Biological nitrogen removal from low carbon wastewater.

Nitrogen has traditionally been removed from wastewater by nitrification and denitrification processes, in which organic carbon has been used as an electron donor during denitrification. However, some wastewaters contain low concentrations of organic carbon, which may require external organic carbon supply, increasing treatment costs. As a result, processes such as partial nitrification/anammox (anaerobic ammonium oxidation) (PN/A), autotrophic denitrification, nitritation-denitritation and bioelectrochemical processes have been studied as possible alternatives, and are thus evaluated in this study based on process kinetics, applicability at large-scale and process configuration. Oxygen demand for nitritation-denitritation and PN/A is 25% and 60% lower than for nitrification/denitrification, respectively. In addition, PN/A process does not require organic carbon supply, while its supply for nitritation-denitritation is 40% less than for nitrification/denitrification. Both PN/A and nitritation-denitritation produce less sludge compared to nitrification/denitrification, which saves on sludge handling costs. Similarly, autotrophic denitrification generates less sludge compared to heterotrophic denitrification and could save on sludge handling costs. However, autotrophic denitrification driven by metallic ions, elemental sulfur (S) and its compounds could generate harmful chemicals. On the other hand, hydrogenotrophic denitrification can remove nitrogen completely without generation of harmful chemicals, but requires specialized equipment for generation and handling of hydrogen gas (H2), which complicates process configuration. Bioelectrochemical processes are limited by low kinetics and complicated process configuration. In sum, anammox-mediated processes represent the best alternative to nitrification/denitrification for nitrogen removal in low- and high-strength wastewaters.

Effects of antimicrobials in anammox mediated systems: critical review.

Anammox-mediated systems are thought to be cost-effective and efficient technologies for removing nitrogen from wastewater by converting nitrite and ammonium into dinitrogen gas. However, there are inhibitory substances that reduce the effectiveness and efficiency of these processes, preventing their widespread application. Antimicrobial agents are among these substances that have been observed to inhibit anammox-mediated processes. Therefore, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the effects of various antimicrobials on the anammox-based systems with emphasis on the effects in different reactor configurations, sludge types and microbial population of anammox-based systems. In addition, this review also discusses the mechanisms by which nitrifying bacteria are inhibited by the antimicrobials. Gaps in knowledge based on this review as well as future research needs have also been suggested. This review gives a better knowledge of antimicrobial effects on anammox-based systems and provides some guidance on the type of system to use to treat antimicrobial-containing wastewater using anammox-based processes.

Critical Analysis of Biomass Retention Strategies in Mainstream and Sidestream ANAMMOX-Mediated Nitrogen Removal Systems.

ANAMMOX (anaerobic ammonium oxidation) represents an energy-efficient process for biological nitrogen removal, particularly from wastewater streams with low chemical oxygen demand (COD) to nitrogen (C/N) ratios. Its widespread application, however, is still hampered by a lack of access to biomass-enriched with ANAMMOX bacteria (AMX), slow growth rates of AMX, and their sensitivity to inhibition. Although the coupling of ANAMMOX processes with partial nitrification is already widespread, especially for sidestream treatment, maintaining a functional population density of AMX remains a challenge in these systems. Therefore, strategies that maximize retention of AMX-rich biomass are essential to promote process stability. This paper reviews existing methods of biomass retention in ANAMMOX-mediated systems, focusing on (i) granulation; (ii) biofilm formation on carrier materials; (iii) gel entrapment; and (iv) membrane technology in mainstream and sidestream systems. In addition, the microbial ecology of different ANAMMOX-mediated systems is reviewed.

Effect of ammonium to nitrite ratio on reactor performance and microbial population structure in anammox reactors.

Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) presents an efficient alternative for conventional nitrogen removal process. In this study, the effect of varying Substrate (ammonium to nitrite) ratios on reactor performance and microbial community structures within three anaerobic sequencing batch reactors (ASBRs) was investigated. Three 1 L ASBRs (Reactors 1, 2 and 3) were operated under similar operational conditions. By varying the ammonium to nitrite ratios, a significant variation in nitrogen removal was observed after 170 days of operation: nitrogen removal efficiencies of 67.17 ± 7.29%, 57.13 ± 11.18% and 56.26 ± 17.05% in Reactors 3, 2 and 1 respectively were achieved. Similarly, using quantitative PCR, an overall variation in the population of anammox bacteria, ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB), Nitrospira and copy numbers of nirS, hzo and hzs genes were observed with varying degrees of expression. High throughput sequencing analysis further showed a shift in microbial community structure with an overall increase in population of Planctomycetia from 0.76% to (3%, 25% and 26%) and Betaproteobacteria from 5.38% to (19%, 21% and 43%) within Reactors 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In conclusion, different substrates ratio showed a significant influence on the overall nitrogen removal rate as well as the abundances of the different microbial groups.