Amphetamine increases motivation of humans and mice as measured by breakpoint, but does not affect an Electroencephalographic biomarker.

Translation of drug targets from preclinical studies to clinical trials has been aided by cross-species behavioral tasks, but evidence for brain-based engagement during task performance is still required. Cross-species progressive ratio breakpoint tasks (PRBTs) measure motivation-related behavior and are pharmacologically and clinically sensitive. We recently advanced elevated parietal alpha power as a cross-species electroencephalographic (EEG) biomarker of PRBT engagement. Given that amphetamine increases breakpoint in mice, we tested its effects on breakpoint and parietal alpha power in both humans and mice. Twenty-three healthy participants performed the PRBT with EEG after amphetamine or placebo in a double-blind design. C57BL/6J mice were trained on PRBT with EEG (n = 24) and were treated with amphetamine or vehicle. A second cohort of mice was trained on PRBT without EEG (n = 40) and was treated with amphetamine or vehicle. In humans, amphetamine increased breakpoint. In mice, during concomitant EEG, 1 mg/kg of amphetamine significantly decreased breakpoint. In cohort 2, however, 0.3 mg/kg of amphetamine increased breakpoint consistent with human findings. Increased alpha power was observed in both species as they reached breakpoint, replicating previous findings. Amphetamine did not affect alpha power in either species. Amphetamine increased effort in humans and mice. Consistent with previous reports, elevated parietal alpha power was observed in humans and mice as they performed the PRBT. Amphetamine did not affect this EEG biomarker of effort. Hence, these findings support the pharmacological predictive validity of the PRBT to measure effort in humans and mice and suggest that this EEG biomarker is not directly reflective of amphetamine-induced changes in effort.

Auditory discrimination and frequency modulation learning in schizophrenia patients: amphetamine within-subject dose response and time course.

BACKGROUND: Auditory frequency modulation learning ('auditory learning') is a key component of targeted cognitive training (TCT) for schizophrenia. TCT can be effective in enhancing neurocognition and function in schizophrenia, but such gains require significant time and effort and elude many patients. METHODS: As a strategy to increase and/or accelerate TCT-induced clinical gains, we tested the dose- and time-course effects of the pro-attentional drug, amphetamine (AMPH; placebo, 2.5, 5 or 10 mg po; within-subject double-blind, order balanced) on auditory learning in schizophrenia patients [n = 32; M:F = 19:13; age 42.0 years (24-55)]. To understand predictors and/or mechanisms of AMPH-enhanced TCT, we also measured auditory fidelity (words-in-noise (WIN), quick speech-in-noise (QuickSIN)) and neurocognition (MATRICS comprehensive cognitive battery (MCCB)). Some measures were also acquired from age-matched healthy subjects (drug free; n = 10; M:F = 5:5). RESULTS: Patients exhibited expected deficits in neurocognition. WIN and QuickSIN performance at low signal intensities was impaired in patients with low v. high MCCB attention/vigilance (A/V) scores; these deficits were corrected by AMPH, maximally at 2.5-5 mg (d's = 0.79-1.29). AMPH also enhanced auditory learning, with maximal effects at 5 mg (d = 0.93), and comparable effects 60 and 210 min post pill. 'Pro-learning' effects of AMPH and AMPH-induced gains in auditory fidelity were most evident in patients with low MCCB A/V scores. CONCLUSIONS: These findings advance our understanding of the impact of pro-attentional interventions on auditory information processing and suggest dose- and time-course parameters for studies that assess the ability of AMPH to enhance the clinical benefits of TCT in schizophrenia patients.

Preliminary Evidence that Memantine Enhances Prepulse Effects on Startle Magnitude and Latency in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.

