Drug survival of biologic therapy in a large, disease-based registry of patients with psoriasis: results from the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR).

BACKGROUND: Drug survival is a marker for treatment sustainability in chronic diseases such as psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of these analyses was to assess survival of biologic treatments in the PSOriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR). METHODS: PSOLAR is a large, prospective, international, disease-based registry of patients with psoriasis receiving (or eligible for) systemic therapy in a real-world setting. Drug survival is defined as the time from initiation to discontinuation (stop/switch) of biologic therapy on registry. The number of patients who discontinued each treatment and the duration of therapy were recorded. Using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox-regression analyses [hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)], time to discontinuation was compared across cohorts undergoing first-, second- or third-line treatment with ustekinumab, infliximab, adalimumab or etanercept. RESULTS: As of the 2013 data cut, 12 095 patients with psoriasis were enrolled in PSOLAR. Of the 4000 patients initiating any new biologic therapy, approximately 3500 started a first-line, second-line or third-line biologic therapy during the registry. Lack of effectiveness was the most common reason for discontinuation across biologic therapies. Based on the multivariate analysis, significantly shorter times to discontinuation were observed for infliximab [HR (95%CI) = 2.73 (1.48-5.04), P = 0.0014]; adalimumab [4.16 (2.80-6.20), P < 0.0001]; and etanercept [4.91 (3.28-7.35) P < 0.0001] compared with ustekinumab [reference treatment]) for first-line biologic use; results were similar for treatment effects for second/third-line therapies. Although limited in power, analyses in patients with concurrent psoriatic arthritis confirmed by a rheumatologist reflect observations in the overall psoriasis population. CONCLUSION: Drug survival was superior for ustekinumab compared with infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept in patients with psoriasis.

Long-term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, with and without dosing adjustment, in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the PHOENIX 2 study through 5 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the dosing flexibility and long-term efficacy of biological agents is limited. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab with and without dosing adjustment in the 5-year PHOENIX 2 study. METHODS: Patients were randomized to placebo or ustekinumab (45 or 90 mg) at weeks 0, 4, then every 12 weeks; patients receiving placebo crossed-over at week 12. Dosing adjustments were permitted at/beyond week 28 for early adjusters (weeks 28 or 40 per response); late adjusters (during long-term extension per investigator judgement); and nonadjusters (maintained randomized treatment throughout the study). Efficacy and safety were evaluated through weeks 244 and 264, respectively. RESULTS: In the overall population, 70% (849 of 1212) of ustekinumab-treated patients completed treatment through week 244, with high proportions of patients responding to the 45-mg and 90-mg doses, respectively: 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) (76·5% and 78·6%) and PASI 90 (50·0% and 55·5%). Approximately 20% of patients were early adjusters, 30% were late adjusters and 50% were nonadjusters. Approximately half of the late adjusters initiated adjustments after already achieving PASI 75. Improved response was generally observed following dosing adjustments. Through week 264, safety event rates did not increase and event rates were generally comparable between dose groups and between patients with and without dosing adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ustekinumab for up to 5 years was safe and effective. Improved response was generally demonstrated following dosing adjustments; further investigations are required to quantify actual incremental benefits. The results also suggest that some patients may desire treatment goals beyond PASI 75.

Patient satisfaction with treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Treatment satisfaction among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis has not been studied and compared across treatments using a validated instrument. OBJECTIVES: To assess patient-reported satisfaction with systemic and phototherapy treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in clinical practice and to correlate satisfaction with disease severity and quality-of-life measures. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 1182 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the Dermatology Clinical Effectiveness Research Network in the U.S.A. Patients receiving either topical therapies only; monotherapy with oral systemic therapies, biologics or narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy; or combination therapy with biologics and methotrexate completed the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II. RESULTS: Median unadjusted overall satisfaction scores were highest for patients receiving biologic monotherapies, biologic-methotrexate combinations, or phototherapy (83.3); scores were lowest for those receiving topical therapies only or acitretin (66.7). In fully adjusted models, compared with patients receiving methotrexate monotherapy, those receiving adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab, phototherapy or adalimumab with methotrexate had significantly higher median overall satisfaction scores by 7.2-8.3 points, while those receiving topical therapies only had significantly lower overall satisfaction by 8.9 points. Adjusted convenience scores were lowest for patients receiving topical therapies only or infliximab. Modest but significant correlations were found between the overall satisfaction subscale and both the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (ρ = -0.36, P < 0.001) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (ρ = -0.47, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Discernible differences were found in treatment satisfaction among therapies, particularly regarding treatment effectiveness and convenience. Further application of treatment satisfaction measures may inform treatment decisions and guideline development.

