Crimping-induced structural gradients explain the lasting strength of poly l-lactide bioresorbable vascular scaffolds during hydrolysis.

Biodegradable polymers open the way to treatment of heart disease using transient implants (bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, BVSs) that overcome the most serious complication associated with permanent metal stents-late stent thrombosis. Here, we address the long-standing paradox that the clinically approved BVS maintains its radial strength even after 9 mo of hydrolysis, which induces a ∼40% decrease in the poly l-lactide molecular weight (Mn). X-ray microdiffraction evidence of nonuniform hydrolysis in the scaffold reveals that regions subjected to tensile stress during crimping develop a microstructure that provides strength and resists hydrolysis. These beneficial morphological changes occur where they are needed most-where stress is localized when a radial load is placed on the scaffold. We hypothesize that the observed decrease in Mn reflects the majority of the material, which is undeformed during crimping. Thus, the global measures of degradation may be decoupled from the localized, degradation-resistant regions that confer the ability to support the artery for the first several months after implantation.

Paving the way to a bioresorbable technology: Development of the absorb BRS program.

Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) combine attributes of the preceding generations of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) devices with new technologies to result in a novel therapy promoted as being the fourth generation of PCI. By providing mechanical support and drug elution to suppress restenosis, BRS initially function similarly to drug eluting stents. Thereafter, through their degradation, BRS undergo a decline in radial strength, allowing a gradual transition of mechanical function from the scaffold back to the artery in order to provide long term effectiveness similar to balloon angioplasty. The principles of operation of BRS, whether of polymeric or metallic composition, follow three phases of functionality reflective of differing physiological requirements over time: revascularization, restoration, and resorption. In this review, these three fundamental performance phases and the metrics for the nonclinical evaluation of BRS, including both bench and preclinical testing, are discussed. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Multiplicity of morphologies in poly (l-lactide) bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.

Poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) is the structural material of the first clinically approved bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS), a promising alternative to permanent metal stents for treatment of coronary heart disease. BVSs are transient implants that support the occluded artery for 6 mo and are completely resorbed in 2 y. Clinical trials of BVSs report restoration of arterial vasomotion and elimination of serious complications such as late stent thrombosis. It is remarkable that a scaffold made from PLLA, known as a brittle polymer, does not fracture when crimped onto a balloon catheter or during deployment in the artery. We used X-ray microdiffraction to discover how PLLA acquired ductile character and found that the crimping process creates localized regions of extreme anisotropy; PLLA chains in the scaffold change orientation from the hoop direction to the radial direction on micrometer-scale distances. This multiplicity of morphologies in the crimped scaffold works in tandem to enable a low-stress response during deployment, which avoids fracture of the PLLA hoops and leaves them with the strength needed to support the artery. Thus, the transformations of the semicrystalline PLLA microstructure during crimping explain the unexpected strength and ductility of the current BVS and point the way to thinner resorbable scaffolds in the future.

Design Principles of Bioresorbable Polymeric Scaffolds.

The concept for a bioresorbable vascular scaffold combines the best features of the first 3 generations of percutaneous coronary intervention (namely), balloon angioplasty, bare metallic stents, and drug-eluting stents, into a single device. The principles of operation of a BRS follow 3 phases of functionality that reflect the different physiologic requirements over time; revascularization, restoration, and resorption. Most BRS designs make use of the continuum of hydrolytic degradation in aliphatic polyesters, such as poly(l-lactide), in which molecular weight, strength, and mass decrease progressively in 3 distinct stages, consistent with the in vivo requirements of each performance phase.

In vivo characterisation of bioresorbable vascular scaffold strut interfaces using optical coherence tomography with Gaussian line spread function analysis.

AIMS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) produces a highly reflective signal outlining struts. This signal interferes with the measurement of strut thickness, as the boundaries cannot be accurately identified, and with the assessment of coverage, because the neointimal backscattering convolutes that of the polymer, frequently making them indistinguishable from one another. We hypothesise that Gaussian line spread functions (LSFs) can facilitate identification of strut boundaries, improving the accuracy of strut thickness measurements and coverage assessment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-eight randomly selected BVS struts from 12 patients in the ABSORB Cohort B clinical study and four Yucatan minipigs were analysed at baseline and follow-up (six months in humans, 28 days in pigs). Signal intensities from the raw OCT backscattering were fit to Gaussian LSFs for each interface, from which peak intensity and full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) were calculated. Neointimal coverage resulted in significantly different LSFs and higher FWHM values relative to uncovered struts at baseline (p<0.0001). Abluminal polymer-tissue interfaces were also significantly different between baseline and follow-up (p=0.0004 in humans, p<0.0001 in pigs). Using the location of the half-max of the LSF as the polymer-tissue boundary, the average strut thickness was 158±11 µm at baseline and 152±20 µm at six months (p=0.886), not significantly different from nominal strut thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Fitting the raw OCT backscattering signal to a Gaussian LSF facilitates identification of the interfaces between BVS polymer and lumen or tissue. Such analysis enables more precise measurement of the strut thickness and an objective assessment of coverage.

Spatial distribution and temporal evolution of scattering centers by optical coherence tomography in the poly(L-lactide) backbone of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold.

BACKGROUND: Scattering centers (SC) are often observed with optical coherence tomography (OCT) in some struts of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS). These SC might be caused by crazes in the polymer during crimp-deployment (more frequent at inflection points) or by other processes, such as physiological loading or hydrolysis (eventually increasing with time). The spatial distribution and temporal evolution of SC in BVS might help to understand their meaning. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three patients were randomly selected from 12 imaged with Fourier-domain OCT at both baseline and 6 months in the ABSORB cohort B study (NCT00856856). Frame-by-frame analysis of the SC distribution was performed using spread-out vessel charts, and the results from baseline and 6 months were compared. A total of 4,328 struts were analyzed. At baseline and follow-up all SC appeared at inflection points. No significant difference was observed between baseline and 6 months in the number of SC struts (14.9 vs. 14.5%, P=0.754) or in the distribution of SC. The proportion and distribution of SC did not vary substantially among the patients analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: The SC observed in OCT imaging of the BVS are located exclusively at inflection points and do not increase with time. These findings strongly suggest that SC are caused by crazes in the polymer during crimp-deployment, ruling out any major role of hydrolysis or other time-dependent processes.