BACKGROUND: The uncompetitive NMDA antagonist, memantine (MEM), enhances prepulse inhibition of startle (PPI) across species. MEM is used to treat Alzheimer's disease (AD); conceivably, its acute impact on PPI might be used to predict a patient's sensitivity to MEM's therapeutic effects. OBJECTIVE: To begin to test this possibility, we studied MEM effects on PPI and related measures in AD patients. METHODS: 18 carefully screened individuals with AD (mean age = 72.8 y; M:F=9 : 9) completed double-blind order-balanced testing with MEM (placebo versus 20 mg), assessing acoustic startle magnitude, habituation, PPI, and latency. RESULTS: Fifteen out of 18 participants exhibited reliable startle responses. MEM did not significantly impact startle magnitude or habituation. Compared to placebo responses, PPI was significantly increased after MEM (p < 0.04; d = 0.40); this comparison reached a large effect size for the 60 ms interval (d = 0.62), where maximal MEM effects on PPI were previously detected. Prepulses reduced peak startle latency ("latency facilitation") and this effect was amplified after MEM (p = 0.03; d = 0.41; for 60 ms intervals, d = 0.69). No effects of MEM were detected on cognition, nor were MEM effects on startle associated with cognitive or clinical measures. CONCLUSION: MEM enhances prepulse effects on startle magnitude and latency in AD; these changes in PPI and latency facilitation with MEM suggest that these measures can be used to detect an AD patient's neural sensitivity to acute MEM challenge. Studies in progress will determine whether such a "biomarker" measured at the outset on treatment can predict sensitivity to MEM's therapeutic effects.

General and Specific Dimensions of Mood Symptoms Are Associated With Impairments in Common Executive Function in Adolescence and Young Adulthood.

Both unipolar and bipolar depression have been linked with impairments in executive functioning (EF). In particular, mood symptom severity is associated with differences in common EF, a latent measure of general EF abilities. The relationship between mood disorders and EF is particularly salient in adolescence and young adulthood when the ongoing development of EF intersects with a higher risk of mood disorder onset. However, it remains unclear if common EF impairments have associations with specific symptom dimensions of mood pathology such as blunted positive affect, mood instability, or physiological arousal, or if differences in common EF more broadly relate to what is shared across various symptom domains, such as general negative affect or distress. To address this question, bifactor models can be applied to simultaneously examine the shared and unique contributions of particular mood symptom dimensions. However, no studies to our knowledge have examined bifactor models of mood symptoms in relation to measures of common EF. This study examined associations between common EF and general vs. specific symptom dimensions (anhedonia, physiological arousal, and mania) using structural equation modeling in adolescents and young adults with varying severity of mood symptoms (n = 495, ages = 13-25 years, 68.69% female). A General Depression factor capturing shared variance across symptoms statistically predicted lower Common EF. Additionally, a factor specific to physiological arousal was associated with lower Common EF. Anhedonia-specific and Mania-specific factors were not significantly related to Common EF. Altogether, these results indicate that deficits in common EF are driven by, or reflect, general features of mood pathology that are shared across symptom dimensions but are also specifically associated with physiological arousal.

Amphetamine alters an EEG marker of reward processing in humans and mice.

The bench-to-bedside development of pro-cognitive therapeutics for psychiatric disorders has been mired by translational failures. This is, in part, due to the absence of pharmacologically sensitive cognitive biomarkers common to humans and rodents. Here, we describe a cross-species translational marker of reward processing that is sensitive to the aminergic agonist, d-amphetamine. Motivated by human electroencephalographic (EEG) findings, we recently reported that frontal midline delta-band power is an electrophysiological biomarker of reward surprise in humans and in mice. In the current series of experiments, we determined the impact of parametric doses of d-amphetamine on this reward-related EEG response from humans (n = 23) and mice (n = 28) performing a probabilistic learning task. In humans, d-amphetamine (placebo, 10 mg, 20 mg) boosted the Reward Positivity event-related potential (ERP) component as well as the spectral delta-band representations of this signal. In mice, d-amphetamine (placebo, 0.1 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg) boosted both reward and punishment ERP features, yet there was no modulation of spectral activities. In sum, the present results confirm the role of dopamine in the generation of the Reward Positivity in humans, and pave the way toward a pharmacologically valid biomarker of reward sensitivity across species.

EEG reveals that dextroamphetamine improves cognitive control through multiple processes in healthy participants.

