Subtotal vs total cholecystectomy for difficult gallbladders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: With severely inflamed gallbladders, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be difficult and may require procedures like subtotal cholecystectomy (SC). Few studies exist comparing SC and total cholecystectomy (TC) in the setting of severe biliary inflammation. This meta-analysis aims to compare SC and TC for difficult gallbladders. METHODS: Medline-OVID, Embase-OVID, and Cinahl were searched including only studies comparing SC to TC for difficult gallbladders. Primary outcome was CBD injury. Secondary outcomes included bile leak, duodenal injury, retained stone, bleeding, intraabdominal collection, wound infection, reoperation, and mortality. RESULTS: Ten studies were included. Compared to TC, SC significantly lowered the risk for CBD injury (0 â€‹% vs. 1.6 â€‹%, RR 0.30, 95%CI 0.10-0.87) but increased risk of bile leaks (RR 3.5, 95%CI 1.79-6.84), postoperative ERCP (RR 2.86, 95%CI 1.53-5.35), intraabdominal collections (RR 2.55, 95%CI 1.32-4.93), and reoperation (RR 2.92, 95%CI 1.14-7.47). CONCLUSION: SC is a reasonable alternative to difficult gallbladders that may decrease the risk of CBD injuries. Knowing both approaches is crucial to manage the difficult gallbladder while minimizing harm. Further studies are needed to understand the value of SC for difficult cholecystectomy.

Benefit of hospital admission for detecting serious adverse events among emergency department patients with syncope: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of hospital admission after emergency department evaluation for syncope is unclear. We sought to determine the association between hospital admission and detection of serious adverse events, and whether this varied according to the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS). METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort of patients assessed in the emergency department for syncope. We compared patients admitted to hospital and discharged patients, using propensity scores to match 1:1 for risk of a serious adverse event. The primary outcome was detection of a serious adverse event in hospital for admitted patients or within 30 days after emergency department disposition for discharged patients. RESULTS: We included 8183 patients, of whom 743 (9.1%) were admitted; 658/743 (88.6%) were matched. Admitted patients had higher odds of detection of a serious adverse event (odds ratio [OR] 5.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3-7.4), nonfatal arrhythmia (OR 5.1, 95% CI 2.9-8.8) and nonarrhythmic serious adverse event (OR 6.3, 95% CI 2.9-13.5). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in death (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.4-2.7) or detection of ventricular arrhythmia (OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.7-6.0). Differences between admitted and discharged patients in detection of serious adverse events were greater for those with a CSRS indicating medium to high risk (p = 0.04). INTERPRETATION: Patients with syncope were more likely to have serious adverse events identified within 30 days if they were admitted to hospital rather than discharged from the emergency department. However, the benefit of hospital admission is low for patients at low risk of a serious adverse event.

Do four or more antenatal care visits increase skilled birth attendant use and institutional delivery in Bangladesh? A propensity-score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: With Bangladesh's adoption of the third Sustainable Development Goal to reduce maternal mortality, the impetus for Bangladesh to continue to improve uptake of maternal healthcare is strong. METHODS: Using a propensity-score matched analysis, the present study utilized data from the 2014 Bangladesh Demographic Health survey to examine the impact of four or more antenatal care visits on skilled birth attendant use and institutional delivery. RESULTS: The results revealed a significant and positive impact of four or more antenatal care visits on skilled birth attendant use and institutional delivery after matching treated and untreated mothers on included socio-demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of policies to provide at least four antenatal care visits may serve as an effective strategy to increase SBA use and institutional delivery in Bangladesh, which could contribute to the reduction of maternal mortality.

