CD19-CD28: an affinity-optimized CD28 agonist for combination with glofitamab (CD20-TCB) as off-the-shelf immunotherapy.

ABSTRACT: Effective T-cell responses not only require the engagement of T-cell receptors (TCRs; "signal 1"), but also the availability of costimulatory signals ("signal 2"). T-cell bispecific antibodies (TCBs) deliver a robust signal 1 by engaging the TCR signaling component CD3ε, while simultaneously binding to tumor antigens. The CD20-TCB glofitamab redirects T cells to CD20-expressing malignant B cells. Although glofitamab exhibits strong single-agent efficacy, adding costimulatory signaling may enhance the depth and durability of T-cell-mediated tumor cell killing. We developed a bispecific CD19-targeted CD28 agonist (CD19-CD28), RG6333, to enhance the efficacy of glofitamab and similar TCBs by delivering signal 2 to tumor-infiltrating T cells. CD19-CD28 distinguishes itself from the superagonistic antibody TGN1412, because its activity requires the simultaneous presence of a TCR signal and CD19 target binding. This is achieved through its engineered format incorporating a mutated Fc region with abolished FcγR and C1q binding, CD28 monovalency, and a moderate CD28 binding affinity. In combination with glofitamab, CD19-CD28 strongly increased T-cell effector functions in ex vivo assays using peripheral blood mononuclear cells and spleen samples derived from patients with lymphoma and enhanced glofitamab-mediated regression of aggressive lymphomas in humanized mice. Notably, the triple combination of glofitamab with CD19-CD28 with the costimulatory 4-1BB agonist, CD19-4-1BBL, offered substantially improved long-term tumor control over glofitamab monotherapy and respective duplet combinations. Our findings highlight CD19-CD28 as a safe and highly efficacious off-the-shelf combination partner for glofitamab, similar TCBs, and other costimulatory agonists. CD19-CD28 is currently in a phase 1 clinical trial in combination with glofitamab. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05219513.

Re-evaluating the need for chronic toxicity studies with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, using a weight of evidence approach.

To support registration of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for chronic indications, 6-month toxicity studies have historically been conducted. Experience with mAb development has shown a relatively benign and well-understood safety profile for this class, with most toxicity findings anticipated based on pharmacology. We evaluated whether a 6-month toxicity study is necessary to assess the long-term safety of mAbs. Data on First-in-Human (FIH)-enabling and chronic toxicity studies were shared for 142 mAbs submitted by 11 companies. Opportunities to further optimize study designs to reduce animal usage were identified. For 71% of mAbs, no toxicities or no new toxicities were noted in chronic studies compared to FIH-enabling study findings. New toxicities of potential concern for human safety or that changed trial design were identified in 13.5% of cases, with 7% being considered critical and 2% leading to program termination. An iterative, weight-of-evidence model which considers factors that influence the overall risk for a mAb to cause toxicity was developed. This model enables an evidence-based justification, suggesting when 3-month toxicity studies are likely sufficient to support late-stage clinical development and registration for some mAbs.

The use of recovery animals in nonclinical safety assessment studies with monoclonal antibodies: further 3Rs opportunities remain.

Assessment of reversibility from nonclinical toxicity findings in animals with potential adverse clinical impact is required during pharmaceutical development, but there is flexibility around how and when this is performed and if recovery animals are necessary. For monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and in accordance with ICH S6(R1) if inclusion of recovery animals is warranted, this need only occur in one study. Data on study designs for first-in-human (FIH)-enabling and later-development toxicity studies were shared from a recent collaboration between the NC3Rs, EPAA, Netherlands Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB) and 14 pharmaceutical companies. This enabled a review of practices on recovery animal use during mAb development and identification of opportunities to reduce research animal use. Recovery animals were included in 68% of FIH-enabling and 69% of later-development studies, often in multiple studies in the same program. Recovery groups were commonly in control plus one test article-dosed group or in all dose groups (45% of studies, each design). Based on the shared data review and conclusions, limiting inclusion of recovery to a single nonclinical toxicology study and species, study design optimisation and use of existing knowledge instead of additional recovery groups provide opportunities to further reduce animal use within mAb development programs.

