A multidimensional scaling analysis of vowel discrimination in humans and monkeys.

Multidimensional scaling (MDS) was used to compare perceptual maps for 10 synthetic English vowels in humans and Old World monkeys (Macaca fuscata and Cercopithecus albogularis). Subjects discriminated among the vowels using a repeating background procedure, and reaction times were submitted to an MDS analysis to derive measures of perceive similarity. The dimensions that emerged related to the frequencies of the first (F1), second (F2), and third (F3) formants. Human data indicated a good match to previous MDS studies using rating procedures or confusion matrices: The dominant dimension mapped onto vowel F2, the phonetically most important formant, and the second and third dimensions mapped onto F1 and F3, respectively. For monkeys, equal weightings occurred for F1 and F2, and F3 was not clearly represented. Monkey sensitivity to the formants appeared to relate to formant amplitudes. If monkeys are giving an accurate representation of the psychoacoustic relations among the formants, then our human results suggest that species-specific mechanisms, reflecting the salience of the phonetic feature of advancement, may contribute to vowel coding in humans.

Perception of chirps by Sykes's monkeys (Cercopithecus albogularis) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Four Sykes's monkeys (Cercopithecus albogularis) and 4 humans (Homo sapiens) discriminated among 12 chirps presented in a repeating background paradigm. The test stimuli consisted of sets of 4 chirps recorded from Sykes's monkeys, red-tailed monkeys (C. ascanius), and small East African birds. Reaction times were submitted to a multidimensional scaling analysis. All monkey listeners perceived the bird chirps as similar to each other and distinct from the monkey calls, whereas 3 of the 4 human listeners had difficulty distinguishing the bird chirps from the monkey calls. Both human and monkey subjects tended to perceive Sykes's and red-tailed monkey calls as very similar to one another, but the degree of perceived similarity was greatest for the monkey listeners. The data suggest that the perceptual map of these calls is influenced by their biological significance in nature.