Randomized phase III trial comparing docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine combinations as front-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer (ABC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with ABC were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) plus epirubicin 75 mg/m(2) (DE) on day 1 or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus capecitabine 950 mg/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1-14 (DC) in 21-day cycles. Previous anthracycline-based (neo)-adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed if completed >1 year before enrollment. The primary objective of the study was to compare time to disease progression (TTP). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-six women were treated on each arm and median TTP was 10.6 versus 11.0 months (P = 0.7), for DE and DC, respectively. According to RECIST criteria we observed 15 (11%) versus 11 (8%) complete responses and 55 (40%) versus 61 (45%) partial responses (P = 0.8), with DE and DC, respectively. Severe toxicity included grade 3-4 neutropenia (57% versus 46%; P = 0.07), febrile neutropenia (11% versus 8%; P = 0.4), hand-foot syndrome (0% versus 4%; P = 0.02), grade 2-3 anemia (20% versus 7%; P = 0.001) and asthenia (12% versus 6%; P = 0.09) with DE and DC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The DE and DC regimens have similar efficacy but different toxicity. Either regimen can be used as front-line treatment of ABC.

Combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI regimen) as first line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with bolus and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (FOLFIRI regimen) as first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). METHODS: Thirty consecutive, previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, aged (median 76 years; range 70-84) were enrolled. The performance status (WHO) was 0 in 8, 1 in 16 and 2 in 6 patients; 19 (63%) patients had prior surgery and 8 (27%) adjuvant chemotherapy. CPT-11 (180 mg/m(2) as a 90 min i.v. infusion) was administered on day 1, LV (200 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour i.v. infusion), 5-FU (400 mg/m(2)/d i.v. bolus followed by 600 mg/m(2)/d as a 22-hour i.v. continuous infusion) were given on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Complete response was achieved in one (3.3%) patient and partial response in 10 (33.3%) (overall response rate: 36.6%; 95% C.I.: 26.6-48.4%); 11 (36.6%) patients had stable disease and, 8 (26.6%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 7.5 months and the median time to disease progression 7.0 months. After a median follow-up period of 17 months, the median overall survival was 14.5 months. Main toxicities were: grade 3-4 neutropenia (n = 6; 20%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1; 3.3%), grade 2 anemia (n = 9; 30%), grade 3-4 diarrhea (n = 5; 17%) and grade 3 asthenia (n = 3; 10%). There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: The FOLFIRI combination is an active regimen with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in patients above 70 years of age.

Temozolomide and cisplatin versus temozolomide in patients with advanced melanoma: a randomized phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent that produces methyl adducts at the 0.6 position of guanine. The methyl adducts are removed by the DNA repair enzyme AGAT. As demonstrated by in vitro studies, cisplatin (CDDP) is able to down-regulate the AGAT activity, suggesting that CDDP could enhance the antitumor activity of TMZ. We designed a randomized phase II study to evaluate and compare the activity and safety profile of the combination versus single-agent TMZ in patients with advanced melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to April 2002, 132 patients were enrolled on the study. Patient and tumor characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. Patients with cerebral metastases were included. Patients received TMZ 200 mg/m(2)/day orally for five consecutive days every 4 weeks or TMZ + CDDP 200 mg/m(2) daily on days 1-5 and 75 mg/m(2) of CDDP on day 1. RESULTS: Tumor responses (complete and partial responses) were seen in 16 patients (26%) in arm A and 19 patients (29%) in arm B. The median time to progression (TTP) was 3.8 months in arm A and 5.8 months in arm B. The median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 months in arm A and 12 months in arm B. The difference between treatment arms regarding objective response rates, TTP and OS were not statistically significant. Toxicity was comparable between the two arms for anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, constipation and arthralgias/myalgias. There was significantly more grade 3 and 4 emesis in the combination arm. CONCLUSIONS: No clear benefit in terms of response rates, median TTP or OS was shown with the combination of TMZ + CDDP. Additionally, the combination was associated with higher incidence of grade 3 and 4 emesis.

Carcinoma of sigmoid colon after ureterosigmoidostomy.

