Terbutaline Accumulates in Blood and Urine after Daily Therapeutic Inhalation.

PURPOSE: This study investigated pharmacokinetics of terbutaline after single and seven consecutive days of inhalation in exercising trained men. METHODS: Twelve healthy trained men underwent two pharmacokinetic trials comparing single dose (2 mg) and seven consecutive days (2 mg·d) of inhaled terbutaline. After inhalation of terbutaline at each trial, subjects performed 90 min of bike ergometer exercise at 55%-65% of maximal oxygen consumption after which they stayed inactive. Blood and urine samples were collected before and after inhalation of terbutaline. Samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Maximum serum concentration of terbutaline (Cmax) (6.4 ± 1.2 vs 4.9 ± 1.2 ng·mL, P = 0.01) (mean ± 95% confidence interval) and area under serum concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 h after inhalation (AUC0-4) (16 ± 3 vs 13 ± 2 ng·mL·h, P ≤ 0.005) were higher after 7 d of inhalation compared with the first day. Seven days of terbutaline inhalation resulted in accumulation of terbutaline in urine, in which total urine excretion of terbutaline was higher after 7 d of inhalation compared with the first day (274 ± 43 vs 194 ± 33 µg, P ≤ 0.001). These differences were partly attributed to systemic accumulation of terbutaline after consecutive days of inhalation, in that baseline serum and urine samples revealed incomplete elimination of terbutaline. CONCLUSION: Terbutaline accumulates in serum and urine after consecutive days of inhalation. For doping control purposes, these observations are of relevance if a urine threshold and decision limit is to be introduced for terbutaline on the World Anti-Doping Agency's list of prohibited substances because asthmatic athletes may use their bronchorelievers for consecutive days.

Pharmacokinetics of Oral and Inhaled Terbutaline after Exercise in Trained Men.

AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate pharmacokinetics of terbutaline after oral and inhaled administration in healthy trained male subjects in relation to doping control. METHODS: Twelve healthy well-trained young men (27 ±2 years; mean ± SE) underwent two pharmacokinetic trials that compared 10 mg oral terbutaline with 4 mg inhaled dry powder terbutaline. During each trial, subjects performed 90 min of bike ergometer exercise at 65% of maximal oxygen consumption. Blood (0-4 h) and urine (0-24 h) samples were collected before and after administration of terbutaline. Samples were analyzed for concentrations of terbutaline by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics differed between the two routes of administration. Serum Cmax and area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) were lower after oral administration compared to inhalation (Cmax: 4.2 ± 0.3 vs. 8.5 ± 0.7 ng/ml, P ≤ 0.001; AUC: 422 ± 22 vs. 1308 ± 119 ng/ml × min). Urine concentrations (sum of the free drug and the glucuronide) were lower after oral administration compared to inhalation 2 h (1100 ± 204 vs. 61 ± 10 ng/ml, P ≤ 0.05) and 4 h (734 ± 110 vs. 340 ± 48 ng/ml, P ≤ 0.001) following administration, whereas concentrations were higher for oral administration than inhalation 12 h following administration (190 ± 41 vs. 399 ± 108 ng/ml, P ≤ 0.05). Urine excretion rate was lower after oral administration than inhalation the first 2 h following administration (P ≤ 0.001). Systemic bioavailability ratio between the two routes of administration was 3.8:1 (inhaled: oral; P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Given the higher systemic bioavailability of inhaled terbutaline compared to oral, our results indicate that it is difficult to differentiate allowed inhaled use of terbutaline from prohibited oral ingestion based on urine concentrations in doping control analysis. However given the potential performance enhancing effect of high dose terbutaline, it is essential to establish a limit on the WADA doping list.

Pharmacokinetics of nebulized and oral procaterol in asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects in relation to doping analysis.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate pharmacokinetics of procaterol in asthmatics and non-asthmatics after nebulized and oral administration in relation to doping. Ten asthmatic and ten non-asthmatic subjects underwent two pharmacokinetic trials. At first trial, 4 µg procaterol was administered as nebulization. At second trial, 100 µg procaterol was administered orally. Serum and urine samples were collected before and after administration of procaterol. Samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Serum and urine concentrations of procaterol were markedly higher after oral administration compared to nebulized administration. After oral administration, serum procaterol concentration-time area under the curve (AUC) was higher (P ≤ 0.05) for asthmatics than non-asthmatics. Likewise, urine concentrations were higher (P ≤ 0.01) for asthmatics than non-asthmatics 4 (47 ± 12 vs. 28 ± 9 ng/mL) and 8 h (39 ± 9 vs. 15 ± 5 ng/mL) after oral administration. Detection of serum procaterol was difficult after nebulized administration with 38 samples (27%) below limit of quantification (LOQ) and only trends were observed. No differences were observed between asthmatics and non-asthmatics in the urine concentrations of procaterol after nebulized administration. In summary, our data showed that asthmatics had higher urine concentrations of procaterol than non-asthmatics after oral administration of 100 µg, whereas no difference was observed between the groups after nebulized administration. For doping control purposes, our observations indicate that it is possible to differentiate therapeutic nebulized administration of procaterol from prohibited use of oral procaterol. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.