The low value of pre-decannulation capped overnight ICU monitoring for pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of pre-decannulation capped overnight ICU monitoring for assessing decannulation-readiness in pediatric patients. METHODS: This study included all pediatric patients, age 18 and under, with a tracheostomy attempting decannulation at the University of Michigan between 2013 and 2018. Patients who underwent major airway reconstruction immediately prior to decannulation were excluded. Descriptive and comparative statistics were calculated to compare the sub-group of patients who underwent pre-decannulation capped overnight ICU monitoring to those who did not. RESULTS: 125 pediatric patients attempted decannulation for a total of 126 attempts with 105 attempts being eligible for inclusion. 75 eligible attempts included pre-decannulation capped overnight ICU monitoring, while 30 did not. Subsequent rates of successful decannulation were 97.33% (73/75) and 100.00% (30/30), respectively (P = 0.366; 95% CI -8.818-9.260). The pre-decannulation capped overnight ICU monitoring passing rate was 98.67% (74/75) despite a complication rate of 5.33% (4/75). Post-decannulation, 98.08% (102/104) of decannulated patients were monitored inpatient for a minimum of 24 h DISCUSSION: With similar rates of successful decannulation among both sub-groups and previous research demonstrating sufficient ambulatory testing accurately predicts successful decannulation, pre-decannulation capped overnight ICU monitoring is a low-value, high-cost test that can be safely discontinued without compromising patient care. Notably, our study excluded patients undergoing open airway reconstruction immediately prior to decannulation. The 24-h monitoring post-decannulation serves as a safety net for individuals who ultimately fail decannulation.

Disparities and ethical considerations for children with tracheostomies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic is exacerbating longstanding challenges facing children with tracheostomies and their families. Myriad ethical concerns arising in the long-term care of children with tracheostomies during the COVID-19 pandemic revolve around inadequate access to care, healthcare resources, and rehabilitation services. Marginalized communities such as those from Black and Hispanic origins face disproportionate chronic illness because of racial and other underlying disparities. In this paper, we describe how these disparities also present challenges to children who are technology-dependent, such as those with tracheostomies and discuss the emerging ethical discourse regarding healthcare and resource access for this population during the pandemic.