An unusual case of adenocarcinoma of the colon in a 49-year-old man is described. The patient underwent ureterosigmoidostomy at the age of 3 years after a traffic accident. At the age of 49 years, he was admitted to a Department of Urology for treating urinary lithiasis. A chest x-ray and thoracic computed tomography (CT) showed some nodules in both pulmonary fields, while an abdominal CT was normal. The previous patient's history was ignored, the patient underwent thoracoctomy and a nodule was removed. The histology revealed a metastatic, moderately differentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma, probably of the bowel. A sunsequent colonoscopy was non-disclosing and the patient was thought to suffer from a carcinoma of unknown origin and received 6 cycles of chemotherapy with carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Five months after the end of chemotherapy he presented with an uncerated mass in the lower abdominal wall. A new CT scan revealed a solid mass in the pelvis with infiltration of the suprapubic region while a repeat colonoscopy showed an infiltrating mass in the sigmoid. Biopsies were obtained from both lesions and the histology was similar with that of the pulmonary nodule.

Irinotecan plus gemcitabine vs irinotecan for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with docetaxel and cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, phase II study.

To compare irinotecan (CPT-11)+gemcitabine vs CPT-11 alone as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after docetaxel-cisplatinum-based therapy. A total of 147 evaluable, pretreated patients, with NSCLC, received either gemcitabine (1000 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8)+CPT-11 (300 mg m(-2), day 8) (Group A, n=76) or CPT-11 (300 mg m(-2), day 1) (Group B, n=71), every 3 weeks. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The objective response rate was 18.4% (95% CI: 9.71-27.14%) and 4.2% (95% CI: 0-8.90%) (P=0.009) for groups A and B, respectively. No significant differences between the two groups in terms of the median duration of response, time to tumour progression, overall survival and 1-year survival were observed. The CPT-11/gemcitabine regimen significantly improved the patients' quality of life ('general mood today' (P=0.014), 'coughing' (P=0.003) and 'intensity of symptoms' (P=0.034)) compared with CPT-11. More cycles had to be delayed (P=0.001) and required prophylactic growth factor support (P=0.001) in Group A than B. Three (3.9%) patients in Group A and eight (11.3%) in Group B developed febrile neutropenia (P=0.09); one patient died of sepsis in each group. Three additional (Group A, n=1; Group B, n=2) treatment-related deaths were observed. Grade 3-4 haematologic toxicity was comparable in the two groups except anaemia (P=0.03 in favour of CPT-11). Other nonhaematologic toxicities were mild and similar in the two groups. CPT-11+gemcitabine resulted in a higher response rate and better control of disease-related symptoms than CPT-11 alone, but without any improvement in the overall survival.

Dose escalation study on oxaliplatin and capecitabine (Xeloda) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

OBJECTIVES: Capecitabine (CAP) and oxaliplatin (OX) have shown interesting activity in a wide range of solid tumors. A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of their combination in patients with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three pretreated patients with histologically confirmed inoperable neoplasms were enrolled. The patients' median age was 64 years, 21 were males, and 27 had a WHO performance status of 0-1. OX was administered on days 1 and 8, as a 3-hour intravenous infusion, at escalated doses ranging from 50 to 70 mg/m(2). CAP was administered orally for 14 consecutive days, at escalated doses ranging from 1,200 to 2,100 mg/m(2)/day. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: At the dose of 2,100 mg/m(2) (Xeloda) and 70 mg/m(2) (OX), all 3 enrolled patients presented DLT (grade 3 diarrhea, grade 3 asthenia and grade 3 neurotoxicity, respectively), and, thus, the recommended MTD for future phase II studies are 2,000 mg/m(2) for CAP and 70 mg/m(2 )for OX. A total of 145 treatment cycles were administered. Toxicity was very mild. Grade 2/3 neutropenia was observed in 4 (3%) treatment cycles. The main nonhematologic toxicities were grade 2/3 nausea/vomiting (7 cycles; 5%), grade 2/3 neurotoxicity (10 cycles; 7%), grade 2/3 asthenia (8 cycles; 5.5%) and grade 2/3 diarrhea (6 cycles; 4%). There was no treatment-related death. One (4%) complete remission, 2 (8%) partial remissions, and 9 (36%) cases of stable disease were observed among 25 evaluable patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that CAP and OX can be safely combined at clinically relevant doses and that this regimen merits further evaluation.

