A Cluster of Neuroinvasive Adenovirus Infections on a College Campus: Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: We present six adenovirus cases that emerged from a cluster of respiratory illnesses within a college population. Two patients required intensive care with complicated hospital courses and experienced residual symptoms. Four additional patients were evaluated in the emergency department (ED) with two additional diagnoses of neuroinvasive disease. These cases represent the first known occurrences of neuroinvasive adenovirus infections in healthy adults. CASE SERIES: An individual presented to the ED with fever, altered mental status, and seizures after being found unresponsive in his apartment. His presentation was concerning for significant central nervous system pathology. Shortly after his arrival, a second individual presented with similar symptoms. Both required intubation and admission to a critical care setting. Over a 24-hour period, four additional individuals presented to the ED with moderate severity symptoms. All six individuals tested positive for adenovirus in their respiratory secretions. A provisional diagnosis of neuroinvasive adenovirus was made after consultation with infectious diseases. CONCLUSION: This cluster of cases appears to represent the first known reported diagnosis of neuroinvasive adenovirus in healthy young individuals. Our cases were also unique in demonstrating a significant spectrum of disease severity. Over 80 individuals in the broader college community ultimately tested positive for adenovirus in respiratory samples. As respiratory viruses continue to challenge our healthcare systems, new spectrums of disease are being discovered. We believe clinicians should be aware of the potential severity of neuroinvasive adenovirus disease.

Persons Who Engage in Self-Harm While in the Emergency Department: A Case-Control Analysis.

ABSTRACT: Some patients engage in self-harm behaviors while in the emergency department. Risk factors for self-harm have been described for inpatient and outpatient/community settings, but not among emergency department patients. Authors conducted case-control, retrospective reviews of medical records and incident reports for emergency department patients in two academic medical centers. Variables were analyzed using conditional logistic regression. There were 113 individuals who engaged in self-harm while in the emergency department and 226 individuals who did not. Four variables were significant in the final model: a history of nonsuicidal self-harm (odds ratio [OR], 4.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.95-9.41), opioid use in the prior 2 weeks (OR, 2.89; CI, 1.19-7.02), current manic episode (OR, 3.59; CI, 1.33-9.70), and a history of seizures (OR, 4.19; CI, 1.16-15.14). Risk of self-harm while in the emergency department may be mitigated with interventions that support adaptive coping skills, promptly address pain and withdrawal symptoms, and treat mania.

Self-harm During Visits to the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Content Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Some patients engage in self-harm behaviors while in the emergency department, both suicidal and nonsuicidal self-harm. Little is known about what motivates these behaviors. This gap in the empirical literature limits efforts to develop early identification and risk mitigation strategies. OBJECTIVE: To describe methods and motivations when patients self-harm in the emergency department. METHOD: Authors reviewed self-harm incident reports and medical records from two urban academic emergency departments. Event timing and self-harm methods were extracted. Authors performed a qualitative content analysis of self-harm narratives to examine the question, "Which factors motivate patients to engage in deliberate (nonaccidental) self-harm in the emergency department?" RESULTS: The sample included 184 self-harm incidents involving 118 unique patients. A wide variety of self-harm methods were present in the data. Suicidal intent was present in a minority of incidents. Other motives included psychosis, intoxication, aggression, managing distress, communication, and manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Self-harm behaviors in the emergency department encompassed a variety of methods and motivations. These findings suggest risk mitigation strategies that emphasize suicide screening, reducing environmental hazards, and increasing observation are unlikely to achieve the goal of zero harm. Strategies focusing on engagement may create more fruitful opportunities to improve patient safety.