The MULAN Trial - RCT on the use of MUsic in Cath-Lab to reduce ANxiety during peripheral vascular interventions.

Background: The purpose was to analyze the use of classical music to reduce procedure-related anxiety while conducting percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with peripheral artery disease. Patients and methods: A total of 155 patients were analyzed in this single center randomized controlled trial. Procedure-related anxiety was assessed by a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10) and by recording of physiological parameters at three different points in time. A survey was conducted after the intervention. Results: This study showed that the patients listened to music overcame their procedure-related anxiety more quickly than the patients in the control group. The NRS at second timepoint was significantly reduced in intervention group compared to control group (p<0.01; r=0.2). Most participants stated that they would like to listen to music during possible future interventions. Conclusions: Classical music during endovascular interventions reduced procedure-related anxiety measured as greater reduction in NRS values in intervention group as well as in results of questionnaire performed post procedurally in PAD patients.

Endovascular interventions in outpatient care.

Endovascular arterial revascularisations for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease are constantly increasing in importance and number due to the changing age structure and high numbers of comorbidities in the German population. Patients with peripheral artery disease are often at increased risk for peri- and post-procedural complications including severe cardiovascular events. Due to limited financial and human resources and considerable risks of hospitalization, endovascular interventions that were previously reserved for hospitalized patients are now progressively considered to be performed as day case procedures. More than one third of these procedures are performed in Germany by internists with a specialization in angiology. In the current position paper the German Society of Angiology endorsed by the European Society of Vascular Medicine, summarizes the requirements and risk factors to be considered for the planning, safe performance and post procedural care of endovascular revascularizations in outpatients. The performance of endovascular procedures for peripheral artery disease both in hospitalised and outpatients should be accompanied by a mandatory quality assurance process that should not only capture procedural data, but also require documentation of complications and longterm outcome.

Diabetes mellitus and femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.

Background: The influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) on recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) of femoropopliteal arteries remains understudied. We investigated whether DM has an impact on recurrent restenosis after femoropopliteal stenting in patients included in the dRug-coatEd balloon angioPlasty for femoropopliteAl In-stent Restenosis (REPAIR) cooperation. Patients and methods: The REPAIR cooperation pooled the patient-level data from 3 randomized trials in which patients with ISR of femoropopliteal arteries received either drug-coated balloon (DCB) or plain balloon angioplasty. For this analysis, patients were divided in two groups based on whether they had or had not a DM diagnosis at the time of enrollment. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization (TLR). The main secondary outcome was recurrent ISR. Other outcomes of interest were death, Rutherford class improvement and ankle-brachial index at follow-up. Results: 256 patients (DM, n=99 vs. non-DM, n=157) with 12-month follow-up were included in the analysis. Compared to non-DM patients, DM patients displayed no difference in terms of TLR [adjusted hazard ratio (95% Confidence intervals): 0.96 (0.55, 1.69), p=0.89] and recurrent ISR [1.04 (0.61, 1.77), p=0.88], whilst mortality was higher [9.38 (1.06, 83.11), p=0.044]. There were no differences between groups with respect to other secondary outcomes. The percutaneous treatment with DCB as compared to plain balloon angioplasty significantly reduced the risk of TLR and recurrent ISR without an excess risk of death irrespective of DM (p for interaction ≥0.70). Conclusions: In patients with femoropopliteal ISR, diabetes has a neutral effect on the risk of recurrence, but increases mortality at 12-month follow-up. DCB as compared to plain balloon angioplasty is associated with superior efficacy without trade-off in safety, regardless of diabetes.

Stents With Torsional Strength for Superficial Femoral Artery Disease: The Prospective Q3-Registry.

PURPOSE: This postmarketing surveillance study aimed to assess effectiveness and safety of a peripheral self-expanding stent with high torsional strength (POLARIS stent) for the treatment of de novo superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions in the routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with symptomatic de novo SFA occlusive disease who underwent POLARIS stent implantation were enrolled into the prospective, multicenter, observational postmarket surveillance study. Primary outcome measure was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cdTLR) at 12 months. Main secondary outcomes were procedural success, primary clinical improvement, and freedom from major adverse cardiovascular and limb events (MACLE) throughout 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 199 participants (70±11 years, 70.4% men) were included in the study at 9 German sites from December 2014 to August 2018. Half of them (52.6%) were current smokers, 37.6% had diabetes, and 25.0% were obese. Most participants suffered from intermittent claudication (88.4%). Mean lesion length was 98±83 mm, 43.5% of lesions were occluded, and 27.3% were severely calcified. Freedom from 12 months cdTLR was 94.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.6-98.2). At 24 months, freedom from cdTLR was 88.7% (95% CI, 83.0-94.4). Procedural success was achieved in 96.2% of participants. Primary clinical improvement occurred in 87.5% and 85.4% of participants at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Freedom from MACLE was 94.8% (95% CI, 91.4-98.1) and 93.8% (95% CI, 89.9-97.6) at 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of SFA occlusive disease in a real-world setting using the POLARIS stent with high bidirectional torsional strength is efficacious and does not raise any safety concern in the medium term. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02307292).

