Comparison of mitral regurgitation severity assessments based on magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Mitral regurgitation (MR), which is one of the factors responsible for heart failure symptoms and the development of atrial fibrillation, is an important feature of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and its presence affects which treatment options are chosen. Although cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the reference standard for assessing the regurgitant volume (RV) and fraction (RF), echocardiography is the most common method for assessing MR severity. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to compare the results of echocardiography and cardiac MRI for assessing MR severity in a cohort of patients with HCM. MR severity was assessed in 53 patients using cardiac MRI by determining the mitral RV (MRV) and mitral RF (MRF). The results were graded according to thresholds recommended in current guidelines. MR severity assessed by echocardiography was graded by integrating indices of severity. Greater than mild MR, as assessed using echocardiography, was present in 22 patients (41.5%) with HCM and in none of the control patients (p = 0.001). In all, 31 patients (58.5%) had no more than mild MR. When MR severity was assessed using different methods, either moderate (kappa = 0.44, 95% confidence interval = 0.21-0.67), poor or no agreement was found between MRI-derived and echocardiography-derived grades. HCM patients with echocardiography-derived moderate and severe MR had similar median MRVs and MRFs (p = 0.59 and p = 0.11, respectively). In HCM patients, cardiac MRI and echocardiography were at most in modest agreement in assessing MR severity. Importantly, echocardiography-derived moderate and severe MR were not distinguishable by either MRV or MRF.

Sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison between echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.

In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients, left ventricular (LV) maximal wall thickness (MWT) is one of the most important factors determining sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk. In a large unselected sample of HCM patients, we aimed to simulate what changes would occur in the calculated SCD risk according to the European HCM Risk-SCD calculator when MWT measured using echocardiography was changed to MWT measured using MRI. All consecutive patients with HCM who underwent cardiac MRI were included. MWT measured with echocardiography and MRI were compared, and 5-year SCD risk according to the HCM Risk-SCD calculator was computed using four different models. The final population included 673 patients [389 (57.8%) males, median age 50 years, interquartile range (36-60)]. The median MWT was lower measured by echocardiography than by MRI [20 (17-24) mm vs 21 (18-24) mm; p < 0.0001]. There was agreement between echocardiography and MRI in the measurement of maximal LV wall thickness in 96 patients (14.3%). The largest differences between echo and MRI were - 13 mm and + 9 mm. The differences in MWT by echocardiography and MRI translated to a maximal difference of 8.33% in the absolute 5-year risk of SCD, i.e., the echocardiography-based risk was 8.33% lower than the MRI-based estimates. Interestingly, 13.7% of patients would have been reclassified into different SCD risk categories if MRI had been used to measure MWT instead of echocardiography. In conclusion, although there was high general intermodality agreement between echocardiography and MRI in the MWT measurements, the differences in MWT translated to significant differences in the 5-year risk of SCD.

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular morphology and function in patients with fibromuscular dysplasia: the ARCADIA-POL study.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive assessment of left ventricle (LV) structure, and function and to detect alterations in cardiac properties in relationship to presence, subtypes and extent of fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD). METHODS: We studied 144 patients with FMD. The control group consisted of 50 matched individuals. Office and ambulatory blood pressure levels were evaluated. Echocardiography was employed to assess: left ventricular mass index (LVMI), systolic function including speckle tracking echocardiography and diastolic function assessed by mitral flow and tissue Doppler imaging. RESULTS: There were no differences in LV morphology and function between patients with FMD and the control group. Among 128 patients with renal FMD, there were no differences in LVMI and LV systolic function between patients with unifocal and multifocal FMD. The patients with multifocal FMD were characterized by lower early diastolic velocity (e') as compared with unifocal FMD and control groups. However, in a multivariate regression model, e' was not independently correlated with FMD. There were no associations between echocardiographic indexes and vascular involvement of FMD. Also, there were no differences in LV morphology and function in patients with significant renal artery stenosis (RAS) compared with patients with history of significant RAS and patients with nonsignificant RAS. CONCLUSION: Our study in contrast to those with atherosclerotic RAS, did not show differences in LV morphology and function between FMD patients and matched controls. Although FMD can result in hypertension and serious vascular complications, there is no proof that it can alter LV regardless of FMD type and its extent.

Cardiac arrest and ventricular arrhythmia in adults with Ebstein anomaly and left ventricular non-compaction.

BACKGROUND: Ebstein anomaly is a complex, congenital heart defect that is associated with a variety of cardiac abnormalities. Studies found a similar sarcomere gene mutation in patients with Ebstein anomaly (EA) and patients with isolated left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC). AIM: We aimed to show the prevalence of LVNC and its potential relationship with severe cardiac events (VT - ventricular tachycardia, cardiac arrest) in adult patients with EA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective search of our institutional database from 2010 to 2014 for patients with EA and reviewed patients' medical records (age, sex, clinical presentation, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and CMR - cardiac magnetic resonance features). We reviewed echocardiograms and CMR scans for concomitant morphological abnormalities (LVNC, PDA - patent ductus arteriosus, VSD - ventricular septal defect, ASD - atrial septal defect, mitral valve prolapse, BAV - bicuspid aortic valve, CoA - coarctation of aorta). RESULTS: The studied group consisted of 84 consecutive patients (mean age 38±15 years, 50 women) with EA. We found four patients (4.8%) with LVNC, two of them had cardiac arrest, one had VT, and one was symptomless, but had QTc prolongation in Holter recordings. Concomitant abnormalities were VSD (4.8%), PDA (1.2%), CoA (1.2%), mitral valve prolapse (1.2%), and BAV (2.4%). The most common anomaly was ASD type II - 23 patients (27.3%) and WPW - Wolff-Parkinson-White's syndrome - 9 patients (10.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Non-compaction is a notable abnormality in adult patients with EA and it may affect their prognosis. Although other concomitant lesions were more common, only patients with LVNC suffered from cardiac arrest or ventricular arrhythmia.