Diagnosing and treating psoriatic arthritis: an update.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthritis of uncertain pathogenesis, affecting approximately one in four patients with psoriasis. Onset of psoriasis typically precedes the development of PsA. Therefore, the dermatologist is ideally positioned to recognize the early signs and symptoms of PsA for diagnosis and subsequent treatment. The role of the dermatologist in early diagnosis and treatment is essential for preventing pain and functional disabilities, as well as the joint deterioration that accompanies progressive forms of PsA. Diagnosis of PsA is a key aspect of the clinical decision process for the dermatologist, as psoriasis plus PsA requires a different therapeutic approach from that required for psoriasis alone. Furthermore, PsA is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular comorbidities that present significant health concerns. In this review, the pathogenesis and comorbidities of PsA are discussed. In addition, screening and imaging tools that aid in the diagnosis of PsA, as well as tools used for efficacy assessment, are reviewed. Available therapies are presented, with a focus on targeted biologics and emerging treatments.

Safety results from a pooled analysis of randomized, controlled phase II and III clinical trials and interim data from an open-label extension trial of the interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, briakinumab, in moderate to severe psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-interleukin-12/23 treatment (anti-IL-12/23) has recently demonstrated significant efficacy for moderate to severe psoriasis, yet potential safety signals warrant further investigation. OBJECTIVES: Expand safety findings for the anti-IL-12/23, briakinumab, beyond individual phase II and III clinical trials. METHODS: Safety data pooled from five phase II and III clinical trials (parent studies) and an open-label extension study (OLE), through 22 October 2010; patients with ≥ 1 dose of briakinumab in a parent study or the OLE are included. All parent study briakinumab treatment groups were combined with the OLE population, which received 100-mg briakinumab every 4 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) were collected from the first dose of briakinumab, whether in a parent study or the OLE, through 45 days post-last dose. RESULTS: Two thousand five hundred and twenty patients (4704 patient-years drug exposure) received ≥ 1 dose of briakinumab during the interim period: 5.6% withdrew due to AEs. Serious infections occurred in 1.3% and malignancies in 2.6% (including 1.0% basal cell carcinoma, 0.8% squamous cell carcinoma). Twenty-seven major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred, seven in one parent study and 20 in the OLE (incidence = 0.57 events/100 PY). Four cardiovascular risk factors were retrospectively found to be significant predictors for MACE during briakinumab exposure: history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, body mass index (≥ 30) and baseline blood pressure (systolic ≥ 140 or diastolic ≥ 90). CONCLUSIONS: Pooled briakinumab safety results from five parent studies and an OLE suggest increased rates of infections, malignancies and MACE, and that patients receiving anti-IL-12/23 treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis should be monitored for these potential safety signals.

Ustekinumab improves health-related quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the PHOENIX 1 trial.

Background PHOENIX 1 was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that demonstrated the long-term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Objectives To assess the effect of ustekinumab maintenance therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in PHOENIX 1 patients. Patients and methods Patients (n = 766) were randomized to receive ustekinumab 45 mg (n = 255) or 90 mg (n = 256) at weeks 0 and 4 and every 12 weeks thereafter, or placebo (n = 255) at weeks 0 and 4 with crossover to ustekinumab at week 12. Ustekinumab-randomized patients achieving at least 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 at weeks 28 and 40 were re-randomized at week 40 to continue ustekinumab or be withdrawn until loss of therapeutic effect. HRQoL was assessed using the SF-36 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Results At baseline, more than 97% had a DLQI > 1 and the average DLQI was > 10, indicating a significant impact on patients' HRQoL. Significantly greater proportions of patients receiving ustekinumab 45 and 90 mg achieved a normalized DLQI score (< or = 1) compared with placebo (53.2%, 52.4% and 6.0%, respectively, both P < 0.001) at week 12 and achieved a clinically meaningful improvement (increase of at least five points) in SF-36 physical (23.1%, 33.7% and 15.6%) and mental (25.5%, 31.3% and 14.8%) component summary scores. At week 12, changes in individual DLQI and SF-36 domains were significantly better in each ustekinumab group vs. placebo (P < 0.001). The magnitude of improvement across SF-36 scales was greatest for the bodily pain and social functioning domains. Improvements in HRQoL were sustained with maintenance ustekinumab therapy through at least 1 year. Regression analysis showed that, after adjustment for improvement in PASI or Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), ustekinumab-treated patients demonstrated significant improvements in DLQI. Conclusions Ustekinumab improves HRQoL in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Patient-reported outcomes measured a treatment effect beyond that indicated by clinical measures.

