Arginine vasopressin during sinus rhythm: effects on haemodynamic variables, left anterior descending coronary artery cross sectional area and cardiac index, before and after inhibition of NO-synthase, in pigs.

UNLABELLED: We have shown previously that arginine vasopressin (AVP) given during sinus rhythm increases mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery cross sectional area. AVP was assumed to result in vasodilatation via activation of the endothelial nitric oxide system. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effects of AVP before and after NO-inhibition. Nine domestic pigs were instrumented for measurement of haemodynamic variables using micromanometer-tipped catheters, and measurement of LAD coronary artery cross sectional area employing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Haemodynamic variables, LAD coronary artery cross sectional area and cardiac output were measured at baseline, 90 s and 5, 15, and 30 min after AVP (0.4 U kg (-1) IV) before and after blockade of nitric oxide synthase with N(G)-nitro L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). Compared with baseline, AVP significantly increased MAP after 90 s (89+/-4 versus 160+/-5 mm Hg), increased LAD coronary artery cross sectional area (11.3+/-1 versus 11.8+/-1 mm(2)) and decreased cardiac index (138+/-6 versus 53+/-6 mL/min kg(-1)). After blockade of nitric oxide synthase, AVP significantly increased MAP after 90 s (135+/-4 versus 151+/-3 mm Hg), increased LAD coronary artery cross sectional area (8.7+/-1 versus 8.9+/-1 mm(2)), and significantly decreased cardiac index (95+/-6 versus 29+/-4 mL/min kg (-1)). IMPLICATIONS: During sinus rhythm, AVP increased MAP and LAD coronary artery cross sectional area, but decreased cardiac index.

Vasopressin improves survival in a porcine model of abdominal vascular injury.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine and compare the effects of vasopressin, fluid resuscitation and saline placebo on haemodynamic variables and short-term survival in an abdominal vascular injury model with uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock in pigs. METHODS: During general anaesthesia, a midline laparotomy was performed on 19 domestic pigs, followed by an incision (width about 5 cm and depth 0.5 cm) across the mesenterial shaft. When mean arterial blood pressure was below 20 mmHg, and heart rate had declined progressively, experimental therapy was initiated. At that point, animals were randomly assigned to receive vasopressin (0.4 U/kg; n = 7), fluid resuscitation (25 ml/kg lactated Ringer's and 25 ml/kg 3% gelatine solution; n = 7), or a single injection of saline placebo (n = 5). Vasopressin-treated animals were then given a continuous infusion of 0.08 U/kg per min vasopressin, whereas the remaining two groups received saline placebo at an equal rate of infusion. After 30 min of experimental therapy bleeding was controlled by surgical intervention, and further fluid resuscitation was performed. Thereafter, the animals were observed for an additional hour. RESULTS: After 68 +/- 19 min (mean +/- standard deviation) of uncontrolled bleeding, experimental therapy was initiated; at that time total blood loss and mean arterial blood pressure were similar between groups (not significant). Mean arterial blood pressure increased in both vasopressin-treated and fluid-resuscitated animals from about 15 mmHg to about 55 mmHg within 5 min, but afterward it decreased more rapidly in the fluid resuscitation group; mean arterial blood pressure in the placebo group never increased. Seven out of seven vasopressin-treated animals survived, whereas six out of seven fluid-resuscitated and five out of five placebo pigs died before surgical intervention was initiated (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Vasopressin, but not fluid resuscitation or saline placebo, ensured short-term survival in this vascular injury model with uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock in sedated pigs.

An observational study of vasopressin infusion during uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock in a porcine trauma model: Effects on bowel function.

The effects of vasopressin on the gut in a porcine uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock model are described. In eight anaesthetised pigs, a liver laceration was performed; when haemorrhagic shock was decompensated, all animals received 0.4 IU/kg vasopressin, followed by 0.08 IU/kg min over 30 min, which maintained a mean arterial blood pressure >40 mmHg. Subsequent surgical intervention, infusion of whole blood and fluids resulted in a stable cardiocirculatory status. Three hours after stabilisation, all pigs developed non-bloody diarrhoea which converted into normal bowel movements within 24 h. All histological samples retained 7 days after the experiment revealed no histopathological changes. In conclusion, in this small observational study of uncontrolled porcine haemorrhagic shock, a resuscitation strategy that included high dose vasopressin was associated with transient diarrhoea and good long term survival.

