Trends in the numbers of SARS-CoV-2 infections among students: a prospective cohort study comparing students in sports boarding schools with students in day schools during early COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: During the first months of the COVID pandemic it emerged that facilities where people gather or live together in cohorts, such as nursing homes or schools, were particularly at high risk for becoming hotspots of virus transmission. German political and health institutions responded with far-reaching interventions and preventive strategies to protect the population from infection with SARS-CoV-2. In this context, it remains unclear whether boarding schools for sports particularly pose a risk of infection to their residents. Methods: In a single-center prospective cohort study, numbers of SARS-CoV-2 infections of students in sports boarding schools (n = 11) vs. students attending regular day schools (n = 22) in the region Freiburg/Hochschwarzwald in Germany were investigated over a period from October 2020 to January 2021 via regular virus and antibody screening (German Clinical Trials Register; Study ID: DRKS00021909). In addition, individual and behavioral risk factors for infection were stratified via questionnaire, which provide an indication of cohort specific risk factors for infection and the success of the implementation of hygiene concepts, as well as other infection prevention strategies, within the respective facilities. Results: Regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection numbers, the screening detected no significant group difference between sports boarding schools vs. day schools. Discussion: The study results provide indications that sports boarding schools did not pose an increased risk of infection, assuming that the facilities prevent virus transmissions with appropriate preventive strategies and hygiene measures. In future pandemic scenarios larger-scale and multicenter studies are necessary to achieve more comprehensive epidemiological data in this field.

A Comparison of the Impact of COVID-19-Related Restrictions on Physical Activity Among Public Employees.

OBJECTIVES: This article compares the impact of COVID-19-related restrictions on the level of physical activity, performed by public servants, in April and November 2020. METHODS: The survey examined the amount (in minutes per week) and the energy expenditure (in metabolic equivalent of task in minutes per week [METmin/week]) of physical activity for both before and during contact restrictions in April and November 2020, respectively. RESULTS: Especially for sports activity difference was determined by the medians before (April/November: median [Mdn] = 180.0 min/wk) and during (April: Mdn = 130 minutes, November: Mdn = 60 min/wk) restrictions ( P < 0.05).Also for energy consumption (METmin/wk), the medians before and during the contact restrictions declined for both periods. CONCLUSIONS: Measures against the coronavirus have led to a reduction in activity levels among public employees, regardless of their work environment. The decrease in participation in sport activities seemed to be even more noticeable within the second restriction period.

[Influence of the contact restrictions against SARS-CoV-2 on physical activity among public sector employees.] / Einfluss der Kontaktbeschränkungen gegen SARS-CoV-2 auf die körperliche Aktivität von Beschäftigten des öffentlichen Dienstes.

Objective: Preliminary results from activity surveys conducted in spring 2020 suggest that athletic activity may have decreased within the contact restrictions against the spread of coronavirus. The coronavirus pandemic poses many challenges to the workforce in the healthcare system. Therefore, this study investigated whether the measures to limit the pandemic have an influence on the activity behavior of employees in the public sector. Method: A retrospective cross-sectional survey was conducted to collate the activity behavior among employees of three institutions in the public sector before and during the measures against the coronavirus in April 2020. An online version of the Freiburg Activity Questionnaire was used. Using Wilcoxon tests on connected samples with a significance level of p < 0.05, the activity behavior was examined for differences before compared to during the contact restrictions in min/week and MET-min./week. Results: A total of 1797 public sector employees in Freiburg (36.0% male, 63.9% female, and 0.1% diverse) participated in the survey. For sports activity, a relevant difference (p < 0.05) was measured in the medians (Mdn) of activities per week before (Mdn = 180 min) and during (Mdn = 120 min) the relevant contact restrictions. Similarly, for energy expenditure through exercise, the median value within the contact restrictions decreased from Mdn = 1022 MET-min/week to Mdn = 750 MET-min./week. Conclusion: Measures to limit the spread of the coronavirus have led to a reduction in activity levels among public sector employees. In particular, fewer employees engaged in sports. This could be related to the closure of fitness studios as these activities were particularly reduced. Decreased physical activity can lead to unfavorable individual risk profiles, which must be compensated for in the future.

Genetic variations of phenprocoumon metabolism in patients with ventricular assist devices.

OBJECTIVES: Anticoagulation in patients with ventricular assist device (VAD) support is crucial and to date, no alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) can be safely used. Genetic variances of cytochrome p450 2C9 (CYP2C9) and vitamin K epoxide reductase (VKORC) have been recently connected with variation of VKA maintenance as well as loading doses. In this retrospective study, we assessed the incidence of genetic variations and the influence of different genotypes of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 in VAD patients. METHODS: A total of 161 patients received a VAD implant in our institution between January 2006 and July 2014. Of these, 63 consented to genetic analysis and completed an interview with standardized questions on phenprocoumon (PC) dosage, international normalized ratio and anticoagulation-related complications. Determination of VKORC (-1639 G > A; -1173 C > T) and of CYP2C9 (*2, 430 C > T; *3, 1075 A > C) polymorphisms was performed by polymerase chain reaction and restriction analysis. RESULTS: The most common VKORC-1639 allele combination was wild-type GG (41%) followed by GA (32%) and AA (27%). Patients with VKORC1 polymorphisms AA and GA needed less PC in the maintenance phase of anticoagulation (P < 0.001) compared with wild-type GG patients. In contrast, CYP2C9 polymorphisms showed no effect on PC doses. Similar findings were observed in the initiation phase of PC therapy. High complications rates under PC therapy were observed particularly at the beginning. CONCLUSIONS: VKORC polymorphism affects PC dosage in the initiation as well as the maintenance phase. High rates of bleeding complications and thromboembolic events were found at the beginning of PC therapy in VAD patients. Therefore, a genotype-guided dosage algorithm might be useful in VAD patients.