Access Site Complications of Peripheral Endovascular Procedures: A Large, Prospective Registry on Predictors and Consequences.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate predictors and consequences of acute vascular access site complications (ASCs) related to peripheral endovascular diagnostic or interventional procedures. Despite improvement of puncture techniques, access site-related morbidity and mortality is still considerable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 5263 participants who underwent 5385 endovascular procedures at a single center were consecutively included in this prospective, observational study. Primary outcomes were ASCs defined as composite of puncture site hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and overt puncture site bleeding on the first day after procedure. RESULTS: ASCs occurred in 16.6% of peripheral endovascular procedures (78.6% hematomas, 18.9% pseudoaneurysms, 1.4% arteriovenous fistulas, 1.1% overt bleedings). Independent predictors were advanced age [odds ratio (OR) per 10 years: 1.12, p=0.004], female sex (OR men, 0.77; p=0.001), lysis (OR 3.56; p<0.001), periprocedural heparin (OR 5000 IU, 1.96; p=0.001; OR >5000 IU, 3.56; p=0.02), time to access (OR per 10 seconds, 1.01; p<0.001), sheath size (OR per French, 1.59; p<0.001), brachial artery access (OR vs retrograde transfemoral, 4.58; p<0.001), and compression only (OR Angio-Seal, 0.57, p=0.02; ProGlide, 0.36, p<0.001; FemoSeal, 0.57, p<0.001). Treatment was required in 20.2% and prolonged hospitalization in 17.7% of ASC. Three participants died from access site-related bleeding. CONCLUSION: ASCs after peripheral endovascular procedures are associated with advanced age, female sex, periprocedural antithrombotic medication, brachial artery access, postinterventional bleeding, and nonuse of vascular closure devices.

Provisional focal stenting of complex femoropopliteal lesions using the Multi-LOC multiple stent delivery system - 12-month results from the LOCOMOTIVE EXTENDED study.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate a Multiple Stent Delivery System for provisional focal stenting of the femoropopliteal artery. Patient and methods: The LOCOMOTIVE EXTENDED study (Multi-LOC for flOw liMiting Outcomes after plain old balloon angioplasty and/or drug-coated balloon Treatment in the infrainguinal position with the objectIVE to implant multiple stent segments) is a prospective, single-arm, multicentre observational study. The Multi-LOC Multiple Stent Delivery System (B.Braun, Melsungen, Germany) was used for provisional focal stenting of the femoropopliteal artery. We enrolled 357 patients with 449 femoropopliteal lesions; all had flow-limiting dissections or recoil following angioplasty. Eligibility included Rutherford classification 2 to 5 with a de novo or non-stented restenotic femoropopliteal lesion undergoing plain balloon or drug-coated balloon angioplasty. The 6- and 12-month efficacy endpoints encompassed target lesion revascularisation and primary patency rates. Results: The mean patient age was 71 ± 10 years. The mean lesion length was 16.0 ± 9.7 cm; 44.5% were TASC II C/D lesions and 31.4% were chronic total occlusions. By operator choice, 45% of the patients underwent drug-coated balloon angioplasty. On average, 4.0 stents (each 13 mm long) were placed in each lesion, resulting in a scaffolding proportion of 56% of the total lesion length with a technical success rate of 98.3%. At 6 and 12 months, the freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation was 95.5% and 88.7% and the primary patency rates were 88.7% and 82.3%, respectively. At 12 months, significant improvements were noted in Rutherford categories and ankle-brachial indices. In multiple regression analyses, both diabetes mellitus and no distal run-off vessel showed a trend toward worse TLR, while other factors such as DCB predilation or the lesion length were not predictive. Conclusions: The LOCOMOTIVE EXTENDED study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the Multi-LOC stent system for focal provisional stenting of complex femoropopliteal lesions.

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal revascularization therapy for in-stent restenosis (ISR) of femoropopliteal arteries represents a matter of debate. We investigated the outcomes of patients treated with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for ISR of femoropopliteal arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patient-level data from 3 randomized trials of DCB angioplasty for ISR of femoropopliteal arteries were pooled. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization. The main secondary outcome was recurrent ISR. Other outcomes of interest were ipsilateral amputation, death, Rutherford class improvement, and ankle-brachial index at follow-up. A total of 263 patients randomly assigned to DCB (n=133) or plain balloon angioplasty (n=130) were included in the analysis. After a follow-up of 12 months, patients treated with DCB angioplasty displayed a lower risk for target lesion revascularization (hazard ratio [95% CIs]: 0.25 [0.14-0.46]; P<0.001) and recurrent ISR (0.19 [0.10-0.35]; P<0.001) as compared with those treated with plain balloon angioplasty. There was no significant interaction between the treatment effect for target lesion revascularization and high-risk subgroups of patients such as those with diabetes mellitus, longer lesions, small vessels, moderate to severe underlying calcification, and occlusive pattern of ISR. DCB and plain balloon angioplasty were comparable with respect to other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In case of femoropopliteal ISR, the percutaneous treatment with DCB angioplasty is associated with superior clinical and antirestenotic efficacy as compared with plain balloon angioplasty at 1-year follow-up, without attrition of efficacy in high-risk subgroups of patients. The long-term durability of DCB angioplasty in this setting remains to be further investigated.

Self-Expanding Versus Balloon-Expandable Stents for Iliac Artery Occlusive Disease: The Randomized ICE Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Atherosclerosis of iliac arteries is widespread. As inflow vessels, they are of great clinical significance and increasingly being treated by endovascular means. Most commonly, stents are implanted. BACKGROUND: So far, due to a lack of comparative data, no guideline recommendations on the preferable stent type, balloon-expandable stent (BE) or self-expanding stent (SE), have been issued. METHODS: In this randomized, multicenter study, patients with moderate to severe claudication from common or external iliac artery occlusive disease were assigned 1:1 to either BE or SE. The primary endpoint was binary restenosis at 12 months as determined by duplex ultrasound. Key secondary endpoints were walking impairment, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), hemodynamic success, target limb amputation, and all-cause death. RESULTS: Six hundred sixty patients with 660 lesions were enrolled at 18 German and Swiss sites over a period of 34 months; 24.8% of the patients had diabetes and 57.4% were current smokers. The common iliac artery was affected in 58.9%. One hundred nine (16.5%) lesions were totally occluded and 25.6% heavily calcified. Twelve-month incidence of restenosis was 6.1% after SE implantation and 14.9% after BE implantation (p = 0.006). Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from TLR was 97.2% and 93.6%, respectively (p = 0.042). There was no between-group difference in walking impairment, hemodynamic success, amputation rate, all-cause death, or periprocedural complications. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of iliac artery occlusive disease with SE as compared with BE resulted in a lower 12-month restenosis rate and a significantly reduced TLR rate. No safety concerns arose in both groups. (Iliac, Common and External [ICE] Artery Stent Trial; NCT01305174).

A randomized, multi-center, prospective study comparing best medical treatment versus best medical treatment plus renal artery stenting in patients with hemodynamically relevant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RADAR) - one-year results of a pre-maturely terminated study.

BACKGROUND: The indications for conservative "best medical treatment" (BMT) versus additional renal artery stenting are a matter of ongoing debate. The RADAR study aimed to evaluate the impact of percutaneous renal artery stenting on the impaired renal function in patients with hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS). METHODS: RADAR is an international, prospective, randomized (1:1) controlled study comparing BMT alone versus BMT plus renal artery stenting in patients with duplex sonographic hemodynamically relevant RAS. Follow-up assessments were at 2, 6, and 12 months and at 3 years. The primary endpoint was change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12 months. RESULTS: Due to slow enrollment, RADAR was terminated early after inclusion of 86 of the scheduled 300 patients (28.7%). Change in eGFR between baseline and 12 months was 4.3 ± 15.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 (stent group) and 3.0 ± 14.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 (BMT group), p > 0.999. Clinical event rates were low with a 12-month composite of cardiac death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and hospitalization for congestive heart failure of 2.9% in the stent and 5.3% in the BMT group, p = 0.526, and a 3-year composite of 14.8% and 12.0%, p = 0.982. At 3 years, target vessel (re-)vascularization occurred in one patient (3.0%) in the stent group and in 8 patients (29.4%) in the BMT group. CONCLUSION: In RADAR, outcomes of renal artery stenting were similar to BMT. These results have to be interpreted with the caveat that the study did not reach its statistically based sample size. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00640406. Registered on 17 March 2008.

Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Standard Balloon for Superficial Femoral Artery In-Stent Restenosis: The Randomized Femoral Artery In-Stent Restenosis (FAIR) Trial.

BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) was shown to be superior to standard balloon angioplasty (POBA) in terms of restenosis prevention for de novo superficial femoral artery disease. For in-stent restenosis, the benefit of DCBA over POBA remains uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients with superficial femoral artery in-stent restenosis and chronic limb ischemia were recruited over 34 months at 5 German clinical sites and prospectively randomized to either DCBA (n=62) or POBA (n=57). Mean lesion length was 82.2±68.4 mm. Thirty-four (28.6%) lesions were totally occluded; 30 (25.2%) were moderately or heavily calcified. Clinical and duplex ultrasound follow-up was conducted at 6 and 12 months. The primary end point of recurrent in-stent restenosis assessed by ultrasound at 6 months was 15.4% (8 of 52) in the DCBA and 44.7% (21 of 47) in the POBA group (P=0.002). Freedom from target lesion revascularization was 96.4% versus 81.0% (P=0.0117) at 6 months and 90.8% versus 52.6% (P<0.0001) at 12 months, respectively. At 12 months, clinical improvement by ≥1 Rutherford category without the need for target lesion revascularization was observed in 35 of 45 DCBA patients (77.8%) and 23 of 44 POBA patients (52.3%; P=0.015). No major amputation was needed. Two patients in the DCBA and 3 patients in the POBA group died. No death was procedure related. CONCLUSIONS: DCBA for superficial femoral artery in-stent restenosis is associated with less recurrent restenosis and a better clinical outcome than POBA without an apparent difference in safety. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01305070.

How should I treat a complex left subclavian artery stenosis involving the vertebral artery in a patient with subclavian steal syndrome and left internal mammary artery bypass graft?

BACKGROUND: A 68-year-old male smoker presented with progressive symptoms of vertebrobasilar insufficiency and angina. His past medical history included arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia as well as diffuse coronary artery disease including left main disease. Of note, he had undergone coronary bypass surgery 12 years earlier utilising the left internal mammary artery. INVESTIGATION: Physical examination, laboratory tests, duplex ultrasound imaging, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and coronary angiography. DIAGNOSIS: Severe bifurcation stenosis of the left subclavian and vertebral artery with consecutive subclavian steal syndrome and myocardial ischaemia. MANAGEMENT: Bifurcation T-stenting using a self-expandable bare metal and a coronary drug-eluting stent.

Stent placement vs. balloon angioplasty for popliteal artery treatment: two-year results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the 2-year technical and clinical results of primary nitinol stent placement in comparison with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of de novo lesions of the popliteal artery. METHODS: The ETAP study (Endovascular Treatment of Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Lesions: balloon angioplasty vs. primary stenting; www.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00712309) is a prospective, randomized trial that enrolled 246 patients (158 men; mean age 72 years) who were randomly assigned to receive a nitinol stent (n=119) or PTA (n=127) for lesions averaging 42.3 mm in length. The results of the primary study endpoint were published. Secondary outcome measures and endpoints included primary patency (freedom from duplex-detected target lesion restenosis), target lesion revascularization (TLR), secondary patency, changes in ankle-brachial index and Rutherford class, and event-free survival (freedom from target limb amputation, TLR, myocardial infarction, and death). RESULTS: In total, 183 patients (89 stent and 94 PTA) were available for the 2-year analysis. The primary patency rate was significantly higher in the stent group (64.2%) than in the PTA group (31.3%, p=0.0001). TLR rates were 22.4% and 59.5%, respectively (p=0.0001). When provisional stent placement in the PTA arm was not considered as TLR and loss in patency, the differences prevailed between the study groups but were not significant (64.2% vs. 56.1% for primary patency, respectively; p=0.44). A significant improvement in ABI and Rutherford category was observed at 2 years in both groups. CONCLUSION: In treatment of obstructive popliteal artery lesions, provisional stenting reveals equivalent patency in comparison to primary stenting. However, the 2-year results of this trial suggest the possibility of a shift toward higher patency rates in favor of primary stenting.

German multicenter real-world registry of stenting for superficial femoral artery disease: clinical results and predictive factors for revascularization.