Peripheral blood circulating cytokeratin-19 mRNA-positive cells after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the molecular detection of cytokeratin 19 (CK-19) mRNA-positive cells in the peripheral blood of women with operable breast cancer after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood from 161 patients with stage I and II breast cancer, obtained after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, was tested by nested RT-PCR for CK-19 mRNA detection. Using univariate and multivariate analyses possible interactions with other prognostic factors and association of CK-19 mRNA detection with risk of relapse, disease-free interval (DFI) and overall survival were investigated. RESULTS: After completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, 27.3% of patients had peripheral blood CK-19 mRNA-positive cells; there was no association of this finding with any other prognostic factors or the type of chemotherapy regimen used. For patients with less than four involved axillary lymph nodes the risk of relapse was 3.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-13.71] times higher, and the DFI was significantly reduced (P = 0.028) if CK-19 mRNA-positive cells were detectable in the blood after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. In contrast, for patients with four or more involved lymph nodes, the presence of CK-19 mRNA-positive cells after adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly affect the risk of relapse or DFI. Furthermore, the risk of relapse was higher (hazards ratio 3.70; 95% CI 1.09-13.89) and the DFI was reduced (P = 0.022) for patients with detectable CK-19 mRNA-positive cells following adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) as compared with epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil (FEC) or sequential taxotere-epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (T/EC) chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of CK-19 mRNA-positive cells in the peripheral blood after adjuvant chemotherapy may be of clinical relevance for patients with early breast cancer and less than four involved axillary lymph nodes.

ZD1839, a novel, oral epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as salvage treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Experience from a single center participating in a compassionate use program.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of the orally active, selective epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) ZD1839 in patients with pretreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) participating in a compassionate use program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with advanced, unresectable and progressive NSCLC, previously treated with one or two chemotherapy regimens, received ZD1839 250 mg orally once daily. Patients who had received only one prior chemotherapy regimen had to be considered unsuitable for second-line chemotherapy. RESULTS: The disease control rate was 32% (95% CI: 15.8-48.7) (1/31 patients had a partial response and 9/31 patients had stable disease) and the median overall survival 23 weeks (range 4-40). Symptom improvement was reported by 39% of patients overall and by 83% of patients who achieved disease control. The median time to symptom improvement was 3 weeks (range 2-4). Adverse events were generally mild (grade I or II) and reversible and consisted mostly of skin rash, diarrhea and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: ZD1839 demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity with significant improvement in symptoms in this heavily pretreated group of patients with advanced NSCLC. Furthermore, ZD1839 showed a favorable toxicity profile, with the majority of adverse events being mild and reversible.

Treatment of pancreatic cancer with a combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and gemcitabine: a multicenter phase II study by the Greek Cooperative Group for Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine (GEM) and irinotecan (CPT-11) is evaluated in previously untreated patients with inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1999 to July 2001, 60 patients with pancreatic cancer (85% stage IV) were enrolled in a two-step extended phase II trial. Patients were treated with gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) and CPT-11 (300 mg/m2 on day 8) in cycles of 3 weeks. No prophylactic use of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) was initially planned. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis one (1.7%) complete and 14 (23.3%) partial responses were achieved [objective response rate (ORR) 24.7%; 95% confidence interval 14.04% to 35.96%]. Twenty-two (36.7%) and 23 (38.3%) patients had stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median duration of response was 5 months, the median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 7 months and the median overall survival 7 months. One-year survival was 22.5%. Pain improvement and asthenia during treatment were observed in 45% and 43% of patients, respectively; weight gain occurred in 19.5% of patients. Grade 3 anemia occurred in three (5%) patients who required transfusion of six packed red blood cell (RBC) units. Ten (16.7%) additional patients with grade 2 anemia were treated with recombinant erythropoietin. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in seven (11.7%) patients and grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in 27 (45%). Ten patients developed febrile neutropenia, two of whom died due to sepsis. Prophylactic use of rhG-CSF was eventually required in 93 (28.3%) of 329 administered cycles. Other toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and irinotecan is an active chemotherapy regimen against pancreatic cancer with a 25% ORR. Toxicity was acceptable for the great majority of patients but with a high percentage of hematopoietic growth factor administration.

A dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin have broad antineoplastic activity and favorable toxicity. We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the combination in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with advanced stage solid tumors were enrolled. Treatment was first-line for 35% of patients, second-line for 27%, and third-line for 38%. Gemcitabine was administered at escalating doses of 1000-2000 mg/m(2) as a 30-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin at 60-130 mg/m(2) as a 4-h i.v. infusion on day 8 every 21 days without growth factor support. RESULTS: The MTD was defined at gemcitabine 1800 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 8. Twelve dose levels were evaluated and DLTs occurring during the first cycle consisted of grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 asthenia or mucositis and grade 1-3 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia resulting in treatment delays. A total of 266 cycles were administered with only one episode of febrile neutropenia and no toxic deaths. Seven (3%) and 26 (10%) cycles were complicated by grade 4 and 3 neutropenia, respectively, three (1%) and 13 (5%) by grade 4 and 3 thrombocytopenia, and eight (3%) by grade 3 anemia. The most common non-hematological toxicity was grade 2/3 asthenia observed in 23% of cycles. Responses were observed in patients with a variety of epithelial neoplasms. The pharmacokinetic study revealed no significant interaction between the two drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin has excellent tolerability and promising activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. As the MTD exceeds the recommended single-agent dose for gemcitabine, and a dose-response effect has not been established, we recommend using both drugs at full doses, e.g. gemcitabine 1200-1400 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 8 for further phase II studies.

A dose-escalation study of oxaliplatin and vinorelbine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

OBJECTIVES: Vinorelbine (V) and oxaliplatin (OX) have shown interesting activity in a wide range of solid tumors. A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of their combination in patients with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with histologically confirmed non-small-cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer and breast cancer who had failed at least one prior chemotherapy regimen were enrolled. The patients' median age was 60 years, 33 were female, and 27 had a performance status (WHO) of 0-1. V was administered on days 1 and 8 as a 1-hour intravenous infusion at escalated doses ranging from 20 to 27 mg/m2. OX was administered on days 1 and 8 at escalated doses ranging from 40 to 55 mg/m2, following V administration. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: At the dose of V 27 mg/m2 and OX 55 mg/m2 3 out of 6 enrolled patients presented DLTs (2 patients grade 4 neutropenia and 1 treatment delay at day 8), and, thus, the recommended MTD for future phase II studies are V 27 mg/m2 and OX 50 mg/m2. A total of 131 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 3/4 neutropenia complicated 23 (18%) treatment cycles. There was one septic death. The main nonhematologic toxicities were grade 2/3 nausea/vomiting (17 cycles; 13%), grade 2 neurotoxicity (6 cycles; 5%) and grade 2/3 asthenia (21 cycles; 16%). One CR (4%), 5 PR (20%) and 4 SD (16%) were observed amongst the 25 evaluable patients. All responses were observed in patients with ovarian and breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this phase I study demonstrate that V and OX can be combined at clinically effective and relevant doses to be further evaluated in patients with breast and ovarian cancer.

Phase I study of weekly paclitaxel and liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumours.