FDA and industry collaboration: Identifying opportunities to further reduce reliance on nonhuman primates for nonclinical safety evaluations.

The nonhuman primate (NHP) has always been a limited resource for pharmaceutical research with ongoing efforts to conserve. This is due to their inherent biological properties, the growth in biotherapeutics and other modalities, and their use in small molecule drug development. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has significantly impacted the availability of NHPs due to the immediate need for NHPs to develop COVID-19 vaccines and treatments and the China NHP export ban; thus, accelerating the need to further replace, reduce and refine (3Rs) NHP use. The impact of the NHP shortage on drug development led DruSafe, BioSafe, and the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) to discuss this issue at their 2021 annual meeting. This meeting identified areas to further the 3Rs in NHP use within the current nonclinical safety evaluation regulatory framework and highlighted the need to continue advancing alternative methods towards the aspirational goal to replace use of NHPs in the long term. Alignment across global health authorities is necessary for implementation of approaches that fall outside existing guidelines. This article captures the proceedings from this meeting highlighting current best practices and areas for 3Rs in NHP use.

Current nonclinical approaches for immune assessments of immuno-oncology biotherapeutics.

Harnessing the immune system to kill tumors has been revolutionary and, as a result, has had an enormous benefit for patients in extending life and resulting in effective cures in some. However, activation of the immune system can come at the cost of undesirable adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome, immune-related adverse events, on-target/off-tumor toxicity, neurotoxicity and tumor lysis syndrome, which are safety risks that can be challenging to assess non-clinically. This article provides a review of the biology and mechanisms that can result in immune-mediated adverse effects and describes industry approaches using in vitro and in vivo models to aid in the nonclinical safety risk assessments for immune-oncology modalities. Challenges and limitations of knowledge and models are also discussed.

Development of a nonhuman primate challenge model to evaluate CD8+ T cell responses to an adenovirus-based vaccine expressing SIV proteins upon repeat-dose treatment with checkpoint inhibitors.

Targeting immune checkpoint receptors expressed in the T cell synapse induces active and long-lasting antitumor immunity in preclinical tumor models and oncology patients. However, traditional nonhuman primate (NHP) studies in healthy animals have thus far demonstrated little to no pharmacological activity or toxicity for checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), likely due to a quiescent immune system. We developed a NHP vaccine challenge model in Mauritius cynomolgus monkey (MCMs) that elicits a strong CD8+ T cell response to assess both pharmacology and safety within the same animal. MHC I-genotyped MCMs were immunized with three replication incompetent adenovirus serotype 5 (Adv5) encoding Gag, Nef and Pol simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) proteins administered 4 weeks apart. Immunized animals received the anti-PD-L1 atezolizumab or an immune checkpoint-targeting bispecific antibody (mAbX) in early development. After a single immunization, Adv5-SIVs induced T-cell activation as assessed by the expression of several co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules, proliferation, and antigen-specific T-cell response as measured by a Nef-dependent interferon-γ ELIspot and tetramer analysis. Administration of atezolizumab increased the number of Ki67+ CD8+ T cells, CD8+ T cells co-expressing TIM3 and LAG3 and the number of CD4+ T cells co-expressing 4-1BB, BTLA, and TIM3 two weeks after vaccination. Both atezolizumab and mAbX extended the cytolytic activity of the SIV antigen-specific CD8+ T cell up to 8 weeks. Taken together, this vaccine challenge model allowed the combined study of pharmacology and safety parameters for a new immunomodulatory protein-based therapeutic targeting CD8+ T cells in an NHP model.

Challenges of non-clinical safety testing for biologics: A Report of the 9th BioSafe European Annual General Membership Meeting.

