neurosurgery Training Center experience, successful production and hosting of both in-person and virtual educational endeavors seems to be contingent on a collaborative effort by medical students, resident physicians, and neurosurgery faculty. Including medical students throughout the planning phase adds to the overall educational value of each experience and promotes program longevity and consumer engagement. Curricula should be guided by clear learning objectives and a variety of teaching modalities available to the organization. Finally, methods for assessing course outcomes are important, including institutional review board-approved data curation and analysis. Further investigation of neurosurgical learning outcome measurement is needed and has the potential to shape the future of medical student education and neurosurgery career preparation.

Reevaluating Innovations in Medical Student Neurosurgery Education: Lessons Learned Today from Data Collected Before COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Virtual learning has made neurosurgery education more available to medical students (MSs) of all stages than ever before. We aimed to evaluate the impact of on-site learning in order to assess whether a return to this method of teaching, when safe, is warranted for MSs of all years. METHODS: Registrants of the 2019 MS Neurosurgery Training Camps were sent precourse and postcourse surveys to assess changes in self-assessed confidence in concrete neurosurgical skills. Data were analyzed using a 2-tailed paired Student's t-test for continuous variables. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The 2019 Training Camp had 105 attendees, of whom 94 (89.5%) completed both surveys. Students reported statistically significant improvements in every surveyed skill area, except for understanding what is and is not sterile in an operating room. The cohort of MS 3/4 students indicated a postcourse decrease in confidence in their ability to understand what is and is not sterile in an operating room (93.69 ± 16.41 vs. 86.20 ± 21.18; P < 0.05). MS 3/4 students did not benefit in their ability to perform a neurologic examination or tie knots using a 1-handed technique. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgical education initiatives for MSs should continue to be developed. Hands-on neurosurgical training experiences for MSs serve as a valuable educational experience. Improvement in training models will lead to capitalizing on MS education to better improve readiness for neurosurgical residency without concern for patient safety.

Utility of Virtual Spine Neurosurgery Education for Medical Students.

OBJECTIVE: Distance learning has become increasingly important to expand access to neurosurgical spine education. However, emerging online spine education initiatives have largely focused on residents, fellows, and surgeons in practice. We aimed to assess the utility of online neurosurgical spine education for medical students regarding career interests, knowledge, and technical skills. METHODS: A survey assessing the demographics and effects of virtual spine education programming on the interests, knowledge, and technical skills was sent to attendees of several virtual spine lectures. The ratings were quantified using 7-point Likert scales. RESULTS: A total of 36 responses were obtained, of which 15 (41.7%) were from first- or second-year medical students and 18 (50.0%) were from international students. Most respondents were interested in neurosurgery (n = 30; 80.3%), with smaller numbers interested in radiology (n = 3; 8.3%) and orthopedic surgery (n = 2; 5.6%). The rating of utility ranged from 5.69 ± 1.14 to 6.50 ± 0.81 for career, 5.83 ± 0.94 to 6.14 ± 0.80 for knowledge, and 5.22 ± 1.31 to 5.83 ± 1.06 for clinical skills. Of the 36 respondents, 26 (72.2%) preferred virtual neurosurgical spine education via intermixed lectures and interactive sessions. The most common themes regarding the utility of virtual spine education were radiology by 18 (50.0%), anatomy by 12 (33.3%), and case-based teaching by 8 (22.2%) respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual distance learning for neurosurgical spine education is beneficial for students by enabling career exploration and learning content and clinical skills. Although the overall benefit was lowest for clinical skills, virtual programming could serve as an adjunct to traditional in-person exposure. Distance learning could also provide an avenue to reduce disparities in medical student neurosurgical spine education locally and globally.

Distance Learning for Medical Students without a Neurosurgery Interest Group.