Plaque thickness and morphology in psoriasis vulgaris associated with therapeutic response.

BACKGROUND: The Utah Psoriasis Initiative (UPI) is an expanding database that is being used to identify and characterize phenotypic variants of psoriasis and explore genotype-phenotype relationships. We recently reported distinct morphological variants of psoriasis that are characterized by thickness of lesions (induration) in the untreated state. OBJECTIVES: To explore the clinical relevance of these morphological variants. METHODS: For these analyses, we used the phenotypic data from 282 additional subjects gathered at enrollment into the UPI and compared their phenotype with that of the original 500 patients reported previously. The analysis was further expanded via a longitudinal follow-up of 286 subjects from the original 500 case cohort. RESULTS: Firstly, the initial findings were confirmed. Expansion of the cohort used for the original observation by about 50% and reanalysis showed that there was no alteration in the proportions of patients expressing thin- and thick-plaque disease phenotypes. Secondly, analysis of the larger cohort showed that this morphological phenotype had clinical relevance: those patients with thin-plaque disease were more likely to report a complete therapeutic response to topical corticosteroids and phototherapy. In contrast, plaque thickness did not appear to be a factor in response to systemic agents. CONCLUSIONS: Using a patient's baseline plaque morphology to choose a primary treatment modality may result in earlier disease improvement and reduce the cost of therapy.

Detailed genetic characterization of the interleukin-23 receptor in psoriasis.

Using a multi-tiered, case-control association design, scanning 25 215 gene-centric SNPs, we previously identified two psoriasis susceptibility genes: IL12B and IL23R. These results have recently been confirmed. To better characterize the IL23R psoriasis-association, we used a fine mapping strategy to identify 59 additional IL23R-linked SNPs, which were genotyped in our three independent, white North American sample sets (>2800 individuals in toto). A sliding window of haplotype association demonstrates colocalization of psoriasis susceptibility effects within the boundaries of IL23R across all sample sets, thereby decreasing the likelihood that neighboring genes, particularly IL12RB2, are driving the association at this region. Additional haplotype work identified two 5-SNP haplotypes with strong protective effects, consistent across our three sample sets (OR(common)=0.67; P(comb)=4.32E-07). Importantly, heterogeneity of effect was extremely low between sample sets for these haplotypes (P(Het)=0.961). Together, these protective haplotypes attain a frequency of 16% in controls, declining to 11% in cases. The characterization of association patterns within IL23R to specific predisposing/protective variants will play an important role in the elucidation of psoriasis etiology and other related phenotypes. Further, this work is essential to lay the foundation for the role of IL23R genetics in response to pharmaceutical therapy and dosage.

Variants in the 5q31 cytokine gene cluster are associated with psoriasis.

A multitiered genetic association study of 25 215 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in three case-control sample sets (1446 patients and 1432 controls) identified three IL13-linked SNPs (rs1800925, rs20541 and rs848) associated with psoriasis. Although the susceptibility effects at these SNPs were modest (joint allelic odds ratios (ORs): 0.76 to 0.78; P(comb): 1.3E-03 to 2.50E-04), the association patterns were consistent across the sample sets, with the minor alleles being protective. Haplotype analyses identified one common, susceptible haplotype CCG (joint allelic OR=1.27; P(comb)=1.88E-04) and a less common, protective haplotype TTT (joint allelic OR=0.74; P(comb)=7.05E-04). In combination with the other known genetic risk factors, HLA-C, IL12B and IL23R, the variants reported here generate an 11-fold psoriasis-risk differential. Residing in the 5q31 cytokine gene cluster, IL13 encodes an important T-cell-derived cytokine that regulates cell-mediated immunity. These results provide the foundation for additional studies required to fully dissect the associations within this cytokine-rich genomic region, as polymorphisms in closely linked candidate genes, such as IRF1, IL5 or IL4, may be driving these results through linkage disequilibrium.