Significant survival prolongation in pigs with fulminant hepatic failure treated with a novel microgravity-based bioartificial liver.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of our novel Innsbruck Bioartificial Liver (IBAL; US patent no. 10/641275), which contains aggregates of porcine hepatocytes grown under simulated microgravity, in a porcine model of fulminant hepatic failure (FHF). FHF was induced by a combination of 75-80% liver resection and ischemia of the remnant segments for 60 min in 12 pigs. Two experimental groups were studied: the control group (n = 5) received standard intensive care and the study group (n = 5) received IBAL treatment. The survival of pigs with FHF was significantly prolonged by about 150% with IBAL treatment as compared to controls (controls: 20.4 +/- 2.8 h, IBAL: 51.0 +/- 2.2 h; P = 0.00184). In addition, intracranial pressure, blood ammonia, lactate, aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase levels were lower in the IBAL group than in controls, indicating metabolic activity of porcine hepatocytes in the bioreactor. No adverse effects were observed.

Influence of negative expiratory pressure ventilation on hemodynamic variables during severe hemorrhagic shock.

OBJECTIVE: Outcome after trauma with severe hemorrhagic shock is still dismal. Since the majority of blood is present in the venous vessels, it might be beneficial to perform venous recruiting via the airway during severe hemorrhagic shock. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to evaluate the effects of negative expiratory pressure ventilation on mean arterial blood pressure, cardiac output, and short-term survival during severe hemorrhagic shock. DESIGN: Prospective study in 21 laboratory animals. SETTING: University hospital research laboratory. SUBJECTS: : Tyrolean domestic pigs. INTERVENTIONS: After induction of controlled hemorrhagic shock (blood loss approximately 45 mL/kg), 21 pigs were randomly ventilated with either zero end-expiratory pressure (0 PEEP; n = 7), 5 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure (5 PEEP; n = 7), or negative expiratory pressure ventilation (up to -30 cm H2O at the endotracheal tube during expiration; n = 7). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean (+/-sd) arterial blood pressure was significantly higher in the negative expiratory pressure ventilation swine when compared with the 0 PEEP (38 +/- 5 vs. 27 +/- 3 mm Hg; p = .001) and the 5 PEEP animals (38 +/- 5 vs. 20 +/- 6 mm Hg; p < .001) after 5 mins of the experiment. Cardiac output was significantly higher in the negative expiratory pressure ventilation swine when compared with the 0 PEEP (3.1 +/- .4 vs. 1.9 +/- .9 L/min; p = .001) and 5 PEEP animals (3.1 +/- .4 vs. 1.2 +/- .8 L/min; p < .001) after 5 mins of the experiment. All seven negative expiratory pressure ventilation animals, but only three of seven 0 PEEP animals (p = .022), survived the 120-min study period, whereas all seven of seven 5 PEEP animals were dead within 35 mins (p < .001). Limitations include that blood loss was controlled and that the small sample size limits the evaluation of survival outcome. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with pigs ventilated with either 0 PEEP or 5 PEEP, negative expiratory pressure ventilation during severe hemorrhagic shock improved mean arterial blood pressure and cardiac output.

Vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and different shock states: a review of the literature.