OBJECTIVE: Interest groups for medical students (MSs) facilitate interest and engagement in neurosurgery. Students without interest groups are at a disadvantage as a result of greater barriers to exposure. We aimed to compare the usefulness of a virtual neurosurgery training camp for MSs with and without interest groups. METHODS: A survey assessing demographics, interests, and ratings of informativeness and usefulness was sent to attendees of virtual neurosurgery training camps. Ratings were quantified on modified 7-point Likert scales. Data were compared between respondents with and without neurosurgery interest groups. RESULTS: Students without an interest group were less likely to be MS1/MS2 (P = 0.0007) and more likely to be postdoctoral students (P = 0.0017). Students without an interest group were less likely to list breakout sessions as their primary reason for attendance (P = 0.0007), more likely to rate the resident panel as most useful (P = 0.0429), and less likely to rate the breakout session as most useful (P = 0.0231). Students without interest groups reported greater increases in interest in neurosurgery in general (P = 0.0284) and subspecialties of spine (P = 0.0003), peripheral nerve (P = 0.0054), and pediatric (P = 0.0137). There was no difference in willingness to pursue a neurosurgical career (P = 0.06), likelihood of taking a year off during medical school (P = 0.45), or preparedness for subinternships (P = 0.18) or residency application process (P = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Distance learning increases both general and subspecialty-specific interest in neurosurgery among MSs without neurosurgery interest groups to a greater degree than among those with interest groups. Future initiatives seeking to benefit students without home programs should address the specific concerns of these students.

The Perceived Utility of 3 Online Resources for Medical Student Neurosurgery Education.

OBJECTIVE: Neurosurgery has a high barrier of educational access for medical students. The Medical Student Neurosurgery Training Center (MSNTC) is a novel online learning platform that provides on-site and virtual training opportunities and resources that aim to increase student access to neurosurgical education. The objective of this article was to describe student-reported utility of Medical Student Neurosurgery Training Center educational resources. METHODS: A Qualtrics survey was sent to attendees after the 2020 Virtual Neurosurgery Training Camp. Ratings were quantified on modified 5-point Likert scales and compared using Wilcoxon rank sum tests, with a P value of 0.05. RESULTS: Response was obtained from 119 (25.2%) of 473 Virtual Neurosurgery Training Camp registrants. Of respondents, 65 (54.6%) reported prior use of Brain & Spine Report (BSR), 68 (57.14%) reported use of the Video Library (VL), and 78 (65.5%) reported use of the Global Events Calendar (GEC). Among respondents who previously used the BSR, VL, or GEC, mean ratings of usefulness were 3.94 ± 1.01, 4.06 ± 0.91, and 4.10 ± 0.99, respectively. Medical students with a neurosurgery interest group at their home institution reported greater utility of the BSR (P = 0.0008), VL (P = 0.0018), and GEC (P = 0.0250). Medical students with a home program reported greater utility of the BSR (P = 0.0079), and international students reported greater utility of the VL (P = 0.0447). CONCLUSIONS: Medical Student Neurosurgery Training Center resources appear to have promising preliminary benefits for students. Increasing medical student awareness, continued development of these resources, and objectively assessing outcomes in neurosurgery education are warranted.

Long-term Neurologic Outcome After Spinal Ependymoma Resection With Multimodal Intraoperative Electrophysiological Recording: Cohort Study and Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) changes during spinal ependymoma (SE) resection correlate with long-term neuro-functional outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients aged 18 years or older who underwent surgical resection for SE over a 10-year period was conducted. IONM changes were defined as sustained transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) and/or somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) signal decrease of 50% or greater from baseline. Primary endpoints were postoperative modified McCormick Neurologic Scale (MNS) scores at postoperative day (POD) < 2, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were identified. Average age was 44.2 ± 15.4 years. Sixteen (55.2%) were male and 13 (44.8%) were female. Tumor location was 10 cervical-predominant (34.5%), 13 thoracic-predominant (44.8%), and 6 lumbar/conus-predominant (20.7%). A majority (69.0%) were World Health Organization grade 2 tumors. Twentyfour patients (82.8%) achieved gross total resection. Thirteen patients (44.8%) had a sustained documented IONM signal change and 10 (34.5%) had a TcMEP change with or without derangement in SSEP. At POD < 2, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years, MNS was significantly higher for those when analyzing subgroups with either any sustained IONM or TcMEP ± SSEP signal attenuation > 50% below baseline (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Sustained IONM derangements > 50% below baseline, particularly for TcMEP, are significantly associated with higher MNS postoperatively out to 2 years. Intraoperative and postoperative management of these patients warrant special consideration to limit neurologic morbidity.

