A comparison of secondary prevention practice in poststroke and coronary heart disease patients.

OBJECTIVES: It is evident that patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease (AVD) benefit from appropriate secondary prevention. In clinical reality, the secondary prevention in AVD patients other than those with coronary heart disease (CHD) is often overlooked. Therefore, we compared the adherence to secondary prevention principles between poststroke and CHD patients. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive (cross-sectional) study with prospective mortality follow-up. METHODS: We examined 1729 chronic patients with AVD (mean age 65.9 (±SD 9.6) years), 964 with CHD, and 765 poststroke (pooled data of Czech samples of EUROASPIRE III, IV, and the ESH stroke survey). The interview was performed 6-36 months after the coronary event/revascularization or the first ischemic stroke, while the mortality follow-up 5 years after this interview. RESULTS: Poststroke patients had a significantly higher risk of persistent smoking, blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg and LDL ≥2.5 mmol/L than CHD patients [odds ratios adjusted for age, gender and survey were 1.63 (95% CI: 1.13-2.33), 1.38 (95% CI: 1.13-1.69) and 2.26 (95% CI: 1.84-2.78), respectively]. In contrast, poststroke patients showed a lower risk of inappropriate glucose control and hypertriglyceridemia [0.66 (95%CI: 0.54-0.82) and 0.74 (95%CI: 0.61-0.91), respectively]. The prescription rates of antiplatelets/anticoagulants, antihypertensives and statins were also significantly lower in poststroke than in CHD patients (89.4 vs 93.7, 85.9 vs 97.5, and 57.7 vs 89.8, respectively). Mortality analysis was performed in a subsample of 815 subjects interviewed in 2006/07. The 5-year all-cause mortality rates were 25.8% and 13.3% in poststroke and coronary patients, respectively (P = 0.0023); the hazard ratio for stroke adjusted for major risk factors was 1.85 (95% CI: 1.31-2.63). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to CHD patients, poststroke patients are strongly handicapped in terms of poor adherence to secondary prevention target, prescription of basic pharmacotherapies and mortality risk.

Tobacco smoking strongly modifies the association of prothrombin G20210A with undetermined stroke: consecutive survivors and population-based controls.

OBJECTIVE: Due to contradictory results of previous studies evaluating the association between ischemic stroke (IS) and thrombophilic polymorphisms, their routine screening in IS patients, particularly those older than 60 years, is not recommended. We evaluated the differences in the distribution of rs6025 and rs1799963 polymorphisms according to IS subtypes and their interaction with smoking. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of 423 hospital-based consecutive survivors of their first-ever IS and 614 population-based controls. Survivors (18-81 years) with IS documented by brain imagining were examined at a median of 16 months after the index event. The stroke subtype was categorized using the Causative Classification of Stroke System. Controls (50-75 years) were free of a history of stroke/TIA, coronary heart disease, and venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: Age- and gender-adjusted prevalence of individuals carrying at least one copy of the rs1799963A minor allele was 5.3% among stroke survivors (by subtypes: 3.1% in large artery atherosclerosis, 2.0% in cardio-aortic embolism, 2.4% in small artery occlusion, and 10.3% in undetermined stroke) vs. 2.4% among controls. In multinomial multivariate adjusted analysis, rs1799963 was exclusively associated with undetermined stroke (OR: 3.67; 95% CI: 1.52-8.85; p = 0.004). There was strong evidence of rs1799963 × smoking synergistic interaction (OR: 5.14; 95% CI: 1.65-16.01; p = 0.005). There was no association of rs6025 with IS in general, or with any subtype. CONCLUSIONS: In our consecutive IS survivors, carriage of the rs1799963A allele is associated with undetermined stroke. This effect appears to be confined to smokers.

A novel oscillometric device for peripheral arterial disease screening in everyday practice. The Czech-post MONICA study.

AIM: Ankle brachial index (ABI) is a diagnostic tool for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and a cardiovascular risk stratification tool. Despite this evidence and guidelines recommending its use in everyday practice, ABI is not widely used. Automatic ABI measurement may lower the barrier to incorporate ABI measurement into everyday practice. The aim of this study was to validate a novel automatic oscillometric ABI device (BOSO ABI) against a gold standard-Doppler device in an epidemiological setting. METHODS: In 839 patients from the Czech post-MONICA study (a randomly selected representative population sample aged over 25 years), mean age 54.3±13.8 years (47% of men), ABI measurement was performed using the BOSO ABI device and a handheld Doppler device in a random fashion. The two techniques were carried out by different investigators each blinded to the findings of the other. Analyses were conducted as proposed by Bland and Altman. RESULTS: The mean ABI difference between the two methods was 0.1±0.11, with 95% limits of agreement ranging from -0.11 to 0.30. The difference between Doppler and oscillometric ABI increased significantly with increasing mean ABI (r=0.29; P<0.001). When considering Doppler the gold standard, automated oscillometric measurement had a 76.9% sensitivity, 97.9% specificity, and 37% positive and 99.6% negative predictive values in diagnosing ABI <0.9. CONCLUSION: The BOSO ABI device cannot be used interchangeably for standard Doppler ABI measurement in diagnosing PAD. However, its high negative predictive value allows using it as a screening tool for PAD.