Polyp size measurement during colonoscopy using a virtual scale: variability and systematic differences.

BACKGROUND: Accurate polyp size measurement is important for polyp risk stratification and decision-making regarding polypectomy and surveillance. Recently, a virtual scale (VS) function has been developed that allows polyp size measurement through projection of an adaptive VS onto colorectal polyps during real-time endoscopy. We aimed to evaluate the VS in terms of variability and systematic differences. METHODS: We conducted a video-based study with 120 colorectal polyps, measured by eight dedicated colorectal gastroenterologists (experts) and nine gastroenterology residents following endoscopy training (trainees). Three endoscopic measurement methods were compared: (1) visual, (2) snare and (3) VS measurement. We evaluated the method-specific variance (as measure of variability) in polyp size measurements and systematic differences between these methods. RESULTS: Variance in polyp size measurements was significantly lower for VS measurements compared to visual and snare measurements for both experts (0.52 vs. 1.59 and 1.96, p<0.001) and trainees (0.59 vs. 2.21 and 2.53, p<0.001). VS measurement resulted in a higher percentage of polyps assigned to the same size category by all endoscopists compared to visual and snare measurements (experts: 69% vs. 55% and 59%; trainees: 67% vs. 51% and 47%) and reduced the maximum difference between individual endoscopists regarding the percentage of polyps assigned to the >10 mm size category (experts: 1.7% vs. 10.0% and 5.0%; trainees: 2.5% vs. 6.7% and 11.7%). Systematic differences between methods were <0.5 mm. Conclusions Use of the VS leads to lower polyp size measurement variability and more uniform polyp sizing by individual endoscopists compared to visual and snare measurements.

Healthy Tissue Uptake of 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen, 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-Fluoromethylcholine, and 18F-Dihydrotestosterone.

PET is increasingly used for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics. Important PCa radiotracers include 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen HBED-CC (68Ga-PSMA), 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-fluoromethylcholine (18F-FCH), and 18F-dihydrotestosterone (18F-FDHT). Knowledge on the variability of tracer uptake in healthy tissues is important for accurate PET interpretation, because malignancy is suspected only if the uptake of a lesion contrasts with its background. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify uptake variability of PCa tracers in healthy tissues and identify stable reference regions for PET interpretation. Methods: A total of 232 PCa PET/CT scans from multiple hospitals was analyzed, including 87 68Ga-PSMA scans, 50 18F-DCFPyL scans, 68 18F-FCH scans, and 27 18F-FDHT scans. Tracer uptake was assessed in the blood pool, lung, liver, bone marrow, and muscle using several SUVs (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak). Variability in uptake between patients was analyzed using the coefficient of variation (COV%). For all tracers, SUV reference ranges (95th percentiles) were calculated, which could be applicable as image-based quality control for future PET acquisitions. Results: For 68Ga-PSMA, the lowest uptake variability was observed in the blood pool (COV, 19.9%), which was significantly more stable than all other tissues (COV, 29.8%-35.2%; P = 0.001-0.024). For 18F-DCFPyL, the lowest variability was observed in the blood pool and liver (COV, 14.4% and 21.7%, respectively; P = 0.001-0.003). The least variable 18F-FCH uptake was observed in the liver, blood pool, and bone marrow (COV, 16.8%-24.2%; P = 0.001-0.012). For 18F-FDHT, low uptake variability was observed in all tissues, except the lung (COV, 14.6%-23.6%; P = 0.001-0.040). The different SUV types had limited effect on variability (COVs within 3 percentage points). Conclusion: In this multicenter analysis, healthy tissues with limited uptake variability were identified, which may serve as reference regions for PCa PET interpretation. These reference regions include the blood pool for 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-DCFPyL and the liver for 18F-FCH and 18F-FDHT. Healthy tissue SUV reference ranges are presented and applicable as image-based quality control.

