The association of osteoporosis and geriatric syndromes in the elderly: data from the Russian epidemiological study EVKALIPT.

Osteoporosis is associated with almost all geriatric syndromes (GSs), and the occurrence of osteoporosis in patients over 65 years of age increases by 1.2-2.5 times. Early diagnosis of osteoporosis and GSs is very important. Additional programs should be adopted by the state to introduce information about the possibilities of working with elderly patients. PURPOSE: To analyze associations of osteoporosis with geriatric syndromes in patients aged 65 years and older in the Russian Federation. METHODS: A total of 4308 patients (30% men) aged 65-107 years were examined and distributed into 3 age groups (65-74 years, 75-84 years, and 85 years and older). All patients underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment. In the "Falls and risk of falls" module, the number and circumstances of falls over the previous year were analyzed, as well as the history of fractures. The presence of osteoporosis was determined based on medical records. Physical examination included anthropometric measurements and standard enquiry, short physical performance battery (SPPB), dynamometry, measurement of gait velocity, Mini-Cog test, and orthostatic test. RESULTS: A total of 507 patients (11.8%) had evidence of osteoporosis; indications of low-energy fractures in history were recorded in 739 (17.3%) patients. Patients with osteoporosis were older, shorter, and predominantly women; had a lower body weight and a higher Charlson comorbidity index; and took more drugs. Patients with osteoporosis had lower gait velocity, hand grip strength, Barthel index value, and scores of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale, the MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment) short-form, and the SPPB. Osteoporosis is associated with almost all geriatric syndromes (GSs), and the occurrence of osteoporosis in patients over 65 years of age increases by 1.2-2.5 times. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis is associated with almost all GSs. The association of osteoporosis with advanced GSs aggravates the condition of these patients. Early diagnosis of osteoporosis and GSs is very important. Additional programs should be adopted by the state to introduce information about the possibilities of working with elderly patients: early detection and correction of osteoporosis.

Gut Microbiota in Patients with Different Metabolic Statuses: Moscow Study.

The aim of this paper was to study gut microbiota composition in patients with different metabolic statuses. METHODS: 92 participants aged 25⁻76 years (26 of whom were men), with confirmed absence of cardiovascular and other chronic diseases (but with the possible presence of cardiovascular risk factors) were included. Carotid ultrasound examinations, 16S rRNA sequencing of stool samples and diet assessments were performed. Statistical analysis was performed using R programming language, 3.1.0. RESULTS: Enterotyping yielded two clusters differentiated by alpha-diversity. Intima-media thickness was higher in the cluster with lower diversity (adj. p < 0.001). Obesity was associated with higher Serratia (adj. p = 0.003) and Prevotella (adj. p < 0.0003) in relative abundance. Abdominal obesity was associated with higher abundance of Serratia (adj. p = 0.004) and Prevotella (adj. p = 0.0008) and lower levels of Oscillospira (adj. p = 0.0005). Glucose metabolism disturbances were associated with higher Blautia (adj. p = 0.0007) and Serratia (adj. p = 0.003) prevalence. Arterial hypertension was associated with high Blautia levels (adj. p = 0.002). The Blautia genus strongly correlated with low resistant starch consumption (adj. p = 0.007). A combination of high-fat diet and elevated Blautia levels was very common for diabetes mellitus type 2 patients (adj. p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results show that there is a relationship between metabolic changes and higher representation of opportunistic pathogens and low diversity of gut microbiota even in apparently healthy participants.

Twenty-Four-Hour Ambulatory Pulse Wave Analysis in Hypertension Management: Current Evidence and Perspectives.

The predictive value of vascular biomarkers such as pulse wave velocity (PWV), central arterial pressure (CAP), and augmentation index (AIx), obtained through pulse wave analysis (PWA) in resting conditions, has been documented in a variety of patient groups and populations. This allowed to make appropriate recommendations in clinical practice guidelines of several scientific societies. Due to advances in technologies, largely operator-independent methods are currently available for estimating vascular biomarkers also in ambulatory conditions, over the 24 h. According to the acceptable accuracy and reproducibility of 24-h ambulatory PWA, it appears to be a promising tool for evaluating vascular biomarkers in daily life conditions. This approach may provide an opportunity to further improve the early cardiovascular screening in subjects at risk. However, concerning the clinical use of PWA over the 24 h in ambulatory conditions at the moment, there is no sufficient evidence to support its routine clinical use. In particular, long-term outcome studies are needed to show the predictive value of 24-h PWV, CAP, and AIx values, provided by these devices, over and beyond peripheral blood pressure, and to answer the many technical and clinical questions still open. To this regard, the VASOTENS Registry, an international observational prospective study recently started, will help providing answers on a large sample of hypertensive patients recruited worldwide.