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of a weekly administration of paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx; Schering Plough Pharmaceutical) in patients with advanced solid tumours. 19 pretreated patients with solid tumours received escalated doses of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (6-12 mg/m(2)) as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by a fixed dose of paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) weekly for 4 consecutive weeks in cycles of 6 weeks. DLT was defined as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, grades 3 or 4 non-haematological toxicity or treatment delay due to unresolved toxicity during cycle 1. The MTD was reached at the dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin of 10 mg/m(2)/week and paclitaxel of 80 mg/m(2)/week. The DLTs were treatment delay due to grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhoea. A total of 55 chemotherapy cycles were administered, and grades 3-4 neutropenia occurred in seven cycles (13%); the non-haematological toxicity was mild with grades 2/3 diarrhoea occurring in 4 (7%), grades 2-4 asthenia in 11 (20%) and grade 2 mucositis in 7 (13%) cycles. There was no case with more than a 10% LVEF decrease after a median of 3 (range 2-6) administered cycles/patients. One patient with breast cancer and 1 with ovarian cancer experienced a major partial response. The weekly administration of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin at the dose of 10 mg/m(2) in combination with paclitaxel at the dose of 80 mg/m(2) for 4 consecutive weeks, in cycles of 6 weeks which represent the recommended doses for further phase II studies, is a well tolerated regimen, which merits further evaluation in tumours known to be sensitive to taxanes and/or anthracyclines.

Irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (de Gramont regimen) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

The combination of CPT-11 with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC) represents an attractive approach. A phase II study was conducted to assess the tolerance and efficacy of CPT-11 in combination with leucovorin-modulated bolus plus infusional 5-FU given according to the de Gramont regimen in chemonaive patients with ACC. Fifty-four patients with histologically confirmed ACC were enrolled. The patients' median age was 65 years; 30 (55.5%) patients were men; performance status (World Health Organization) was 0 in 27 (50%) patients, 1 in 22 (41%), and 2 in 5 (9%). Patients received leucovorin (200 mg/m2/d) as a 2-hour intravenous infusion, followed by 5-FU as an intravenous bolus at 400 mg/m2/d, and then as a 22-hour continuous infusion at 600 mg/m2/d, repeated on 2 consecutive days. CPT-11 (180 mg/m2; 30-minute intravenous infusion) was administered on day 1, simultaneously with leucovorin administration. This cycle was repeated every 2 weeks. Complete response was achieved in 4 patients (8%) and partial response in 19 (37%) (overall response rate: 45%; 95% CI: 24-50.5%). Stable disease was achieved in 16 (31%) patients and progressive disease in 13 (25%). The median duration of response and the median TTP were 5 and 8 months, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 11 months, 33 (61%) patients are still alive; the median overall survival has not yet been reached. Thrombocytopenia and anemia were very rare. Grade III/IV neutropenia developed in 19 patients (36%); febrile neutropenia developed in 4 patients, and 1 of them died of sepsis. Grade IV diarrhea was seen in 7 (13%) patients, and 4 of them required hospitalization. Grade III and IV mucositis was observed in two (4%) and one (2%) patients, respectively. Other toxicities were mild. The combination of CPT-11 and bolus plus infusional 5-FU is a relatively well-tolerated and effective first-line treatment in ACC. Final results from large phase III trials are awaited to clarify whether the CPT-11/5-FU combinations should be considered as "standard" first-line treatment in ACC.

Ifosfamide, paclitaxel and cisplatin first-line chemotherapy in advanced, suboptimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: The combination of paclitaxel with a platinum analogue is the preferred chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The alkylating agent ifosfamide has shown activity in refractory or recurrent ovarian cancer. We conducted a Phase II study with the combination of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin for the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with advanced, suboptimally debulked ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] Stage III or IV) and residual disease larger than 2 cm after staging laparotomy and cytoreductive surgery were treated with paclitaxel, 175 mg/m(2), as a 3-hour intravenous infusion on Day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) intravenously over 2 hours on Day 2, and ifosfamide 1500 mg/m(2) intravenously over 1 hour on Days 1-3 (with sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate [MESNA] uroprotection). Courses were administered every 3 weeks on an outpatient basis. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was given at a dose of 5 microg/kg/day on Days 7-11. RESULTS: Among 26 patients with measurable disease, 22 (85%) achieved an objective response including 15 complete and 7 partial responses. With a minimum follow-up of 46 months, the median overall survival was 52.8 months (range, 5.3-56.6+ mos), whereas the median time to progression for all patients was 22.2 months. The median remission duration for women with measurable disease who responded to treatment was 12.6 months. The treatment was tolerated relatively well without toxic deaths; the most common toxicity was Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia that occurred in 42% of patients. Significant peripheral neuropathy (Grade 2 or higher) developed in 35% of patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin is a well-tolerated outpatient regimen with significant activity in the treatment of newly diagnosed FIGO Stage III or IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Further evaluation is justified to clearly define the role of ifosfamide as an additional agent to the current platinum and paclitaxel regimens.

