Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms after bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: On the basis of revisions of DSM criteria, questions have been raised concerning the occurrence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms among adults who have been diagnosed and treated for life-threatening illnesses. The present study examined the prevalence and correlates of PTSD symptoms among women who had undergone autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) for breast cancer. METHODS: Participants were 43 women who had undergone ABMT for breast cancer an average of 19 months previously (range = 2 to 62 months) and had no clinical evidence of disease at their most recent follow-up visit. PTSD symptoms and quality of life were assessed using standardized self-report instruments. RESULTS: Between 12% and 19% of participants were likely to meet DSM-IV criteria for the current diagnosis of PTSD. Women who were less well educated, had more advanced disease at the time of the transplantation and had longer hospital stays for the transplantation reported more symptoms of PTSD. Greater PTSD symptomatology was associated with reports of poorer physical health, mental health, and sleep quality. CONCLUSION: Comparisons with previous research suggest that rates of PTSD are higher among women who undergo ABMT as opposed to less intensive forms of breast cancer treatment. These findings are consistent with the view that development of PTSD symptoms is associated with the degree of life threat. The clinical significance of PTSD in this patient population is underscored by findings indicating that greater PTSD symptoms are associated with poorer health-related quality of life.

Defining the role of novel high-dose chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of high-risk breast cancer.

We have explored several novel high-dose combinations in an attempt to increase antitumor activity while decreasing treatment-related toxicity. From October 1989 through June 1997, we performed phase I/II dose-escalation trials exploring novel high-dose regimens including ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide, mitoxantrone/thiotepa, and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ)/mitoxantrone/thiotepa. We have also evaluated busulfan/cyclophosphamide and cyclophosphamide/thiotepa/carboplatin in phase II trials. Three hundred ninety-three patients have been treated in these trials and followed for a minimum of 3 months. Event-free survival (including relapses and treatment-related mortality; +/-SE) at 3 years by stage and chemosensitivity is as follows: stage II, four to nine positive nodes (n=16), 52%+/-17%; stage II, greater than nine nodes (n=30), 46%+/-11%; stage III (n=59), 50%+/-8%; inflammatory stage III (n=15), 27%+/-17%; stage IV, anthracycline responsive (n=69), 19%+/-5%; stage IV, anthracycline refractory but responsive to salvage therapy with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide or paclitaxel (n=53), 12%+/-6%; stage IV, refractory (n=128), 5%+/-2%; and stage IV, not evaluable for response (n=23), 10%+/-8%. Treatment-related mortality was 4% for both phase I and II studies involving stage II breast cancer patients, 5% for stage III breast cancer, 15% for inflammatory breast cancer, and 18% for all stage IV breast cancers, responsive and refractory. We conclude that high-dose therapy for the treatment of high-risk early stage breast cancer or metastatic breast cancer results in durable remissions. Chemosensitivity to induction regimens remains the most important prognostic indicator, although long-term survival has been seen even in patients with highly refractory disease. Further studies are necessary to define optimal high-dose strategies based on stage and chemosensitivity of disease.

Dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, idarubicin and etoposide (DC-IE): a novel, intensive induction chemotherapy regimen for patients with high-risk multiple myeloma.

We evaluated toxicities and responses to a novel, dose intensive and time sequenced, chemotherapy programme (DC-IE) in 45 patients with high-risk myeloma. DC-IE consisted of: dexamethasone (days 1-4); cyclophosphamide (day 5); idarubicin and etoposide (days 8-10). Complete response (CR) was achieved in four patients, six patients achieved near complete responses (nCR) and 21 patients achieved a partial remission (PR). Overall response rate was 76% (CI 56-94%) for newly diagnosed patients (n = 21) and 62% (CI 36-81%) for relapsed/refractory patients (n = 24). Toxicities were limited to myelosuppression; two patients died of sepsis during neutropenia (4%). DC-IE is active and tolerable for high-risk multiple myeloma, including patients with relapsed or refractory disease to anthracycline containing regimens.

Quality of life following bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer: a comparative study.

