Structure-Function Relationship of XCL1 Used for in vivo Targeting of Antigen Into XCR1+ Dendritic Cells.

XCL1 is the ligand for XCR1, a chemokine receptor uniquely expressed on cross-presenting dendritic cells (DC) in mouse and man. We are interested in establishing therapeutic vaccines based on XCL1-mediated targeting of peptides or proteins into these DC. Therefore, we have functionally analyzed various XCL1 domains in highly relevant settings in vitro and in vivo. Murine XCL1 fused to ovalbumin (XCL1-OVA) was compared to an N-terminal deletion variant lacking the first seven N-terminal amino acids and to several C-terminal (deletion) variants. Binding studies with primary XCR1+ DC revealed that the N-terminal region stabilizes the binding of XCL1 to its receptor, as is known for other chemokines. Deviating from the established paradigm for chemokines, the N-terminus does not contain critical elements for inducing chemotaxis. On the contrary, this region appears to limit the chemotactic action of XCL1 at higher concentrations. A participation of the XCL1 C-terminus in receptor binding or chemotaxis could be excluded in a series of experiments. Binding studies with apoptotic and necrotic XCR1-negative cells suggested a second function for XCL1: marking of stressed cells for uptake into cross-presenting DC. In vivo studies using CD8+ T cell proliferation and cytotoxicity as readouts confirmed the critical role of the N-terminus for antigen targeting, and excluded any involvement of the C-terminus in the uptake, processing, and presentation of the fused OVA antigen. Together, these studies provide basic data on the function of the various XCL1 domains as well as relevant information on XCL1 as an antigen carrier in therapeutic vaccines.

Peripheral injection of bombesin induces c-Fos in NUCB2/nesfatin-1 neurons.

As anorexigenic hormones bombesin and nucleobindin2 (NUCB2)/nesfatin-1 decrease food intake in rodents. Both hormones have been described in brain nuclei that play a role in the modulation of hunger and satiety, like the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) and the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS). However, the direct interaction of the two hormones is unknown so far. The aim of study was to elucidate whether bombesin directly interacts with NUCB2/nesfatin-1 neurons in the PVN and NTS. Therefore, we injected bombesin intraperitoneally (ip) at two doses (26 and 32nmol/kg body weight) and assessed c-Fos activation in the PVN, arcuate nucleus (ARC) and NTS compared to vehicle treated rats (0.15M NaCl). We also performed co-localization studies with oxytocin or tyrosine hydroxylase. Bombesin at both doses increased the number of c-Fos positive neurons in the PVN (p<0.05) and NTS (p<0.05) compared to vehicle, while in the ARC no modulation was observed (p>0.05). In the PVN and NTS the number of c-Fos positive neurons colocalized with NUCB2/nesfatin-1 increased after bombesin injection compared to vehicle treatment (p<0.05). Moreover, an increase of activated NUCB2/nesfatin-1 immunoreactive neurons that co-expressed oxytocin in the PVN (p<0.05) or tyrosine hydroxylase in the NTS (p<0.05) was observed compared to vehicle. Our results show that peripherally injected bombesin activates NUCB2/nesfatin-1 neurons in the PVN and NTS giving rise to a possible interaction between bombesin and NUCB2/nesfatin-1 in the modulation of food intake.

The dopamine antagonist flupentixol does not alter ghrelin-induced food intake in rats.

It has been shown that dopamine antagonists suppress the ghrelin-induced increased motivation to work for food. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the dopamine antagonist flupentixol on ghrelin-induced food intake. Ad libitum fed male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were injected intraperitoneally (ip) with vehicle plus vehicle, vehicle plus ghrelin (13 µg/kg), 0.25mg/kg or 0.5mg/kg flupentixol plus ghrelin, or 0.25mg/kg or 0.5 mg/kg flupentixol plus vehicle. In a second experiment, intracerebroventricularly (icv) cannulated rats received an ip injection of vehicle (0.15M NaCl) or flupentixol (0.25mg/kg) and 20 min later an icv injection of vehicle or ghrelin (1 µg/rat). Both experiments were performed twice: first, rats were offered only standard chow, while in the second experiment they could choose between standard chow and a palatable/preferred chow. Cumulative light phase food intake was assessed for 7h. Ip as well as icv injected ghrelin reliably increased intake of standard chow. Flupentixol did not affect ghrelin-induced intake of standard chow. Ip injected ghrelin failed to increase the intake of palatable chow, whereas icv injected ghrelin did. This effect was not blocked by ip flupentixol. In summary, ip administered ghrelin did not increase the intake of chow the rats preferred; whereas icv injected ghrelin further stimulated the intake of preferred chow suggesting a direct central mediation of this effect. Our results show that the dopamine antagonist flupentixol does not influence ghrelin-induced feeding in our choice paradigm.