Vasopressin administration may be a promising therapy in the management of various shock states. In laboratory models of cardiac arrest, vasopressin improved vital organ blood flow, cerebral oxygen delivery, the rate of return of spontaneous circulation, and neurological recovery compared with epinephrine (adrenaline). In a study of 1219 adult patients with cardiac arrest, the effects of vasopressin were similar to those of epinephrine in the management of ventricular fibrillation and pulseless electrical activity; however, vasopressin was superior to epinephrine in patients with asystole. Furthermore, vasopressin followed by epinephrine resulted in significantly higher rates of survival to hospital admission and hospital discharge. The current cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines recommend intravenous vasopressin 40 IU or epinephrine 1mg in adult patients refractory to electrical countershock. Several investigations have demonstrated that vasopressin can successfully stabilize hemodynamic variables in advanced vasodilatory shock. Use of vasopressin in vasodilatory shock should be guided by strict hemodynamic indications, such as hypotension despite norepinephrine (noradrenaline) dosages >0.5 mug/kg/min. Vasopressin must never be used as the sole vasopressor agent. In our institutional routine, a fixed vasopressin dosage of 0.067 IU/min (i.e. 100 IU/50 mL at 2 mL/h) is administered and mean arterial pressure is regulated by adjusting norepinephrine infusion. When norepinephrine dosages decrease to 0.2 microg/kg/min, vasopressin is withdrawn in small steps according to the response in mean arterial pressure. Vasopressin also improved short- and long-term survival in various porcine models of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock. In the clinical setting, we observed positive effects of vasopressin in some patients with life-threatening hemorrhagic shock, which had no longer responded to adrenergic catecholamines and fluid resuscitation. Clinical employment of vasopressin during hemorrhagic shock is experimental at this point in time.

Effects of thrombolysis during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

In this post hoc analysis, we assessed effects of thrombolysis during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The original study was designed as a double-blinded, prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. In this report, 1,219 patients were randomized, but 33 patients were excluded due to missing study drug codes. Thus, 1,186 patients were analyzed based on receipt (n = 99) versus nonreceipt (n = 1,087) of thrombolysis; the primary end point was hospital admission, and the secondary end point was hospital discharge. Patients who received thrombolysis versus those who did not were significantly younger (mean +/- SD 62.7 +/- 13.3 vs 66.5 +/- 14.3 years of age, p = 0.01) and more likely to have had an acute myocardial infarction (75.3% vs 54.6%, p < 0.01) or pulmonary embolism (20.2% vs 12.0%, p = 0.03) as the suspected underlying cause for cardiac arrest. In patients who underwent thrombolysis versus those who did not, cardiac arrest was more often witnessed (86.9% vs 77.5%, p = 0.03), initial ventricular fibrillation was more likely (59.6% vs 38.0%, p < 0.01), and a short estimated interval (0 to 5 minutes) between collapse and initiation of basic life support was more likely (51.3% vs 29.2%, p < 0.01). In patients who received thrombolysis, sodium bicarbonate (45.5% vs 33.0%, p = 0.01), lidocaine (32.3% vs 18.1%, p < 0.01), and amiodarone (30.3% vs 12.2%, p < 0.01) were administered significantly more often. Hospital admission rates were significantly higher in patients who underwent thrombolysis than in patients who did not (45.5% vs 32.7%, p = 0.01), and there was a trend to higher hospital discharge rates (14.1% vs 9.5%, p = 0.14). In patients who had suspected myocardial infarction, hospital admission and discharge rates were significantly higher in patients who underwent thrombolysis than in patients who did not. In logistic regression models after adjusting for confounding variables (e.g., age, initial electrocardiographic rhythm, and initiation of basic life support), hospital admission and discharge rates did not differ significantly. In conclusion, even when being employed in patients with a potentially better chance to survive, thrombolysis in patients with cardiac arrest resulted in an increased hospital admission but not discharge rate in this post hoc analysis.

Signs of inflammation after sciatic nerve block in pigs.

Nerve stimulators are widely used to assist with peripheral nerve blocks but do not eliminate the risk of nerve injury. We evaluated the histologic findings 6 h after sciatic nerve block with bupivacaine in pigs. When a motor response was still obtained with a current <0.2 mA (n = 10), the postmortem microscopic evaluation revealed lymphocytes and granulocytes sub-, peri-, and intraneurally in 5 (50%) of 10 pigs. No signs of inflammation were observed when the muscle contraction was achieved with a current between 0.3 and 0.5 mA (P = 0.03). In conclusion, the current required to elicit a motor response, the position of the needle tip, and the subsequent likelihood of nerve damage merit further evaluation.