As more women are treated with bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for breast cancer, there is growing interest in quality of life (QOL) following treatment. Although there have been some clinical studies of QOL following BMT, this area has received little systematic attention. In particular, it is unclear how QOL for women treated with BMT for breast cancer differs from that which might be expected for 'healthy' women of about the same age. To address this issue, we compared QOL reported by women treated with autologous BMT for breast cancer with that of a group of women of similar age with no history of cancer. In addition, we examined the relationship of demographic factors, medical factors, and self-reported symptom prevalence, severity, and distress to QOL in post-BMT patients. All participants completed the SF-36 Health Survey developed from the Medical Outcomes Study (SF-36). Post-BMT patients also completed the ECOG Performance Status Rating Scale (PSR) and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). Results indicated that, compared to the women with no cancer history, post-BMT patients reported significantly impaired physical functioning, physical role functioning, general health, vitality, social functioning, and emotional role functioning. Impaired QOL following BMT was significantly associated with lower income, a longer time to engraftment, longer hospital stay, poor performance status, and greater symptom prevalence, severity, and distress. The problems identified in this study may be important targets for intervention when trying to improve QOL following BMT.

Fatigue in women treated with bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer: a comparison with women with no history of cancer.

As more individuals undergo autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT), there is growing interest in the impact of treatment side effects on quality of life. Fatigue is a potentially disruptive treatment side effect that has not been systematically assessed following BMT. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether the severity of fatigue and its impact on quality of life is significantly greater in women who had undergone BMT for breast cancer than in women of similar age with no history of cancer. Another aim was to identify the medical and psychosocial correlates of fatigue in women who had completed BMT. A group of women treated with autologous BMT for breast cancer (n = 43; mean age = 44; mean time since BMT = 20 months) and a group of women of similar age with no history of cancer (n = 43; mean age = 46) participated in this study. Subjects completed measures of fatigue, anxiety, depression, and sleep habits. Medical data were obtained from computerized patient records. Women who had completed BMT for breast cancer reported significantly more frequent and severe fatigue than women with no cancer history. In addition, fatigue had a significantly greater impact on daily functioning and quality of life in BMT recipients than in women with no cancer history. Fatigue following BMT for breast cancer was related to both medical factors (i.e., time since BMT) and psychosocial factors (i.e., anxiety, depressive symptoms and sleep difficulties). Following BMT for breast cancer, women may experience fatigue that is worse than might "normally" be expected and can interfere with daily functioning and quality of life. Future research should focus on identifying the biological correlates of fatigue, psychological and physiological mechanisms by which fatigue is produced, and interventions to alleviate fatigue.

High-dose ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide: maximum tolerable doses, toxicities, and hematopoietic recovery after autologous stem cell reinfusion.

We treated 115 patients in a phase I/II dose-escalation study of ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide (ICE) followed by autologous stem cell rescue. Patients treated had a variety of diagnoses, including breast cancer (high-risk stage II disease with eight or more positive nodes, stage III disease, and responsive metastatic disease), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, acute leukemia in first remission, and various solid tumors that were responsive to induction therapy. Patients received autologous bone marrow stem cells or peripheral blood stem cells primed by one of several methods. The maximum tolerated dose of ICE was determined to be ifosfamide 20,100 mg/m2, carboplatin 1,800 mg/m2, and etoposide 3,000 mg/m2 when administered as a 6-day regimen. The dose-limiting toxicities included acute renal failure, severe central nervous system toxicity, and "leaky capillary syndrome" with hypoalbuminemia, profound fluid overload, and pulmonary insufficiency. Analysis of hematologic recovery based on stem cell source and influence of hematopoietic growth factor administration was undertaken. Hematopoietic growth factor use significantly reduced neutrophil engraftment time for patients receiving bone marrow stem cells, with evidence of earlier recovery times for patients receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor compared with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Neutrophil recovery times varied based on the source of stem cells used, with the earliest engraftment times seen for patients receiving peripheral blood stem cells primed with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Platelet recovery times were not statistically different for any of the subsets. In conclusion, the maximum tolerated dose of ICE has been defined, and the source of stem cells and the use of hematopoietic growth factors influence hematopoietic recovery.

Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide: a new regimen with a broad spectrum of activity.