Is the Risk of Infection Lower with Sutures than with Staples for Skin Closure After Orthopaedic Surgery? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: Two previous meta-analyses comparing staples versus sutures have led to conflicting relative risks for surgical site infection between skin closure methods after orthopaedic surgery. Consequently, the choice of sutures or staples for skin closure continues to be a subject of conversation. Recently, additional randomized trials have been published, and an updated meta-analysis is needed to inform this debate. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To determine using a meta-analysis of randomized trials (1) whether there is a difference in surgical site infection (SSI) between staples and sutures for skin closure after orthopaedic surgery, and (2) whether that finding remains the same when the analysis is limited to randomized trials with a low risk of bias. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing staples with sutures for skin closure after orthopaedic surgery was conducted. We excluded barbed sutures, surgical zippers, and skin adhesives from this meta-analysis. Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Global Index Medicus were searched from date of inception to October 18, 2017. The sole outcome of interest was SSI as defined by the original study authors, with preference given to Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions whenever possible, recognizing that this may result in the pooling of more common minor events with rarer, more severe events, and in so doing, overestimate between-group differences. Because of this, subgroup analysis was planned based on severity of infection. Relative risk was calculated using a random-effects model (relative risk [RR], 95% confidence interval [CI]). Heterogeneity was estimated using I. Publication bias was explored using visual inspection of the funnel plot and Egger's test. Subgroup analysis was planned for type of orthopaedic surgery, suture material, SSI category, and country development index. Subgroup interaction p values were calculated. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess study quality. Sensitivity analysis was planned to assess whether the results changed when the analysis was limited to studies with low risk of bias. In total, 17 RCTs (2446 patients) were eligible, of which five RCTs (501 patients) were at low risk of bias. RESULTS: In the primary analysis, patients randomized to staples had a higher risk of SSI versus those who received sutures for skin closure (RR, 2.05; 95% CI,1.38-3.06; I = 0%). However, most of the events were driven by superficial SSI, and only two deep infections were explicitly reported in total (one in each group). After a post-hoc sensitivity analysis excluded a highly influential trial with high risk of bias, the results were highly fragile, relying on a difference of only four additional events in the staples group. When we limited the analysis to RCTs with low risk of bias, no difference was found between sutures and staples in terms of SSI (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.31-6.79; I = 46%). Effect sizes were consistent across subgroups (p value for subgroup interaction was not significant for elective versus trauma; hip versus knee arthroplasty; suture material; high versus middle- versus low-income settings). CONCLUSIONS: Even in this relatively large meta-analysis, existing RCTs do not provide definitive evidence of a difference in SSI risk when staples are used instead of sutures for skin closure after orthopaedic surgery. Currently, the total body of evidence remains weak and, even when limiting to only low risk of bias studies, it is not possible to rule in or rule out clinically important differences between staples and sutures. Until randomized studies of adequate power and followup duration are performed to definitively inform this issue, the choice between staples versus sutures should be based on other factors such as local availability, surgeon preference, and cost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Outcomes of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Head and Neck Region With Regional Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IMPORTANCE: There is a need to summarize the available evidence and provide quantitative data of the most important prognostic factors for patients with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region with regional lymph node metastasis (McSCCHN). OBJECTIVE: To undertake a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies on the risk factors for overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LRC), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and disease-specific survival (DSS) for patients with McSCCHN. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase were searched from 1946 to August 2018 for English-language articles. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials or observational studies reporting on at least 10 patients with McSCCHN; studies analyzing 1 defined risk factor; reporting OS, LRC, LRR, or DSS; and clinical follow-up of 1 year of more. For the final analysis we included risk factors that were analyzed for the same outcome in at least 3 studies. Of the 2923 articles screened, 21 articles met the inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: PRISMA guidelines were used for abstracting the data. Two reviewers independently abstracted the data. Risk of bias was estimated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. All analysis took place between January and October 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was OS. Secondary end points included LRC, LRR, and DSS. RESULTS: A total of 20 observational studies and 1 randomized clinical trial were identified, representing 3534 patients (some reviewed articles reported no demographic characteristics), and were included in the analysis. Significant risk factors associated with OS were immunosuppression (hazard ratio [HR] of death, 2.66; 95% CI, 2.26-3.13), extracapsular spread (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.12-3.23), adjuvant radiotherapy (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.27-0.78), lymph node ratio (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.09-3.35), and advanced age (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07). Immunosuppression (HR, 3.82; 95% CI, 2.47-5.92) and adjuvant radiotherapy (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.84) were also significant risk factors for DSS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Immunosuppressed patients and those with extracapsular extension have poor prognosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy is associated with an improvement in OS. These risk factors will assist with better risk stratification and may also help to inform future clinical trials.

Sex-Specific Associations Between Alcohol Consumption and Incidence of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

