Antithrombotic potential of GW813893: a novel, orally active, active-site directed factor Xa inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: Factor Xa (FXa) has been a target of considerable interest for drug development efforts aimed at suppressing thrombosis. In this report, a new orally active, small molecule, active-site directed FXa inhibitor, GW813893, has been profiled in a succession of in vitro and in vivo assays involved in its preclinical characterization as a potential antithrombotic therapeutic. METHODS: In vitro profiling of GW813893 consisted of assessing its inhibitory potential against FXa and a broad panel of related and unrelated enzymes and receptors. Additionally, the FXa inhibition potential of GW813893 was assessed in prothrombinase and plasma-based clotting assays. In vivo characterization of GW813893 consisted of thrombosis studies in a rat inferior vena cava model, a rat carotid artery thrombosis model, and a rabbit jugular thrombosis model. Bleeding studies were conducted in a rat tail transection model. Ex vivo determinations of compound effects on FX and clotting activity were also undertaken. RESULTS: GW813893 was more than 90-fold selective over all enzymes tested, and it inhibited FXa and prothrombinase activity with a Ki of 4.0 nM and 9.7 nM, respectively. In vivo, GW813893 concentration-dependently suppressed thrombotic activity in all models tested. The antithrombotic activity correlated with the suppression of plasma-based clotting activity and the inhibition of plasma FX activity (P < 0.02). Over the antithrombotic dose-range, an increased bleeding diathesis was not observed. CONCLUSION: These experiments demonstrate that GW813893 is a potent, selective, orally active inhibitor of FXa. The data suggest that GW813893 has robust antithrombotic potential at doses that have no detectable hemostasis liability. Collectively, the profile suggests that GW813893 has the preclinical pharmacology underpinnings of an oral antithrombotic therapeutic.

Inhibition of factor IX(a) is protective in a rat model of thromboembolic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although used clinically to prevent stroke, there are few examples of anticoagulant investigations in the treatment of acute thromboembolic stroke in animal models. The treatment of thromboembolic stroke in experimental models has been investigated almost exclusively around the use of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). In this study, using a rat thromboembolic stroke model, we investigated the use of an inhibitory anti-factor IX(a) monoclonal antibody (SB 249417) for the treatment of thromboembolic stroke and compared its efficacy to that of tPA. METHODS: Stroke was initiated by delivering 6 clots into the internal carotid artery. After 2, 4, or 6 hours, rats received either intravenous vehicle, 10.0 mg/kg tPA, or 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 mg/kg SB 249417. At 24 hours after stroke, infarct volumes and neurological deficits were assessed. RESULTS: Treatment with tPA 2, 4, or 6 hours after stroke reduced infarct volumes by 35% (P=NS), 45%, and 39%, respectively. tPA treatment did not improve neurological deficits at any time point. Treatment with SB 249417 (3.0 mg/kg) 2, 4, or 6 hours after stroke reduced infarct volumes by 44%, 50%, and 13% (P=NS), respectively. Neurological deficits were reduced by 49%, 42%, and 13% (P=NS), respectively. Neither mortality nor hemorrhage was affected by either treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that the inhibition of factor IX(a) within 4 hours of thromboembolic stroke produced a more favorable outcome than tPA. When treatment was initiated 6 hours after stroke, the benefits of factor IX(a) inhibition were lost, whereas tPA continued to suppress lesion development, albeit without a corresponding improvement in functional deficits. This study suggests that cerebral ischemia and the resultant perfusion deficit are exacerbated by the activation of blood coagulation and that anticoagulants like SB 249417 may find utility in the treatment of ischemic stroke.

The antithrombotic efficacy of lotrafiban (SB 214857) in canine models of acute coronary thrombosis.

In patients with acute coronary syndromes, inhibition of platelet aggregation with parenteral alpha(IIb)/beta(III) antagonists has proven effective at preventing nonfatal myocardial infarction and repeat percutaneous coronary interventions. Paradoxically, the efficacy observed for acute indications and parenteral agents has not extended to oral agents and chronic prevention of secondary thrombotic events, despite robust antithrombotic properties in preclinical thrombosis models. This report documents the preclinical data of Lotrafiban, an oral alpha(IIb)/beta(III) antagonist that recently failed in a phase III clinical trial (BRAVO) for the prevention of secondary thrombosis. Lotrafiban was characterized in a dog circumflex artery electrical injury model, and a cyclic flow reduction model ("Folts"). The data demonstrate that both oral (1.0-50.0 mg/kg) and intravenous (0.1-0.8ug/kg/min) administration of lotrafiban produced dose-related inhibition (45%-95%) of ex vivo platelet aggregation. In the electrical injury model, the dose-related inhibition correlated with a significant reduction in the frequency of coronary occlusion, size of the developing thrombus, and the extent of left ventricular ischemic damage. Effects on blood flow and bleeding time were also dose related. The combination of low dose lotrafiban (0.1ug/kg/min) and aspirin (5.0 mg/kg) generated additive antithrombotic effects, approximating the antithrombotic efficacy of a 2-4 fold higher dose of lotrafiban while only modestly prolonging the bleeding time. For purposes of comparison, the ADP receptor antagonist clopidogrel was also assessed in the electrical injury model. Clopidogrel (5.0-10.0 mg/kg, iv.) significantly reduced the resulting left ventricular infarct areas, but lacked the overall efficacy of lotrafiban. In the "Folts" model, lotrafiban inhibited cyclic blood flow reductions (CFR's) by 100% in animals insensitive to the antithrombotic effects of aspirin. Overall, the preclinical data demonstrated that alpha(IIb)/beta(III) antagonism with lotrafiban was a well tolerated and effective strategy for attenuating acute arterial thrombosis. The lack of a correlation between these preclinical data and the outcome of the clinical trial BRAVO are unexplained. However, the combined evidence suggests that these acute canine thrombosis studies may not completely capture the pathology reflected in chronic human atherothrombotic disease.