Minimal enteral feeding within 3 d of birth in prematurely born infants with birth weight < or = 1200 g improves bone mass by term age.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice guidelines for aggressive nutritional intervention by using parenteral amino acids (AAs) and minimal enteral feeding (MEF) as early as the first day of life have not been tested for benefits to bone mass. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether early introduction of parenteral AAs and MEF improves growth and bone mass achieved by term age in infants born prematurely. DESIGN: Twenty-seven infants who were < or = 1200 g and < or = 32 wk gestation at birth were randomly assigned by using a 2 x 2 design to treatment of either 1 g AAs/kg within the first 24 h or 12 mL MEF x kg(-1) x d(-1) within the first 72 h of life. Nutrition and growth were documented during hospitalization, and bone mineral content (BMC) of lumbar spine 1-4, femur, and whole body was measured at term age. Biomarkers of bone metabolism were measured at weeks 1, 3, and 5 and at discharge. Statistical analysis was conducted by using 2 x 2 analysis of variance for intent to treat and for infants receiving protocol nutrition. RESULTS: Over the first 14 d of life, a main effect of early AAs elevated total intake of protein, and a main effect of early MEF was a higher frequency of MEF volumes exceeding > 12 mL x kg(-1) x d(-1). Main effects on growth were not evident. An interaction effect was observed for osteocalcin whereby early AAs or MEF alone elevated osteocalcin. A main effect of early MEF yielded higher BMC of spine and femur. CONCLUSION: Early aggressive nutrition support with MEF enhances BMC in premature infants, but early MEF or AAs do not improve growth.

Low levels of dietary arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acids improve bone mass in neonatal piglets, but higher levels provide no benefit.

In piglets, feeding arachidonic acid (AA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in a 5:1 ratio leads to elevated bone mass, but the optimal total quantity requires clarification. We studied bone mass and modeling of piglets that were randomized to receive 1 of 4 formulas for 15 d: control formula or the same formula with various levels of AA:DHA (0.5:0.1 g, 1.0:0.2 g or 2.0:0.4 g AA:DHA/100 g of fat). Measurements included: bone area (BA), mineral content (BMC), and density (BMD) of whole body, lumbar spine, and excised femurs; biomarkers of bone modeling were plasma osteocalcin and urinary cross-linked N-telopeptides of type 1 collagen (NTx), tibial ex vivo release of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)), plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and tissue fatty acids. Main effects were identified using ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni t tests. In supplemented piglets, relations among liver fatty acid proportions and bone mass were assessed using Pearson correlations. Whole body (P = 0.028) and lumbar spine (P = 0.043) BMD were higher in the group supplemented with 0.5:0.1 g AA:DHA/100 g of fat than in controls. Tissue AA and DHA increased in proportion to diet levels. Liver eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) correlated positively (r > or = 0.38, P < or = 0.05) with whole body and femur BMC and BMD and lumbar spine BMC. Liver AA:EPA ratio correlated negatively (r > or = -0.039, P < or = 0.05) with whole body, femur, and lumbar spine BMC plus whole body and femur BMD. Dietary 1.0:0.2 g AA:DHA/100 g reduced NTx relative to 2.0:0.4 g AA:DHA/100 g of fat (P = 0.039). The diets did not affect the other biochemical variables measured. Low levels of dietary AA:DHA (0.5:0.1 g/100 g of fat) elevate bone mass, but higher amounts are not beneficial.