[Prognostic Value of Preoperative Anaemia and Perioperative Blood Transfusion in Surgical Treatment of Rectal Cancer]. / Prognostischer Wert präoperativer Anämie und perioperativer Fremdbluttransfusion in der chirurgischen Therapie des Rektumkarzinoms.

INTRODUCTION: There is evidence for the prognostic value of perioperative blood transfusion in the surgical treatment of patients with rectal cancer in the current literature. Also preoperative anaemia seems to have an impact on the outcome of these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative anaemia and perioperative blood transfusion in patients with rectal cancer treated in our hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 208 patients (81 females, 127 males; median age, 67 years) with rectal cancer were included in this retrospective study. All patients received surgical treatment. In 75 % of the patients an anterior rectum resection was performed while 25 % received an abdominoperineal rectum exstirpation. Patients with neoadjuvant treatment were included and statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: 107 (51.4 %) patients exhibited preoperative anaemia. Patients with neoadjuvant treatment presented with significantly lower preoperative Hb (haemoglobin) values than patients without neoadjuvant treatment (p = 0.022). Patients with preoperative anaemia received significantly more blood transfusions (p = 0.001), had significantly longer hospital stays (p = 0.023) and significantly lower 5-years overall survival (p = 0.005). Blood transfusion was necessary in 82 patients (39.4 %). These patients presented with a significantly higher rate of perioperative complications (p = 0.01) and a lower 5-years overall survival (p = 0.002). In multivariate analyses neither preoperative anaemia nor perioperative transfusion was a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: In our study preoperative anaemia and perioperative blood transfusion seems to have an impact on outcome of surgical treatment of patients with rectal cancer. However, in multivariate analyses neither preoperative anaemia nor perioperative transfusion was a significant prognostic factor.

Secondary malignancy in patients with sporadic neuroendocrine neoplasia.

The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasias (NENs), especially of the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP), system relatively increased over the past decades, as a result of advanced diagnostic tools, a better clinical awareness, and distinguished pathological diagnostic recognition. Previous reports hypothesized an increased risk for secondary malignancies in patients with NEN especially in GEP-NENs. The present study was designed to investigate the coincidence of NENs and secondary malignancies in a large patient collective. A retrospective analysis was performed on 161 patients (85 female and 76 male) with NEN of various origins. Clinical data of these patients, different classification systems (TNM/WHO), proliferations-based grading, and clinical follow-up were collected and analyzed. Out of 143 patients with a sporadic NEN, 15 (10.49 %) patients were identified with secondary malignant tumors. Median age at the time of the primary operation for NEN was 65 years, whereas the median age of initial diagnosis of associated tumors was 59 years. Mean follow-up time was 61 months. The risk of developing a secondary malignancy was most elevated for patients with an NEN of the lung, the stomach, and the ileum (60, 50 and 20 %, respectively). The spectrum of secondary malignancies included various types of cancer. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis shows a difference suggesting that patients with a secondary malignancy demonstrate a worse survival compared to patients without a secondary tumor; no significance was detected (p = 0.349). Our data suggest that secondary malignancies in patients with NEN's especially in GEP-NENs are found more frequently than in general population. Therefore, patients with NEN need a continuous and detailed follow-up. The reason for the increased incidence of secondary malignancies in patients with NENs remains to be elucidated.

