RESUMO
Background and Aims: Preoxygenation is supplementation of 100% oxygen prior to induction of general anaesthesia to increase the body's oxygen stores. Efficacy of preoxygenation can be increased by optimising fresh gas flow (FGF) rate and pattern of breathing. Methods: Based on pattern of breathing-Tidal Volume Breathing (TVB) or Deep Breathing (DB) and FGF-10 L/min or 15 L/min-100 subjects of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I/II posted for elective surgery were recruited and randomised into four groups: T10 - TVB with 10 L/min; D10 - DB with 10 L/min; T15 - TVB with 15 L/min; and D15 - DB with 15 L/min. A tight-fitting anaesthesia mask along with continuous positive airway pressure of 5 cm of H2O with 20° head-up was used for preoxygenation. The total time taken and the total number of breaths required to achieve end tidal oxygen concentration (EtO2) of 90% were noted. Exhaled tidal volume (Vte), end tidal carbon dioxide, fraction of inspired oxygen, and EtO2 were recorded at each breath. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for inferential statistics and Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test was used to calculate mean difference in total time and number of breaths amongst the groups. Results: Total time taken was significantly low (P < 0.001) in DB compared to TVB (D10: 70.2 ± 19.91, D15: 68.4 ± 20.27 vs T10: 112.28 ± 47.96, T15: 113.6 ± 48.57 seconds). Number of breaths was significantly high (P < 0.001) in TVB with 22.84 ± 8.73, 23.76 ± 11.64, 10.56 ± 3.69, and 8.32 ± 1.8 in T10, T15, D10 and D15, respectively. Vte was significantly low in TVB (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Rapid preoxygenation can be achieved by DB at high FGF of a minimum of 10 L/min.
RESUMO
Background and Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant infections among healthcare workers and deaths warranting the need for personal protective equipment. This study aimed to estimate the proportion of anaesthesiologists adhering to safety precautions and to evaluate their adherence patterns, difficulties faced and coping mechanisms in the operation theatre during the pandemic. Methods: This was a multicentric mixed methods study conducted among anaesthesiologists from two tertiary care hospitals. A paper-based questionnaire was given to all participants. The first part consisted of 21 questions regarding safety measures and extent of adherence. The second part was a response sheet regarding the various difficulties faced and coping mechanisms adopted. Following this, an in-depth interview was conducted to understand the same. The proportion of anaesthesiologists in different categories of adherence, patterns of adherence, difficulties faced, and coping mechanisms were computed and compared. Thematic framework analysis was done for in-depth interview. Results: Sixty participants were included. The adherence levels for N95 masks and face shields were higher. Most participants practised frequent handwashing and took showers after work. Fogging, difficulty in communication, marks on the face were the commonly faced difficulties. Self reassurance, adjusting the fit of masks/face shields, or taking breaks were the coping mechanisms mostly followed. Themes generated from in-depth interview include waning of caution, adaptation through innovative methods and stress due to uncertainty. Conclusion: The N95 mask was the most preferred safety precaution. Ease of use and safety were important considerations for adherence. Physical and mental acclimatisation and improved knowledge of disease played a vital role.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lumbar spine surgery demands intense analgesia. Preemptive multimodal analgesia (MMA) is a novel approach to attenuate the stress response to surgical stimulus. AIMS: The aim of the study was to assess the intraoperative morphine consumption in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, prospective, double-blind study involving 42 patients belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I and II scheduled to undergo elective lumbar spine surgery were allocated into two groups of 21 each. Group A (study group) received injection diclofenac sodium, paracetamol, clonidine, and skin infiltration with bupivacaine adrenaline and Group B (control group) received paracetamol and skin infiltration with saline adrenaline. Preemptive analgesia was practiced in both the groups. Intraoperative morphine consumption was documented. STATISTICAL METHODS: Intraoperative morphine consumption between the two groups was compared using Mann-Whitney U-test. Postextubation sedation score between the two groups was compared using Chi-square test and presented as number and percentage. P < 5% was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Intraoperative morphine consumption was significantly low in the study group (P < 0.001). Postextubation sedation score was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Preemptive MMA has demonstrated significant morphine sparing effect intraoperatively in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries.