Influence of positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation on survival during severe hemorrhagic shock.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Although a moderate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level is widely recommended, it is unknown whether moderate PEEP during mechanical ventilation has adverse effects during severe hemorrhagic shock. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to evaluate the effects of 0 cm H2O PEEP versus 5 cm H2O PEEP versus 10 cm H2O PEEP on short-term survival in a porcine model of severe hemorrhagic shock. Secondary study endpoints were hemodynamic variables and blood gases. METHODS: Twenty-four anesthetized pigs were bled approximately 45 mL/kg, randomized into 3 groups, and then ventilated with 0, 5, or 10 cm H2O PEEP. Survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier methods with log rank (Mantel Cox) comparison of cumulative survival by treatment group. RESULTS: Seven of 8 0 cm H2O PEEP animals survived the 120-minute study period, but 8 of 8 5 cm H2O PEEP animals died within 30 minutes, and 8 of 8 10 cm H2O PEEP animals were dead within 20 minutes (P<.0001). Ventilation with 0 cm H2O PEEP prevented a further reduction of mean arterial blood pressure and cardiac output. When compared with the 0 cm H2O PEEP group, end-tidal CO2 declined in the 5 cm H2O PEEP and 10 cm H2O PEEP animals. Compared with the 0 cm H2O PEEP animals, those ventilated with 5 or 10 cm H2O PEEP had higher lactate levels after 10 minutes. CONCLUSION: When compared with pigs ventilated with either 5 or 10 cm H2O PEEP, those ventilated with 0 cm H2O PEEP during untreated, severe hemorrhagic shock had significantly improved short-term survival.

Effects of decreasing peak flow rate on stomach inflation during bag-valve-mask ventilation.

Reducing inspiratory flow rate and peak airway pressure may be important in order to minimise the risk of stomach inflation when ventilating an unprotected airway with positive pressure ventilation. This study was designed to yield enough power to determine whether employing an inspiratory gas flow limiting bag-valve device (SMART BAG, O-Two Medical Technologies Inc., Ontario, Canada) would also decrease the likelihood of stomach inflation in an established bench model of a simulated unintubated respiratory arrest patient. The bench model consists of a training lung (lung compliance, 50 ml/cm H2O; airway resistance, 4 cm H2O/l/s) and a valve simulating lower oesophageal sphincter opening at a pressure of 19 cm H(2)O. One hundred and ninety-one emergency medicine physicians were requested to ventilate the manikin utilising a standard single-person technique for 1 min (respiratory rate, 12/min; Vt, 500 ml) with both a standard adult bag-valve-mask and the SMART BAG. The volunteers were blinded to the experimental design of the model until completion of the experimental protocol. The SMART BAG versus standard bag-valve-mask resulted in significantly (P < 0.001) lower (mean +/- S.D.) mean airway pressure (14 +/- 2 cm H2O versus 16 +/- 3 cm H2O), respiratory rates (13 +/- 3 breaths per min versus 14 +/- 4 breaths per min), incidence of stomach inflation (4.2% versus 38.7%) and median stomach inflation volumes (351 [range, 18-1211 ml] versus 1426 [20-5882 ml]); lung tidal volumes (538 +/- 97 ml versus 533 +/- 97 ml) were comparable. Inspiratory to expiratory ratios were significantly (P < 0.001) increased (1.7 +/- 0.5 versus 1.5 +/- 0.6). In conclusion, the SMART BAG reduced inspiratory flow, mean airway pressure and both the incidence and actual volume of stomach inflation compared with a standard bag-valve-mask device while maintaining delivered lung tidal volumes and increasing the inspiratory to expiratory ratio.

Vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a progress report.

OBJECTIVE: In patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, circulating endogenous vasopressin concentrations were significantly higher in successfully resuscitated patients than in patients who died. These observations have prompted several investigations to assess the role of vasopressin to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation management. DESIGN: Literature review. RESULTS: In the cardiopulmonary resuscitation laboratory, vasopressin improved vital organ blood flow, cerebral oxygen delivery, the probability of restoring spontaneous circulation, and neurologic recovery better than epinephrine. In pediatric preparations with asphyxia, epinephrine was superior to vasopressin, whereas in both pediatric pigs with ventricular fibrillation and adult porcine models with asphyxia, combinations of vasopressin and epinephrine proved to be highly effective. In addition, vasopressin enabled short- and long-term survival in a porcine model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock. In a recently published European, multiple-center trial, 1,219 adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were randomized to receive two injections of either 40 IU of vasopressin or 1 mg of epinephrine followed by additional epinephrine if needed. The clinical study did not confirm laboratory data showing vasopressin to be more effective than epinephrine in ventricular fibrillation and pulseless electrical activity, but vasopressin was superior to epinephrine in patients with asystole. Vasopressin followed by epinephrine was more effective than epinephrine alone in the treatment of refractory cardiac arrest. CONCLUSIONS: According to new data from the European vasopressin study, we suggest, first, the administration of 1 mg of epinephrine, followed alternately by 40 IU of vasopressin and 1 mg of epinephrine every 3 mins in adult cardiac arrest victims, regardless of the initial electrocardiographic rhythm.