Infliximab inhibits progression of radiographic damage in patients with active psoriatic arthritis through one year of treatment: Results from the induction and maintenance psoriatic arthritis clinical trial 2.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of infliximab on progression of structural damage over 1 year in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) enrolled in the Induction and Maintenance Psoriatic Arthritis Clinical Trial 2. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 200 patients with active PsA were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter through week 54. At week 24, patients initially assigned to receive placebo crossed over to receive infliximab (5 mg/kg). Based on predefined criteria, patients randomized to receive placebo could enter early escape by receiving infliximab (5 mg/kg) starting at week 16, and patients randomized to receive infliximab could have the dose increased to 10 mg/kg starting at week 38. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were randomized to receive. Radiographs of hands and feet were obtained at baseline and at weeks 24 and 54. Two readers blinded to treatment assignment and radiograph sequence independently evaluated erosions and joint space narrowing using the Sharp/van der Heijde scoring method modified for PsA. RESULTS: At week 24, patients randomized to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg had significantly less radiographic progression compared with patients randomized to receive placebo, with mean +/- SD changes from baseline in the total Sharp/van der Heijde score of -0.70 +/- 2.53 and 0.82 +/- 2.62, respectively (P < 0.001). At week 54, mean +/- SD changes from baseline in the total Sharp/van der Heijde score were -0.94 +/- 3.40 in patients randomized to receive infliximab and 0.53 +/- 2.60 in those receiving placebo/infliximab (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Infliximab significantly inhibits radiographic progression in patients with PsA as early as 6 months after starting treatment, and the beneficial effect continues through 1 year of infliximab therapy.

A classification of psoriasis vulgaris according to phenotype.

For nearly 200 years it has been appreciated that plaque psoriasis consists of a number of distinct clinical phenotypes. However, a reliable and simple stratification of clinical presentation of psoriasis is lacking. In the era of immunogenetic association studies and an advanced understanding of the pathomechanisms of psoriasis it is important that a classification of the disease according to phenotype is readily available. Such a classification would facilitate clinically relevant interpretation of investigational data. A meeting of the International Psoriasis Council produced a consensus on clinical phenotypes of psoriasis equally relevant to clinical practitioners and psoriasis researchers.

Infliximab maintains a high degree of clinical response in patients with active psoriatic arthritis through 1 year of treatment: results from the IMPACT 2 trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab through 1 year in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) enrolled in the IMPACT 2 trial. METHODS: In this double blind, placebo controlled, phase III study, 200 patients with active PsA were randomised to receive infusions of infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter through 1 year. Patients with persistent disease activity could enter early escape at week 16, and all remaining placebo patients crossed over to infliximab at week 24. Patients randomised to infliximab who had no response or who lost response could escalate their dose to 10 mg/kg starting at week 38. Clinical efficacy was assessed based on the proportion of patients achieving ACR 20 and PASI 75 responses. Major clinical response (that is, maintenance of ACR 70 response for 24 continuous weeks) was assessed for the first time in PsA. RESULTS: Through 1 year of treatment, 58.9% and 61.4% of patients in the randomised infliximab and placebo/infliximab groups, respectively, achieved ACR 20; corresponding figures for PASI 75 were 50.0% and 60.3%. At week 54, major clinical response was achieved by 12.1% of patients in the infliximab group. The safety profile of infliximab through week 54 was consistent with that seen through week 24. Two malignancies occurred: basal cell skin cancer (placebo) and stage I Hodgkin's lymphoma (infliximab). CONCLUSION: Infliximab maintains a high degree of clinical efficacy and continues to be well tolerated in patients with PsA through 1 year of treatment.

Infliximab improves health related quality of life and physical function in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of infliximab on health related quality of life (HRQoL) and physical function in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the IMPACT 2 trial. METHODS: 200 patients with PsA unresponsive to conventional treatment were randomised to intravenous infusions of infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22; patients with inadequate response entered early escape at week 16. HRQoL was assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) at weeks 0, 14, and 24. Functional disability was assessed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at every visit through week 24. Associations between changes in quality of life (SF-36) and articular (American College of Rheumatology (ACR)) and dermatological (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)) responses were examined. RESULTS: Mean percentage improvement from baseline in HAQ was 48.6% in the infliximab group compared with worsening of 18.4% in the placebo group at week 14 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 58.6% and 19.4% of infliximab and placebo treated patients, respectively, achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in HAQ (that is, > or = 0.3 unit decrease) at week 14 (p < 0.001). Increases in physical and mental component summary (PCS and MCS) scores and all eight scales of the SF-36 in the infliximab group were greater than those in the placebo group at week 14 (p < or = 0.001). These benefits were sustained through week 24. Patients achieving ACR20 and PASI75 responses had the greatest improvements in PCS and MCS scores. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PsA, infliximab 5 mg/kg significantly improved HRQoL and physical function compared with placebo through 24 weeks.