Vascular Health Assessment of The Hypertensive Patients (VASOTENS) Registry: Study Protocol of an International, Web-Based Telemonitoring Registry for Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension guidelines recommend ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), central aortic pressure (CAP), and pulse wave velocity (PWV) as parameters for estimating blood pressure (BP) control and vascular impairment. Recent advances in technology have enabled devices to combine non-invasive estimation of these parameters over the 24-hour ABP monitoring. However, currently there is limited evidence on the usefulness of such an approach for routine hypertension management. OBJECTIVE: We recently launched an investigator-initiated, international, multicenter, observational, prospective study, the Vascular health Assessment Of The Hypertensive patients (VASOTENS) Registry, aimed at (1) evaluating non-invasive 24-hour ABP and arterial stiffness estimates (through 24-hour pulse wave analysis, PWA) in hypertensive subjects undergoing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for clinical reasons; (2) assessing the changes in estimates following treatment; (3) weighing the impact of 24-hour PWA on target organ damage and cardiovascular prognosis; (4) assessing the relationship between arterial stiffness, BP absolute mean level and variability, and prognosis; and (5) validating the use of a 24-hour PWA electronic health (e-health) solution for hypertension screening. METHODS: Approximately 2000 subjects, referred to 20 hypertension clinics for routine diagnostic evaluation and follow-up of hypertension of any severity or stage, will be recruited. Data collection will include ABPM, performed with a device allowing simultaneous non-invasive assessment of 24-hour CAP and arterial stiffness (BPLab), and clinical data (including cardiovascular outcomes). As recommended by current guidelines, each patient will be followed-up with visits occurring at regular intervals (ideally every 6 months, and not less than once a year depending on disease severity). A Web-based telemedicine platform (THOLOMEUS) will be used for data collection. The use of the telemedicine system will allow standardized and centralized data collection, data validation by experts and counseling to remote centers, setup and maintenance of the Registry, and prompt data analysis. RESULTS: First follow-up results are expected to be available in the next 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the VASOTENS Registry will help define the normalcy thresholds for current and future indices derived from 24-hour PWA, according to outcome data, and will also provide supporting evidence for the inclusion of this type of evaluation in hypertension management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02577835; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02577835 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.Webcitation.org/6hzZBKY2Q).

Validation of the integration of technology that measures additional "vascular" indices into an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring system.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to validate the novel integration of oscillometric (Vasotens(®)) technology into a BPLab(®) ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring system to measure central BP, the aortic augmentation index, and pulse wave velocity (PWV) compared with the recommended and widely accepted tonometric method. METHODS: The ARTERY Society guidelines for comparison of PWV measurement techniques were used as the basis for recruitment of 99 individuals (mean age 44±19 years, 52 males). The standard for comparison was the conventional "classic" SphygmoCor device. RESULTS: Accordance of the two methods was satisfactory (r=0.98, mean difference of 2.9±3.5 mmHg for central systolic BP; r=0.98, mean difference of -1.1±2.3 mmHg for central diastolic BP; r=0.83, mean difference of -2.6%±13% for aortic augmentation index; r=0.85, mean difference of 0.69±1.4 for PWV). CONCLUSION: The performance of Vasotens algorithms using an oscillometric ambulatory BP monitoring system is feasible for accurate diagnosis, risk assessment, and evaluation of the effects of antihypertensive drugs.