BACKGROUND: Although it is well established that heavy alcohol consumption increases the risk of hypertension, the risk associated with low levels of alcohol intake in men and women is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched Medline and Embase for original cohort studies on the association between average alcohol consumption and incidence of hypertension in people without hypertension. Random-effects meta-analyses and metaregressions were conducted. Data from 20 articles with 361 254 participants (125 907 men and 235 347 women) and 90 160 incident cases of hypertension (32 426 men and 57 734 women) were included. In people drinking 1 to 2 drinks/day (12 g of pure ethanol per drink), incidence of hypertension differed between men and women (relative riskwomen vs men=0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.93). In men, the risk for hypertension in comparison with abstainers was relative risk=1.19 (1.07-1.31; I2=59%), 1.51 (1.30-1.76), and 1.74 (1.35-2.24) for consumption of 1 to 2, 3 to 4, and 5 or more standard drinks per day, respectively. In women, there was no increased risk for 1 to 2 drinks/day (relative risk=0.94; 0.88-1.01; I2=73%), and an increased risk for consumption beyond this level (relative risk=1.42; 1.22-1.66). CONCLUSIONS: Any alcohol consumption was associated with an increase in the risk for hypertension in men. In women, there was no risk increase for consumption of 1 to 2 drinks/day and an increased risk for higher consumption levels. We did not find evidence for a protective effect of alcohol consumption in women, contrary to earlier meta-analyses.

Cytomegalovirus infection and graft rejection as risk factors for pneumocystis pneumonia in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

A growing number of publications have reported the outbreaks of post-transplant pneumocystis pneumonia (PJP). In most studies, the onset of PJP was beyond 6-12 months of prophylaxis. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and allograft rejection have been repeatedly reported as probable risk factors for post-transplant PJP. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we determined the pooled effect estimates of these 2 variables as risk factors. Data sources included PUBMED, MEDLINE-OVID, EMBASE-OVID, Cochrane Library, Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, World Health Organization, and Web of Science. We excluded publications related to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) patients. Eventually, 15 studies remained for the final stage of screening. Cytomegalovirus infection (OR: 3.30, CI 95%: 2.07-5.26, I2 : 57%, P = 0.006) and allograft rejection (OR:2.36, CI95%: 1.54-3.62, I2: 45.5%, P = 0.05) significantly increased the risk of post-transplant PJP. Extended prophylaxis targeting recipients with allograft rejection or CMV infection may reduce the risk of PJP.

Mentoring needs of distributed medical education faculty at a Canadian medical school: a mixed-methods descriptive study.

INTRODUCTION: The Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry in London, Ontario, has a mentorship program for all full-time faculty. The school would like to expand its outreach to physician faculty located in distributed medical education sites. The purpose of this study was to determine what, if any, mentorship distributed physician faculty currently have, to gauge their interest in expanding the mentorship program to distributed physician faculty and to determine their vision of the most appropriate design of a mentorship program that would address their needs. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study. The quantitative phase consisted of surveys sent to all distributed faculty members that elicited information on basic demographic characteristics and mentorship experiences/needs. The qualitative phase consisted of 4 focus groups of distributed faculty administered in 2 large and 2 small centres in both regions of the school's distributed education network: Sarnia, Leamington, Stratford and Hanover. Interviews were 90 minutes long and involved standardized semistructured questions. RESULTS: Of the 678 surveys sent, 210 (31.0%) were returned. Most respondents (136 [64.8%]) were men, and almost half (96 [45.7%]) were family physicians. Most respondents (197 [93.8%]) were not formal mentors to Schulich faculty, and 178 (84.8%) were not currently being formally mentored. Qualitative analysis suggested that many respondents were involved in informal mentoring. In addition, about half of the respondents (96 [45.7%]) wished to be formally mentored in the future, but they may be inhibited owing to time constraints and geographical isolation. Consistently, respondents wished to have mentoring by a colleague in a similar practice, with the most practical being one-on-one mentoring. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that the school's current formal mentoring program may not be applicable and will require modification to address the needs of distributed faculty.