New challenges and other topics in non-clinical safety testing of biotherapeutics were presented and discussed at the nineth European BioSafe Annual General Membership meeting in November 2019. The session topics were selected by European BioSafe organization committee members based on recent company achievements, agency interactions and new data obtained in the non-clinical safety testing of biotherapeutics, for which data sharing would be of interest and considered as valuable information. The presented session topics ranged from strategies of in vitro testing, immunogenicity prediction, bioimaging, and developmental and reproductive toxicology (DART) assessments to first-in-human (FIH) dose prediction and bioanalytical challenges, reflecting the entire space of different areas of expertise and different molecular modalities. During the 9th meeting of the European BioSafe members, the following topics were presented and discussed in 6 main sessions (with 3 or 4 presentations per session) and in three small group breakout sessions: 1) DART assessment with biotherapeutics: what did we learn and where to go?; 2) Non-animal testing strategies; 3) Seeing is believing: new frontiers in imaging; 4) Predicting immunogenicity during early drug development: hope or despair?; 5) Challenges in FIH dose projections; and 6) Non-canonical biologics formats: challenges in bioanalytics, PKPD and biotransformation for complex biologics formats. Small group breakout sessions were organized for team discussion about 3 specific topics: 1) Testing of cellular immune function in vitro and in vivo; 2) MABEL approach (toxicology and pharmacokinetic perspective); and 3) mRNA treatments. This workshop report presents the sessions and discussions at the meeting.

Nonclinical Development of Biologics: Integrating Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics to Create Smarter and More Flexible Nonclinical Safety Programs Optimizing Animal Use.

Safety assessment of biological drugs has its challenges due to the multiple new different modalities, for example, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecifics, nanobodies, fusion proteins and advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), their different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, and their ability to trigger immunogenicity and toxicity. In the public and in the pharmaceutical industry, there is a strong and general desire to reduce the number of animals used in research and development of drugs and in particular reducing the use of nonhuman primates. Important discussions and activities are ongoing investigating the smarter designs of early research and dose range finding studies, reuse of animals, and replacing animal experiments with in vitro studies. Other important challenges include absence of a relevant species and design of studies and developing genetically modified animals for special investigative toxicology studies. Then, the learnings and challenges from the development of the first ATMPs are available providing valuable insights in the development path for these new potentially transformative treatments. Finally, development of strategies for assessment of immunogenicity and prediction of translation of immunogenicity and associated findings to the clinic. On this, the eighth meeting for the European BioSafe members, these challenges served as the basis for the presentations and discussions during the meeting. This article serves as the workshop report reviewing the presentations and discussions at the meeting.

Industry experiences with immune-mediated findings in biotherapeutic nonclinical toxicology studies.

With the growth of monoclonal antibodies and other proteins as major modalities in the pharmaceutical industry, there has been an increase in pharmacology and toxicity testing of biotherapeutics in animals. Animals frequently mount an immune response to human therapeutic proteins. This can result in asymptomatic anti-drug antibody formation, immune complexes that affect drug disposition and/or organ function such as kidney, cytokine release responses, fatal hypersensitivity, or a range of reactions in between. In addition, an increasing number of oncology therapeutics are being developed that enhance or directly stimulate immune responses by a variety of mechanisms, which could increase the risk of autoreactivity and an autoimmune-like syndrome in animals and humans. When evaluating the risk of biotherapeutics prior to entering the clinic, the nonclinical safety data may include any of these responses and it is critical to understand whether they represent a safety liability for humans. The DruSafe Leadership group of the IQ Consortium conducted a survey of industry to understand sponsors' experiences with these immune reactions in nonclinical studies related to both immunogenicity and pharmacologically-mediated immune perturbations. The survey covered what pathways were affected, how the immune responses were presented, how the company and health authorities interpreted the data and whether the immune responses were observed in the clinic. Additionally, the survey gathered information on association of these findings with anti-drug antibodies as well as sponsor's use of immunogenicity predictive tools. The data suggests that the ability of a biotherapeutic to activate the immune system, intended or not, plays a significant role on characteristics of the response and whether theys are translatable.

Mechanistic Investigations of Diarrhea Toxicity Induced by Anti-HER2/3 Combination Therapy.

