Study protocol for two stepped-wedge interventional trials evaluating the effects of holistic information technology-based patient-oriented management in older multimorbid patients with cancer: The GERONTE trials.

INTRODUCTION: Current hospital-based care pathways are generally single-disease centred. As a result, coexisting morbidities are often suboptimally evaluated and managed, a deficiency becoming increasingly apparent among older patients who exhibit heterogeneity in health status, functional abilities, frailty, and other geriatric impairments. To address this issue, our study aims to assess a newly developed patient-centred care pathway for older patients with multimorbidity and cancer. The new care pathway was based on currently available evidence and co-designed by end-users including health care professionals, patients, and informal caregivers. Within this care pathway, all healthcare professionals involved in the care of older patients with multimorbidity and cancer will form a Health Professional Consortium (HPC). The role of the HPC will be to centralise oncologic and non-oncologic treatment recommendations in accordance with the patient's priorities. Moreover, an Advanced Practice Nurse will act as case-manager by being the primary point of contact for the patient, thus improving coordination between specialists, and by organising and leading the consortium. Patient monitoring and the HPC collaboration will be facilitated by digital communication tools designed specifically for this purpose, with the added benefit of being customisable for each patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The GERONTE study is a prospective international, multicentric study consisting of two stepped-wedge trials performed at 16 clinical sites across three European countries. Each trial will include 720 patients aged 70 years and over with a new or progressive cancer (breast, lung, colorectal, prostate) and at least one moderate or severe multimorbidity. The patients in the intervention group will receive the new care pathway whereas patients in the control group will receive usual oncologic care. DISCUSSION: GERONTE will evaluate whether this kind of holistic, patient-oriented healthcare management can improve quality of life (primary outcome) and other valuable endpoints in older patients with multimorbidity and cancer. An ancillary study will assess in depth the socio-economic impact of the intervention and deliver concrete implementation guidelines for the GERONTE intervention care pathway. TRIAL REGISTRATION: FRONE: NCT05720910 TWOBE: NCT05423808.

Doxycycline versus azithromycin for the treatment of anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women concurrent with vaginal infection (CHLAZIDOXY study): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Anorectal infections with Chlamydia trachomatis are commonly found in women. Although the efficacy of doxycycline and azithromycin is comparable in the treatment of urogenital infection, their efficacies toward anorectal infection remain unclear. We therefore aimed to compare a single dose of azithromycin with a 7-day course of doxycycline for the treatment of anorectal C trachomatis infection in women with concurrent vaginal infection. METHODS: We did a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, superiority trial involving four sexually transmitted infection screening centres and three pregnancy termination centres in France. We included sexually active adult women (≥18 years) with a positive C trachomatis vaginal swab who agreed to provide self-collected anorectal swabs for C trachomatis detection. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using block sizes of six and eight and stratification by each investigating centre, to orally receive either azithromycin (a single 1-g dose, with or without food) or doxycycline (100 mg in the morning and evening at mealtimes for 7 days [ie, 100 mg of doxycycline twice per day for 7 days]). All laboratory staff who did the bacteriological analyses, but not the participants and the investigators, were masked to the treatment groups. The primary outcome was the microbiological anorectal cure rate defined as a C trachomatis-negative nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) result in anorectal specimens 6 weeks after treatment initiation among women who had a baseline C trachomatis-positive anorectal NAAT result. The primary analysis was done in the modified intention-to-treat population, with multiple imputation, which included all women who underwent randomisation and had a C trachomatis-positive vaginal and anorectal NAAT result at baseline. Adverse events were reported in all women who underwent randomisation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03532464. FINDINGS: Between Oct 19, 2018, and April 17, 2020, we randomly assigned a total of 460 participants to either the doxycycline group (n=230) or the azithromycin group (n=230). Four (1%) of 460 participants were excluded because they refused to take doxycycline or were found to be ineligible after randomisation. Among the 456 participants, 357 (78%) had a concurrent C trachomatis-positive anorectal NAAT result at baseline; 184 (52%) of 357 were in the doxycycline group and 173 (48%) were in the azithromycin group (ie, the modified intention-to-treat population). Microbiological anorectal cure occurred in 147 (94%) of 156 participants in the doxycycline group (28 missing values) versus 120 (85%) of 142 in the azithromycin group (31 missing values; adjusted odds ratio with imputation of missing values 0·43 [95% CI 0·21-0·91]; p=0·0274). Reported adverse events possibly related to treatment were notified in 53 (12%) of 456 women: 24 (11%) of 228 in the doxycycline group and 29 (13%) of 228 in the azithromycin group. Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently occurring, in 43 (9%) of 456 women: 17 (8%) of 228 in the doxycycline group and 26 (11%) of 228 in the azithromycin group. INTERPRETATION: The microbiological anorectal cure rate was significantly lower among women who received a single dose of azithromycin than among those who received a 1-week course of doxycycline. This finding suggests that doxycycline should be the first-line therapy for C trachomatis infection in women. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Efficacy of a new membrane obturator prosthesis in terms of speech, swallowing, and the quality of life of patients with acquired soft palate defects: study protocol of the VELOMEMBRANE randomized crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Soft palate defects created during oral cancer surgery may prevent complete palatal closure and trigger palatopharyngeal insufficiency. One current treatment employs a rigid obturator prosthesis; an extension of acrylic resin at the level of the hard palate ensures surface contact with the remaining musculature. Unfortunately, airflow escape often causes hypernasality, compromises speech intelligibility, and creates swallowing problems (including leakage of food and fluid into the nasal airway). We plan to test a new removable denture featuring a thick dental dam that serves as a membrane obturator. The principal objective of the clinical trial is a comparison of speech handicap levels after 1 month in patients with acquired velar insufficiencies who wear either the new device or a conventional, rigid obturator. The secondary objectives are between-device comparisons of the swallowing handicaps and the health-related qualities of life. METHODS: The VELOMEMBRANE trial is a superiority, open-labeled, two-way, random crossover clinical trial. Adult patients exhibiting velar or palatovelar substance loss after tumor excision and who are indicated for rigid obturator-mediated prosthetic rehabilitation will be recruited in two teaching hospitals in France. Fourteen participants will be randomly allocated to wear both prostheses for 1-month periods in either order. The new membrane obturator is a removable resin prosthesis incorporating a rigid extension that holds a dental dam to restore the soft palate. The primary outcome will be the extent of phonation-related disability (the overall score on the Voice Handicap Index [VHI]). The secondary outcomes will be the Deglutition Handicap Index and health-related quality of life scores of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). DISCUSSION: High-quality evidence will be provided to document the utility of a new medical device that may greatly improve the management and quality of life of patients with acquired velar insufficiency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04009811 . Registered on 4 July 2019.