Efficacy and Acceptability of Indapamide Sustained Release in Elderly High-Risk Hypertensive Patients : the ARGUS Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and acceptability of indapamide sustained-release (SR) monotherapy in elderly high-risk patients with moderate to severe hypertension. METHODS: 1277 hypertensive patients older than 55 years with moderate to severe hypertension, including 91% with systolic blood pressure (SBP) >160 mmHg and at least one cardiovascular risk factor (age >65 years, male, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease [CHD], cerebrovascular disease, dyslipidaemia, obesity, smoking) were enrolled in this observational study. They received indapamide SR 1.5 mg, one tablet daily, for 3 months. Blood pressure (BP) was assessed monthly by sphygmomanometer. Statistical analyses were performed using the χ(2) test, analysis of variance, and the Newman-Keuls test. RESULTS: After 3 months of treatment with indapamide SR, SBP had decreased by 34 ± 3 mmHg and diastolic BP (DBP) by 12 ± 6 mmHg (both p < 0.001). Ninety-two percent of patients responded to therapy (SBP/DBP reduction >20/10 mmHg) and 52% were normalized (SBP <140 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHg). BP targets were reached in 48% of patients older than 65 years, 31% of diabetic patients, and 33% of patients with CHD. There were no changes in serum creatinine, glucose or lipid parameters, and 3% of patients had hypokalaemia (<3.5 mmol/L). The patients self-assessment scores regarding general state of health improved and 34% of patients reported 'excellent' health after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the high-risk patients of the ARGUS study, monotherapy with indapamide SR showed antihypertensive efficacy with good acceptability and no changes in metabolic parameters over a 3-month period. Indapamide SR monotherapy normalized BP in half of the patients treated and proved an appropriate first-line treatment in hypertensive patients older than 55 years with added cardiovascular risk factors.

Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.

OBJECTIVE: To perform validation for an arm-type oscillometric TM-2655 device (A&D Company Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) for blood pressure measurement according to the British Hypertension Society protocol. METHODS: Eighty-five study participants (33 men and 52 women) were included in the study. Mean age was 52.9+/-15.0 years, systolic blood pressure range was 84-208 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure range was 48-120 mmHg. For each participant, three readings of TM-2655 were compared with sequential auscultatory measurements by two trained independent observers. The observers used a calibrated mercury sphygmomanometer and dual stethoscope. The results were graded according to the British Hypertension Society protocol 1993. RESULTS: The average difference between mercury sphygmomanometer and TM-2655 readings for systolic blood pressure was -1.0+5.2 mmHg (mean+/-SD) and for diastolic blood pressure -0.9+/-4.7 mmHg. The proportions of values agreeing to within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg were 72.5, 93.7 and 99.6% for systolic blood pressure and 78.8, 96.9 and 100% for diastolic blood pressure between the observers and the device (A/A British Hypertension Society grade). CONCLUSIONS: The TM-2655 device achieved British Hypertension Society grade A/A and therefore can be recommended for blood pressure measurement in an adult population.

Validation of the TM-2564G device for in-hospital blood pressure measurement.

OBJECTIVE: To perform clinical validation of the TM-2564G device for in-hospital blood pressure measurement according to the British Hypertension Society protocol. METHODS: The tests were carried out on 85 patients aged 19-82 years (41 male patients, mean age 50+/-19 years) with systolic blood pressure 75-219 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure 43-117 mmHg (mean 142+/-33/85+/-20 mmHg). For each patient, three readings of the TM-2564G device were compared with simultaneous auscultatory measurements by two trained independent observers. The observers used a mercury-calibrated sphygmomanometer and dual stethoscope. The results were graded according to the British Hypertension Society protocol 1993. RESULTS: The average difference was -1.85 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -1.20 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The standard deviation of the difference between TM-2564G and the observers' results was 4.85 and 4.16 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressures, respectively. Systolic blood pressure percentage of readings agreeing to within 5 mmHg was 75.7%, 10 mmHg 95.36% and 15 mmHg 99.6%, and for DBP 82.7, 97.6 and 99.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The TM-2564G device achieved A/A British Hypertension Society grade and can be recommended for in-hospital measurement of blood pressure.

Validation of semi-automatic device UA-704 for self-measurement of blood pressure.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a clinical validation for a semi-automatic arm-type device UA-704 (A&D Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) according to the British Hypertension Society protocol. METHODS: Eighty-five study participants (37 men) were included. The mean age was 50.1+/-17.0 years, systolic blood pressure range was 79-212 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure range was 43-118 mmHg. For each participant, three readings of the UA-704 were compared with simultaneous auscultatory measurements by two trained independent observers. The observers used a mercury calibrated sphygmomanometer and a dual stethoscope. The results were graded according to the 1993 British Hypertension Society protocol. RESULTS: The average difference between mercury sphygmomanometer and UA-704 readings was -1.85+/-4.26 mmHg (mean+/-SD) for systolic blood pressure and -1.44+/-3.97 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The proportions of values agreeing to within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg were 79.2%, 96.5% and 99.6% for systolic blood pressure and 86.7%, 96.9% and 99.6% for diastolic blood pressure for the observers and device (A/A grade for British Hypertension Society). CONCLUSIONS: For an adult population, the UA-704 device for self-measurement of blood pressure achieved a British Hypertension Society grade A/A and therefore can be recommended for home blood pressure monitoring.