RESUMO
We study the synchronization properties of a generic networked dynamical system, and show that, under a suitable approximation, the transition to synchronization can be predicted with the only help of eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the graph Laplacian matrix. The transition comes out to be made of a well defined sequence of events, each of which corresponds to a specific clustered state. The network's nodes involved in each of the clusters can be identified, and the value of the coupling strength at which the events are taking place can be approximately ascertained. Finally, we present large-scale simulations which show the accuracy of the approximation made, and of our predictions in describing the synchronization transition of both synthetic and real-world large size networks, and we even report that the observed sequence of clusters is preserved in heterogeneous networks made of slightly non-identical systems.
RESUMO
We explore the metric structure of networks with higher-order interactions and introduce a novel definition of distance for hypergraphs that extends the classic methods reported in the literature. The new metric incorporates two critical factors: (1) the inter-node distance within each hyperedge, and (2) the distance between hyperedges in the network. As such, it involves the computation of distances in a weighted line graph of the hypergraph. The approach is illustrated with several ad hoc synthetic hypergraphs, where the structural information unveiled by the novel metric is highlighted. Moreover, the method's performance and effectiveness are shown through computations on large real-world hypergraphs, which indeed reveal new insights into the structural features of networks beyond pairwise interactions. Namely, using the new distance measure, we generalize the definitions of efficiency, closeness and betweenness centrality for the case of hypergraphs. Comparing the values of these generalized measures with their analogs calculated for the hypergraph clique projections, we show that our measures provide significantly different assessments on the characteristics (and roles) of the nodes from the information-transferability point of view. The difference is brighter for hypergraphs in which hyperedges of large sizes are frequent, and nodes relating to these hyperedges are rarely connected by other hyperedges of smaller sizes.