Effectiveness and organizational conditions of effectiveness of telemedicine in nursing homes. A study protocol of a comparative prospective cohort (EFFORT study).

The profile of nursing home (NH) residents has changed over the past decade with more dependency, more severe chronic diseases and more treatments prescribed. For residents, the major consequence is the higher risk of unplanned hospitalization. French guidelines recommend the development of interactive telemedicine (InT) in NHs in order to improve access to care, and to decrease the rate of avoidable unplanned hospitalizations. Methods and analysis: The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of an InT protocol delivered in NHs on the rate of unplanned hospitalizations, and on the quality of life at work and the organizational conditions of effectiveness of telemedicine in NHs. We will perform a mixed methods study combining a cluster non-randomized controlled trial in two matched parallel arms (telemedicine group and control group) and qualitative analysis of the evolution of organizational and professional contexts in NHs. Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol was approved and sponsored by the French Ministry of Health. The study received ethical approval from the Bordeaux University Hospital Institutional Review Board. We will communicate the final results to the public via conferences and results will also be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed scientific journals. Trial registration number NCT03486977.

Randomized, open-label, multicenter study of azithromycin compared with doxycycline for treating anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis infection concomitant to a vaginal infection (CHLAZIDOXY study).

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis can lead to a persistent infection in the lower gastrointestinal tract, suggesting a potential role of autoinoculation of cervical chlamydial infection from the rectal site, contributing to repeat infections. Moreover, around 75% of women with urogenital C. trachomatis have concurrent anorectal infection. Current treatment guidelines for urogenital C. trachomatis infection recommend either a single 1 g dose of azithromycin or doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days. Doxycycline appears to be more effective in treating anorectal infections as suggested in a population of men who have sex with men, but no randomized controlled trial (RCT) had directly compared azithromycin with doxycycline for the treatment of rectal infections. We propose an open-label RCT to compare the microbial cure obtained with a single 1 g dose of azithromycin versus 100 mg of doxycycline twice daily for 7 days, for the treatment of anorectal C. trachomatis infection concurrent to urogenital infection in women. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A total of 460 women with C. trachomatis urogenital infection will be enrolled in the study. Women will be asked to provide self-collected anorectal swabs and will be randomized to receive either a 1 g single dose of azithromycin or doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days. Clinical and biological data will be collected and patients will complete questionnaires about their sexual behavior. The primary outcome is the microbial cure rate, defined as a C. trachomatis negative nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) result in the anorectal specimens 6 weeks after treatment initiation among women with a C. trachomatis positive urogenital and anorectal NAAT result at the baseline. The secondary outcome is autoinoculation from the rectum to the vagina, which will be evaluated based on the number of women with the same C. trachomatis genotype profile that will be identified in an anorectal-positive specimen obtained 6 weeks after treatment initiation and in a vaginal-positive specimen obtained four months after treatment. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will establish which treatment is more efficacious against anorectal infection and could affect recommendations for the treatment of urogenital C. trachomatis infection, taking into account concurrent anorectal infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT number: 2017-002595-15. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03532464. Date of registration: May 31, 2018. WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: NTC03532464. Secondary ID: CHUBX 2016/26. Date of registration: May 09, 2018.

Improving the safety climate in hospitals by a vignette-based analysis of adverse events: a cluster randomised study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a vignette-based analysis of adverse events (AEs) on the safety climate (SC) of care units. DESIGN: Prospective, open, cluster (a unit) randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Eighteen acute care units of seven hospitals in France. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare providers who worked in the units. INTERVENTION: Vignette-based analyses of AEs were conducted with unit's providers once per month for six consecutive months. The AEs were real cases that occurred in other hospitals. The hospital risk manager conducted each analysis as follows: analysis of the immediate and root causes of the AE; assessment of the care unit's vulnerabilities and existing barriers in the occurrence of an identical AE and search for solutions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: SC was measured using the French version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire. The primary outcome was the difference in the 'Organisational learning and continuous improvement' dimension score, from before to after the analyses. RESULTS: Median participation rate in the analyses was 20% (range: 7-45%). Before intervention, the response rate to the SC survey was 80% (n = 210) in the intervention group and 73% (n = 191) in the control group. After intervention, it was 59% (n = 141) and 63% (n = 148), respectively. The dimension score evolved differently for the groups from before to after intervention (intervention: +10.2 points ±8.8; control: -3.0 points ±8.5, P = 0.04). Side effects were not measured. CONCLUSIONS: Vignette-based analysis was associated with the improvement of the perception of participants regarding their institution's capacity for organisational learning and continuous improvement.

Decrease in pregnancy rate after endometrial scratch in women undergoing a first or second in vitro fertilization. A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does endometrial scratch in women undergoing a first or second IVF/ICSI attempt improve the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Endometrial scratch (ES) in women undergoing their first or second IVF/ICSI attempt does not enhance the CPR under the technical conditions of our study. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Several studies have suggested that physical scratch of the endometrium before an IVF attempt could improve embryo implantation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a randomized controlled multi-center, two-arm, parallel trial. Inclusions started in February 2010 and stopped prematurely in July 2014 after an unplanned interim analysis. At the time of study closure, 191 of the planned 358 patients had been included. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients included in the study were randomly assigned to either the ES arm or the non-ES arm. Local ES was performed between Day 20 and Day 24 of the cycle preceding ovarian stimulation using a device for endometrial biopsy. Ovarian stimulation used a combination of recombinant FSH and either an GnRH agonist protocol or a GnRH antagonist protocol without any estrogen pre-treatment. CPR was analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. All comparisons between the two groups were done using a logistic regression model adjusted for age, BMI and infertility etiology. Differences between the two arms were considered statistically significant at P value of less than 0.0446 for the primary outcome only. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Sixty-eight embryo transfers were performed in the ES arm and sixty-four in the non-ES arm. CPR was 23.5% (16/68) in the ES arm and 35.9% (23/64) in the non-ES arm (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.18-1.02; P = 0.0568). The implantation rate was 19.1% and 24.0% in the ES arm and in the non-ES arm, respectively. Two miscarriages and one ectopic pregnancy were reported in each arm. The multiple pregnancy rate was higher in the scratch arm (50.0% vs 20.0%), but the difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio (OR) = 4.54; 95% CI, 0.50-40.93; P = 0.1349). The endometrial biopsy procedure was well tolerated in most women. Of 50 patients in the ES arm having received the embryo transfer, 40 (80.0%) patients reported having felt pain during the procedure, the pain resolving quickly for 31 of them. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: An interim analysis of the primary endpoint was conducted and an independent data monitoring committee agreed on stopping the inclusions. This analysis was prompted by the tendency towards lower pregnancy rates observed in the ES arm. Consequently, the study suffered from a lower inclusion rate and failed to reach the planned sample size. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Under the technical condition employed in this study, ES in the luteal phase of the cycle preceding the ovarian stimulation does not improve CPR in patients undergoing a first or second IVF/ICSI attempt. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by a grant from Ministère de la Santé Français (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique 2009). There are no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01064193. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 08-Feb-2010. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 08-Feb-2010.

Organizational and managerial factors associated with clinical practice guideline adherence: a simulation-based study in 36 French hospital wards.

OBJECTIVES: To identify managerial and organizational characteristics of multi-specialty medicine wards and individual characteristics of health professionals that are most strongly associated with clinical practice guidelines (CPG) adherence. DESIGN: Cross-sectional stratified cluster sample design. SETTING: Data were gathered from 36 randomly selected multi-specialty medicine wards. PARTICIPANTS: The study population included all health professionals involved in patient care working in the participating wards. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The degree of CPG adherence was measured using clinical vignettes on three topics: pain management, managing heart failure and managing diabetes. Responses from each professional to each clinical case were quantified using a 10-point scale. Managerial and organizational characteristics of medical department and individual characteristics of health professionals were obtained using three questionnaires. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 859 professionals (362 orderlies, 361 nurses and 136 physicians). Factors independently and positively associated with CPG adherence were (i) individual factors: low age of professionals, expertise in diabetology and activity in cardiology; (ii) organizational and managerial factors: good understanding between physicians and other personnel; and (iii) structural factors: computer-based test results and prescriptions, presence of medical specialists, inter-department mobility of orderlies, medium-length stay (between 7 and 10 days) and large bed capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Good CPG adherence in general medicine needs institutional dynamism, availability of clinical competence and team culture based on cooperation.

Development and validation of hospital information system-generated indicators of the appropriateness of oral anticoagulant prescriptions in hospitalised adults: the PACHA study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The appropriateness of oral anticoagulant prescriptions is a major challenge to improve quality and safety of care. As indicators of the appropriateness of oral anticoagulant prescriptions are lacking, the aim of the study is to develop and validate a panel of such indicators, in hospitalised adults, from the hospital information system of two university hospitals in France. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will be carried out in four steps: (1) a literature review to identify indicators of the appropriateness of oral anticoagulant prescriptions and their conditions of appropriateness; (2) a Delphi consensus method to assess the potential utility and operational implementation of the selected indicators; (3) techniques of medical data search to implement indicators from the hospital information system and; (4) a cross-sectional study to assess the ability of indicators to detect inappropriate oral anticoagulant prescriptions, performance of medical data search techniques for tracking or retrieving information and the ability of tools to be transferred into other institutions. The fourth step will include up to 80 patient hospital stays for each indicator, depending on the prevalence of inappropriate prescriptions estimated in interim analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This work addresses the current lack of quality indicators of the appropriateness of oral anticoagulant prescriptions. We aim to develop and validate such indicators for integrating them into hospital clinical practice, as part of a structured approach to improve quality and safety of care. As each hospital information system is different, we will propose tools transferable to other healthcare institutions to allow an automated construction of these indicators. The PACHA study protocol was approved by institutional review boards and ethics committees (CPP Sud-Ouest et Outre Mer III-DC 2016/119; CPP Ile-de-France II-CDW_2016_0014). REGISTRATION DETAILS: Clinical Trial.gov registration: NCT02898090.

Patient safety incidents are common in primary care: A national prospective active incident reporting survey.

BACKGROUND: The study objectives were to describe the incidence and the nature of patient safety incidents (PSIs) in primary care general practice settings, and to explore the association between these incidents and practice or organizational characteristics. METHODS: GPs, randomly selected from a national influenza surveillance network (n = 800) across France, prospectively reported any incidents observed each day over a one-week period between May and July 2013. An incident was an event or circumstance that could have resulted, or did result, in harm to a patient, which the GP would not wish to recur. Primary outcome was the incidence of PSIs which was determined by counting reports per total number of patient encounters. Reports were categorized using existing taxonomies. The association with practice and organizational characteristics was calculated using a negative binomial regression model. RESULTS: 127 GPs (participation rate 79%) reported 317 incidents of which 270 were deemed to be a posteriori judged preventable, among 12,348 encounters. 77% had no consequences for the patient. The incidence of reported PSIs was 26 per 1000 patient encounters per week (95% CI [23‰ -28‰]). Incidents were three times more frequently related to the organization of healthcare than to knowledge and skills of health professionals, and especially to the workflow in the GPs' offices and to the communication between providers and with patients. Among GP characteristics, three were related with an increased incidence in the final multivariable model: length of consultation higher than 15 minutes, method of receiving radiological results (by fax compared to paper or email), and being in a multidisciplinary clinic compared with sole practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: Patient safety incidents (PSIs) occurred in mean once every two days in the sampled GPs and 2% of them were associated with a definite possibility for harm. Studying the association between organizational features of general practices and PSIs remains a major challenge and one of the most important issues for safety in primary care.

Benchmarking trial between France and Australia comparing management of primary rectal cancer beyond TME and locally recurrent rectal cancer (PelviCare Trial): rationale and design.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with rectal cancer, 5-10% have a primary rectal cancer beyond the total mesorectal excision plane (PRC-bTME) and 10% recur locally following primary surgery (LRRC). In both cases, patients 'care remains challenging with a significant worldwide variation in practice regarding overall management and criteria for operative intervention. These variations in practice can be explained by structural and organizational differences, as well as cultural dissimilarities. However, surgical resection of PRC-bTME and LRRC provides the best chance of long-term survival after complete resection (R0). With regards to the organization of the healthcare system and the operative criteria for these patients, France and Australia seem to be highly different. A benchmarking-type analysis between French and Australian clinical practice, with regards to the care and management of PRC-bTME and LRRC, would allow understanding of patients' care and management structures as well as individual and collective mechanisms of operative decision-making in order to ensure equitable practice and improve survival for these patients. METHODS/DESIGN: The current study is an international Benchmarking trial comparing two cohorts of 120 consecutive patients with non-metastatic PRC-bTME and LRRC. Patients with curative and palliative treatment intent are included. The study design has three main parts: (1) French and Australian cohorts including clinical, radiological and surgical data, quality of life (MOS SF36, FACT-C) and distress level (Distress thermometer) at the inclusion, 6 and 12 months; (2) experimental analyses consisting of a blinded inter-country reading of pelvic MRI to assess operatory decisions; (3) qualitative analyses based on MDT meeting observation, semi-structured interviews and focus groups of health professional attendees and conducted by a research psychologist in both countries using the same guides. The primary endpoint will be the clinical resection rate. Secondary end points will be concordance rate between French and Australian operative decisions based on the inter-country reading MRI, post-operative mortality and morbidity rates, oncological outcomes based on resection status and one-year overall and disease-free survival, patients' quality of life and distress level. Qualitative analysis will compare obstacles and facilitators of operative decision-making between both countries. DISCUSSION: Benchmarking can be defined as a comparison and learning process which will allow, in the context of PRC-bTME and LRRC, to understand and to share the whole process management of these patientsbetween Farnce and Australia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02551471 . (date of registration: 09/14/2015).

[Clinical features, care pathways and behaviors of patients with high level of cardiovascular risk: transversal study in south-west region of France]. / Profil clinique, parcours de soins et comportements des patients à haut risque cardiovasculaire : étude transversale en Aquitaine.

INTRODUCTION: To screen and to follow-up the patients with high cardiovascular risk in general practice may amplify the decrease of the cardiovascular morbi-mortality observed since a few years. The objective of this study is to identify the patients with high cardiovascular risk and to describe the management of these patients by general practitioners in Aquitaine. METHODS: Transversal study of a sample of patients from 18 to 70 years old with high cardiovascular risk (combining at least 3 factors), included by voluntary general practitioners (GP). RESULTS: Forty-seven GP included 102 patients, presenting on average 3.7 risk factors among which 2.6 modifiable. The target values were reached for 59 % of patients with high blood pressure, 56 % of patients with diabetes and 53 % of patients with high cholesterol level. The analysis of care pathways identified the cardiologist as the privileged interlocutor. The doctors thought that seven patients out of 10 could change their risk behaviors. For the patients, the scale of declared importance to change was 6.6 on 10 for tobacco, 6.0 for food habits and 6.2 for physical activity. The confidence in their capacity to change was 3.8 on 10 for the tobacco, 5.2 for the food habits and 4.7 for the physical activity. DISCUSSION: Although doctors' sample is not representative, these results give an original overview of the management of patients with high cardiovascular risk and their care pathways. Medical treatments were globally in accordance with guidelines. The difficulty to change risk behaviors illustrates the necessity of patient therapeutic education.