Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
G Chir ; 41(1): 126-130, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32038024

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Perioperative blood management represents a major issue in knee arthroplasty. The aim of the present observational study is to compare two different methods of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) administration (periarticular and intraarticular) in primary knee arthroplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present is an observational comparative study. A total of 66 consecutive patients receiving topical injection of TXA after unilateral primary knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1; periarticular injection of TXA and group 2; intraarticular injection. RESULTS: Transfusion rate in group 1 was found to be 15%, compared to 44% in group 2 (p-value= 0.015). In transfused patients the mean received blood units were 1.2 (SD=0.44) in group 1, compared to 1.06 (SD=0.24; p-value=0.34) in group 2. The mean hospital stay of group 1 patients was 7.94 days (SD=2.79), compared to 9.58 days (SD=3.26; p-value=0.03) in group 2. DISCUSSION: The main findings of the study are that statically significant higher transfusion rates, as well as longer in-hospital stay were found in the intraarticular group, when compared to the periarticular group. According to these two parameters the present study has shown that the topical periarticular TXA injection is superior to the intraarticular one. Further research is of utmost importance in order to conclude to the optimum combination of knee arthroplasty perioperative blood management.


Assuntos
Antifibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Artroplastia do Joelho , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Ácido Tranexâmico/administração & dosagem , Administração Tópica , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares/métodos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo
2.
G Chir ; 40(1): 49-53, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30771799

RESUMO

Chronic osteomyelitis represents a challenging to treat clinical entity. A case of a whole femur chronic osteomyelitis, definitely treated with total femur resection and a positioning of a modular megaprosthesis in 2 stages is presented. An 81-year-old female, with hip hemiarthroplasty and internal fixation plate of the distal femur presented with signs and symptoms of femur osteomyelitis. Based on the clinical, radiologic and laboratory findings, the diagnosis of chronic femur osteomyelitis was established. Multiple bone cultures from different femur sites revealed the same methicillin resistant S. aureus. The patient was subjected to a two stage femur reconstruction operation. At the first stage, radical debridement, total femur resection and the application of a custom made vancomycin loaded spacer was performed. After a total of 6 weeks i.v. and 3 months oral proper causative antimicrobial treatment a modular megaprosthesis was applied. The patient was definitely treated from total femur chronic osteomyelitis and has returned to her daily activities. Chronic osteomyelitis demands a multidisciplinary approach, including the right causative long-term antimicrobial treatment, as well as the proper surgical treatment, aiming for eradication of infection and best possible postoperative limb function.


Assuntos
Fêmur/cirurgia , Osteomielite/cirurgia , Próteses e Implantes , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica , Desbridamento , Feminino , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Osteomielite/diagnóstico , Osteomielite/microbiologia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA