Routine Screening in a California Jail : Effect of Local Policy on Identification of Syphilis in a High-Incidence Area, 2016-2017.

OBJECTIVES: California is experiencing a syphilis and congenital syphilis epidemic, and many persons diagnosed with syphilis report a history of recent incarceration or sexual contact with a person who has recently been incarcerated. Fresno County's local health department and jail collaborated to implement a routine syphilis screening policy for male adults aged 18-30 and female adults aged 18-35 booked into the facility. We evaluated syphilis screening, case finding, and treatment rates after implementation of the new policy. METHODS: We linked jail census and laboratory data to syphilis surveillance data to assess screening coverage, positivity, and treatment rates for age-eligible persons who were booked into Fresno County Jail from April 1, 2016, through December 31, 2017. RESULTS: Of 24 045 age-eligible persons who were booked into the jail during the study period, 5897 (24.5%) were female and 18 148 (75.5%) were male. Of 7144 (29.7%) persons who were screened for syphilis, 611 (8.6%) had a reactive rapid plasma reagin blood test result (16.4% [253 of 1546] of female adults; 6.4% [358 of 5598] of male adults) and 238 (3.3%) were newly diagnosed with syphilis, as confirmed by matching to the surveillance system (6.9% [106 of 1546] of female adults; 2.4% [132 of 5598] of male adults). Of persons identified with syphilis, 51.7% (n = 123 of 238) received adequate recommended treatment (59.4% [63 of 106] of female adults; 45.5% [60 of 132] of male adults). CONCLUSIONS: The age-based syphilis screening policy adopted in this jail yielded high positivity, including newly identified syphilis infections among female adults of childbearing age. The targeted screening policy was formalized in the county-negotiated contract with the jail's private correctional health care company in 2018-a strategy that can be replicated.

Gaps in Chlamydia Treatment Within California Family Planning Clinics: Are Patients Filling Prescriptions?

BACKGROUND: Compared with receiving medication dispensed in a health center, patients receiving prescriptions must take additional steps for treatment. Few clinics have protocols for ensuring prescriptions are filled. This study evaluated prescription fill rates for chlamydia treatment based on claims data in California Title X clinics and examined fill rates by patient demographics and clinic type. METHODS: We collected treatment information during Title X site audits for a convenience sample of patients with a positive chlamydia test between January 2008 and March 2013. We categorized patients as receiving treatment on-site versus via prescription and matched prescriptions to pharmacy billing claims within 90 days of test date. We examined treatment rates by patient age, gender, and race/ethnicity, and by clinic type, and assessed the median time to treatment. RESULTS: Among 790 patients diagnosed with chlamydia across 79 clinics, 65% (n = 513) were treated on-site and 33% (n = 260) via prescription; 17 (2%) did not have treatment information. Sixty-seven percent of prescriptions had confirmed receipt of treatment. Prescription fill rates were lower for patients age 18 years and younger (47% vs. 71%, P < 0.01) and for patients attending federally qualified health centers compared with stand-alone family planning clinics (63% vs. 88%, P < 0.01). Median time to treatment was similar for patients treated on-site (5 days) or via prescription (4 days). CONCLUSIONS: Delays in chlamydia treatment increase risk of complications and ongoing transmission. Providing medications on-site can improve treatment rates, especially among younger patients. These insights can inform clinic treatment protocols and efforts to improve quality of chlamydia care.