Pharmacological neuroprotection and clinical trials of novel therapies for neonatal peri-intraventricular hemorrhage: a comprehensive review.

Peri-intraventricular hemorrhage (PIVH) is a serious condition for preterm infants, caused by traumatic or spontaneous rupture of the germinal matrix (GM) capillary network in the cerebral ventricles. It is a common source of morbidity and mortality in neonates, and risk correlates with earlier delivery, low birth weight, maternal-fetal infection, and vital sign derangements, among others. PIVH typically occurs in the first 72 h of life, and symptoms, when present, manifest most commonly within the first week of life. Prevention remains the primary goal in management, predominantly via prolonging of gestation. Current therapy protocols are center-dependent without consistent consensus guidelines, but infant positioning, homeostatic stabilization, and neuroprotection offer potential options. In this update of pharmacologic neuroprotective therapies for PIVH, we highlight commonly utilized therapies and review the investigative literature. Further multi-institutional clinical trials and basic research studies are required.

Operation-related Musculoskeletal Injuries among United States Surgeons: A Gender-stratified National Survey.

Operation-related musculoskeletal injury (ORMI) among surgeons is a well-described phenomenon. Our study aimed to determine the prevalence of self-reported ORMI among surgeons of various subspecialties and preliminarily investigate the role of gender. METHODS: An anonymous survey, querying information pertinent to ORMIs, was distributed online through the American College of Surgeons community membership forum. Nonparametric univariate analysis and a multivariate regression model were conducted. A P value of 0.05 determined significance. RESULTS: A total of 624 male and female surgeons responded to the survey, with 50.8% reporting having an injury related to operating. Among the entire cohort, the prevalence of ORMI was significantly higher among female surgeons than male surgeons (P = 0.01), although there was no significant difference among the genders in ORMI prevalence when stratifying by age group (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Female surgeons are more likely to report an ORMI, although the impact of confounding variables such as age, operative case volume, and surgical subspecialty remain to be fully elucidated.

Endocrinological outcomes after transcranial resection of tuberculum sellae meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) arise from the anterior skull base. Endocrine status after TSM resection is an important determinant of quality of life. We sought to better characterize the risk of postoperative endocrinopathy for patients with TSM undergoing open transcranial approach (TCA) microsurgical resection. A systematic review was conducted following MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines. Results were screened against predefined criteria, which included studies evaluating endocrinopathy rates after open transcranial microsurgery for TSM. Outcome incidence was calculated using random-effect meta-analysis of proportions. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 406 patients. The average age of the cohort was 52.2 years, and a majority (70%) of the patients were female. The pooled incidence of postoperative transient diabetes insipidus (DI) was 7.5% (95% CI 2.9-12%; p = 0.001; I2 = 75.9%) and permanent DI was 1.6% (95% CI 0.3-2.7%; p = 0.01; I2 = 0%). The pooled rate of postoperative hypopituitarism was 3.6% (95% CI 1.6-5.7%; p < 0.001; I2 = 22.2%), while the incidence of hyperprolactinemia was 1.3% (95% CI 0.1 = 2.6%; p = 0.036; I2 = 8.74%). The incidence of SIADH was 4% in one study but was not included in the meta-analysis. Endocrinopathy after TSM microsurgical resection is rare, but the available studies' poor quality of evidence and inconsistent methodology may reflect that it is underreported in the literature. Nevertheless, clinicians should consider the risk of hormonal impairment and counsel their patients accordingly when selecting a TCA for these lesions.

A retrospective and correlative analysis of academic and nonacademic predictors of COMLEX level 1 performance.