INTRODUCTION: L'École de médecine et de dentisterie Schulich, à London en Ontario, offre un programme de mentorat à tout le personnel enseignant à temps plein. L'École aimerait étendre son programme aux médecins enseignants des établissements de formation médicale décentralisée. Le but de cette étude était de déterminer à quel mentorat, le cas échéant, ces médecins ont accès actuellement et d'établir leur intérêt pour le programme de mentorat de l'École et leur vision du programme le plus approprié pour répondre à leurs besoins. METHODS: Nous avons mené une étude en méthodologie mixte. Lors de la phase quantitative, nous avons envoyé des questionnaires à tous les médecins des établissements de formation médicale décentralisée afin d'obtenir des renseignements sur les caractéristiques démographiques de base ainsi que les expériences et besoins de mentorat. La phase qualitative comprenait quatre groupes de discussion composés de médecins enseignants décentralisés dans deux grands et deux petits centres des deux régions du réseau de formation décentralisée de l'École, soit Sarnia, Leamington, Stratford et Hanover. Les entrevues étaient d'une durée de 90 minutes et se composaient de questions semi-structurées normalisées. RESULTS: Sur les 678 questionnaires distribués, 210 (31 %) ont été retournés. La plupart des répondants (136 [64,8 %]) étaient des hommes et presque la moitié (96 [45,7 %]) étaient des médecins de famille. La plupart des répondants (197 [93,8 %]) n'agissaient pas comme mentors officiels auprès du personnel enseignant de l'École de médecine et de dentisterie Schulich et 178 (84,8 %) ne recevaient pas de mentorat officiel actuellement. L'analyse qualitative suggère que plusieurs répondants participaient à une forme quelconque de mentorat informel. De plus, environ la moitié des répondants (96 [45,7 %]) souhaitaient recevoir un mentorat officiel à l'avenir, mais avaient possiblement des contraintes liées au manque de temps et à l'isolement géographique. Les répondants ont systématiquement exprimé le désir d'obtenir un mentorat d'un collègue dans une pratique similaire et un mentorat individualisé, de façon pratique. CONCLUSION: Notre analyse suggère que le programme actuel de mentorat de l'École n'est peut-être pas applicable et nécessitera des modifications pour répondre aux besoins du personnel enseignant décentralisé.

Transfusion-associated necrotizing enterocolitis re-evaluated: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Significant controversy exists surrounding the possible association between recent packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion and the subsequent development of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in infants. Previous studies and meta-analyses reporting a statistically significant association led to a practice change to withhold enteral feeds in the peri-transfusion period in many centers in an effort to prevent NEC; however, results from more recent studies do not support the existence of an association and, thus, question the validity of this practice change. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether exposure to recent PRBC transfusion (defined as within 48 h) is associated with the subsequent development of NEC stage ≥II (Bell's criteria) in infants. METHODS: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 7, 2015. A gray literature search was also performed. Studies comparing the risk of NEC in infants exposed and unexposed to recent PRBC transfusion were included. Thirteen studies met eligibility criteria, and 10 (n=15,675 infants) were included in the meta-analysis. Three authors independently extracted data, and meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant 45% reduction in the unadjusted odds of NEC in infants exposed to a recent PRBC transfusion (odds ratio=0.55, 95% confidence interval=0.31-0.98). CONCLUSION: Our results show a protective effect of recent PRBC transfusion on the subsequent development of NEC. The practice of withholding enteral feeds during the peri-transfusion period should be re-evaluated in light of these results.

Should Transfusion Trigger Thresholds Differ for Critical Care Versus Perioperative Patients? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To address the significant uncertainty as to whether transfusion thresholds for critical care versus surgical patients should differ. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. SETTING: Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library searches were performed up to 15 June 2016. PATIENTS: Trials had to enroll adult surgical or critically ill patients for inclusion. INTERVENTIONS: Studies had to compare a liberal versus restrictive threshold for the transfusion of allogeneic packed RBCs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality, sub-grouped by surgical and critical care patients. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, stroke, renal failure, allogeneic blood exposure, and length of stay. Odds ratios and weighted mean differences were calculated using random effects meta-analysis. To assess whether subgroups were significantly different, tests for subgroup interaction were used. Subgroup analysis by trials enrolling critically ill versus surgical patients was performed. Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials (10,797 patients) were included. In critical care patients, restrictive transfusion resulted in significantly reduced 30-day mortality compared with liberal transfusion (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.97). In surgical patients, a restrictive transfusion strategy led to the opposite direction of effect for mortality (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.94-1.82). The subgroup interaction test was significant (p = 0.04), suggesting that the effect of restrictive transfusion on mortality is statistically different for critical care (decreased risk) versus surgical patients (potentially increased risk or no difference). Regarding secondary outcomes, for critically ill patients, a restrictive strategy resulted in reduced risk of stroke/transient ischemic attack, packed RBC exposure, transfusion reactions, and hospital length of stay. In surgical patients, restrictive transfusion resulted in reduced packed RBC exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The safety of restrictive transfusion strategies likely differs for critically ill patients versus perioperative patients. Further trials investigating transfusion strategies in the perioperative setting are necessary.

The effectiveness of topical colloidal silver in recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis: a randomized crossover control trial.