Combination of targeted therapies is expected to provide superior efficacy in the treatment of cancer either by enhanced antitumor activity or by preventing or delaying the development of resistance. Common challenges in developing combination therapies include the potential of additive and aggravated toxicities associated with pharmacologically related adverse effects. We have recently reported that combination of anti-HER2 and anti-HER3 antibodies, pertuzumab and lumretuzumab, along with paclitaxel chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer, resulted in a high incidence of diarrhea that ultimately limited further clinical development of this combination. Here, we further dissected the diarrhea profile of the various patient dose cohorts and carried out in vitro investigations in human colon cell lines and explants to decipher the contribution and the mechanism of anti-HER2/3 therapeutic antibodies to intestinal epithelium malfunction. Our clinical investigations in patients revealed that while dose reduction of lumretuzumab, omission of pertuzumab loading dose, and introduction of a prophylactic antidiarrheal treatment reduced most severe adverse events, patients still suffered from persistent diarrhea during the treatment. Our in vitro investigations showed that pertuzumab and lumretuzumab combination treatment resulted in upregulation of chloride channel activity without indication of intestinal barrier disruption. Overall, our findings provide a mechanistic rationale to explore alternative of conventional antigut motility using medication targeting chloride channel activity to mitigate diarrhea of HER combination therapies. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(7); 1464-74. ©2018 AACR.

Biotherapeutics in non-clinical development: Strengthening the interface between safety, pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics and manufacturing.

Biological drugs comprise a wide field of different modalities with respect to structure, pharmacokinetics and pharmacological function. Considerable non-clinical experience in the development of proteins (e.g. insulin) and antibodies has been accumulated over the past thirty years. In order to improve the efficacy and the safety of these biotherapeutics, Fc modifications (e.g. Fc silent antibody versions), combinations (antibody-drug conjugates, protein-nanoparticle combinations), and new constructs (darpins, fynomers) have been introduced. In the last decade, advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) in research and development have become a considerable and strongly growing part of the biotherapeutic portfolio. ATMPs consisting of gene and cell therapy modalities or even combinations of them, further expand the level of complexity, which already exists in non-clinical development strategies for biological drugs and has thereby led to a further diversification of expertise in safety and PKPD assessment of biological drugs. It is the fundamental rationale of the BioSafe meetings, held yearly in the EU and in the US, to convene experts on a regular basis and foster knowledge exchange and mutual understanding in this fast growing area. In order to reflect at least partially the variety of the biotherapeutics field, the 2016 EU BioSafe meeting addressed the following topics in six sessions: (i) In vitro Meets in vivo to Leverage Biologics Development (ii) New developments and regulatory considerations in the cell and gene therapy field (iii) CMC Challenges with Biologics development (iv) Minipigs in non-clinical safety assessment (v) Opportunities of PKPD Assessment in Less Common Administration Routes In the breakout sessions the following questions were discussed: (i) Cynomolgus monkey as a reprotoxicology Species: Impact of Immunomodulators on Early Pregnancy Maintenance (ii) Safety Risk of Inflammation and Autoimmunity Induced by Immunomodulators (iii) Experience with non-GMP Material in Pivotal Non-clinical Safety Studies to Support First in Man (FiM) Trials (iv) Safety Assessment of Combination Products for Non-oncology.

Comparative assessment of immune complex-mediated hypersensitivity reactions with biotherapeutics in the non-human primate: Critical parameters, safety and lessons for future studies.

With the emergence of novel biotherapeutic formats and immunostimulatory biotherapeutics in cancer immunotherapy, an understanding of immune-complex (IC) mediated hypersensitivity reactions in toxicology studies - and their differentiation from pharmacology - remains key to the preclinical evaluation of these drugs. In this review we provide an in-depth evaluation and comparison of case examples where IC-mediated hypersensitivity reactions were observed in cynomolgus monkeys. We provide details of the parameters evaluated in each study to substantiate and guide the interpretation of these findings. Five study cases (1 therapeutic protein, 4 monoclonal antibodies) are discussed for which effects ranged from minor to fatal. Common characteristics are the high incidence of clinical signs, detectable antidrug antibodies, and accelerated drug clearance up to virtual loss of exposure. In our experience, measurement of cytokine levels in vivo and detection of complement (split products) were supportive markers in situations where coagulopathy was suspected to play a role in the observed effects. Recommendations are outlined to prepare for root-cause analysis of suspected hypersensitivity reactions. Overall, a thorough analysis of the findings has helped to start clinical trials despite major findings. The hypersensitivity reactions with our human(ized) immunoglobulins have not proven to be predictive for humans.