CONTEXT: National licensing exams (NLEs) including the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX) Level 1 evaluate student achievement. Scores have historically been utilized to stratify medical student applicants for residency. Grade point average (GPA), number of practice questions completed, and performance on practice exams have been shown to be predictive of NLE performance. Test anxiety and acute stress have been shown to negatively impact NLE performance. The role of study behaviors and other nonacademic factors in COMLEX Level 1 performance is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate academic and nonacademic factors and to correlate them with COMLEX Level 1 performance. Additional analysis is conducted to associate COMLEX Level 1 performance with academic and nonacademic factors when controlling for GPA. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was administered to third- (OMS III) and fourth-year (OMS IV) osteopathic medical students at Kansas City University that had completed the COMLEX Level 1 examination. In total, 72 students responded to the survey. Survey results were linked to student records of GPA and COMLEX Level 1 scores, resulting in 59 complete responses for analysis. Independent-sample t-tests and linear ordinary least squares regression were utilized to analyze the results. RESULTS: The majority of participants are male (62.7%) and OMS III (98.3%) with an average age of 27.14 ± 2.58 (mean ± standard deviation). Further demographic data reveal hours per week spent for personal time during dedicated study (n=46, 19.7 ± 18.53), hours of sleep per night during dedicated study (7.34 ± 0.92), and money spent on board preparation ($1,319.12 ± $689.17). High ($1,600-$3,000), average ($1,000-$1,500), and low ($100-$900) spenders do not statistically differ and COMLEX Level 1 performance is not related to the number of resources utilized (F statistics <1; p>0.05). Pearson correlations reveal a statistically significant relationship between COMLEX Level 1 scores with GPA (0.73, p<0.001), number of practice exams completed (0.39, p<0.001), number of questions completed (0.46, p<0.001), number of weeks of study (0.55, p<0.001), and preparation cost (0.28, p<0.05). The regression analysis revealed that money spent on board preparation, number of questions completed, and time spent studying accounted for 75.8% of the variance in COMLEX Level 1 scores after controlling for GPA. CONCLUSIONS: The data show the association of money spent on board preparation, numbers of questions competed, and time spent studying with a student's COMLEX Level 1 score. Additionally, these results highlight the amount of money students spend on extracurricular materials to prepare for COMLEX Level 1, yet the data show that the number of resources that students utilized is not related to a student's COMLEX Level 1 performance.

Virtual Neurosurgery Education for Medical Students without Home Residency Programs: A Survey of 2020 Virtual Neurosurgery Training Camp Attendees.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the perceived effectiveness of the virtual neurosurgery training camps (VNTC) among medical students with (HP) and without (NHP) home neurosurgery residency programs. METHODS: A survey assessing demographics, baseline interests, and ratings of usefulness and interest of programming was sent to attendees after the VNTC. Ratings were quantified on modified 7-point Likert scales. Ratings were compared between attendees HP and NHP neurosurgery residency programs using Wilcoxon sum-rank or χ2 tests. A P value of 0.05 determined significance. RESULTS: There were 119 respondents, with 80 (67.2%) HP and 39 (32.8%) NHP students. Differences were observed between the groups for medical school type (P = 0.002), highest degree achieved (P = 0.030), previous participation in a Medical Student Neurosurgery Training Center event (P = 0.004), having a neurosurgery interest group (P < 0.001), and primary reason for VNTC attendance (P = 0.028). Increased interest in peripheral nerve neurosurgery was greater for the NHP (P = 0.047) but not neurosurgery or other subspecialties. A significant difference in usefulness of the different VNTC sessions was observed (P = 0.002), whereas none was seen in willingness to pursue neurosurgery (P = 0.33), likelihood of taking a year off (P = 0.44), and preparedness for subinternships (P = 0.57) or applications (P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: The 2020 VNTC benefited both HPO and NHP medical students, but there were differences in perceived usefulness of virtual education. Future initiatives should continue to be tailored toward disadvantaged students.