Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Transplant ; 13(4): 169-182, 2023 Jun 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37388395

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Indications to refer patients with cirrhosis for liver transplant evaluation (LTE) include hepatic decompensation or a model for end stage liver disease (MELD-Na) score ≥ 15. Few studies have evaluated how delaying referral beyond these criteria affects patient outcomes. AIM: To evaluate clinical characteristics of patients undergoing inpatient LTE and to assess the effects of delayed LTE on patient outcomes (death, transplantation). METHODS: This is a single center retrospective cohort study assessing all patients undergoing inpatient LTE (n = 159) at a large quaternary care and liver transplant center between 10/23/2017-7/31/2021. Delayed referral was defined as having prior indication (decompensation, MELD-Na ≥ 15) for LTE without referral. Early referral was defined as referrals made within 3 mo of having an indication based on practice guidelines. Logistic regression and Cox Hazard Regression were used to evaluate the relationship between delayed referral and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Many patients who require expedited inpatient LTE had delayed referrals. Misconceptions regarding transplant candidacy were a leading cause of delayed referral. Ultimately, delayed referrals negatively affected overall patient outcome and an independent predictor of both death and not receiving a transplant. Delayed referral was associated with a 2.5 hazard risk of death. CONCLUSION: Beyond initial access to an liver transplant (LT) center, delaying LTE increases risk of death and reduces risk of LT in patients with chronic liver disease. There is substantial opportunity to increase the percentage of patients undergoing LTE when first clinically indicated. It is crucial for providers to remain informed about the latest guidelines on liver transplant candidacy and the transplant referral process.

2.
Clin Liver Dis ; 24(2): 219-229, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32245529

RESUMO

The presence of hepatic encephalopathy is often associated with worse clinical outcomes and increased mortality. Even subclinical hepatic encephalopathy has clinical impacts on daily life and has been linked to increased falls, motor vehicle accidents, and hospitalizations. The presence and degree of hepatic encephalopathy can also affect survival outcomes in cirrhosis, acute liver failure, and liver transplant recipients. Patients may have improved clinical outcomes after treatment of hepatic encephalopathy, but the long-term impact of treatment on prognosis is unclear.


Assuntos
Encefalopatia Hepática , Cirrose Hepática , Doenças Assintomáticas , Encefalopatia Hepática/tratamento farmacológico , Encefalopatia Hepática/etiologia , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Cirrose Hepática/fisiopatologia , Cirrose Hepática/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Período Pós-Operatório , Período Pré-Operatório , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
3.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 21(3): 564-9, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25581825

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing, and CDI has a negative impact on IBD outcomes with both increased morbidity and mortality. Data are lacking regarding the rate of appropriate testing for CDI at the time of diagnosis. METHODS: We sought to determine the rate of CDI testing and CDI positivity at diagnosis of IBD using data collected through the Ocean State Crohn's and Colitis Area Registry (OSCCAR), a prospective cohort of patients with newly diagnosed IBD. CDI testing and CDI positivity were determined by reviewing the medical records of patients enrolled into the registry and diagnosed with IBD between January 2008 and July 2011. RESULTS: Of 320 enrolled patients, 227 (70.9%) reported diarrhea, and CDI testing was performed for 113 (49.8%) of the 227 patients. CDI testing was not recorded as being performed for the remaining 114 patients who reported having diarrhea. An additional 24 patients were tested for CDI but did not report having diarrhea. Seven (5.1%) of the 137 patients tested for CDI were positive. CONCLUSIONS: Testing for CDI is significantly lower than expected at diagnosis of IBD. Although the prevalence of CDI among tested patients is approximately 5%, a low testing rate suggests a significant quality issue in the diagnosis of IBD, with the potential for delayed diagnosis of CDI.


Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Fezes/microbiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/diagnóstico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/microbiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New York/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Características de Residência , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...