RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Much controversy remains about whether minimally displaced tibial plateau fractures should be treated operatively or nonoperatively. It is generally accepted that gaps and stepoffs up to 2 mm can be tolerated, but this assumption is based on older studies using plain radiographs instead of CT to assess the degree of initial fracture displacement. Knowledge regarding the relationship between the degree of fracture displacement and expected functional outcome is crucial for patient counseling and shared decision-making, specifically in terms of whether to perform surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is operative treatment associated with improved patient-reported outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment in minimally displaced tibial plateau fractures (fractures with up to 4 mm of displacement)? (2) What is the difference in the risk of complications after operative versus nonoperative treatment in minimally displaced tibial plateau fractures? METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was performed in patients treated for tibial plateau fractures between 2003 and 2019 at six hospitals. Between January 2003 and December 2019, a total of 2241 patients were treated for tibial plateau fractures at six different trauma centers. During that time, the general indication for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was intra-articular displacement of > 2 mm. Patients treated with ORIF and those treated nonoperatively were potentially eligible; 0.2% (4) were excluded because they were treated with amputation because of severe soft tissue damage, whereas 4% (89) were excluded because of coexisting conditions that complicated outcome measurement including Parkinson disease, cerebrovascular accident, or paralysis (conditions causing an inability to walk). A further 2.7% (60) were excluded because their address was unknown, and 1.4% (31) were excluded because they spoke a language other than Dutch. Based on that, 1328 patients were potentially eligible for analysis in the operative group and 729 were potentially eligible in the nonoperative group. At least 1 year after injury, all patients were approached and asked to complete the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale (KOOS) questionnaire. A total of 813 operatively treated patients (response percentage: 61%) and 345 nonoperatively treated patients (response percentage: 47%) responded to the questionnaire. Patient characteristics including age, gender, BMI, smoking, and diabetes were retrieved from electronic patient records, and imaging data were shared with the initiating center. Displacement (gap and stepoff) was measured for all participating patients, and all patients with minimally displaced fractures (gap or stepoff ≤ 4 mm) were included, leaving 195 and 300 in the operative and nonoperative groups, respectively, for analysis here. Multivariate linear regression was performed to assess the association of treatment choice (nonoperative or operative) with patient-reported outcomes in minimally displaced fractures. In the multivariate analysis, we accounted for nine potential confounders (age, gender, BMI, smoking, diabetes, gap, stepoff, AO/OTA classification, and number of involved segments). In addition, differences in complications after operative and nonoperative treatment were assessed. The minimum clinically important differences for the five subscales of the KOOS are 11 for symptoms, 17 for pain, 18 for activities of daily living, 13 for sports, and 16 for quality of life. RESULTS: After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as age, gender, BMI, and AO/OTA classification, we found that operative treatment was not associated with an improvement in patient-reported outcomes. Operative treatment resulted in poorer KOOS in terms of pain (-4.7 points; p = 0.03), sports (-7.6 points; p = 0.04), and quality of life (-7.8 points; p = 0.01) compared with nonoperative treatment, but those differences were small enough that they were likely not clinically important. Patients treated operatively had more complications (4% [7 of 195] versus 0% [0 of 300]; p = 0.01) and reoperations (39% [76 of 195] versus 6% [18 of 300]; p < 0.001) than patients treated nonoperatively. After operative treatment, most reoperations (36% [70 of 195]) consisted of elective removal of osteosynthesis material. CONCLUSION: No differences in patient-reported outcomes were observed at midterm follow-up between patients treated surgically and those treated nonsurgically for tibial plateau fractures with displacement up to 4 mm. Therefore, nonoperative treatment should be the preferred treatment option in minimally displaced fractures. Patients who opt for nonoperative treatment should be told that complications are rare, and only 6% of patients might undergo surgery by midterm follow-up. Patients who opt for surgery of a minimally displaced tibial plateau fracture should be told that complications may occur in up to 4% of patients, and 39% of patients may undergo a secondary intervention (most of which are elective implant removal). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