Treatment of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock after liver trauma: fatal effects of fluid resuscitation versus improved outcome after vasopressin.

UNLABELLED: In a porcine model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, we evaluated the effects of vasopressin versus an equal volume of saline placebo versus fluid resuscitation on hemodynamic variables and short-term survival. Twenty-one anesthetized pigs were subjected to severe liver injury. When mean arterial blood pressure was <20 mm Hg and heart rate decreased, pigs randomly received either vasopressin IV (0.4 U/kg; n = 7), an equal volume of saline placebo (n = 7), or fluid resuscitation (1000 mL each of lactated Ringer's solution and hetastarch; n = 7). Thirty minutes after intervention, surviving pigs were fluid resuscitated while bleeding was surgically controlled. Mean (+/- SEM) arterial blood pressure 5 min after the intervention was significantly (P < 0.05) higher after vasopressin than with saline placebo or fluid resuscitation (58 +/- 9 versus 7 +/- 3 versus 32 +/- 6 mm Hg, respectively). Vasopressin improved abdominal organ blood flow but did not cause further blood loss (vasopressin versus saline placebo versus fluid resuscitation 10 min after intervention, 1343 +/- 60 versus 1350 +/- 22 versus 2536 +/- 93 mL, respectively; P < 0.01). Seven of 7 vasopressin pigs survived until bleeding was controlled and 60 min thereafter, whereas 7 of 7 saline placebo and 7 of 7 fluid resuscitation pigs died (P < 0.01). We conclude that vasopressin, but not saline placebo or fluid resuscitation, significantly improves short-term survival during uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock. IMPLICATIONS: Although IV fluid administration is the mainstay of nonsurgical management of trauma patients with uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, the efficacy of this strategy has been discussed controversially. In this animal model of severe liver trauma with uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, vasopressin, but not saline placebo or fluid resuscitation, improved short-term survival.

A comparison of vasopressin and epinephrine for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Vasopressin is an alternative to epinephrine for vasopressor therapy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, but clinical experience with this treatment has been limited. METHODS: We randomly assigned adults who had had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to receive two injections of either 40 IU of vasopressin or 1 mg of epinephrine, followed by additional treatment with epinephrine if needed. The primary end point was survival to hospital admission, and the secondary end point was survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: A total of 1219 patients underwent randomization; 33 were excluded because of missing study-drug codes. Among the remaining 1186 patients, 589 were assigned to receive vasopressin and 597 to receive epinephrine. The two treatment groups had similar clinical profiles. There were no significant differences in the rates of hospital admission between the vasopressin group and the epinephrine group either among patients with ventricular fibrillation (46.2 percent vs. 43.0 percent, P=0.48) or among those with pulseless electrical activity (33.7 percent vs. 30.5 percent, P=0.65). Among patients with asystole, however, vasopressin use was associated with significantly higher rates of hospital admission (29.0 percent, vs. 20.3 percent in the epinephrine group; P=0.02) and hospital discharge (4.7 percent vs. 1.5 percent, P=0.04). Among 732 patients in whom spontaneous circulation was not restored with the two injections of the study drug, additional treatment with epinephrine resulted in significant improvement in the rates of survival to hospital admission and hospital discharge in the vasopressin group, but not in the epinephrine group (hospital admission rate, 25.7 percent vs. 16.4 percent; P=0.002; hospital discharge rate, 6.2 percent vs. 1.7 percent; P=0.002). Cerebral performance was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of vasopressin were similar to those of epinephrine in the management of ventricular fibrillation and pulseless electrical activity, but vasopressin was superior to epinephrine in patients with asystole. Vasopressin followed by epinephrine may be more effective than epinephrine alone in the treatment of refractory cardiac arrest.

