Direction-Specific Effects of Artificial Skin-Stretch on Stiffness Perception and Grip Force Control.

When interacting with an object, we use kinesthetic and tactile information to create our perception of the object's properties and to prevent its slippage using grip force control. We previously showed that applying artificial skin-stretch together with, and in the same direction as, kinesthetic force increases the perceived stiffness. Here, we investigated the effect of the direction of the artificial stretch on stiffness perception and grip force control. We presented participants with kinesthetic force together with negative or positive artificial stretch, in the opposite or the same direction of the natural stretch due to the kinesthetic force, respectively. Our results showed that artificial skin-stretch in both directions augmented the perceived stiffness; however, the augmentation caused by the negative stretch was consistently lower than that caused by the positive stretch. Additionally, we proposed a computational model that predicts the perceptual effects based on the preferred directions of the stimulated mechanoreceptors. When examining the grip force, we found that participants applied higher grip forces during the interactions with positive skin-stretch in comparison to the negative skin-stretch, which is consistent with the perceptual results. These results may be useful in tactile technologies for wearable haptic devices, teleoperation, and robot-assisted surgery.

The Effect of Kinesthetic and Artificial Tactile Noise and Variability on Stiffness Perception.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgeries (RAMIS) have many benefits. A disadvantage, however, is the lack of haptic feedback. Haptic feedback is comprised of kinesthetic and tactile information, and we use both to form stiffness perception. Applying both kinesthetic and tactile feedback can enable more precise feedback than kinesthetic feedback alone. However, during remote surgeries, haptic noises and variations can be present. Therefore, toward designing haptic feedback for RAMIS, it is important to understand the effect of haptic manipulations on stiffness perception. We assessed the effect of two manipulations using stiffness discrimination tasks in which participants received force feedback and artificial skin stretch. In Experiment 1, we added sinusoidal noise to the artificial tactile signal, and found that the noise did not affect participants' stiffness perception or uncertainty. In Experiment 2, we varied either the kinesthetic or the artificial tactile information between consecutive interactions with an object. We found that the both forms of variability did not affect stiffness perception, but kinesthetic variability increased participants' uncertainty. We show that haptic feedback, comprised of force feedback and artificial skin stretch, provides robust haptic information even in the presence of noise and variability, and hence can potentially be both beneficial and viable in RAMIS.

Visual Feedback Weakens the Augmentation of Perceived Stiffness by Artificial Skin Stretch.

Tactile stimulation devices are gaining popularity in haptic science and technology-they are lightweight, low-cost, can be wearable, and do not suffer from instability during closed loop interactions with users. Applying tactile stimulation, by means of stretching the fingerpad skin concurrently with kinesthetic force feedback, has been shown to augment the perceived stiffness during interactions with elastic objects. However, to date, the perceptual augmentation due to artificial skin-stretch was studied in the absence of visual feedback. In this article, we tested whether this perceptual augmentation is robust when the stretch is applied in combination with visual displacement feedback. We used a forced-choice stiffness discrimination task with four conditions: force feedback, force feedback with skin-stretch, force and visual feedback, and force and visual feedback with skin-stretch. We found that the visual feedback weakens, but does not eliminate, the skin-stretch induced perceptual effect. Additionally, no effect of visual feedback on the discrimination precision was found.

The Effect of Variability in Stiffness on Perception and Grip Force Adjustment.

Haptic information can be used to create our perception of the stiffness of objects and to regulate grip force. Introducing noise into sensory inputs can create uncertainty, yet a method of creating haptic uncertainty without distorting the haptic information has yet to be discovered. Toward this end, in this article, we investigated the effect of varying haptic information between consecutive interactions with an elastic force field on stiffness perception and grip force control. In a stiffness discrimination task, participants interacted with force fields multiple times. Low, medium, and high variability levels were created by drawing the stiffness level applied in each consecutive interaction within a trial from normal distributions. Perceptual haptic uncertainty was created only by the medium variability level. Moreover, all the variability levels affected the grip force control: the modulation of the grip force with the load force decreased with repeated interactions with the force field, whereas no change in the baseline grip force was observed. Additionally, we ascertained that participants formed their perceived stiffness by calculating a weighted average of the different stiffness levels applied by a given force field. We conclude that the medium variability level can be effective in inducing uncertainty in both perception and action.

Stretching the skin immediately enhances perceived stiffness and gradually enhances the predictive control of grip force.

When manipulating objects, we use kinesthetic and tactile information to form an internal representation of their mechanical properties for cognitive perception and for preventing their slippage using predictive control of grip force. A major challenge in understanding the dissociable contributions of tactile and kinesthetic information to perception and action is the natural coupling between them. Unlike previous studies that addressed this question either by focusing on impaired sensory processing in patients or using local anesthesia, we used a behavioral study with a programmable mechatronic device that stretches the skin of the fingertips to address this issue in the intact sensorimotor system. We found that artificial skin-stretch increases the predictive grip force modulation in anticipation of the load force. Moreover, the stretch causes an immediate illusion of touching a harder object that does not depend on the gradual development of the predictive modulation of grip force.