Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist, Almorexant, in Elderly Patients With Primary Insomnia: A Randomized, Controlled Study.

Objective: Sleep laboratory study to determine the dose-related efficacy and safety of almorexant in elderly patients with primary chronic insomnia. Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years with primary insomnia were enrolled into a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter dose-finding study with a five-period, five-way Latin square cross-over design. Patients were randomized to one of 10 unique sequences of two-night treatment with oral almorexant 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg capsules, or matching placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was polysomnography (PSG)-determined mean wake time after sleep onset (WASO). Secondary and exploratory efficacy endpoints were also assessed. Results: 112 patients were randomized (mean [SD] age 72.1 [5.0] years; 69.9% female). Significant, dose-related improvements (reductions) in mean WASO were observed with almorexant. Least-squares mean (95% CI) treatment effects in the almorexant 200, 100, 50, and 25 mg dose groups versus placebo were -46.5 minutes (-53.0, -39.9; p < .0001), -31.4 minutes (-38.0, -24.9; p < .0001), -19.2 minutes (-25.7, -12.6; p < .0001), and -10.4 minutes (-17.0, -3.9; p = .0018), respectively. Mean total sleep time was significantly increased with each almorexant dose (mean increases versus placebo ranged 55.1-14.3 minutes; p < .0001 for each dose). Latency to persistent sleep was statistically significantly reduced only with almorexant 200 mg versus placebo (mean [95% CI] treatment effect -10.2 minutes, [-15.4, -5.0]; p = .0001). No unexpected safety concerns were identified. Adverse events were similar between all almorexant dose groups and placebo. Conclusions: Two-night oral administration of almorexant was effective and well tolerated in treating primary insomnia in elderly patients.

Bosentan treatment of digital ulcers related to systemic sclerosis: results from the RAPIDS-2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Ischaemic digital ulcers (DUs) are common in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and are a cause of disease-related morbidity. In an earlier trial, treatment with bosentan, an oral endothelin receptor antagonist, reduced the occurrence of new DUs by 48%. The present study (RAPIDS-2, for 'RAndomized, double-blind, Placebo-controlled study with bosentan on healing and prevention of Ischemic Digital ulcers in patients with systemic Sclerosis') was conducted to more fully evaluate the effects of bosentan treatment on DUs associated with SSc. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 41 centres in Europe and North America randomised 188 patients with SSc with at least 1 active DU ('cardinal ulcer') to bosentan 62.5 mg twice daily for 4 weeks and 125 mg twice daily thereafter for 20 weeks (n=98) or matching placebo (n=90; total 24 weeks). The two primary end points were the number of new DUs and the time to healing of the cardinal ulcer. Secondary end points included pain, disability and safety. RESULTS: Over 24 weeks, bosentan treatment was associated with a 30% reduction in the number of new DUs compared with placebo (mean ± standard error: 1.9±0.2 vs 2.7±0.3 new ulcers; p=0.04). This effect was greater in patients who entered the trial with more DUs. There was no difference between treatments in healing rate of the cardinal ulcer or secondary end points of pain and disability. Peripheral oedema and elevated aminotransferases were associated with bosentan treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Bosentan treatment reduced the occurrence of new DUs in patients with SSc but had no effect on DU healing. Bosentan was well tolerated and may be a useful adjunct in the management of patients with SSc with recurrent DUs.