Risk of new alloimmunization in patients on anti-CD38 treatment using tube LISS-IAT method.

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD38, a transmembrane protein expressed on many cells including RBCs and to a greater extent on myeloma cells. It has been used for treatment of multiple myeloma and autoimmune diseases. Transfusion management of patients on such therapy can be challenging as these drugs cross-react with RBC surface antigens and cause panreactivity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of the 68 patients treated with anti-CD38 from 2018-2023 was carried out. Data regarding transfusion history and antibody screens were analyzed. Depending whether they had immunohematological work-up before or during the treatment- DAT, antibody screen (CAT and tube), RBC pheno/genotyping and serologic cross-matches (CAT and tube) were performed for each patient. All cases with positive CAT IAT were retested in LISS-tube and cross-matches were performed with phenotypically matched units in LISS-tube. RESULTS: Antibody screen has shown panagglutination with all panel cells with low and variable agglutination intensity (weak to 2 +). Panagglutination remained positive for 1 - 6 months after drug cessation. Positive DAT was seen in 60,6% patients, while autocontrol was negative. Ficin treated panel-cells eliminated nonspecific reactivity. LISS-tube antibody screen and cross-matches were negative for all patients, apart from 3 patients who had preexisting antibodies. No new antibodies were detected during the course of the study. CONCLUSION: Among study group there were no newly identified alloantibodies, meaning that the policy of transfusing them with matched RBCs and performing IAT/cross-matches in tube is a safe and effective policy according to the findings of this study.

RhD alloimmunization by DEL variant missed in donor testing.

INTRODUCTION: Exposure to normal or variably expressed RhD antigens in an antigen-negative individual can elicit an immune response and lead to the formation of clinically significant anti-D alloantibodies. We present the case of anti-D alloimmunization by DEL variant missed in routine blood donor screening. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Blood donors were typed for D antigen using the direct serologic micromethod. Nonreactive samples were confirmed in the indirect antiglobulin method with an IgM/IgG anti-D monoclonal reagent. Genomic DNA was extracted using a commercial QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kit on the QIAcube device (Qiaqen, Germany). RHD genotyping was performed using the PCR-SSP genotyping kits- Ready Gene D weak, Ready Gene D weak screen, Ready Gene CDE, and Ready Gene D AddOn (Inno-Train, Germany). Unidentified alleles were sent for DNA genome sequencing. RESULTS: After identifying DEL positive blood units in RhD negative blood donor pool, a look-back study was performed to determine if their previous donations caused alloimmunization in recipients. Out of 40 D negative recipients, one developed anti-D alloantibody after 45 days. The patient did not receive other RhD positive blood products. Blood donor typed D negative in direct and indirect agglutination method. RHD screening was positive, but RHD genotyping and DNA sequencing showed no mutation indicating the normal genotype. CONCLUSION: Currently used methods in RHD genotyping are insufficient to identify many variant alleles, especially intronic variations. We suggest additional gene investigation including yet unexplored regions of regulation and intron regions to justify our serological finding.