Perioperative interstitial CT-based brachytherapy boost in breast cancer patients with breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Intraoperative placement of catheters in the tumor bed during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) enables postponed targeted boost irradiation in high risk breast cancer patients. Twenty-three patients with high risk breast cancer underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and multifractionated perioperative brachytherapy as a boost to the tumor bed using three-dimensional (3D) CT-based planning. Plastic catheters for brachytherapy were implanted during surgery and targeted irradiation was delivered in the course of 2-3 weeks. Acute and late toxicities were scored according to the RTOG Common Toxicity Criteria. Cosmetic outcomes were assessed using the Harvard criteria. No major perioperative complications were recorded. Circumscribed wound infection occurred in one patient (4.3%). Only 3 patients (13%) experienced acute skin toxicity Grade 1. We observed no teleangiectasias or pigmentations. The cosmetic outcome at last follow-up visit was rated as excellent/good, in 82.6%, fair, in 13% and poor in 4.4% of patients, respectively. There was no evidence of disease recurrence after median follow-up of 43. 4 months. Systematic integration of the perioperative fractionated 3D CT-based HDR brachytherapy as a boost for patients with breast cancer after BCS is feasible and seems safe. It might be beneficial especially for women with high risk of local recurrence.

[3D MRI-based brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma - early clinical results]. / 3D MR-based brachyterapie v lécbe lokálne pokrocilého karcinomu delozního hrdla - casné klinické výsledky.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the clinical benefit of MRI-based brachytherapy using CT and MRI data fusion. DESIGN: Clinical trial. SETTING: Oncology Centre, Multiscan and Pardubice Regional Hospital, Pardubice. METHODS: Thirty six patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were treated with MRI-based brachytherapy (MRI-based preplanning 15 patients, MRI approximation 21 patients). All patients were continuously followed during and after treatment. Tumor control and toxicity were evaluated at each visit. Late gastrointestinal and genitourinary symptoms were recorded, using Fox Chase (FC) modification of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT) toxicity criteria. RESULTS: We observed no complications during the entire MRI procedure at the radiology department. The cumulative incidence of grade 2 late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity at median follow up of 30.3 months was 4.8% and 9.5% for MRI approximation, respectively 0% and 13.3% for MRI-based preplanning. Local control was 86.7% for MRI-based preplanning and 76.2% for MRI approximation. CONCLUSION: 3D MRI-based brachytherapy with consecutive CT/MRI data fusion yields excellent local control with minor toxicity.

MRI-based pre-planning in patients with cervical cancer treated with three-dimensional brachytherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyse the feasibility and determine the benefits of MRI-based pre-planning with CT/MRI data fusion in patients with cervical cancer treated with radical radiotherapy. METHODS: Patients underwent MRI examination prior to external beam radiotherapy and prior to the first and fourth fraction of brachytherapy with applicators in place. Insertion of applicators at the radiology department was performed under paracervical anaesthesia. The benefit of MRI pre-planning was determined by comparing conventional treatment planning with dose specification to "point A" and dose specification to 90% of the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV D90). Tolerance of MRI evaluation with applicators, coverage of HR-CTV and dose-volume parameters for organs at risk (OAR) has been assessed in 42 brachytherapy procedures. RESULTS: Insertion of applicators at the radiology department was successful in all patients and there were no complications. The target dose was higher for MRI planning than for conventional planning (5.3 Gy vs 4.5 Gy). Maximum doses in the bladder and rectum were significantly lower (p<0.05) for MRI planning than for the conventional approach (6.49 Gy vs 7.45 Gy for bladder; 4.57 Gy vs 5.06 Gy for rectum). We found no correlation between the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) point dose for OAR and the maximum dose in OAR. Nevertheless, a strong correlation between the maximum dose in OAR and the minimal dose in a volume of 2 cm(3) has been observed. CONCLUSION: MRI-based pre-planning with consecutive CT/MRI data fusion is feasible and safe, with the advantage of increasing the dose to the tumour and decreasing the dose to the organs at risk.