The effects of nifedipine on ventricular fibrillation mean frequency in a porcine model of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

UNLABELLED: We assessed the effects of a calcium channel blocker versus saline placebo on ventricular fibrillation mean frequency and hemodynamic variables during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Before cardiac arrest, 10 animals were randomly assigned to receive either nifedipine (0.64 mg/kg; n = 5) or saline placebo (n = 5) over 10 min. Immediately after drug administration, ventricular fibrillation was induced. After 4 min of cardiac arrest and 18 min of basic life support CPR, defibrillation was attempted. Ninety seconds after the induction of cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation mean frequency was significantly (P < 0.01) increased in nifedipine versus placebo pigs (mean +/- SD: 12.4 +/- 2.1 Hz versus 8 +/- 0.7 Hz). From 2 to 18.5 min after the induction of cardiac arrest, no differences in ventricular fibrillation mean frequency were detected between groups. Before defibrillation, ventricular fibrillation mean frequency was significantly (P < 0.05) increased in nifedipine versus placebo animals (9.7 +/- 1.2 Hz versus 7.1 +/- 1.3 Hz). Coronary perfusion pressure was significantly lower in the nifedipine than in the placebo group from the induction of ventricular fibrillation to 11.5 min of cardiac arrest; no animal had a return of spontaneous circulation after defibrillation. In conclusion, nifedipine, but not saline placebo, prevented a rapid decrease of ventricular fibrillation mean frequency after the induction of cardiac arrest and maintained ventricular fibrillation mean frequency at approximately 10 Hz during prolonged CPR; this was nevertheless associated with no defibrillation success. IMPLICATIONS: This study evaluates the effects of a calcium channel blocker on ventricular fibrillation mean frequency, hemodynamic variables, and resuscitability during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in pigs. Nifedipine, but not saline placebo, prevented a rapid decrease of ventricular fibrillation mean frequency after the induction of cardiac arrest and maintained ventricular fibrillation mean frequency at approximately 10 Hz during prolonged CPR but did not improve resuscitability.

Survival with full neurologic recovery after prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine in pigs.

UNLABELLED: We sought to determine the effects of a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine on neurologic recovery in comparison with epinephrine alone and saline placebo alone in an established porcine model of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). After 4 min of cardiac arrest, followed by 3 min of basic life support CPR, 17 animals were randomly assigned to receive, every 5 min, either a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine (vasopressin [IU/kg]/epinephrine [ micro g/kg]: 0.4/45, 0.4/45, and 0.8/45; n = 6), epinephrine alone (45, 45, and 200 micro g/kg; n = 6), or saline placebo alone (n = 5). After 22 min of cardiac arrest, including 18 min of CPR, defibrillation was attempted to achieve the return of spontaneous circulation. Aortic diastolic pressure was significantly (P < 0.01) increased 90 s after each of 3 vasopressin/epinephrine injections versus epinephrine alone versus saline placebo alone (mean +/- SEM: 69 +/- 3 mm Hg versus 45 +/- 3 mm Hg versus 29 +/- 2 mm Hg, 63 +/- 4 mm Hg versus 27 +/- 3 mm Hg versus 23 +/- 1 mm Hg, and 52 +/- 4 mm Hg versus 21 +/- 3 mm Hg versus 16 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively). Spontaneous circulation was restored in six of six vasopressin/epinephrine pigs, whereas six of six epinephrine and five of five saline placebo pigs died (P < 0.01). Neurologic evaluation 24 h after successful resuscitation revealed only an unsteady gait and was normal 5 days after the experiment in all vasopressin/epinephrine-treated animals. In conclusion, in this porcine model of prolonged CPR, repeated vasopressin/epinephrine administration, but not epinephrine or saline placebo alone, ensured long-term survival with full neurologic recovery. IMPLICATIONS: We present a study to evaluate the effects of a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation on neurological outcome in pigs. We found that all pigs treated with a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine could be resuscitated and had full neurologic recovery observed over an entire period of 5 days.

