The use of semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) to monitor advanced glaucomatous visual field loss.

PURPOSE: (i) To compare visual field (VF) results obtained with semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) and automated static perimetry (ASP) in patients with advanced glaucomatous VF loss, (ii) to evaluate test-retest reliability of SKP and ASP and (iii) to assess patients' preference for SKP and ASP. METHODS: Twenty eyes of 20 patients (11 male, 9 female, aged 38 to 83 years) with advanced glaucomatous VF loss (stage III or IV according to the Aulhorn classification). Each of the 20 patients were examined in 4 sessions every 3 months with SKP (Goldmann stimulus III4e, I4e and at least one additional dimmer stimulus, within the 90 degrees visual field) and ASP within the 30 degrees VF, employing a threshold-related, supra-threshold test strategy with high spatial resolution for the same instrument (Octopus 101 perimeter, Haag-Streit Inc., Koeniz, Switzerland). RESULTS: Visual field areas (VFA) were compared by analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) with co-variable time, patient effect and their interaction. Test-retest reliability was assessed by ratios (R) of intersection and union of VFA: The mean VFA within the 30 degrees of VF at baseline was 2,344 square degrees (deg(2)) with SKP (Goldmann stimulus III4e) and 1,844 deg(2) with ASP. The patients showed stable visual fields for both SKP and ASP. Comparison of SKP with ASP of the same sessions revealed a median ratio of intersection and union of VFA of 0.78 with the III4e stimulus and of 0.79 with the I4e stimulus. When follow-up SKPs were compared with baseline SKPs the median of the ratios was between 0.80 and 0.93 for the different isopters. The corresponding ratio of ASP's follow-up and baseline VFs was 0.81 (with the size III static stimulus). Nineteen of 20 patients preferred kinetic perimetry to static perimetry. CONCLUSIONS: The comparability between SKP and ASP is satisfactory and within the range of the test-retest reliability of ASP. SKP shows slightly better test-retest reliability than ASP. The majority of patients with advanced glaucomatous visual field loss prefer SKP instead of ASP. SKP is a valuable alternative to ASP in monitoring advanced glaucomatous visual field loss.

Visual field defects in acute optic neuritis--distribution of different types of defect pattern, assessed with threshold-related supraliminal perimetry, ensuring high spatial resolution.

PURPOSE: To assess the pattern and the local spatial frequency distribution of visual field defects (VFDs) in eyes with clinically diagnosed optic neuritis (ON) and their currently unaffected fellow eyes, using threshold-related, slightly supraliminal perimetry, ensuring high spatial resolution. METHODS: Records obtained with the Tübingen Automatic perimeter (TAP, Oculus Inc., Dudenhofen, Germany) and the Octopus 101 perimeter (Haag-Streit Inc, Koeniz, Switzerland), using a standardized grid of 191 static targets within the central 30 degrees visual field, were analysed retrospectively. VFDs were assigned to 15 classes. RESULTS: Visual fields (VF) from 99 patients (26 male and 73 female subjects, aged from 18 to 51 years) with clinically diagnosed, acute ON (52 right eyes, 48 left eyes affected, one bilateral involvement) were evaluated. Central scotomas were the most common finding in associated eyes, covering 41% of all VFDs in affected eyes. Nerve fibre bundle defects were found in 29% and paracentral scotomas in 14% of all VFDs. Fellow eyes were perimetrically normal in 65% of the clinically monocular ONs. Nerve fibre bundle defects were found in 21% and diffuse scotomas in 9% of the fellow eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Central scotomas and retinal nerve fibre bundle defects are the most common VFDs in acute ON. Small central and paracentral scotomas that most probably would have been missed by automated thresholding perimetry with its relatively coarse grid could be detected by threshold-related, slightly supraliminal strategy. Of the fellow eyes in clinically apparent monocular optic neuritis, 35% present with visual field defects.

K-Train--a computer-based, interactive training program with an incorporated certification system for practicing kinetic perimetry: evaluation of acceptance and success rate.

PURPOSE: To evaluate, in an experimental study, an interactive, computer-based teaching procedure for kinetic perimetry that incorporates an evaluation system for scoring examination technique. METHODS AND SUBJECTS: K-Train was developed and based on the original user interface of the new semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) feature of the OCTOPUS 101 perimeter (HAAG-STREIT, Koeniz, Switzerland). The trainer creates a 3D individual "hill of vision" for a specific pathology and the trainee can individually select target characteristics and independently define origin, end and direction of each kinetic stimulus with the help of vectors. Quality of the perimetric examination can be quantitatively assessed by the ratio of intersection area and union area of the trainee's result and the related trainer-defined original isopter. This ratio and other parameters are used to define a score of "perimetric quality". The general acceptance of K-Train was assessed in 30 participants in two perimetric courses. The success rate was examined by comparing the scores before and after a perimetric training session. RESULTS: The K-Train course was graded by the participants with an average score of 1.35 (range 1-3) in a scoring system ranging from 1=excellent to 6=unsatisfactory. The average perimetric quality score increased from 48 before to 59 (max. 100) after the training (27 trainees) indicating that K-Train was able to achieve and also verify a considerable success rate. CONCLUSION: The acceptance of K-Train, a computer-based, interactive tool that allows for certification, education and quality control of kinetic perimetry, is high. K-Train is capable of improving a trainee's individual performance in kinetic perimetry and of verifying this by an appropriate scoring system.