Comparison of docetaxel/cisplatin to docetaxel/gemcitabine as first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: early results of a randomized trial.

The study compares docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) and docetaxel plus gemcitabine (DG) regimens for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients were randomized to receive either the DC or the DG combination. They were stratified according to age, performance status (PS) and stage of disease. Three hundred seventeen patients entered the study. Of them, 162 received the DC regimen and 155 the DG regimen. There were no differences in the patients' characteristics between the two study arms. Preliminary analysis included 132 evaluable patients in the DC arm and 114 in the DG arm. Three complete responses (CR) (2.3%) and 39 partial responses (PR) (30%) were documented in the DC arm (response rate (RR) 32.3%; 95% CI 23.87-39.76%), whereas 1 CR (0.9%) and 38 PR (33%) were documented in the DG arm (RR: 33.9%; 95% CI 25.5-42.92%). No differences in the RR, response duration, time to tumor progression, overall survival and 1-year survival were observed between the two groups. Regarding toxicity, there were no significant differences in grade 3-4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia between the two arms. However, grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 40 patients (33%) treated with the DC regimen and in 31 patients (22%) treated with the DG regimen (P=0.01). Twenty-four (16%) patients in the DC arm and 20 (14%) in the DG arm developed febrile neutropenia. There was one death due to sepsis in each arm. Non-haematological toxicity was mild and equal in the two arms, with the exception of grade 3-4 nausea and diarrhoea, which were more frequent in the DC arm. In conclusion, preliminary results showed that the DG regimen was as effective as the DC regimen. The toxicity profile of the DG combination was relatively milder. Hence, cisplatin cannot be considered longer as a mandatory component of chemotherapy against NSCLC.

Cisplatin and irinotecan (CPT-11) as second-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin (P) are both active agents against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and their combination has shown in vitro an additive or synergistic effect. We conducted a phase II study to determine the toxicity and efficacy of their combination as salvage treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC progressing after a docetaxel-based front line regimen. Forty-four patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC were enrolled. The patients' median age was 60.5 years; 39 patients (87%) were male; 38 (86%) had stage IV disease; and 32 (73%) had a performance status (WHO) 0-1. CPT-11 was administered as a 60 min i.v. infusion at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 110 mg/m(2) on day 8; P was administered at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) on day 8 after CPT-11 administration. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. A total of 159 chemotherapy cycles was administered. In an intention-to-treat analysis, nine patients (22; 95% CI: 9.28-34.62%) achieved a partial response (PR), 8 (20%) had stable disease (SD), and 24 (58%) progressive disease (PD). The median duration of response was 4 months, the median time-to-progression (TTP) 8 months, and the median survival for the entire group 8 months. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 20 (46%) patients and in four cases this was febrile, requiring patient's hospitalisation. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in four (9%) patients. Grade 3-4 diarrhoea was seen in 12 (27%) patients and three of them required hospitalisation. Grade 2-3 neurotoxicity was observed in two (4%) patients and grade 2-3 fatigue in 14 (32%). Other toxicity was mild and no treatment-related death was reported. The combination of CPT-11 and P is a safe, well-tolerated, and active regimen for the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with a docetaxel-based front-line regimen.

Second-line treatment with vinorelbine and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A multicenter phase II study.