Splenic artery switch for revascularization of the liver: a salvage procedure for inflammatory arterial hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage caused by inflammatory vessel erosion represents a life-threatening complication after upper abdominal surgery such as pancreatic head resection. The gold standard therapeutic choice is an endovascular minimally invasive technique such as embolization or stent placement. Hepatic arterial hemorrhage in presence of pancreatitis and peritonitis is a particular challenge is if a standard therapeutic option is not possible. METHODS: The management of five patients with massive bleeding from the common hepatic artery is described. All patients underwent a splenic artery switch. The splenic artery was dissected close to the splenic hilum and transposed end-to-end to the common hepatic artery after resection of the eroded part. Patients' medical records, radiology reports, and images were reviewed retrospectively. Technical success was defined as immediate cessation of hemorrhage and preserved liver vascularization. Clinical success was defined as hemodynamic stability and adequate long-term liver function. RESULTS: Total pancreatectomy and splenectomy were performed in four of the five cases. Hemodynamic stability and good liver perfusion was achieved in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Splenic artery switch is an effective, safe procedure for revascularization of the liver in case of hepatic arterial hemorrhage following pancreatic surgery, pancreatitis, and/or peritonitis. The technique is a promising option if a standard procedure-e.g., stent implantation, embolization and surgical repair with alloplastic prosthesis or autologous venous interposition graft-is not possible.

Global histone modification pattern predicts poor prognosis in organic hyperinsulinism.

Here we tested whether global histone modifications predict survival in organic hyperinsulinism and whether global histone modification pattern can be used to distinguish benign from malignant primary insulinoma. A tissue microarray (TMA) was built, using samples from 63 patients with organic hyperinsulinism. The TMA was classified according to the WHO classification of 2004 [WHO 1A: benign insulinoma (wdPET); WHO 1B: unknown behavior (wdPETub); WHO 2/3: malignant insulinoma (wdPEC/pdPEC)]. The TMA consisted of tissue cores from islands of Langerhans, primary insulinomas, lymph node metastases, and hepatic metastases. Immunohistochemistry was performed on consecutive TMA slides with antibodies against H3K9Ac, H3K18Ac, H4K12Ac, H3K4diMe, and H4R3diMe. The Remmele immunoreactive scoring system was used to classify the staining. The IHC staining results were correlated to the WHO-classification of 2004 as well as to clinical follow-up data (mean: 107 months; range: 1-312 months). A nuclear staining pattern was observed for all antibodies directed against histone H3 and H4 acetylation/methylation sites. We observed significant differences in the distribution of the medians across all investigated tissue types (H3K9Ac, p=0.004; H3K18Ac, p=0.001; H4K12Ac, p=0.006; H4R3diMe, p=0.002) except for H3K4diMe (p=0.183). Correlation of the histone modification with the WHO-classification and clinical follow-up data, showed in the dichotomized groups ["low" (score 0-3), "moderate" (4-7) vs. "high" (≥8)] that patients with lower H3K18Ac levels ("low + moderate") had a significantly decreased relapse-free survival vs. patients with high H3K18Ac levels (p=0.038). The WHO classification and age were also of significant prognostic impact upon univariate analysis. A backwards Cox proportional hazards model revealed the independent prognostic effekt of H3K18Ac levels. Our data revealed low K18 acetylation levels of histone H3 as independent prognostic factor in organic hyperinsulinism. This result warrants validation with independent data sets of organic hyperinsulinism, but is in line with several previous studies in different cancer entities. The broad applicability of this potential biomarker might lead to standardized diagnostic tests in near future and may help to manage insulinoma patients more effectively.

[Individualised and differentiated treatment of rectovaginal fistula]. / Individualisierte und differenzierte Therapie von rektovaginalen Fisteln.

Rectovaginal fistuale (RVF) are a serious and disabling problem for the patients and a surgical challenge for the treating physicians. The most common causes of RVF are postoperative complications, inflammatory bowel disease, complications of radiotherapy, obstetric complications, and neoplasia. Therapeutic options are diverse and results often unsatisfactory. This article presents the treatment of patients with rectovaginal fistulae in the general surgery department of University Hospital in Duesseldorf, Germany. The therapeutic strategy for treatment of RVF is divided according to aetiology, localisation, and comorbidity. A diverting ileostomy is particularly useful if acute inflammation exists. Secondary repair may then be a better option. An initial approach with a local repair by preanal repair is justified in low RVF. For failures muscle flaps are promising.