PURPOSE: To conduct a phase I/II evaluation of the combination of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) to determine toxicity and activity in a variety of refractory malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred four patients, 13 to 64 years of age, with a variety of malignancies, including refractory breast cancer and Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, were treated with two cycles of ICE, consisting of intravenous ifosfamide 2 g/m2, carboplatin 400 mg/m2, and continuous infusion etoposide 600 mg/m2 administered in divided doses over 2 days. The regimen was repeated at approximately 28-day intervals. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one patients (94%) received two cycles at full doses and were assessable for response and toxicity. Complete and partial responses were seen in breast cancer (20%, n = 93), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (30%, n = 37), Hodgkin's disease (60%, n = 10), melanoma (9%, n = 11), a variety of sarcomas (20%, n = 10), and other malignancies (43%, n = 30). Myelosuppression was prominent, with significant neutropenia requiring frequent hospitalization for neutropenic fever, and thrombocytopenia and anemia requiring frequent platelet and RBC transfusions. However, the overall treatment-related mortality rate was only 3%. No other moderate to severe organ toxicity was seen at a frequency of greater than 1%. CONCLUSION: This regimen is active in a variety of refractory malignancies, with significant but tolerable hematologic toxicity. The addition of hematopoietic growth factors may allow further dose escalation.

Two novel high-dose treatment regimens for metastatic breast cancer--ifosfamide, carboplatin, plus etoposide and mitoxantrone plus thiotepa: outcomes and toxicities.

This report describes the results of two phase I/II dose escalation trials for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Successive groups of patients with metastatic breast cancer responsive to induction therapy following standard doses of chemotherapy were treated with escalating doses of ifosfamide (6,000 to 24,000 mg/m2), carboplatin (1,200 to 2,100 mg/m2), and etoposide (1,800 to 3,000 mg/m2) followed by autologous stem cell rescue. The maximum tolerated doses of these drugs were defined as ifosfamide 20,100 mg/m2, carboplatin 1,800 mg/m2, and etoposide 3,000 mg/m2. Major nonhematologic toxicity consisted of mucositis and enteritis, and the dose-limiting toxicities were central nervous system toxicity and acute renal failure. The overall treatment-related mortality rate was 4%. The event-free survival rate at 500 days for these patients was 31%. Patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to all standard dose therapy were treated with escalating doses of mitoxantrone (45 to 105 mg/m2) and thiotepa (900 to 1,350 mg/m2) followed by autologous stem cell rescue. The maximum tolerated doses of these drugs were defined as mitoxantrone 90 mg/m2 and thiotepa 1,200 mg/m2 with mucositis and enteritis as the major nonhematologic toxicities and delayed myelosuppression as the dose-limiting toxicity. Twelve percent of the patients remain event free at 500 days and the treatment-related mortality rate for this group of heavily pretreated patients was 17%. These data suggest that patients with metastatic breast cancer may benefit from high-dose therapy and that treatment-related toxicity is tolerable.

Intensive dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide followed by autologous stem cell rescue: results of a phase I/II study in breast cancer patients.

We have recently treated 66 women with breast cancer with escalating doses of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) followed by autologous stem cell rescue (ASCR). Patients received ifosfamide (6000-24,000 mg m-2), carboplatin (1200-2100 mg m-2), and etoposide (1800-3000 mg m-2) divided over 6 days with ASCR 48 h after completion of chemotherapy. Our patient population consisted of seven patients with stage II disease with eight or more positive nodes being treated in the adjuvant setting, 16 patients with a history of stage III or inflammatory breast cancer, and 43 patients with stage IV disease. Six patients were not evaluable for response due to early death from infection (three patients) and incomplete restaging (three patients). The overall response rate in patients with measurable metastatic disease was 50%. Of those patients with stage II disease, 85% remain alive and progression-free with a median follow-up of greater than one year. The two most frequent toxicities encountered were reversible elevations of liver function tests and mucositis/enteritis. The dose-limiting toxicities were central nervous system toxicity and nephrotoxicity.

The CD34+ cell fraction in bone marrow and blood is not universally predictive of CFU-GM.

We have measured the presence of granulocyte-macrophage colony forming cells (CFU-GM) and CD34+ cells in blood and bone marrow. We have compared these hematopoietic cell assays using regression analysis. We have found that under the limited and specific case of blood cells from an individual recovering from myelo-suppressive chemotherapy, the fraction of cells that is CD34 positive is predictive of the number of granulocyte-macrophage colonies (CFU-GM) which will grow. This result is in agreement with published data. We have found, however, that in bone marrow aspirates, or in the blood of individuals recovering from cyclophosphamide chemotherapy and receiving either granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or folinic acid (FA) therapy, there is poor correlation between CD34+ cell fraction and CFU-GM. Accordingly, the use of CD34+ fraction cannot be relied upon to substitute for the CFU-GM assay in assessing the hematopoietic cell content of blood or bone marrow samples.