OBJECTIVE: A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine-carboplatin (VNB-C) combination as a salvage treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after or failing previous non-platinum, taxane-based treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with cytologically or histologically confirmed NSCLC were enrolled. VNB 30 mg/m(2) was administered on days 1 and 8 and C 300 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 28 days. G-CSF (5 microg/kg per day s.c.) was used prophylactically on days 10-15 in case of grade 3-4 neutropenia or febrile neutropenia after the first cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response and all were evaluable for toxicity. In an intention-to-treat analysis, two (5%) complete and four (11%) partial responses were documented for an overall response rate of 16% (95% CI, 4.49-28.84%). Eleven (30%) patients experienced disease stabilisation and 20 (54%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 7.5 months, the median TTP was 9 months, and the median survival was 8.5 months. Patients with objective remission and stable disease had a statistically significant survival benefit over patients with disease progression. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in three (8%) and ten (27%) patients, respectively, and six cases (16%) were complicated with fever. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was documented in one (3%) patient. Non-hematological toxicity was mild, with grade 2 and 3 asthenia reported in 18 (48%) patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: VNB-C combination is well tolerated and retains a notable degree of activity in NSCLC patients progressing after previous non-platinum, taxane-based treatment. Moreover, it confers tumour growth control in a significant proportion of patients, and this seems to be associated with a survival benefit for them.

A phase I clinical trial of topotecan given every 2 weeks in patients with refractory solid tumors.

OBJECTIVES: Topotecan, a potent inhibitor of the enzyme topoisomerase I, has shown an interesting activity against several types of solid tumors, most notably small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and ovarian cancer. We conducted a phase I study to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan given in a novel schedule of administration in patients with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of solid tumors refractory to all known forms of effective therapy were enrolled. The patients' median age was 61 years, 15 were male, and 18 had a performance status of (WHO) 0-1. Seven patients suffered from ovarian cancer, 11 from SCLC, 4 from non-SCLC, 2 from melanoma and 2 from cervical cancer. Topotecan was given for 3 consecutive days as a 30-min intravenous infusion, at doses ranging from 0.75 to 1.2 mg/m2. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. RESULTS: At dose level 5 with topotecan 1.2 mg/m2, both study patients presented DLTs (1 patient grade 4 neutropenia and the other grade 3 fatigue), and the recommended doses for future phase II studies are topotecan 1.1 mg/m2 for 3 consecutive days every 2 weeks. A total of 60 treatment cycles were administered, with a median of 2 cycles per patient. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 11 (18%) cycles and 2 of them were complicated by fever requiring patient hospitalization. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was seen in 2 (3%) cycles and grade 3 anemia in 3 (5%). Although non-hematologic toxicity was generally mild, grade 2/3 fatigue complicated 12 (20%) cycles and grade 4 one (1.5%) requiring treatment interruption in 4 patients. Among 18 evaluable patients, no objective response to treatment was observed. CONCLUSION: This phase I study demonstrates that topotecan given at the dose of 1.1 mg/m2 for 3 consecutive days every 2 weeks is a safe and tolerable regimen and possibly permits the combination of the drug with other cytotoxic agents at clinically relevant doses.

A dose escalation study of topotecan in combination with epirubicin in pretreated patients with small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of topotecan in combination with epirubicin in pretreated patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven SCLC patients with performance status (WHO) of 0-2 and adequate renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function who had failed EP-containing front-line chemotherapy entered the study. Patients received escalated doses of topotecan (starting dose 0.5 mg/m(2)) for 5 days and epirubicin (starting dose 40 mg/m(2)) on day 8, every 28 days. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for toxicity and 20 for response. The MTD was topotecan 0.90 mg/m(2) and epirubicin 40 mg/m(2) with neutropenia being the most common dose-limiting event. Seventy-three courses were administered. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 22 (30%) courses, grade 3-4 anemia in 7 (10%), and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 11 (15%). Seven courses were complicated with fever and one patient died of neutropenic sepsis. Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity was mild and infrequent with only grade 2-3 asthenia occurring in 16 (22%) courses. Among 20 patients who were evaluable for response, 16 (80%) were refractory to prior treatment. One patient with refractory disease (5%) achieved a complete response of 14 weeks duration and four experienced stabilization of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of topotecan 0.90 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, with epirubicin 40 mg/m(2) on day 8, administered every 28 days is a feasible outpatient regimen which merits further evaluation in patients with chemosensitive disease.