Insufficient depression treatment in outpatient settings.

BACKGROUND: The present status of outpatient treatment of depression in Germany was evaluated with respect to the adherence of general practitioners (GPs) and specialists of psychiatry to clinical practice guidelines. METHODS: In total, 488 depressed patients' psychopathology, diagnostic assessment, therapeutic measures and referral frequency were documented at inclusion into study by 43 general practitioners and 23 specialists of psychiatry in three regions of Germany. The investigation of change in depressive symptoms after six to eight weeks by means of self-assessment could be evaluated for 165 patients. RESULTS: The results of diagnostic assessment demonstrated that diagnoses of depression were not always based on the diagnostic criteria for depression (ICD-10): 33% of GPs' and 17% of specialists' patients were included as depressed patients into the study despite not fulfilling the ICD-10 criteria in the standardized documentation. Therapeutic undertreatment was more often found in the group of GPs. Referrals were found not to be oriented towards guidelines. After six to eight weeks, one half of patients reported a reduction in depressed symptoms, the other half of patients reported a stagnation or even a progression. CONCLUSIONS: The study has shown that physicians in outpatient settings still fail to orient themselves towards guideline recommendations. This reflects the need for physicians to receive guideline training, with the aim of improving the quality of care for depression. A quality management intervention program consisting of guideline training and an interdisciplinary quality circle to improve depression treatment and networking was supported by the authors and is currently being evaluated.

[Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of depressive disorders in primary care]. / Versorgungsleitlinien zur Diagnostik und Therapie depressiver Störungen in der hausärztlichen Praxis.

The guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of depressive disorders are practice-oriented and evidence-based recommendations for primary care of depressive patients. They were developed in the context of subproject 3.1 "Comprehensive Quality Management in Outpatient Care" within the German Research Network on Depression and Suicidality. The guidelines were developed by research groups from study centres in Freiburg, Duesseldorf and Munich and an external expert group. In addition, a close co-operation was established with the Guideline Clearing Commission of the Agency for Quality in Medicine (AQuMed) and the Drug Commission of the German Medical Profession (AkdA) and are intended as an orientational aid in terms of a "pathway of care". The guidelines particularly address physicians in primary care. The development process followed the methodological recommendations of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) and the requirements of evidence-based medicine. National and international guidelines for depressive disorders as well as Cochrane reviews (CR) and quality-assessed reviews (CRD) were taken into account. The present formulation of the treatment guidelines and the evidence was agreed upon in a consensus process that included all participants.

[Development and evaluation of a basic documentation tool for guideline-oriented ambulatory care of depressive patients]. / Entwicklung und Evaluation einer Basisdokumentation zur leitlinienorientierten ambulanten Versorgung depressiver Patienten.

Quality assurance in the treatment of mental disorders is becoming increasingly significant. In this context, documentation systems are important in order to control the implementation of guidelines, to analyse shortcomings and to reveal improvement possibilities. Up till now there is no specific documentation tool for the outpatient care of depressive disorders. Within the project "Comprehensive Quality Management in Out-patient Care" a documentation tool for primary care as well as for psychiatric care of depressive patients has been developed, which embraces the principal diagnostic and therapeutic measures. This documentation tool consisting of an instrument for the physician to record the first consultation, a second instrument to record the following consultations as well as a patient questionnaire has been implemented and evaluated in primary care and psychiatric practices. The evaluation results demonstrate that the documentation tool is able to assess guideline-oriented treatment measures. Physicians evaluated the usefulness and practicability of the documentation tool positively. And although the documentation efforts required are quite extensive, this documentation tool provides a suitable basis for external or internal quality assurance as well as patient-oriented case-monitoring.

[Agreement in physicians' and patients' assessment of depressive disorders]. / Konkordanz von Arzt- und Patienten-Einschätzung bei depressiven Störungen.

Depression is one of the most frequently encountered mental health disorders in primary care. The health and financial burden caused by this disorder emphasise the clinical importance of depressive disorders. Research shows that these conditions often remain unrecognised and untreated. The aim of this study is to analyse if and how primary care physicians identify this condition in comparison to the patients' self-evaluation. A total of 1,233 cases in 32 primary care physicians' offices were examined to see if symptoms of depression were recognised. The assessment procedures were evaluated, too. In this study, the prevalence of depressive disorders was 10%, and the recognition rate of primary care physicians 45%. These results underscore the importance of improving physicians' recognition of depression and use of ICD-10 criteria for differential diagnosis. Conclusions must be drawn for a specific training of primary care physicians that focuses on the improvement of diagnosis and treatment of depressed patients.