Arginine vasopressin, but not epinephrine, improves survival in uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock after liver trauma in pigs.

OBJECTIVE: Epinephrine is widely used for treatment of life-threatening hypotension, although new vasopressor drugs may merit evaluation. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of vasopressin vs. epinephrine vs. saline placebo on hemodynamic variables, regional blood flow, and short-term survival in an animal model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock and delayed fluid resuscitation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, laboratory investigation that used a porcine model for measurement of hemodynamic variables and regional abdominal organ blood flow. SETTING: University hospital laboratory. SUBJECTS: A total of 21 pigs weighing 32 +/- 3 kg. INTERVENTIONS: The anesthetized pigs were subjected to a penetrating liver injury, which resulted in a mean +/- sem loss of 40% +/- 5% of estimated whole blood volume within 30 mins and mean arterial pressures of <20 mm Hg. When heart rate declined progressively, pigs randomly received a bolus dose and continuous infusion of either vasopressin (0.4 units/kg and 0.04 units.kg-1.min-1, n = 7), or epinephrine (45 microg/kg and 5 microg.kg(-1).min(-1), n = 7), or an equal volume of saline placebo (n = 7), respectively. At 30 mins after drug administration, all surviving animals were fluid resuscitated while bleeding was surgically controlled. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean +/- sem arterial blood pressure at 2.5 and 10 mins was significantly (p <.001) higher after vasopressin vs. epinephrine vs. saline placebo (82 +/- 14 vs. 23 +/- 4 vs. 11 +/- 3 mm Hg, and 42 +/- 4 vs. 10 +/- 5 vs. 6 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively). Although portal vein blood flow was temporarily impaired by vasopressin, it was subsequently restored and significantly (p <.01) higher when compared with epinephrine or saline placebo (9 +/- 5 vs. 121 +/- 3 vs. 54 +/- 22 mL/min and 150 +/- 20 vs. 31 +/- 17 vs. 0 +/- 0 mL/min, respectively). Hepatic and renal artery blood flow was significantly higher throughout the study in the vasopressin group; however, no further bleeding was observed. Despite a second bolus dose, all epinephrine- and saline placebo-treated animals died within 15 mins after drug administration. By contrast, seven of seven vasopressin-treated animals survived until fluid replacement, and 60 mins thereafter, without further vasopressor therapy (p <.01). Moreover, blood flow to liver, gut, and kidney returned to normal values in the postshock phase. CONCLUSIONS: Vasopressin, but not epinephrine or saline placebo, improved short-term survival in a porcine model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock after liver injury when surgical intervention and fluid replacement was delayed.

Effects of vasopressin on adrenal gland regional perfusion during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the important role of the adrenal gland during cardiac arrest, little is known about changes in the adrenal medullary or cortical blood flow in this setting. This study was designed to assess regional adrenal gland perfusion in the medulla and cortex during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and after administration of adrenaline (epinephrine) versus vasopressin versus saline placebo. METHODS: After 4 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation, and 3 min of basic life support CPR, 19 animals were randomly assigned to receive either vasopressin (0.4 U/kg; n=7), adrenaline (45 microg/kg; n=6) or saline placebo (n=6), respectively. Haemodynamic variables, adrenal, and renal blood flow were measured after 90 s of CPR, and 90 s and 5 min after drug administration. RESULTS: All values are given as mean+/-S.E.M. Blood flow in the adrenal medulla was significantly higher 90 s after adrenaline when compared with saline placebo in the right adrenal medulla (210+/-14 vs. 102+/-5 ml/min per 100 mg), and in the left adrenal medulla (218+/-14 vs. 96+/-3 ml/min per 100 mg). Blood flow in the adrenal medulla was significantly higher 90 s and 5 min after vasopressin when compared with adrenaline in the right (326+/-22 mg vs. 210+/-14 ml/min per 100 mg, and 297+/-17 vs. 103+/-5 ml/min per 100 mg), and in the left medulla (333+/-25 vs. 218+/-14 ml/min per 100 mg, and 295+/-14 vs. 111+/-7 ml/min per 100 mg). Ninety seconds and five minutes after vasopressin, and 90 s after adrenaline, adrenal cortex blood flow was significantly higher when compared with saline placebo. After 12 min of cardiac arrest, including 8 min of CPR, seven of seven pigs in the vasopressin group, one of six pigs in the adrenaline group, but none of six placebo were successfully defibrillated. CONCLUSION: Both vasopressin and adrenaline produced significantly higher medullary and cortical adrenal gland perfusion during CPR than did a saline placebo; but vasopressin resulted in significantly higher medullary adrenal gland blood flow when compared with adrenaline.

