Comparison of mumps-IgM ELISAs in acute infection.

BACKGROUND: In Scotland there has been an outbreak of mumps with over 4000 confirmed cases in the last 2 years. As laboratory diagnosis is usually requested on patients with symptoms, a prompt diagnosis early in the illness is required. OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of the five different commercial IgM-ELISAs used in Scottish Virus laboratories. STUDY DESIGN: The Specialist Virology Laboratory (SVC) Edinburgh distributed a serum panel to all Scottish laboratories that diagnose mumps by IgM-ELISA. The panel consisted of 45 sera from patients with confirmed mumps (date of onset known for 44/45) and 11 sera from patients with alternative diagnoses. Each laboratory performed their own commercial IgM-ELISAs blindly and reported results to the SVC Edinburgh. RESULTS: Sensitivity ranged from 24% to 51%. Assays performed better on samples taken later than 10 days after onset of symptoms. Specificity was about 82% for most assays. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of commercial mumps IgM-ELISAs varied greatly. The Microimmune mumps-IgM ELISA had the best overall sensitivity in acute serum specimens. Diagnostic laboratories should be developing the means to perform direct detection of mumps virus for acute presentation and requesting convalescent bloods, if acute blood samples have no detectable IgM.

Real-time PCR for mumps diagnosis on clinical specimens--comparison with results of conventional methods of virus detection and nested PCR.

BACKGROUND: Since November 2003, the UK has seen a dramatic rise in the number of mumps cases, resulting in increasing demands on virology laboratories to confirm mumps infection in a timely and efficient manner. Traditional mumps virus detection methods are often insensitive, lengthy, and cumbersome. Some laboratories in the UK now use molecular methods that are based on nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Early serological diagnosis often relies on detection of anti-mumps IgM, which may be absent in the first 10 days of illness. OBJECTIVES: We compared a one-step real-time RT-PCR with an established nested PCR (SH-PCR) and virus detection by culture and antigen detection, and assessed the clinical usefulness of mumps real-time PCR for diagnosis from CSF. STUDY DESIGN: In total, 280 clinical samples were investigated by real-time PCR, nested PCR and a combination of traditional virus detection methods (antigen detection on oral samples, cell culture on all samples). Furthermore, 88 CSF samples submitted for diagnosis of possible viral meningitis were analysed by real-time PCR. RESULTS: The real-time PCR detected the highest number of positive oral samples (119/180) compared to SH-PCR (92/180) and combined virus culture and antigen detection procedures (90/180). Sensitivity of mumps virus detection in urine was poor for all three methods: 34.0% (traditional detection), 29.8% (real-time PCR) and 2.1% (SH-PCR), respectively. Real-time PCR on 88 CSF samples identified five patients with mumps meningitis, significantly increasing viral diagnosis in this cohort. CONCLUSION: Real-time PCR on oral samples is the investigation of choice for mumps infection. Mumps virus detection in urine by any of the PCRs used was clearly less successful. Real-time PCR on CSF samples seems a promising adjunct for diagnosis of mumps meningitis, especially in an age group with high incidence of mumps.