[Reason for encounter and diagnosis of depression in patients in general practice]. / Beratungsanlass und Diagnosestellung bei depressiven Patienten in der hausärztlichen Praxis.

The present study investigates the extent to which the physicians' diagnosis of depression was influenced by the reason that patients gave for seeking help, i.e. the reason for encounter. The level of correspondence between the somatic diagnoses of 20 GPs and the self-ratings of 862 patients from the regions of North Rhine and Southern Baden in regard to the presence of a depressive syndrome was recorded. In addition to the somatic diagnosis of depression (yes/no), the reason for encounter as well as primary and secondary diagnoses of the participating GPs were also documented. The results show that approximately 10% of the GPs' patients judged themselves to be depressed and that in these patients, the GPs diagnosed depression in only 39% of cases. This low level of correspondence between physician and patient in regard to depression can be accounted for by the finding that first, there is little difference between depressed and non-depressed patients in the manner in which they distinguish themselves in regard to their reason for encounter and that second, depressed patients expressed more somatic (57%) than mental symptoms (20%). A depressive disorder was only reported for 5% of the patients who had judged themselves to be depressed. On the whole, the results have shown that the reasons for seeking treatment expressed by patients had a significant influence on correspondence between the physician and patient: for patients who had been judged by a physician and themselves to be depressed, mental complaints (34%) were more likely to be reported than for patients who had not been diagnosed with depression by their GPs (10%). Additional questions addressed to the physicians revealed that they were more likely to diagnose depression on the basis of the patients' self-ratings and behaviour than to routinely question the patients for symptoms of depression. Hence, the study underlines the need for training in criteria-orientated diagnosis and the application of suitable screening instruments for depressive disorders in general practice.

[Subjectively-perceived inappropriate treatment of depressed patients in general and psychiatric practice]. / Unzureichender subjektiver Behandlungsverlauf bei depressiven Patienten in der haus- und nervenärztlichen Praxis.

In the present study, process quality in outpatient depression care was documented by general practitioners and specialists in psychiatry. Opportunities to improve inpatient treatment were identified by comparing current physicians' treatment procedures with guideline recommendations and, furthermore, by evaluating treatment outcomes from the patients' perspective. Data of 350 depressed outpatients were collected by 43 GPs and 23 specialists in psychiatry in three study regions (Rhineland, South Baden and Munich). Data reflected psychopathology, diagnostic assessment, investigation of suicidal intentions as well as somatic and psychotherapeutic measures at the first visit. Additionally, change in depression symptoms after six to eight weeks by means of self-rating (n = 165) and expert rating (n = 70) was measured. The study shows that the GPs and, to a lesser extent, the specialists, still fail to orient themselves towards guideline recommendations regarding assessment, therapy and referral in depression care. These findings seem to be reflected in insufficient self rated treatment outcome: one half of the patients reported a reduction in depression symptoms, the other half of patients reported stagnation or even progression. Expert ratings of treatment courses were more positive. The results indicate a considerable need for guideline training and improvement of networking and co-operation between GPs and specialists as well as between inpatient and outpatient settings.

[Continuing education and quality management measures for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines]. / Fortbildungs- und Qualitätsmanagement-Massnahmen zur Implementierung von Versorgungsleitlinien.

In the past years it could be shown that evidence-based guideline-oriented treatment of depressive patients leads to better diagnosis, to more adequate therapy and to better networking of the different levels of care. And yet, guidelines have been rarely used. On the other hand, better short-dated support of depressive patients is achievable by medical education. But to ensure the application of guidelines in the long term, it is necessary to consider individual practice and local/regional conditions. There is a need for interactive and experience-oriented educational concepts. The present educational concept of "Out-patient Depression Management" has been developed as part of the "Comprehensive Quality Management in Out-patient Care" project and implemented in two study regions of Southern Baden and North Rhine. The depression management concept was designed as a combination of interactive, guideline-oriented continuous medical education with interdisciplinary quality circles. The evaluation of the depression management concept shows very positive ratings from both primary care physicians and psychiatrists: 70% of the primary care physicians and 83% of the psychiatrists were satisfied or much satisfied with the program. 70% of the primary care physicians and 50% of the psychiatrists evaluated the usefulness for practice as good or very good.