Vasopressin, but not fluid resuscitation, enhances survival in a liver trauma model with uncontrolled and otherwise lethal hemorrhagic shock in pigs.

BACKGROUND: The authors compared the effects of vasopressin fluid resuscitation on survival in a liver trauma model with uncontrolled and otherwise lethal hemorrhagic shock in pigs. METHODS: A midline laparotomy was performed on 23 domestic pigs, followed by an incision, and subsequent finger fraction across the right medial liver lobe. During hemorrhagic shock, animals were randomly assigned to receive either 0.4 U/kg vasopressin (n = 9), or fluid resuscitation (n = 7), or saline placebo (n = 7), respectively. A continuous infusion of 0.08 U x kg(-1) x min(-1) vasopressin in the vasopressin group, or normal saline was subsequently administered in the fluid resuscitation and saline placebo group, respectively. After 30 min of experimental therapy, bleeding was controlled by surgical intervention, and blood transfusion and rapid fluid infusion were subsequently performed. RESULTS: Maximum mean arterial blood pressure during experimental therapy in the vasopressin-treated animals was significantly higher than in the fluid resuscitation and saline placebo groups (mean +/- SD, 72 +/- 26 vs 38 +/- 16 vs 11 +/- 7 mmHg, respectively; P< 0.05). Subsequently, mean arterial blood pressure remained at approximately 40 mmHg in all vasopressin-treated animals, whereas mean arterial blood pressure in all fluid resuscitation and saline placebo pigs was close to aortic hydrostatic pressure (approximately 15 mmHg) within approximately 20 min of experimental therapy initiation. Total blood loss was significantly higher in the fluid resuscitation pigs compared with vasopressin or saline placebo after 10 min of experimental therapy (65 +/- 6 vs 42 +/- 4 vs 43 +/- 6 ml/kg, respectively; P< 0.05). Seven of seven fluid resuscitation, and seven of seven saline placebo pigs died within approximately 20 min of experimental therapy, while 8 of 9 vasopressin animals survived more than 7 days (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Vasopressin, but not fluid resuscitation or saline placebo, ensured survival with full recovery in this liver trauma model with uncontrolled and otherwise lethal hemorrhagic shock in pigs.

Vasopressin in shock states.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is growing evidence that in end-stage shock or during cardiac arrest, inappropriately low endogenous vasopressin plasma levels may be responsible for pathologic vasodilatation, inadequate organ perfusion, and poor outcome. The purpose of this article is to review recent publications featuring arginine vasopressin as a potent vasoconstrictor in various shock states such as systemic vasodilatation, severe hypovolemia, or cardiac arrest. RECENT FINDINGS: Several retrospective investigations give evidence that vasopressin at a dosage of 2-6 U/h is effective in reversing catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock due to sepsis or after cardiopulmonary bypass, but prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted. In experimental hypovolemic cardiac arrest or therapy-resistant (irreversible) hypovolemic shock, vasopressin may be an intriguing therapy, although human evidence is not available. Animal data gives strong evidence that vasopressin given during cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves both return of spontaneous circulation and neurological outcome. Clinical experience on the use of vasopressin for in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with short response time showed equipotency with epinephrine; in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation, vasopressin showed improved 24 h survival in comparison with epinephrine. After the large European multicenter study completed in summer 2002, we will hopefully be able to better determine the role of vasopressin versus epinephrine in the management of adult cardiac arrest. SUMMARY: Vasopressin administration is emerging as a rational and promising therapy in the management of various shock states and cardiac arrest.