PURPOSE: To investigate nitinol stent treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions and the impact of different risk factors on the need for clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in a large, real-world population of claudicants. METHODS: Patients presenting with symptomatic SFA stenosis >70% were consecutively enrolled in the 13-center MARIS prospective registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01067885). There was no restriction on lesion length, thus leading to the inclusion of a real-world as well as high-risk patient cohort. The 998 participating patients (657 men; mean age 67.4±9.2 years) had 1050 lesions treated with the same nitinol stent type. The mean lesion length was 9.5±9.6 cm (range 0.5-44; median 8.0); more than a third of the lesions (450, 42.9%) were total occlusions. The primary endpoint was the need for clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months. RESULTS: Acute technical success was achieved in 1042 (99.2%) lesions. Restenosis occurred in 187 (23.7%) and reocclusion in 79 (10.0%) lesions at 12 months. The primary endpoint of TLR at 12 months was reached by 136 (17.2%) patients. The periprocedural complication rate was 5.4%. Independent predictors of TLR were female gender [odds ratio (OR) 0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3 to 0.7, p<0.001] and lesion length >20 cm vs. 10 cm (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.6, p=0.029) and 10-20 cm vs. 10 cm (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0 to 4.1, p=0.047). CONCLUSION: Stent implantation in the SFA is safe and associated with favorable acute and midterm results in a real-world setting. Lesion length and female gender were identified as independent risk factors for TLR.

Photoablation using the turbo-booster and excimer laser for in-stent restenosis treatment: twelve-month results from the PATENT study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of the Turbo Elite laser catheter in combination with the Turbo-Booster guiding catheter for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS: The PATENT study (Photoablation Using the Turbo-Booster and Excimer Laser for In-Stent Restenosis Treatment) was a multicenter prospective industry-sponsored registry involving 5 European centers. Patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal ISR (Rutherford categories 2-5) and an ankle-brachial index ≤0.8 were treated with excimer laser atherectomy (ELA). Ninety patients (65 men; mean age 69.5±9.3 years) were enrolled. The majority of patients were Rutherford category 3 (63, 71.6%), and 32 (35.6%) patients had previous treatment for ISR. The average lesion length was 123±95.9 mm, and 30 (34.1%) lesions were total occlusions. The main efficacy outcome was primary patency at 12 months as measured by duplex ultrasonography. The primary safety outcome was freedom from major adverse events (MAE) during hospitalization and at 30-day follow-up to include all death, unplanned major amputation, or target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: The Turbo Elite laser catheter created a pilot channel in 87 (96.7%) of 90 lesions, with a mean of 1.5 passes, followed by the Turbo Booster with a mean of 5.7 passes. Adjunctive balloon dilation was performed in 79 (87.8%) lesions. Procedure success (<30% residual stenosis without stenting) was 96.7%. The mean percentage stenosis improved from a baseline of 87.0% to 32.3% after laser atherectomy and to 7.4% after final treatment. The MAE rate through 30 days was 2.2%. Nine (10.0%) patients experienced distal embolization. Estimates of freedom from TLR at 6 and 12 months were 87.8% and 64.4%, respectively. Primary patency at 6 and 12 months was 64.1% and 37.8%, respectively. Only a history of prior intervention for ISR (p<0.01) was a predictor of TLR at 12 months. CONCLUSION: The PATENT study has established excimer laser atherectomy as safe for the treatment of femoropopliteal ISR, achieving high procedure success. Recurrence of restenosis indicates that removing hyperproliferative tissue alone does not solve the problem of ISR. New concepts, such as the combination of ELA with drug-eluting balloons, may prove beneficial.