The poor translatability between preclinical and clinical drug trials has limited pro-cognitive therapeutic development. Future pro-cognitive drug trials should use translatable cross-species cognitive tasks with biomarkers (1) relevant to specific cognitive constructs, and (2) sensitive to drug treatment. Here, we used a difficulty-modulated variant of a cross-species cognitive control task with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) to identify neurophysiological biomarkers sensitive to the pro-cognitive effects of dextroamphetamine (d-amp) (10 or 20 mg) in healthy adults (n = 23), in a randomized, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced, double blind, within-subject study, conducted across three test days each separated by one week. D-amp boosted d-prime, sped reaction time, and increased frontal P3a amplitude to non-target correct rejections independent of task difficulty. Task difficulty did however, moderate d-amp effects on EEG during target performance. D-amp suppressed frontal theta power during easy target responses which negatively correlated with drug-induced improvement in hit rate while d-amp-induced changes in P3b amplitude during hard target trials strongly correlated with drug-induced improvement in hit rate. In summary, d-amp affected both behavioral and neurophysiological measures of cognitive control elements. Under low-demand, d-amp diminished cognitive control by suppressing theta, yet under high-demand it boosted control in concert with higher P3b amplitudes. These findings thus appear to reflect a gain-sharpening effect of d-amp: during high-demand processes were boosted while during low-demand processes were neglected. Future studies will use these neurophysiological measures of cognitive control as biomarkers to predict d-amp sensitivity in people with cognitive control deficits, including schizophrenia.

Using Biomarkers to Predict Memantine Effects in Alzheimer's Disease: A Proposal and Proof-Of-Concept Demonstration.

Memantine's benefits in Alzheimer's disease (AD) are modest and heterogeneous. We tested the feasibility of using sensitivity to acute memantine challenge to predict an individual's clinical response. Eight participants completed a double-blind challenge study of memantine (placebo versus 20 mg) effects on autonomic, subjective, cognitive, and neurophysiological measures, followed by a 24-week unblinded active-dose therapeutic trial (10 mg bid). Study participation was well tolerated. Subgroups based on memantine sensitivity on specific laboratory measures differed in their clinical response to memantine, some by large effect sizes. It appears feasible to use biomarkers to predict clinical sensitivity to memantine.

Memantine effects on auditory discrimination and training in schizophrenia patients.

The uncompetitive low-affinity NMDA receptor antagonist, memantine, acutely increases electrophysiological measures of auditory information processing in both healthy subjects (HS) and patients with schizophrenia. Memantine effects on functional measures of auditory discrimination performance and learning are not known; conceivably, beneficial effects on these measures might suggest a role for memantine in augmenting the cognitive and functional impact of auditory targeted cognitive training (TCT). Here, carefully characterized HS (n = 20) and schizophrenia patients (n = 22) were tested in measures of auditory discrimination performance (words-in-noise (WIN), quick speech-in-noise (QuickSIN), gaps-in-noise) and auditory frequency modulation learning (a component of TCT) on 2 days about a week apart, after ingesting either placebo or 20 mg memantine po, in a double-blind, within-subject cross-over random order design. Memantine modestly enhanced functional measures of auditory discrimination in both schizophrenia patients (WIN) and HS (WIN and QuickSIN), as well as auditory frequency modulation learning in schizophrenia patients. These findings converge with a growing literature showing that memantine can enhance a range of metrics of auditory function. These properties could contribute to the apparent benefits of memantine as an adjunctive treatment in schizophrenia, and suggest that memantine might augment learning and potentially clinical gains from auditory-based TCT.

Lessons learned by giving amphetamine to antipsychotic-medicated schizophrenia patients.

Experimental Medicine studies in psychiatric populations test specific, mechanistic hypotheses related to the biology of mental illness, by combining well-characterized neurobiological probes and laboratory-based measures of behavioral performance and neurobiology. However, scientific inquiry through the acute administration of psychoactive drugs to patients with serious mental illness raises important ethical issues. These issues arise in studies in which the psychostimulant, amphetamine, is used as an Experimental Medicine probe in patients with schizophrenia. In this study, we summarize relevant aspects of our experience with acute, laboratory-based challenges of amphetamine in schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia patients participated in one or more Experimental Medicine studies involving limited doses of amphetamine with clinical monitoring, over a 4-year period. Acute (within hours of ingestion; collective n = 53), subacute (three active doses over 4 weeks; n = 28), and long-term (mean = 17 months after ingestion; n = 19) effects of amphetamine ingestion were assessed. In antipsychotic (AP)-medicated schizophrenia patients, amphetamine was associated with no detrimental subjective, autonomic, or functional changes. Symptoms assessed acutely, subacutely, or long term were either unchanged or diminished. No adverse acute, subacute, or long-term consequences from the Experimental Medicine use of amphetamine in antipsychotic-medicated schizophrenia patients were detected. These findings do not address the safety or effectiveness of the use of amphetamine in unmedicated patients, or as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia. Indeed, it is important to distinguish evidence-based risks of symptom exacerbation in an Experimental Medicine setting vs. risks associated with long-term, daily clinical use or even misuse of amphetamine.