An outbreak of Burkholderia (formerly Pseudomonas) cepacia respiratory tract colonization and infection associated with nebulized albuterol therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate an outbreak of Burkholderia (formerly Pseudomonas) cepacia respiratory tract colonization and infection in mechanically ventilated patients. DESIGN: A retrospective case-control and bacteriologic study. SETTING: Veterans Affairs medical center. PATIENTS: 42 mechanically ventilated patients who developed respiratory tract colonization or infection with B. cepacia and 135 ventilator-dependent controls who were not colonized and did not develop infections. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and demographic data; benzalkonium chloride concentrations and pH levels in albuterol sulfate solutions; repetitive-element polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-mediated molecular fingerprinting on eight patient isolates and three environmental B. cepacia isolates that were available for study. RESULTS: 42 patients had B. cepacia respiratory tract colonization or infection. Observation of intensive care unit and respiratory care personnel showed faulty infection control procedures (for example, the same multiple-dose bottle of albuterol was used for many mechanically ventilated patients). More case patients (39 [92.9%]) than controls (95 [70.4%]; P = 0.006) received nebulized albuterol, and case patients (67.5 treatments) received more treatments than controls (18 treatments; P < 0.001). In-use albuterol solutions had pH values that were unstable, and benzalkonium chloride concentrations declined over time to levels capable of supporting bacterial growth. Medication nebulizers and in-use bottles of albuterol harbored B. cepacia. Molecular fingerprints of patient isolates and environmental B. cepacia isolates were identical using repetitive-element PCR. No further isolates of B. cepacia were identified after institution of appropriate infection control procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple-dose medications and reliance on benzalkonium chloride as a medication preservative provide a mechanism for nosocomial spread of microorganisms, particularly if infection control procedures are not carefully followed. Repetitive-element PCR is a useful fingerprinting technique for molecular epidemiologic studies of B. cepacia.

Urinary tract infection following instrumentation for urodynamic testing.

After identifying a temporal cluster of urinary tract infections in patients who had undergone urodynamic procedures, we examined the techniques within the urodynamic laboratory and retrospectively reviewed charts of all 155 patients tested in the previous six months. The rate of acquired urinary tract infections was 18.7%. Risk factors for infection included undergoing cystometrograms and being subject to the first procedure performed in a day. Technical errors in the performance of the urodynamic studies included failure to completely disassemble the apparatus upon completion of a procedure, failure to use sterile components, and lapses in aseptic technique. Bacteria implicated in the outbreak were isolated from tubing, transducers, and flush solutions. After the institution of appropriate technique, all patients tested in the subsequent six months were followed. The rate of acquired urinary tract infection dropped to 5%. Urodynamic apparatus should be completely disassembled following the completion of a procedure; reassembly using sterile components should occur immediately prior to the next procedure; aseptic technique should be maintained; and patients should undergo routine urine screening before a procedure. Surveillance of urodynamic procedures may reveal correctable flaws in technique.

Antibiotic resistance patterns during aminoglycoside restriction.

When amikacin first became available its use was restricted to prevent the emergence of resistant strains of gram-negative bacilli to this new agent. Gentamicin was the aminoglycoside most widely used at this time, and the incidence of gentamicin-resistant bacteria was 14%, while only 2.4% were resistant to amikacin. For a period of 15 months gentamicin use was restricted, and amikacin was used almost exclusively. Amikacin use was associated with a fall in the incidence of gentamicin-resistant bacteria to 9.2% (p less than .00005), while amikacin resistance remained unchanged at 2.2% (NS). During a period of 21 months after all aminoglycoside restrictions were lifted, gentamicin use again increased, and was accompanied by a return of gentamicin resistance to the baseline level of 15.3%. During this period, amikacin resistance also increased to 4.0% (p less than .0000001) but was due primarily to an increase in resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Escherichia coli was the most frequently isolated gram-negative bacillus during all three periods, and it remained sensitive to both antibiotics regardless of the drug in use. In contrast, P. aeruginosa showed a high level of resistance to gentamicin, which fell when this antibiotic was restricted, only to return to a high level with reinstitution of gentamicin. While there was also an increase in amikacin resistant strains of P. aeruginosa with unrestricted aminoglycoside use, there was no apparent shift in the pattern of aminoglycoside modifying enzymes among a small random selection of amikacin-resistant bacteria. Impaired uptake of antibiotic was the predominant mechanism responsible for P. aeruginosa resistance among strains that did not produce aminoglycoside acetyltransferase (AAC)(6').