Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study of Immediate Voiding at End of Urinary Sphincter Surgery (REMOVE).

PURPOSE: Patients may remain catheterized after artificial urinary sphincter surgery to prevent urinary retention, despite a lack of evidence to support this practice. Our study aims to evaluate the feasibility of outpatient, catheter-free continence surgery using a multi-institutional database. We hypothesize that between catheterized controls and patients without a catheter, there would be no difference in the rate of urinary retention or postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing first-time artificial urinary sphincter placement from 2009-2021. Patients were stratified by postoperative catheter status into either no-catheter (leaving the procedure without a catheter) or catheter (postoperative indwelling catheter for ∼24 hours). The primary outcome, urinary retention, was defined as catheterization due to subjective voiding difficulty or documented postvoid residual over 250 mL. RESULTS: Our study identified 302 catheter and 123 no-catheter patients. Twenty (6.6%) catheter and 9 (7.3%) no-catheter patients developed urinary retention (P = .8). On multivariable analysis, controlling for age, cuff size, radiation history and surgeon, there was no statistically significant association between omitting a catheter and urinary retention (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.13-1.58; P = .2). Furthermore, at 30 months follow-up, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that device survival was 70% (95% CI: 62%-76%) vs 69% (95% CI: 48%-82%) for the catheter and no-catheter group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our multi-institutional cohort, overall retention rates were low (7%) in groups with a catheter and without. Obviating postoperative catheterization facilitates outpatient incontinence surgery without altering reoperation over medium-term follow-up.

Dermatological Needs in an Urban Free Health Care Setting.

Introduction A large proportion of the United States' underinsured population relies on free health clinics for their health care needs. With only a few free health clinics nationwide hosting specialty clinics, a small subset of which are dermatology clinics, there is a dearth of information in the literature on which dermatological pathologies and treatment modalities are most common in this setting. The purpose of this study was to establish the most common dermatological conditions and treatments in the free health care setting as well as understand which facets of care need improvement. Methods A total of 57 patients with dermatological findings were identified at an urban student-run free health clinic in the southern United States in the past two years (2019-2021). Information reviewed for each patient included general demographics, chief complaint, medical/surgical history, treatments/procedures required for each visit, treatments/procedures available for each visit, referrals, and follow-up rate. Qualitative analysis was performed.  Results The median age of the patients that presented with dermatological findings was 40 while the most common ethnicities were white (26.2%), Hispanic/Latino (28.6%), and black (28.6%). The most common chief complaints were rashes and cysts with a majority (63.2%) of these patients presenting to this particular clinic for the first time. Seven patients (12.3%) were unable to receive treatment due to expense, procedure unavailability, or an unknown reason. The most common treatment prescribed included a topical steroid. A majority (71.9%) of the patients were unable to follow up as scheduled. A majority of patients (81.2%) that were able to follow up were adherent to their prescribed medication. Conclusion Although dermatological conditions are plentiful in the free health care setting, the literature currently contains no information regarding this topic. This may be due to low patient follow-up rates and inadequately charted outcomes on often outdated electronic health records. In order to best care for dermatology patients in this setting, it is necessary to understand the barriers to care and available treatment options.

Pediatric Non-Testicular Torsion Acute Scrotum-Is the Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Patients With Normal Urine Analysis Justified?

OBJECTIVE: To determine if empirical antibiotic treatment for non-testicular torsion (NNT) acute scrotum is necessary in the setting of a normal urine analysis (UA). METHODS: Retrospective chart review revealed 314 pediatric patients with clinically diagnosed NTT acute scrotum with negative UA between 2004-2019. Exclusion criteria included previous urological history and immunocompromised state. Patients were divided into those with antibiotics treatment vs those without. The independent t test was used to compare numerical variables while the chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables. RESULTS: Of the 314 patients identified, 141 (44.9%) received empiric antibiotics despite negative UA. Clinical findings and demographic characteristics between groups were not found to be significant. Patients clinically diagnosed with epididymo-orchitis were more likely to be prescribed antibiotics (48.2 vs 30.6%, P =.02). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole accounted for 83% of the antibiotics that were prescribed in our study. There was no significant difference in symptom resolution between patients prescribed antibiotics and those not prescribed antibiotics (5.1 days vs 4.6 days, P =.71). Additionally, no patient in either group returned with complications such as worsening symptoms or urinary tract infection between presentation and their scheduled follow up visit. CONCLUSION: Based on our analysis, antibiotics in NTT acute scrotum appear to have no benefit in symptom resolution or complication reduction in patients without any predisposing urological risk factors and negative UA at presentation. Given the risk and rise of antibiotic resistance providers need to be careful to select treatments based on available evidence.

Social Media Changes in Pediatric Residency Programs During COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To describe pediatric residency program's virtual presence and opportunities for the 2021 application cycle. METHODS: A total of 202 pediatric residency programs from the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) were reviewed for departmental and residency Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook accounts. These accounts, residency websites, and the Visiting Student Application Service (VSAS) were reviewed for open house opportunities and virtual subinternships. All data were collected from October 12-15, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 261 social media accounts were identified. 123 (61%) programs had at least one account, with 32 (16%) programs having presence on all 3 platforms. 68 (34%) programs established new accounts after March 1, 2020. Instagram appeared most utilized with 106 (52%) programs having accounts. A total of 115 virtual open house opportunities were offered with most offers on Instagram by 61 (30%) programs. Only 2 virtual subinternships were listed on program websites, 2 on Twitter, 1 on Instagram, and 1 on Facebook. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 increased the number of social media accounts used by residency programs. Approximately one-third of all accounts were created after March 1, 2020. However, only 16% of residency programs have a presence on all 3 platforms, allowing for more online growth.