Distribution of FcRn Across Species and Tissues.

The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) is a major histocompatibility complex class I type molecule that binds to, transports, and recycles immunoglobulin G (IgG) and albumin, thereby protecting them from lysosomal degradation. Therefore, besides the knowledge of FcRn affinity, FcRn protein expression is critical in understanding the pharmacokinetic behavior of Fc-containing biotherapeutics such as monoclonal antibodies. The goal of this investigation was to achieve for the first time a comparative assessment of FcRn distribution across a variety of tissues and species. FcRn was mapped in about 20 tissues including placenta from human and the most frequently used species in non-clinical safety testing of monoclonal antibodies (mouse, rat, cynomolgus monkey). In addition, the FcRn expression pattern was characterized in two humanized transgenic mouse lines (Tg32 and Tg276) expressing human FcRn under different promoters, and in the severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mouse. Consecutive sections were stained with specific markers, namely, anti-CD68 for macrophages and anti-von Willebrand Factor for endothelial cells. Overall, the FcRn expression pattern was comparable across species and tissues with consistent expression of FcRn in endothelial cells and interstitial macrophages, Kupffer cells, alveolar macrophages, enterocytes, and choroid plexus epithelium. The human FcRn transgenic mouse Tg276 showed a different and much more widespread staining pattern of FcRn. In addition, immunodeficiency and lack of IgG in SCID mice had no negative effect on FcRn expression compared with wild-type mice.

Non-clinical Safety Evaluation of Biotherapeutics - Challenges, Opportunities and new Insights.

New challenges and opportunities in nonclinical safety testing of biotherapeutics were presented and discussed at the 5th European BioSafe Annual General Membership meeting in November 2015 in Ludwigshafen. This article summarizes the presentations and discussions from both the main and the breakout sessions. The following topics were covered in six main sessions: The following questions were discussed across 4 breakout sessions (i-iv) and a case-study based general discussion (v).

Nonclinical safety testing of biopharmaceuticals--Addressing current challenges of these novel and emerging therapies.

Non-clinical safety testing of biopharmaceuticals can present significant challenges to human risk assessment with these often innovative and complex drugs. Hot Topics in this field were discussed recently at the 4th Annual European Biosafe General Membership meeting. In this feature article, the presentations and subsequent discussions from the main sessions are summarized. The topics covered include: (i) wanted versus unwanted immune activation, (ii) bi-specific protein scaffolds, (iii) use of Pharmacokinetic (PK)/Pharmacodynamic (PD) data to impact/optimize toxicology study design, (iv) cytokine release and challenges to human translation (v) safety testing of cell and gene therapies including chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells and retroviral vectors and (vi) biopharmaceutical development strategies encompassing a range of diverse topics including optimizing entry of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) into the brain, safety testing of therapeutic vaccines, non-clinical testing of biosimilars, infection in toxicology studies with immunomodulators and challenges to human risk assessment, maternal and infant anti-drug antibody (ADA) development and impact in non-human primate (NHP) developmental toxicity studies, and a summary of an NC3Rs workshop on the future vision for non-clinical safety assessment of biopharmaceuticals.

New challenges and opportunities in nonclinical safety testing of biologics.

New challenges and opportunities in nonclinical safety testing of biologics were discussed at the 3rd European BioSafe Annual General Membership meeting in November 2013 in Berlin: (i)Approaches to refine use of non-human primates in non-clinical safety testing of biologics and current experience on the use of minipigs as alternative non-rodent species.(ii)Tissue distribution studies as a useful tool to support pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) assessment of biologics, in that they provide valuable mechanistic insights at drug levels at the site of action.(iii)Mechanisms of nonspecific toxicity of antibody drug conjugates (ADC) and ways to increase the safety margins.(iv)Although biologics toxicity typically manifests as exaggerated pharmacology there are some reported case studies on unexpected toxicity.(v)Specifics of non-clinical development approaches of noncanonical monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), like bispecifics and nanobodies.

