Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg) ; 60(1): 21-28, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33152778

RESUMO

Patients from migrant descent access inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitative care less and achieve less treatment success than patients from the host populations. They are confronted with different process barriers in the healthcare system which combined with individual barriers can inhibit successful treatment. Studies have shown that working with migrant patients may also be challenging for healthcare providers.This study aims to assess and compare barriers and resources faced by migrant and non-migrant patients during their treatment in inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitative care. Also, the aim is to assess and compare barriers and resources faced by healthcare providers in treating migrant and non-migrant patients in order to identify barriers and resources specific to working with migrant patients.A total of 77 semi-structured interviews were conducted (20 migrant and 19 non-migrant patients as well as 14 migrant and 24 non-migrant healthcare providers). Data were transcribed and analyzed applying the method of qualitative content analysis (Mayring) with inductive categories.Migrant and non-migrant patients stated that they profit from the treatment in inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitative care. The greatest barriers for both migrant patients and healthcare providers are language barriers, cultural differences, differences in expectations regarding the treatment and limited organizational cultural competences. As far as organizational cultural competences are implemented, they are profitable for migrant patients and non-migrant healthcare providers. However, migrant healthcare workers seem responsible for implementing culturally competent care and suffer from increased workload.


Assuntos
Barreiras de Comunicação , Competência Cultural , Assistência à Saúde Culturalmente Competente , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Migrantes , Alemanha , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Entrevistas como Assunto , Pesquisa Qualitativa
2.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 270(5): 501-511, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31520149

RESUMO

There is a need for interventions supporting patients with mental health conditions in coping with stigma and discrimination. A psycho-educational group therapy module to promote stigma coping and empowerment (STEM) was developed and tested for efficacy in patients with schizophrenia or depression. 30 clinical centers participated in a cluster-randomized clinical trial, representing a broad spectrum of mental health care settings: in-patient (acute treatment, rehabilitation), out-patient, and day-hospitals. As randomized, patients in the intervention group clusters/centers received an illness-specific eight sessions standard psychoeducational group therapy plus three specific sessions on stigma coping and empowerment ('STEM'). In the control group clusters the same standard psychoeducational group therapy was extended to 11 sessions followed by one booster session in both conditions. In total, N = 462 patients were included in the analysis (N = 117 with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, ICD-10 F2x; N = 345 with depression, ICD-10 F31.3-F31.5, F32-F34, and F43.2). Clinical and stigma-related measures were assessed before and directly after treatment, as well as after 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months (M12). Primary outcome was improvement in quality of life (QoL) assessed with the WHO-QOL-BREF between pre-assessment and M12 analyzed by mixed models and adjusted for pre-treatment differences. Overall, QoL and secondary outcome measures (symptoms, functioning, compliance, internalized stigma, self-esteem, empowerment) improved significantly, but there was no significant difference between intervention and control group. The short STEM module has proven its practicability as an add-on in different settings in routine mental health care. The overall increase in empowerment in both, schizophrenia and depression, indicates patients' treatment benefit. However, factors contributing to improvement need to be explored.The study has been registered in the following trial registers. ClinicalTrials.gov: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/ Registration number: NCT01655368. DRKS: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/ Registration number: DRKS00004217.


Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Transtorno Depressivo/reabilitação , Empoderamento , Pessoas Mentalmente Doentes/psicologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Psicoterapia de Grupo , Esquizofrenia/reabilitação , Estigma Social , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Autoimagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...