The LEVANT I (Lutonix paclitaxel-coated balloon for the prevention of femoropopliteal restenosis) trial for femoropopliteal revascularization: first-in-human randomized trial of low-dose drug-coated balloon versus uncoated balloon angioplasty.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Lutonix drug-coated balloon (DCB) coated with 2 µg/mm(2)paclitaxel and a polysorbate/sorbitol carrier for treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. BACKGROUND: Percutaneous treatment of peripheral vascular disease is associated with a high recurrence. Paclitaxel-coated balloons at 3 µg/mm(2) formulated differently have shown promising results with reduced restenosis. Methods Subjects at 9 centers with Rutherford class 2 to 5 femoropopliteal lesions were randomized between June 2009 and December 2009 to treatment with Lutonix DCB (n = 49) versus uncoated balloons (control group [n = 52]), stratified by whether balloon-only treatment (n = 75) or stenting (n = 26) was intended. The primary endpoint was angiographic late lumen loss at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included adjudicated major adverse events (death, amputation, target lesion thrombosis, reintervention), functional outcomes, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Demographic, peripheral vascular disease, and lesion characteristics were matched, with mean lesion length of 8.1 3.8 cm and 42% total occlusions. At 6 months, late lumen loss was 58% lower for the Lutonix DCB group (0.46 1.13 mm) than for the control group (1.09 1.07 mm; p = 0.016). Composite 24-month major adverse events were 39% for the DCB group, including 15 target lesion revascularizations, 1 amputation, and 4 deaths versus 46% for uncoated balloon group, with 20 target lesion revascularizations, 1 thrombosis, and 5 deaths. Pharmacokinetics showed biexponential decay with peak concentration (Cmax) of 59 ng/ml and total observed exposure (AUC(all)) of 73 ng h/ml. For successful DCB deployment excluding 8 malfunctions, 6-month late lumen loss was 0.39 mm and the 24-month target lesion revascularization rate was 24%. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of femoropopliteal lesions with the low-dose Lutonix DCB reduced late lumen loss with safety comparable to that of control angioplasty. (LEVANT I, The Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Prevention of Femoropopliteal Restenosis; NCT00930813)

Physicians' radiation exposure in the catheterization lab: does the type of procedure matter?

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate differences in radiation exposure of the operator depending on the type of catheterization lab procedure. BACKGROUND: Invasive cardiologists and angiologists are exposed to long-term, low-dose occupational radiation. Increased workload and specialization require more detailed knowledge of the extent and cause of the radiation exposure. METHODS: In this prospective single-center experience, radiation doses of 3 operators were measured by real-time dosimetry for body, neck, and hand during 284 procedures in 281 patients over a period of 14 weeks. To determine the association between the type of procedure and the doses and to draw a pairwise comparison between the procedures, 3 mixed models were used. RESULTS: The type of procedure, the patient's body mass index, and the fluoroscopy time were independently associated with the operator's radiation exposure. Per procedure, the operators were exposed to a mean effective dose (E) of 2.2 ± 5.9 µSv. Compared with coronary angiography, E was 2.3-fold higher in pelvic procedures (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7 to 3.0, p < 0.001), 1.7-fold higher in upper limb procedures (95% CI: 1.3 to 2.1, p < 0.001), and 1.4-fold higher in below-the-knee procedures (95% CI: 1.1 to 2.0, p = 0.023). The mean eye dose was 19.1 ± 37.6 µSv. Eye doses were significantly higher in peripheral procedures than in coronary angiography procedures. The mean hand dose was 99.6 ± 196.0 µSv. Hand doses were significantly higher in pelvic than in coronary angiography, upper limb, and below-the-knee procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular procedures for pelvic, upper limb, and below-the-knee disease are accompanied with a higher radiation exposure of the operator than with coronary procedures.

Drug-coated balloon angioplasty after directional atherectomy improves outcome in restenotic femoropopliteal arteries.

BACKGROUND: Restenosis remains an unresolved problem despite different treatment modalities and new stent technology in femoropopliteal arteries. No standard therapy has proven to provide acceptable outcome data for this entity. Directional atherectomy alone did not result in satisfactory long-term patency rates. The outcome might be improved in conjunction with drug-coated balloon angioplasty. METHODS: In this retrospective study, restenotic lesions of the femoropopliteal arteries were treated with directed atherectomy in 89 lesions of consecutive patients (58% male; mean age, 69 ± 11 years). All patients received adjunctive treatment with conventional balloon percutaneous angioplasty (PTA; n = 60) or drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB; n = 29). RESULTS: Lesion location was in the stent (DCB [n = 27] vs PTA [n = 36]) and in native restenotic vessels (DCB [n = 2] vs PTA [n = 25]). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier freedom from restenosis estimates (95% confidence intervals) in the DCB and PTA groups were 84.7% (70.9%-98.5%) and 43.8% (30.5%-57.1%), respectively. In a multivariable Cox model for restenosis, DCB treatment had a hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.28 (0.12-0.66; P = .0036) compared with the PTA group. In the multivariable model for procedural success, the effect of treatment did not differ between PTA and DCB (P = .134). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of directed atherectomy with adjunctive DCB is associated with a better event-free survival at 12 months of follow-up compared with PTA after directed atherectomy.