Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hum Reprod ; 13(11): 3132-8, 1998 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9853870

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) priming on the in-vitro maturation (IVM) of human oocytes from healthy ovaries using a chemically defined culture system. Seventeen patients donating oocytes for research received a truncated course of 600 IU FSH over 5 days and a further control group of nine patients received no FSH treatment. Mid-follicular phase cumulus-enclosed oocytes (n = 160) were aspirated from follicles < or =4 mm diameter under transvaginal ultrasound guidance and were cultured for 48 h in microdrops of medium containing 10 mIU/ml FSH and 100 mIU/ ml human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). The results demonstrated that human oocytes will efficiently undergo IVM under serum-free conditions. After mild FSH stimulation, a greater number of cumulus-enclosed oocytes was collected, and following culture, a lower rate of degeneration was observed. Significantly more oocytes completed nuclear maturation to metaphase II following FSH stimulation (71.1 versus 43.5%). In conclusion, a truncated course of FSH stimulation in vivo improved the oocyte maturation rate in vitro, giving a mean of 4.8+/-0.7 metaphase II oocytes per patient compared with only 2.1+/-0.7 from control patients, thus yielding more mature oocytes for future IVF treatment.


Assuntos
Hormônio Foliculoestimulante/administração & dosagem , Metáfase , Oócitos/citologia , Adulto , Contagem de Células , Células Cultivadas , Gonadotropina Coriônica/administração & dosagem , Meios de Cultura , Meios de Cultura Livres de Soro , DNA/análise , Estradiol/sangue , Feminino , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante/uso terapêutico , Fase Folicular , Humanos , Oócitos/fisiologia , Sucção , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Hum Reprod ; 13(12): 3363-7, 1998 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9886515

RESUMO

A questionnaire was sent to all Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority-registered reproductive medicine centres throughout the UK to survey their policy for the diagnosis and management of antisperm antibodies. Forty-eight responses were received from the 74 units that use husbands' spermatozoa for treatments (65%). Most centres use at least one test to detect antibodies, although a minority perform no tests on the basis that their clinical practice would be unaltered if antibodies were present. Positive tests are classed as clinically significant at levels varying from > or = 10% to > or = 50% for direct sperm binding tests (mixed antiglobulin reaction, immunobead test), and ranging from any positive reaction to > or = 1:32 for the microtitre tests (gelatin and tray agglutination tests, microimmobilization test). Strategies for managing affected patients include no intervention, artificial insemination and intrauterine insemination (IUI) using spermatozoa prepared by various techniques, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with or without increased insemination concentration, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Criteria for the latter are diverse, some centres managing all antibody-positive patients this way, while others resort to it only in severe cases or after other treatments have failed. Half of the respondents occasionally or regularly employ steroids, either alone or in conjunction with IUI or IVF. Overall, it appears that much confusion exists as to how best to manage couples presenting with antibody-related infertility.


Assuntos
Anticorpos/análise , Anticorpos/imunologia , Infertilidade/imunologia , Espermatozoides/imunologia , Adulto , Autoanticorpos/análise , Autoanticorpos/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Infertilidade/diagnóstico , Infertilidade/terapia , Inseminação Artificial , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 46(1): 35-8, 1992 Aug 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1426499

RESUMO

To determine whether luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone could improve pregnancy rates in our IVF/GIFT programme, we performed a prospective randomised controlled study. After stimulation with clomiphene citrate/human menopausal gonadotrophin, 123 women received no luteal support and 122 received progesterone pessaries 100 mg b.d. from 48 hours prior to embryo transfer and continued throughout the luteal phase. There was no difference in the pregnancy rate following IVF/ET (6/58 and 10/58 for the pessary and control group respectively), but a significantly higher rate was noted for GIFT (13/34 and 5/42 for the pessary and control group respectively; P less than 0.05). Of interest, only one of the 19 pregnancies using luteal support was extra-uterine, compared with 6/15 in the control group.


Assuntos
Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Transferência Intrafalopiana de Gameta/métodos , Fase Luteal/efeitos dos fármacos , Progesterona/uso terapêutico , Administração Intravaginal , Adulto , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Transferência Embrionária/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Menotropinas/uso terapêutico , Pessários , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Gravidez Ectópica/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos
4.
Fertil Steril ; 56(3): 509-14, 1991 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1909978

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and gonadotropin therapy could improve folliculogenesis and pregnancy rates (PRs) in women with a previously satisfactory response to clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG). DESIGN: Randomized prospective study. SETTING: Assisted reproduction clinic. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-seven women were randomized to receive either hMG alone or the GnRH-a buserelin acetate 600 microgram/d or buserelin acetate 1,200 microgram/d plus hMG. RESULTS: Compared with hMG alone, pretreatment with buserelin acetate significantly increased the PR per cycle started by preventing a premature luteinizing hormone rise and thereby reducing the number of abandoned cycles. There was, however, no difference between the number of follicles aspirated, oocytes obtained, or fertilization rates between groups. Furthermore, agonist therapy significantly increased both the dose of hMG required and the duration of stimulation. CONCLUSION: The routine use of GnRH-a in in vitro fertilization programs must be questioned.


Assuntos
Busserrelina/farmacologia , Fertilização in vitro , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/fisiologia , Folículo Ovariano/fisiologia , Clomifeno/farmacologia , Regulação para Baixo , Estradiol/sangue , Feminino , Transferência Intrafalopiana de Gameta , Humanos , Menotropinas/farmacologia , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...