BACKGROUND: Recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis without polyposis (CRSsP) is a challenging condition to manage as traditional medical therapies and surgery fail to provide satisfactory clinical improvements. Colloidal silver (CS), a widely used naturopathic agent, has recently shown anti-biofilm properties both in vitro and within a rhinosinusitis animal model. To date, no trials involving humans have been published in world literature. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of CS as a topical nasal spray in patients with refractory CRSsP. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted using a convenience sample of 20 randomized patients with crossover methodology, comparing nasal sprays with CS versus saline. Patients sprayed twice daily for six weeks with the first intervention and then switched to the second for the next six weeks, with measurements made at baseline and each time point. Primary outcomes were changes in SNOT-22 and Lund-Kennedy (LK) endoscopic scores. All analysis was non-parametric and was conducted using STATA 14. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled in the study with 20 completing the entire protocol. Mean 6-week change in SNOT-22 scores were -2.8 and 1.0 for saline and CS, respectively (p = 0.373). Similarly, mean 6-week change in LK scores were -1.4 and -1.1 for saline and CS, respectively (p = 0.794). Significant period effects were observed with the SNOT-22 score between the randomized groups. No participants experienced negative health effects directly attributable to the administration of intranasal CS. CONCLUSION: Commercially available CS nasal spray did not demonstrate any meaningful subjective or objective improvements in patients with recalcitrant CRSsP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02403479 . Registered on March 1, 2015.

Echocardiogram changes following parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of the study is to systematically review the evidence on post parathyroidectomy (PTX) changes as measured by echocardiogram (ECHO) in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT).PHPT may increase risk of cardiovascular morbidity/mortality. Conclusions of studies assessing ECHO changes, pre versus post PTX, are inconsistent.A systematic literature search was conducted to locate published and unpublished studies. Randomized control trials, nonrandomized control trials, and observational studies were included. Variables were reported as means and standard deviations. An inverse variance statistical method, with random-effects analysis model, was applied to continuous data. The effect measure was standardized mean difference, confidence interval of 95%. Primary outcome measure was left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Secondary outcome measures were left ventricular mass index (LVMI), peak early over peak late diastolic velocity ratio (E/A ratio), isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT), intraventricular septal thickness (IVST), and posterior wall thickness (PWT).Fourteen studies were included. Follow-up time ranged 3 to 67 months. No significant differences (P > .05) in primary outcome measure LVEF (SMD = -0.03, CI = -0.24, 0.19), or secondary outcome measures E/A Ratio (SMD = -0.05, CI = -0.24, 0.14), IVST (SMD = 0, CI = 0.31, 0.32), PWT (SMD = 0.01, CI = -0.38, 0.39), LVMI (SMD = -0.18, CI = -0.74, 0.38), and IVRT (SMD = -0.84, CI = -1.83, 0.14) were observed.There was no significant difference in LVEF pre to post PTX. Due to heterogeneity of current literature, we were unable to determine if other outcome measures of cardiac function are affected after PTX in patients with PHPT. We recommend a randomized control trial be conducted to make concrete conclusions.

Comparing sutures versus staples for skin closure after orthopaedic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there still remains a significant advantage in the use of sutures to staples for orthopaedic skin closure in adult patients. DESIGN: Systematic Review/ Meta-Analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE-OVID, EMBASE-OVID, CINAHL and Cochrane Library. Grey and unpublished literature was also explored by searching: International Clinical Trial Registry, Grey Matters BIOSIS Previews, Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, ClinicalTrials.gov, UK Clinical Trials Gateway, UK Clinical Research Network Study Portfolio, Open Grey, Grey Literature Report, and Web of Science. SELECTION CRITERIA: Articles were from any country, written in English and published after 1950. We included all randomised control trials and observational studies comparing adults (≥ 18 years) undergoing orthopaedic surgery who either received staples or sutures for skin closure. The primary outcome was the incidence of surgical site infection. Secondary outcomes included closure time, inflammation, length of stay, pain, abscess formation, necrosis, discharge, wound dehiscence, allergic reaction and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: 13 studies were included in our cumulative meta-analysis conducted using Review Manager V.5.0. The risk ratio was computed as a measure of the treatment effect taking into account heterogeneity. Random-effect models were applied. There was no significant difference in infection comparing sutures to staples. The cumulative relative risk was 1.06 (0.46 to 2.44). In addition, there was no difference in infection comparing sutures to staples in hip and knee surgery, respectively. Lastly, except for closure time, there was no significant difference in secondary outcomes comparing sutures to staples. CONCLUSIONS: Except for closure time, there was no significant difference in superficial infection and secondary outcomes comparing sutures to staples was found. Given that there may in fact be no difference in effect between the two skin closure and the methodological limitations of included studies, authors should begin to consider the economic and logistic implications of using staples or sutures for skin closure. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015017481.