Quantification of mitral regurgitation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using aortic and pulmonary flow data: impacts of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and different left ventricular segmentation methods.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) enables the assessment of not only left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and scarring but also the severity of mitral regurgitation. CMR assessment of mitral regurgitation is primarily based on the difference between LV stroke volume (LVSV) and aortic forward flow (Ao) measured using the phase-contrast (PC) technique. However, LV outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction causing turbulent, non-laminar flow in the ascending aorta may impact the accuracy of aortic flow quantification, leading to false conclusions regarding mitral regurgitation severity. Thus, we decided to quantify mitral regurgitation in patients with HCM using Ao or, alternatively, main pulmonary artery forward flow (MPA) for mitral regurgitation volume (MRvol) calculations. METHODS: The analysis included 143 prospectively recruited subjects with HCM and 15 controls. MRvol was calculated as the difference between LVSV computed with either the inclusion (LVSVincl) or exclusion (LVSVexcl) of papillary muscles and trabeculations from the blood pool and either Ao (MRvolAoi or MRvolAoe) or MPA (MRvolMPAi or MRvolMPAe). The presence or absence of LVOT obstruction was determined based on Doppler echocardiography findings. RESULTS: MRvolAoi was higher than MRvolMPAi in HCM patients with LVOT obstruction [47.0 ml, interquartile range (IQR) = 31.5-60.0 vs. 35.5 ml, IQR = 26.0-51.0; p < 0.0001] but not in non-obstructive HCM patients (23.0 ml, IQR = 16.0-32.0 vs. 24.0 ml, IQR = 15.3-32.0; p = 0.26) or controls (18.0 ml, IQR = 14.3-21.8 vs. 20.0 ml, IQR = 14.3-22.0; p = 0.89). In contrast to controls and HCM patients without LVOT obstruction, in HCM patients with LVOT obstruction, aortic flow-based MRvol (MRvolAoi) was higher than pulmonary-based findings (MRvolMPAi) (bias = 9.5 ml; limits of agreement: -11.7-30.7 with a difference of 47 ml in the extreme case). The differences between aortic-based and pulmonary-based MRvol values calculated using LVSVexcl mirrored those derived using LVSVincl. However, MRvol values calculated using LVSVexcl were lower in all the groups analyzed (HCM with LVOT obstruction, HCM without LVOT obstruction, and controls) and with all methods of MRvol quantification used (p ≤ 0.0001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: In HCM patients, LVOT obstruction significantly affects the estimation of aortic flow, leading to its underestimation and, consequently, to higher MRvol values than those obtained with MPA-based MRvol calculations.

The usefulness of sST2 and galectin-3 as novel biomarkers for better risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Estimation of sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk is an integral part of clinical management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Identification of novel biomarkers of this disease can provide additional criteria for SCD risk stratification. Soluble suppression of tumourigenicity (sST2) and galectin-3 (Gal-3) are useful biomarkers for prognosis of heart failure (HF). Both of them appear to mediate cardiac fibrosis - an important pathogenetic process in HCM. Data about sST2 and Gal-3 usefulness in patients with HCM are limited. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate sST2 and Gal-3 as potential novel biomarkers for better risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Serum sST2 and serum Gal-3 levels were measured in 57 patients with HCM and in 18 healthy controls. The patients with HCM underwent routine evaluation including medical history, physical examination, blood tests (including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [hs-cTnT] measurements), 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), 48-h Holter monitoring and two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography with the assessment of the maximal left ventricular wall thickness, left atrial diameter, maximal left ventricular outflow tract gradient, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Risk of SCD at five years according to HCM SCD-risk calculator was evaluated. The control group underwent ECG, 2D echocardiography, and NT-proBNP measurements to exclude asymptomatic heart disease. RESULTS: Concentrations of sST2 and Gal-3 were significantly higher in patients with HCM than in controls (14.9 ± 5.8 ng/mL vs. 11.7 ± 3.3 ng/mL, p = 0.03 and 8.4 ng/mL [6.8-10.0] vs. 6.2 ng/mL [5.8-7.7], p = 0.005, respectively). Levels of sST2 and Gal-3 were considerably different in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) groups (p = 0.008, p = 0.009, respectively). Patients who presented non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT) on 48-h Holter monitoring had higher levels of sST2 (19.1 ng/mL [12.2-24.2] vs. 13.2 ng/mL [10.0-17.1], p = 0.02). There were no significant relationships between sST2 and Gal-3 levels and HCM SCD-risk, history of syncope presence, family history of SCD, and echocardio-graphic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Gal-3 levels and sST2 levels were higher in patients with HCM than in the control group. There were significant differences in Gal-3 levels between NYHA classes, but no correlations between Gal-3 levels and other parameters were found. Apart from differences in sST2 levels between NYHA classes, we demonstrated higher levels of sST2 in patients with nsVT. These findings suggest that sST2 may be useful as an additional biomarker for better risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.