Reproducibility and Repeatability of Semiquantitative 18F-Fluorodihydrotestosterone Uptake Metrics in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Metastases: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

18F-fluorodihydrotestosterone (18F-FDHT) is a radiolabeled analog of the androgen receptor's primary ligand that is currently being credentialed as a biomarker for prognosis, response, and pharmacodynamic effects of new therapeutics. As part of the biomarker qualification process, we prospectively assessed its reproducibility and repeatability in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Methods: We conducted a prospective multiinstitutional study of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients undergoing 2 (test/retest) 18F-FDHT PET/CT scans on 2 consecutive days. Two independent readers evaluated all examinations and recorded SUVs, androgen receptor-positive tumor volumes, and total lesion uptake for the most avid lesion detected in each of 32 predefined anatomic regions. The relative absolute difference and reproducibility coefficient (RC) of each metric were calculated between the test and retest scans. Linear regression analyses, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate repeatability of 18F-FDHT metrics. The coefficient of variation and ICC were used to assess interobserver reproducibility. Results: Twenty-seven patients with 140 18F-FDHT-avid regions were included. The best repeatability among 18F-FDHT uptake metrics was found for SUV metrics (SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak), with no significant differences in repeatability among them. Correlations between the test and retest scans were strong for all SUV metrics (R2 ≥ 0.92; ICC ≥ 0.97). The RCs of the SUV metrics ranged from 21.3% (SUVpeak) to 24.6% (SUVmax). The test and retest androgen receptor-positive tumor volumes and TLU, respectively, were highly correlated (R2 and ICC ≥ 0.97), although variability was significantly higher than that for SUV (RCs > 46.4%). The prostate-specific antigen levels, Gleason score, weight, and age did not affect repeatability, nor did total injected activity, uptake measurement time, or differences in uptake time between the 2 scans. Including the most avid lesion per patient, the 5 most avid lesions per patient, only lesions 4.2 mL or more, only lesions with an SUV of 4 g/mL or more, or normalizing of SUV to area under the parent plasma activity concentration-time curve did not significantly affect repeatability. All metrics showed high interobserver reproducibility (ICC > 0.98; coefficient of variation < 0.2%-10.8%). Conclusion: Uptake metrics derived from 18F-FDHT PET/CT show high repeatability and interobserver reproducibility.

Multiparametric Analysis of the Relationship Between Tumor Hypoxia and Perfusion with ¹8F-Fluoroazomycin Arabinoside and ¹5O-H2O PET.

UNLABELLED: (18)F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside ((18)F-FAZA) is a PET tracer of tumor hypoxia. However, as hypoxia often is associated with decreased perfusion, the delivery of (18)F-FAZA may be compromised, potentially disturbing the association between tissue hypoxia and (18)F-FAZA uptake. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the relationship between tumor perfusion and (18)F-FAZA uptake. METHODS: Ten patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer underwent subsequent dynamic (15)O-H2O and (18)F-FAZA PET scans with arterial sampling. Parametric images of both (15)O-H2O-derived perfusion (tumor blood flow [TBF]) and volume of distribution (V(T)) of (18)F-FAZA were generated. Next, multiparametric classification was performed using lesional and global thresholds. Voxels were classified as low or high TBF and (18)F-FAZA V(T), respectively. Finally, by combining these initial classifications, voxels were allocated to 4 categories: lowTBF-lowV(T), lowTBF-highV(T), highTBF-lowV(T), and highTBF-highV(T). RESULTS: A total of 13 malignant lesions were identified in the 10 patients. The TBF and (18)F-FAZA V(T) values (average ± SD) across all lesions were 0.45 ± 0.20 mL·cm(-3)·min(-1) and 0.94 ± 0.31 mL·cm(-3), respectively. The averages of all lesional median values for TBF and (18)F-FAZA V(T) were 0.37 ± 0.15 mL·cm(-3)·min(-1) and 0.85 ± 0.18 mL·cm(-3), respectively. Multiparametric analysis showed that classified voxels were clustered rather than randomly distributed. Several intralesion areas were identified where (18)F-FAZA V(T) was inversely related to TBF. On the other hand, there were also distinct areas where TBF as well as (18)F-FAZA V(T) were decreased or increased. CONCLUSION: The present data indicate that spatial variation of (18)F-FAZA uptake is not necessarily inversely related to TBF. This suggests that decreased TBF may result in flow-limited delivery of (18)F-FAZA. Areas with both high (18)F-FAZA uptake and high TBF values suggest that high (18)F-FAZA uptake, possibly suggesting hypoxia, may occur despite high TBF values. In conclusion, multiparametric evaluation of the spatial distributions of both TBF and (18)F-FAZA uptake may be helpful for understanding the (18)F-FAZA signal.