RESUMO
AIMS: To assess the management strategies applied in non-ST elevation acute ischaemic syndromes in Argentina, the factors influencing the choice of treatment, and their relationship to short- and long-term (1 year) patient outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a 1 month, prospective, population-based survey in 77 hospitals (all over the country). We recruited 492 patients (age 63.9+/-11.7 years, male sex 68.3%, and 59.8% acute ischaemic ECG changes). Subjects were stratified according to the AHCPR classification as: high risk 62.2%, intermediate 25.0% and low 12.8%. At 1 year, the rate of death or myocardial infarction according to risk category and invasive procedures employed were: high risk (angioplasty 5.4% vs coronary artery bypass grafting 12.1% vs medical treatment 17.2%; P=0.001), intermediate risk (angioplasty 5.7% vs coronary artery bypass grafting 12.5% vs medical treatment 4.7%, P=ns), and low risk (angioplasty 10.0% vs coronary artery bypass grafting 15.2% vs medical treatment 1.9%; P<0.001). In the overall population, the 1 year event rate was not significantly different between the invasive and medical treatment groups (11.5% vs 7.2%, P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: A routine, unselected invasive approach in non-ST elevation acute ischaemic syndromes in Argentina is associated with no apparent improvement of patients' outcome.