Aortic intimal sarcoma masquerading as bilateral renal artery stenosis.

Aortic intimal sarcoma is a rare tumor with poor prognosis. The most common manifestations are thromboembolic phenomena and vascular obstruction. We present a case of aortic intimal sarcoma causing bilateral renal artery stenosis which manifested as resistant hypertension and acute kidney inury. Multiple attempts to stent the renal arteries were unsuccessful. Eventually the patient developed acute limb ischemia and oliguric kidney failure as complications of the primary tumor.

Combination inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system: is more better?

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers are considered the standard of care for treatment of cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. Combination therapy with both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers effectively inhibits the renin-angiotensin system as well as potentiates the vasodilatory effects of bradykinin. It has been advocated that this dual blockade approach theoretically should result in improved clinical outcomes in both cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. Clinical trial evidence for the use of combination therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers in cardiovascular disease has provided conflicting results in hypertension, congestive heart failure, and ischemic heart disease. Clinical trial evidence to support combination therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers in chronic kidney disease has largely been based on proteinuria reduction as a surrogate marker for clinically meaningful outcomes. Recent large-scale randomized clinical trials have not been able to validate protection in halting progression in chronic kidney disease with a dual blockade approach. This review serves as an appraisal on the clinical evidence of combination angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockade in both cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease.

Every-other-week darbepoetin alfa in the correction and maintenance of haemoglobin levels in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease: post hoc subanalysis of data from two clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Anaemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with increased rates of mortality and diminished quality of life in patients with CKD. Although extended dosing with darbepoetin alfa, an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), has been shown to be effective in maintaining haemoglobin (Hb) levels in CKD patients, little information is published on the use of darbepoetin alfa in the correction and maintenance of Hb levels in elderly CKD patients naive to ESA therapy. OBJECTIVE: This post hoc subanalysis of data from two clinical trials was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of de novo every-other-week (q2w) darbepoetin alfa in elderly patients with CKD-associated anaemia (not on dialysis), as compared with that of a younger (aged <65 years) patient cohort. METHODS: This analysis was based on data obtained from two open-label, single-arm, multicentre studies of similar design. Patients were aged >or=18 years and naive to previous ESA therapy. Darbepoetin alfa administration was initiated at 0.75 microg/kg and titrated according to individual patient requirements to achieve and maintain Hb levels between 11.0 and 13.0 g/dL. The proportion of patients who achieved the primary endpoint, Hb >or=11.0 g/dL (study 1), and an Hb level between 11.0 and 13.0 g/dL (study 2) at weeks 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at the end of the study were determined. The results of this subanalysis were stratified by age (<65, 65-74 and >or=75 years). RESULTS: A total of 203 patients were enrolled in the two studies; 60% were female, 84 (41%) were aged <65 years, 57 (28%) were aged 65-74 years and 62 (31%) were aged >or=75 years. The proportion of patients who achieved Hb levels of >or=11.0 g/dL in study 1 and 11.0-13.0 g/dL in study 2 at week 20 were 93%, 96% and 92%, respectively, for the three age groups. Weight-adjusted q2w darbepoetin alfa doses were similar between the age groups and stable throughout the study period. The mean (standard deviation) Hb levels at week 21 were 12.0 (1.2), 12.7 (1.1) and 12.6 (1.0) g/dL in subjects aged <65, 65-74 and >or=75 years, respectively. The median (standard error) time to reach the primary endpoint was 5.0 (4.7), 5.0 (5.7) and 5.0 (5.7) weeks for subjects aged <65 years, 65-74 years and >or=75 years, respectively. The safety profiles of q2w darbepoetin alfa in both the older and younger age-groups were consistent with those expected for patients with CKD not receiving dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that ESA-naive subjects aged <65, 65-74 and >or=75 years of age with CKD (not receiving dialysis) who received q2w darbepoetin alfa were able to achieve and maintain Hb levels at 11.0-13.0 g/dL. The de novo q2w treatment regimen with darbepoetin alfa described in the present report may help optimize anaemia management in CKD-associated anaemia patients, including those in the older adult population.

Hemodialysis access success: beyond the operating room.

BACKGROUND: Publication of the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) Guidelines has reinforced an already increased focus within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) on arteriovenous (AV) hemodialysis (HD) vascular access. Meeting these KDOQI goals has been the responsibility of individual VHA centers. We responded by organizing a dedicated HD AV clinic to provide preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up. METHODS: The records of 130 patients referred from January 2004 through June 2006 to our AV HD clinic were retrospectively reviewed. A minimum of 6 months of postoperative follow-up was required. RESULTS: AV fistulae were performed in 71% of the patients, with approximately 45% being Brescia-Cimino fistulae. Importantly, only 38% of AV fistulae matured and were used without secondary intervention. The remaining 62% of AV fistulae each required 2.2 +/- .3 interventions. The final AV fistula use rate was approximately 85%. CONCLUSIONS: To meet these KDOQI guidelines, the VHA should continue to support the concept of dedicated AV HD teams and clinics. This is essential because the majority of our new AV fistulae required secondary intervention for AV fistulae maturation and use. A dedicated HD access team should better be able to assess AV fistula maturation and organize subsequent intervention to promote AV fistulae use.

The elderly patient with chronic kidney disease.

The elderly are a fast growing population in the United States, and they have a high prevalence of chronic kidney disease. The elderly are particularly susceptible to kidney damage from age-related declines in glomerular filtration as well as kidney damage from chronic disease states such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, glomerular, and tubulointerstitial disorders. A significant number of elderly individuals are reaching end-stage renal disease that require renal replacement therapy. This expanding population provides a challenge for health-care providers because the elderly are often referred late to a nephrologist, have a shortened survival on renal replacement therapy as compared with younger individuals, and suffer from more comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, malnutrition, and hearing and visual disabilities. The elderly also have difficulties with dialysis vascular access and often are not candidates for renal transplantation. Despite these obstacles, age alone is not a justification for withholding diagnostic or therapeutic interventions, because many elderly individuals have an improvement in their quality of life and social support once their kidney disease is identified and treated.

Combination therapy improves survival after acute myocardial infarction in the elderly with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with chronic kidney disease have a high mortality rate after acute myocardial infarction. It is not known how frequently these individuals are prescribed combination cardioprotective therapy and if survival is affected by such therapy after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 1,342 Medicare recipients with acute myocardial infarction. Data were collected by medical chart abstraction as part of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project in 60 hospitals in North Carolina during 5/30/1996-12/28/1997. We categorized cardioprotective medication use as aspirin alone, aspirin with beta-blockers, and aspirin with beta-blockers and ace-inhibitors. Chronic kidney disease was defined as a derived glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ranging from 15-89 mL/min/1.73 m2. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of cardioprotective medication use on survival while controlling for potential explanatory variables. RESULTS: The prevalence of cardioprotective medication use differed among levels of chronic kidney disease. Those with severe kidney disease (GFR 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2) were less frequently prescribed aspirin with beta-blockers, 27.1%, and only 8.6% were prescribed aspirin with beta-blockers and ace-inhibitors. Survival was improved with prescribed cardioprotective medication use. In severe kidney disease (GFR 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2), the hazards risk for death was 0.21 (0.08, 0.53) for aspirin alone, 0.17 (0.06, 0.51) for aspirin with beta-blockers, and 0.35 (0.09, 1.42) for aspirin with beta-blockers and ace-inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with chronic kidney disease benefit from combination cardioprotective therapy, but are less likely to be prescribed them after acute myocardial infarction. Further investigation is warranted to identify possible reasons for these observed treatment disparities.