Post-sympathectomy neuralgia: hypotheses on peripheral and central neuronal mechanisms.

Post-sympathectomy neuralgia is proposed here to be a complex neuropathic and central deafferentation/reafferentation syndrome dependent on: (a) the transection, during sympathectomy, of paraspinal somatic and visceral afferent axons within the sympathetic trunk; (b) the subsequent cell death of many of the axotomized afferent neurons, resulting in central deafferentation; and (c) the persistent sensitization of spinal nociceptive neurons by painful conditions present prior to sympathectomy. Viscerosomatic convergence, collateral sprouting of afferents, and mechanisms associated with sympathetically maintained pain are all proposed to be important to the development of the syndrome.

Sympathetic activation of cat spinal neurons responsive to noxious stimulation of deep tissues in the low back.

Prior findings from diverse studies have indicated that activity in axons located in the lumbar sympathetic chains contributes to the activation of spinal pain pathways and to low back pain; these studies have utilized sympathetic blocks in patients, electrical stimulation of the chain in conscious humans, and neuroanatomical mapping of afferent fiber projections. In the present study, dorsal horn neurons receiving nociceptor input from lumbar paraspinal tissues were tested for activation by electrical stimulation of the lumbar sympathetic chain in anesthetized cats. Of 83 neurons tested, 70% were responsive to sympathetic trunk stimulation. Excitatory responses, observed in both nociceptive specific and wide-dynamic-range neurons, were differentiable into two classes: non-entrained and entrained responses. Non-entrained responses were attenuated or blocked by systemic administration of the alpha-adrenergic antagonist phentolamine and are thought to result from sympathetic efferent activation of primary afferents in the units' receptive fields. Entrained responses were unaffected by phentolamine and are thought to result from electrical activation of somatic and/or visceral afferent fibers ascending through the sympathetic trunk into the dorsal horn. These findings from nocireceptive neurons serving lumbar paraspinal tissues suggest that low back pain may be exacerbated by activity in both efferent and afferent fibers located in the lumbar sympathetic chain, the efferent actions being mediated indirectly through sympathetic-sensory interactions in somatic and/or visceral tissues.

Characterization of spinal somatosensory neurons having receptive fields in lumbar tissues of cats.

In pentobarbital anesthetized cats, extracellular unitary recordings were made from neurons in the extreme lateral dorsal horn of spinal segments L4-5. All 118 units reported had receptive fields in deep somatic tissues and/or skin of the lumbar region, hip and/or proximal leg. Neurons were functionally characterized according to their responses to non-noxious and noxious mechanical stimuli and to injections of algogens. Most neurons (92%) were either wide-dynamic range (WDR) or nociceptive specific (NS), and most of these had very large nociceptive receptive fields in the back/hip/leg that included both skin and deep somatic tissues innervated through both the dorsal (back/hip) and ventral (leg/ventral spine) rami. Most (72%) were 'hyperconvergent' in that they were responsive to stimulation of many different somatic tissues including skin, muscles, facet joint capsules, ligaments, and periosteum. Some units were tested and found also to be activated by noxious stimulation of spinal dura and ventral annulus fibrosis and ventral longitudinal ligament. Twelve of 22 neurons tested were found to have ascending axons extending beyond Th10. The nocireceptive neurons (NS and WDR) in the population tested are suitable for processing information about tissue damage in deep somatic tissues in the back, hip and proximal leg. The apparent relative paucity of such neurons and their very large hyperconvergent receptive fields suggest that sensations served by these neurons, such as low back and referred leg pain, would be neither well localized nor attributable to pathology in a specific tissue. These deductions, based on physiological characteristics in cats, are consistent with clinical reports from humans who experience pain as a consequence of spinal or paraspinal injuries.