Patient-reported outcomes of psoriasis improvement with etanercept therapy: results of a randomized phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Etanercept, a soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor, lessens the severity of psoriasis as measured by physician-reported clinical outcomes. Equally important is the patient perspective on the effect of etanercept therapy on daily life. OBJECTIVES: To assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with psoriasis receiving etanercept therapy. METHODS: In this multinational, randomized, phase III trial, patients with psoriasis received placebo (n = 193), etanercept 50 mg per week (n = 196) or etanercept 50 mg twice weekly (n = 194) during the initial 12-week, double-blind period. Thereafter, all patients received open-label etanercept (50 mg per week). The following PROs were assessed: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), patient rating of pruritus, and patient global assessment of psoriasis. RESULTS: At week 12, DLQI total score improved by 65-70% in patients receiving etanercept compared with 6% in patients receiving placebo (P < 0.0001), and improvement in DLQI was clinically meaningful (> or = 5-point improvement or 0 score) for 72-77% of patients receiving etanercept therapy. All DLQI and SF-36 subscales and the SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores demonstrated significantly greater improvement with etanercept therapy than with placebo, illustrating that etanercept benefits patients with psoriasis across multiple domains that contribute to health-related quality of life. With etanercept therapy, distributions of patient ratings of pruritus and global assessment of disease shifted from moderate to severe (baseline) to minimal to good (week 12). Etanercept-induced benefits of PROs were maintained for patients who reduced their dose after 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept therapy improves PROs in patients with psoriasis and makes a meaningful difference to their lives. These results support the efficacy profile of physician-reported clinical measures while providing a more complete understanding of the benefits experienced by patients with psoriasis treated with etanercept.

Alefacept in the treatment of psoriasis in patients for whom conventional therapies are inadequate.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis fail to respond to or are not appropriate candidates for conventional systemic therapies and/or phototherapy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy, quality of life and safety of alefacept among the proportion of patients who participated in the phase III studies and who were not suitable candidates for conventional systemic psoriasis therapies or phototherapy. METHODS: The patient's historical responses at the baseline visit during the phase III studies of alefacept were used to identify a subpopulation in whom the use of methotrexate, ciclosporin, retinoids, ultraviolet B or psoralen plus ultraviolet A was ineffective or inappropriate. Endpoints included Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and adverse events. RESULTS: Most patients (69%) who were treated with alefacept in the phase III programme were not candidates for > or =1 of the above-mentioned therapies, and 41 and 21% were not candidates for > or =2 and > or =3, respectively. A reduction in PASI of > or =75% was achieved by 27, 23 and 26% of alefacept-treated patients who were not candidates for > or =1, > or =2 and > or =3 conventional systemic psoriasis therapies or phototherapy, respectively (all p < or = 0.001 vs. placebo). The corresponding results for PASI 50 were 53, 52 and 50% (all p < or = 0.001 vs. placebo). At 2 weeks after the last dose of alefacept, mean DLQI overall scores were reduced by -4.2, -3.9 and -5.2, respectively (all p < or = 0.001 vs. placebo). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the alefacept and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy, quality of life effects and safety of alefacept in patients who were not candidates for conventional systemic psoriasis therapies or phototherapy were similar to those reported previously for the overall alefacept-treated population in the phase III studies.

Psoriasis: epidemiology, clinical features, and quality of life.

Psoriasis is a common chronic, recurrent, immune mediated disease of the skin and joints. It can have a significant negative impact on the physical, emotional, and, psychosocial wellbeing of affected patients. Psoriasis is found worldwide but the prevalence varies among different ethnic groups. It has a strong genetic component but environmental factors such as infections can play an important role in the presentation of disease. There are several clinical cutaneous manifestations of psoriasis but most commonly the disease presents as chronic, symmetrical, erythematous, scaling papules and plaques. The epidemiology, clinical features, and impact on quality of life of psoriasis are reviewed.