A practical approach to interpretation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for postoperative spine infection.

OBJECTIVE: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT is the imaging modality of choice for the diagnosis of postoperative spine infection. Published interpretation criteria are variable and often incompletely described. The objective was to develop a practical and standardized approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-hundred-twenty-seven FDG-PET/CTs performed on 140 postoperative patients over a 7-year period were reviewed retrospectively. The presence or absence of infection was determined from clinical history, microbiology, other investigations, and clinical outcome during a minimum 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: No activity attributable to normal healing was seen in the post-discectomy space or at the bone-hardware interface in the absence of a complication at any stage. Within the incision, activity from normal healing persisted for months. Wound infections were diagnosed clinically, and most had already been treated before FDG-PET/CT was done to assess deep structures. With proven infection, 95% of cases had activity in bone or soft tissue outside the surgical field. The remaining 5% had activity confined to the post-discectomy space. Sterile hardware loosening may cause elevated activity which remains confined to the bone/hardware interface. Pathogens are introduced directly at the time of surgery and may be avirulent resulting in indolent infection with low-grade activity. At the same time, activity from non-infectious causes can be intense. A semi-quantitative method using SUVmax performed poorly compared with assessment of the distribution of activity. CONCLUSION: These observations have been incorporated into a checklist which is now being used at the time of interpretation. The potential sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of infection are close to 100%.

Diagnostic challenges in pyogenic spinal infection: an expanded role for FDG-PET/CT.

In a preliminary investigation of FDG-PET/CT for assessment of therapy response of pyogenic spine infection, it was concluded that activity confined to the margins of a destroyed or degenerated joint with bone-on-bone contact represents nonseptic inflammation, regardless of the intensity of uptake. Only activity in bone, soft tissue, or within the epidural space represents active infection. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the performance of these pattern-based interpretation criteria in a series of problem cases of proven or suspected spine infection. Eighty-two FDG-PET/CTs were done for initial diagnosis because other imaging failed to provide a definitive diagnosis and 147 FDG-PET/CTs were done to assess treatment responses. Pattern-based interpretations were compared with the clinical diagnosis based on bacterial cultures and outcomes after cessation or withholding of antibiotic therapy. Pattern-based interpretation criteria achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 98 and 100%, respectively, for initial diagnosis and a specificity of 100% for assessment of treatment response. The same data was analyzed using intensity of activity as the primary factor. Sensitivity and specificity using the intensity-based criteria were 93 and 68%, respectively, for initial diagnosis, and the specificity of a negative interpretation for therapy response was 55%. Differences from pattern-based criteria are highly significant. Pattern-based criteria perform well in problem cases with equivocal MR and for treatment response because they correctly eliminate activity from nonspecific inflammation associated with destroyed joints with bone-on-bone contact. Response occurs within a timeframe that is useful for managing antibiotic therapy.