Therapist Adherence to Two Treatments for Adolescent Suicide Risk: Association to Outcomes and Role of Therapeutic Alliance.

In psychotherapy research, adherence refers to the extent to which therapists deliver a treatment as intended. This study examined whether therapist adherence to two different manualized treatments was associated with improved client outcomes and whether the association was moderated by therapeutic alliance. The study sample included 320 video recordings of therapy sessions from 118 cases in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing attachment-based family therapy (ABFT) with family-enhanced nondirective supportive therapy (FE-NST). Recordings were selected from early, middle, and late stages of treatment. The adherence measure consisted of 24 items representing essential therapist interventions from both treatments. Trained raters coded tapes from both therapies. Adolescent self-report of alliance was measured at session 4. Adherence to ABFT was associated with a significant increase in family cohesion at mid-treatment but not at posttreatment. Adherence to FE-NST was significantly associated with an increase in suicide ideation posttreatment. Using therapeutic alliance as a moderator, adherence to ABFT was significantly associated with a reduction in suicide ideation, family conflict, and higher client satisfaction posttreatment. Alliance did not positively affect the association of FE-NST adherence to outcomes. Findings suggest that adherence to ABFT interventions may be better linked to treatment outcomes when adolescents feel a strong alliance with their therapist. Implications for future research and therapist training are explored.

En la investigación sobre psicoterapia, la adhesión se refiere al grado en el cual los terapeutas brindan un tratamiento según lo previsto. Este estudio analizó si la adhesión del terapeuta a dos tratamientos estandarizados diferentes estuvo asociada con mejores resultados en los pacientes y si la asociación estuvo moderada por la alianza terapéutica. La muestra del estudio incluyó 320 videograbaciones de sesiones de terapia de 118 casos en un ensayo aleatorizado controlado donde se comparó la terapia familiar basada en el apego (TFBA) con la terapia de apoyo no directiva optimizada por la familia (TAND-OF). Se eligieron grabaciones de las etapas iniciales, intermedias y finales del tratamiento. El instrumento de medición de la adhesión consistió en 24 ítems que representaban intervenciones esenciales del terapeuta de ambos tratamientos. Un grupo de calificadores capacitados codificaron las grabaciones de ambas terapias. El autoinforme de alianza de los adolescentes se midió en la cuarta sesión. La adhesión a la TFBA estuvo asociada con un aumento considerable de la cohesión familiar en la mitad del tratamiento, pero no después del tratamiento. La adhesión a la TAND-OF estuvo asociada considerablemente con un aumento de la ideación suicida después del tratamiento. Utilizando la alianza terapéutica como moderadora, la adhesión a la TFBA estuvo asociada considerablemente con una reducción de la ideación suicida, el conflicto familiar y una mayor satisfacción del paciente después del tratamiento. La alianza no afectó positivamente la asociación de la adhesión a la TAND-OF con los resultados. Los resultados sugieren que la adhesión a las intervenciones de TFBA puede asociarse mejor con los resultados del tratamiento cuando los adolescentes sienten una alianza fuerte con su terapeuta. Se analizan las implicancias para futuras investigaciones y para la capacitación de los terapeutas.

Exploring the relations between interpersonal risk and adolescent suicidality during treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Despite considerable evidence that supports perceived burdensomeness (PB) and thwarted belongingness (TB) as risk factors for suicidal ideation (SI), far less is known about the direction of effects between these constructs in treatments for suicidal adolescents. The present study examined bidirectional relations between PB, TB, and adolescents' suicidal ideation (SI) during a 16-week randomized clinical trial. METHOD: 129 depressed and suicidal adolescents completed PB, TB, and SI measures at three time points: baseline (T1), mid-treatment (T2), and treatment completion (T3). Random-intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPM) examined within-subject direction of effects between interpersonal variables (PB & TB) and suicidal ideation (SI) in the first and second halves of treatment. RESULTS: Within-subjects, autoregressive paths indicated significant carryover in PB and SI. In the first half of treatment, a significant cross-lagged path indicated that T1 PB predicted change in T2 SI, and in the last half of treatment change in T2 SI predicted change in T3 PB. There were no significant auto-regressive or cross-lagged effects for TB. CONCLUSIONS: In the first half of treatment, baseline PB predicted fewer reductions in SI suggesting that PB initially moderated adolescents' response to treatment. However, in the last half of treatment, initial reductions in SI predicted subsequent reductions in PB suggesting that adolescents' initial response to treatment decreased their perceptions of burdening others. The clinical and treatment implications of these bidirectional findings are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).