Current challenges and opportunities in nonclinical safety testing of biologics.

Nonclinical safety testing of new biotherapeutic entities represents its own challenges and opportunities in drug development. Hot topics in this field have been discussed recently at the 2nd Annual BioSafe European General Membership Meeting. In this feature article, discussions on the challenges surrounding the use of PEGylated therapeutic proteins, selection of cynomolgus monkey as preclinical species, unexpected pharmacokinetics of biologics and the safety implications thereof are summarized. In addition, new developments in immunosafety testing of biologics, the use of transgenic mouse models and PK and safety implications of multispecific targeting approaches are discussed. Overall, the increasing complexity of new biologic modalities and formats warrants tailor-made nonclinical development strategies and experimental testing.

Pharmacological control of platelet-leukocyte interactions by the human anti-P-selectin antibody inclacumab--preclinical and clinical studies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Elevated levels of platelet-leukocyte aggregates (PLAs) have been reported in several cardiovascular diseases and suggested to contribute to disease pathology. Our aim was to characterize the effects of inclacumab, a novel human anti-P-selectin antibody, on the interactions between leukocytes and platelets in preclinical and clinical studies. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES: Dual-label flow cytometry was used to detect the effect of inclacumab on agonist-induced platelet-leukocyte/platelet-monocyte aggregates in cynomolgus monkeys and humans, following ex vivo and in vivo administration. Platelet-dependent leukocyte activation and leukocyte adhesion to a platelet monolayer were also investigated after ex vivo administration of inclacumab to human blood. RESULTS: Treatment of cynomolgus monkeys with inclacumab profoundly inhibited thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP) or adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced PLAs with an IC50 (<2 µg/mL) similar to the in vitro spiking experiments. Maximal inhibition of PLAs persisted for ≥28 days following single dose of inclacumab. In human blood, inclacumab was about 2-fold more potent in inhibiting TRAP-induced PLAs (IC50: 0.7 µg/mL) compared to monkeys. PLA formation was suppressed independently of the inducing platelet agonist. Inclacumab also inhibited the activation of the leukocyte integrin Mac-1 and leukocyte adhesion to a platelet monolayer under flow conditions. In clinical studies, inclacumab inhibited TRAP-induced PLA formation in a dose-dependent manner following single and multiple dose administration to healthy volunteers. It also reduced elevated circulating PLA levels in patients with peripheral arterial disease. CONCLUSION: By inhibiting platelet-leukocyte interactions, demonstrated in multiple preclinical and clinical studies, inclacumab may provide an effective treatment for cardiovascular diseases.

Allelic variants of drug metabolizing enzymes as risk factors in psoriasis.

The onset or exacerbation of psoriasis, a T-cell-dependent skin disease with autoimmune features, can be triggered by drugs such as antimalarials and beta-blockers. Xenobiotics may also play a role in idiopathic psoriasis. It has been hypothesized that different metabolic efficiencies caused by variant alleles of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes could lead to the accumulation of xenobiotics or their reactive metabolites in target organs. Subsequently, neoantigens or cryptic peptides could be presented and initiate an aggressive T cell response. In this context, we analyzed a broad array of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in up to 327 Caucasian psoriasis patients and compared them to 235 control persons. Alleles tested include four phase I and three phase II enzymes. Significantly more carriers of the variant alleles of CYP1A1 (alleles *2A and *2C) were found in healthy controls than in patients, suggesting a protective role for these alleles. No significant difference between patients and controls could be found, however, for the other phase I alleles 1B1*1 and 1B1 *3, 2C19*1A and 2C19*2A, and 2E1*1A and 2E1*5B. Of the variant alleles coding for phase II enzymes only GSTM1, but not GSTT1 or NQOR, correlated with a risk to contract psoriasis. Some combinations of phase I and phase II enzymes suggested protective or risk-associated effects. Interestingly, heterozygosity for CYP2C19 alleles *1A and *2A was associated with increased risk for "late onset" psoriasis, whereas this genotype was protective for psoriatic arthritis. This is the first large-scale study on these enzymes and the results obtained support the concept that different activities of metabolizing enzymes can contribute to disease etiology and progression.