Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 13(1): 121-6, 1998.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9509790

RESUMO

This retrospective study evaluated the use of percutaneous craniofacial implants for the prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with a history of orbital exenteration and irradiation for oncologic tumors of the head and neck. A total of 24 implants were placed in six patients. All implants were determined to be osseointegrated at the time of uncovering. Three implants were subsequently resubmerged beneath the soft tissue because of positional interferences with prosthesis fabrication. The remaining 21 implants were ultimately used to retain six orbital prostheses. Two implants failed to maintain osseointegration during the follow-up period and were subsequently removed without complications. This represents an overall integration success rate of 90.5% over a mean follow-up period of 32.8 months (range = 11 to 68 months). The significance of these findings and their relationship to comparable reports in the literature are discussed.


Assuntos
Irradiação Craniana/efeitos adversos , Olho Artificial , Implante de Prótese Maxilofacial , Órbita/efeitos da radiação , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Órbita/cirurgia , Osseointegração , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...